https://shiannonlc.wixsite.com/mysite-1

In My Opinion, Brisbane (2026)

12/04/2026

Another excellent read from Adam Coates on Facebook. It is really worthwhile giving him a follow. 👇🏻

“Is the "Renewable Disaster" real, or just a well-funded campaign? Let’s talk about that One Nation post.

You might have seen Pauline Hanson’s One Nation claiming the renewables plan is a "trillion-dollar disaster" that "chews up farming land." It’s a powerful narrative, but a March 2026 Australian Senate Inquiry just released a report that tells a much more complicated story about who is actually behind these claims.

Who is funding the "Disaster" narrative?

The Senate Inquiry into Information Integrity recently exposed what it calls a "denial machine"—a coordinated network designed to flood your feed with doubt.
- "Astroturfing" Exposed: The inquiry highlighted groups like "Australians for Natural Gas," which looks like a grassroots community group but was actually set up by the CEO of Tamboran Resources with help from the PR firm Freshwater Strategy.
- Fabricated Data: Some groups, like Rainforest Reserves Australia, were even caught submitting fake data about "non-existent" wind farms to Senate inquiries to manufacture a sense of crisis.
- The AI "Slop" Factor: In 2026, it is incredibly cheap to use AI to generate images of burning turbines or "destroyed" landscapes. These aren't meant to be true; they are meant to be shared.
- Dark Money: While groups like One Nation frame themselves as fighting a "taxpayer racket," they often benefit from the political support of the fossil fuel lobby—industries that stand to lose billions if we switch to cheaper, cleaner power.

The Reality: What the Data Actually Says:

If we move past the PR campaigns, the 2026 operational data from AEMO and CSIRO shows the opposite of a "disaster."
- The $1 Trillion Myth: The latest CSIRO GenCost (2025–26) report confirms that wind and solar are the cheapest forms of new energy in Australia. Even when you include the cost of big batteries to keep the grid reliable, they still easily beat coal and gas on price, with nuclear far behind.
- Not "Chewing Up" Land, Sharing It: As someone in the ag industry, I’m seeing the rise of Agrivoltaics. We aren't losing farms; we are seeing sheep grazing under solar panels. The shade reduces heat stress on livestock and helps soil retain moisture—it’s a win-win that provides farmers with a drought-proof income stream.
- Reliability: Renewables now supply nearly 40% of our power. With big battery costs dropping another 15% this year, we are building a grid that is more resilient to global fuel price shocks than ever before.

🌱 The Solution for Australia’s Future:

Australia isn't just "experimenting"—we are a global leader.
- Household Power: With 39% of homes now powered by rooftop solar, Australians are taking their power bills into their own hands, distributed power is real sovereignty.
- Water Security: Unlike coal or nuclear plants that require billions of litres of water for cooling, solar and wind keep our precious water in the ground and for our crops.

The Bottom Line: The "disaster" narrative is a product designed to protect old interests. The real disaster would be walking away from the cheapest, most ecologically sound energy future we’ve ever had”

The above is factual information regarding the lies, disinformation and the “disaster” narrative that surrounds anti-renewable rhetoric. This disaster narrative, as Adam Coates says, is designed to protect old interests, eg, fossil fuels. There is no question that renewables are the future. Fossil fuel companies are like cornered rats fighting for their survival. They will do anything
- lie, mislead, manipulate and divide entire countries to remain profitable and viable.

12/04/2026

According to Stephen Spencer from the Saturday Paper…

“Prior to the 2025 federal and Western Australian elections, 37 people had served in federal and state parliaments under Pauline Hanson’s banner. Twenty-seven of them didn’t complete a single term with the party”

That in itself is interesting and appears to be a pattern with One Nation.

I’ve mentioned more than once of similar One Nation percentages in 1998 that won them 11 seats in the Queensland state election - more to the detriment of Liberal and National seats than Labor. The sitting LNP government lost the 1998 election and Labor was rewarded with a minority government. By the next QLD election, the One Nation vote had collapsed and Labor was returned in a landslide. Within months of the 1998 QLD election, One Nation “was tearing itself apart and long before the next election all 11 MPs had left the party”

In QLD Hanson has had another 4 MPs elected since then. One MP quit and another was disendorsed.

