17/06/2026
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson used a National Press Club address in Canberra to outline what a One Nation government would look like, presenting policies on immigration, energy, media, Indigenous affairs and social issues.
Hanson argued that Australia should become a “monocultural” society, reduce migration levels, support nuclear energy and expand the use of coal and gas. She also criticised multiculturalism, climate action, transgender rights and publicly funded media.
According to Hanson, a One Nation government would shut down SBS, significantly reduce the role of the ABC, cut the climate change and Indigenous affairs departments, increase regulation of artificial intelligence and challenge advice from the public service.
Some of Australia’s major international partners, including Britain, Canada, France and Germany, were described by Hanson as “S-holes”, which she linked to migration levels and social unrest.
During the speech, Hanson said: “In many respects, I haven’t changed, and neither has One Nation.”
She added: “Thankfully, Australians have woken up, for which I am grateful.”
The address lasted almost an hour and included a lengthy question-and-answer session. Hanson said media scrutiny of One Nation was part of the political process and claimed she welcomed that attention.
However, tensions emerged when Guardian Australia senior correspondent Sarah Martin questioned Hanson about her daughter, Lee Hanson, and her employment with a New South Wales One Nation senator while working in Tasmania.
Hanson accused Martin of having an “obsession” with One Nation, Gina Rinehart and Hanson herself, and warned the journalist could be excluded from future media events.
Later, Hanson responded to a question from SBS political editor Anna Henderson by saying Henderson would be out of a job if One Nation implemented its proposal to close SBS.
The article’s author, Tom McIlroy, argued that Hanson’s platform relies on strong ideological positions and would require greater scrutiny if One Nation maintains its current polling strength heading into the next federal election.