In NSW ‘4 One Nation candidates served in the upper house’ “Every one of those four exited the party before they’d completed a term after falling out with Hanson”.

In Western Australia, “five of the party’s seven upper house members didn’t finish their term as One Nation MLCs, including all three elected in 2001”.

Pauline Hanson likes to retain “top down” control of the party without having any idea how to manage her party effectively and efficiently and this has always resulted in her members and MPs quitting the party.

Cory Bernardi and Barnaby Joyce are likely to follow the path of Mark Latham. All of these men have failed in politics, moved from party to party - or have consistently fallen out with their colleagues within a political party and have decided to try their luck elsewhere.

In the federal parliament, “four of the eight people elected as senators for One Nation didn’t complete a term”.

In South Australia before the last state election, the only One Nation MP, Sarah Game, quit the party, saying that she “wanted to advocate for all South Australians, regardless of their heritage or religious beliefs". Which in effect speaks to the fact that One Nation do not advocate for all people- regardless of what Hanson herself says.

🙄

It will be interesting to see if the One Nation MPs who have been elected into the upper and lower house in South Australia will still be there and/or will still be representing One Nation before their term is up.

Historically, the evidence continues to point to fractured relationships within One Nation, questionable candidacies and questionable practices.

With One Nation “what you vote for is almost certainly not what you get”. In almost every scenario, the representative voted for in a One Nation capacity will not be there at the end of the term to represent their constituents.

Do people know what they are getting with One Nation? Not likely. Apart from a distinct lack of policy, One Nation appears to be suffering from a distinct lack of originally elected MPs.'

Shiannon Corcoran

11/04/2026

The QLD LNP govt latest brain fart via Crisa-the-fooli is as likely as a fairy emerging from the bottom of your garden to grant you your three wishes.

Think about it. The QLD LNP aren’t doing so well in the polls. A number of factors have pushed their poor polling - jobs for mates, cutting affordable housing & healthcare funding, exorbitant spending & general ineptitude, etc, etc.

The LNP are also concerned about a resurgence of One Nation in QLD. With scary 1998 memories of similar One Nation percentages that netted them 11 seats in the QLD parliament - largely at the expense of the Libs & the Nationals, which delivered a minority Labor govt & ousted the sitting LNP govt - the LNP had to come up with a distraction that the numpties could get on board with in a fuel “crisis”

The QLD LNP have become the hero & saviour in their own propaganda. In an oil crisis they are running the narrative that “drilling the Taroom trough oil field is their “generational opportunity”

🙄

One would think that if drilling the Taroom Trough is a generational opportunity - previous generations would’ve capitalised greatly on this “opportunity”

The first point to consider against this ridiculous notion is the huge water resource risk it imposes. It would likely impact the agricultural sector through contamination of water supplies - particularly regarding the use of water from the Great Artesian Basin.

Point 2. The project requires unconventional methods to extract the oil from shale deposits -fracking. Fracking uses a significant amount of water. See point 1 with regard to concerns of water contamination.

Point 3. Hydraulic fracturing - fracking - “is the process of injecting water, sand &/or chemicals into a well to break up underground bedrock to free up oil & gas reserves”. Fracking in the Taroom Trough raises significant concerns regarding the impact on regional geology “primarily through the alteration of rock structures & compromise of major water aquifers”. Extraction activities would also threaten to impact 100s of water bores relied upon by agriculture.

Point 4. Timescale. It would likely take a decade before the Taroom Trough could produce oil at a commercial scale. That’s provided everything went to plan and the fracking didn’t glut agricultural water and contaminate the water - AND Crisafooli wasn’t grandstanding in an attempt to deflect & wedge the federal Labor government to “fast track approvals for oil projects” - when the QLD govt haven’t even applied to the federal government to “fast track” oil projects yet.

Point 5. High costs of “exploration”. Costs WILL be high due to the “technical complexity of deep, unconventional tight-rock formations”. Individual wells are an estimated cost of $15 to $20 million. Each. With no guarantee of success. The development involves THOUSANDS of wells. It’s not called “high-risk” for nothing …but I guess if Crisafooli is not paying for it personally then it’s all good. Costs of infrastructure to support this so-called new oil industry in QLD are also prohibitive - as they don’t yet exist on the larger scale needed.

Point 6. Coal-seam gas extraction is already damaging the Great Artesian Basin. Approximately 650 water bores relied upon by farmers are already impacted. I would imagine that Crisafooli’s grand oil plan will further impact the Great Artesian basin and agricultural production.

Point 7. The QLD LNP, as usual, are prioritising fossil fuels over renewable energy production. They have already proven their allegiance to mining interests by accepting donations from the mining industry before the last state election -notably from one donor of many, Gina Rinehart. The QLD LNP have cancelled renewable projects across the state - at the same time approving ageing coal-fired power plants to run well past their use-by dates - which continues to cost taxpayers in maintenance, subsidies and repairs from breakdowns.

Point 8. The climate destruction manifesto of the LNP speaks for itself.

30/01/2026

Normal people.

I had a political conversation with my neighbour the other day while we were walking our dogs. I don’t normally engage in political discussions with my neighbours but they started it and were
all in for a discussion.

They told me about how concerned they were about the events that have continued to unfold in tangerine ville with regard to a corrupt and a likely evolving authoritarian administration - and how upset and unsettled they were with regard to the events surrounding ICE and the deaths of innocent civilians.

They described their reactions to the sh*tcanning of an entire country as visceral, both physically and emotionally. They feared the implications that this would have around the world and particularly here in Australia.

My neighbour is not an overly politically involved person, but they are intelligent enough to know that what is happening in the US is not democratic and is not normal or moral. One thing they do know is that they would not want to experience anything remotely like that here.

I suspect that my neighbour is like a good proportion of people who live in this country who are not exposed and influenced to any great degree to online propaganda, misinformation, Sky News and Murdoch echo chambers, online communities infested with conspiracy theories and considerable Advance-like RW rhetoric and culture wars.

Generally speaking, old news models are dying. People no longer get their main sources of information from print media. In our local area they give their local (biased) print media away for free on stands outside shopping centres and newsagents. Few people get their papers delivered anymore.

News media are moving to online platforms but they’ve missed the boat. For the most part people like my neighbour don’t have the time to scroll through the latest news events. They work and they have lives that are separated from the machinations of angertainment and populist media bites. They may watch the news on television but they are focused primarily on the headlines - which are always nearly negative gloom, doom and disaster. Then they move on to entertainment and their favourite shows. Not many people want to spend a large proportion of their time being stressed out by constant implosions of angst on television occurring all over the world. They have their own lives and issues to deal with.

The above is absolutely normal behaviour. What isn’t normal is a small proportion of society that spends their time revisiting rabbit holes and being sucked into the misinformation vortex online and via exposure to continual propaganda, culture wars and conspiracy theories.

Normal behaviour in this country overrides much of the s***efokery that is projected by RW pundits and their vested interests. That’s why you get what is considered a safe and normal government being elected with a 94-seat majority in 2025 as opposed to an opposition that looked like it would be emulating the one thing that people don’t want in this country…
. instability, disruption, danger, division and hate. Normal people in this country - those like my neighbour - took one look at that escalating authoritarian s***e and decided that the safest option would be the stability of an established and proven Labor government.

This isn’t going to change. Not for as long as the Hansons, the Nationals and the hard-right of the Liberal Party cahoot with Rinehart, Murdoch and Abbott- who openly use the US as a model to aspire to.

For as long as the RW continue to implode and as long as the sh*tcanning of an entire country continues via an openly corrupt and hostile administration in that too-far-gone land - the normal people of Australia will continue to reject any possibility of that bad juju manifesting here.

Normal people like my neighbour.

29/01/2026

Pauline Hanson reckons she’s got “a Hell of a job ahead of her” to form government.

If you believe that s***efokery you’ll believe anything.

When Hanson once said she was going to keep the b*stards honest”, she was referring to the government of the day. Which is now ironic considering she thinks she’s a contender.

There are many reasons why Pauline Hanson will never form government. The primary reason being that Hanson is a Senator.

Traditionally if Hanson wanted to pretend for a minute that she could ever be prime minister, she would need to do so from the House to maintain presence, control and confidence in the system and structure of government. There has only been one PM who was a Senator in this country - John Gorton was a senator when he was elected leader of the Liberal party after Harold Holt’s disappearance. Gorton became PM while he was in the Senate - but he quickly resigned his Senate seat to contest and win a House of Representatives seat. Could Pauline Hanson resign her Senate seat and then contest and win a House of Representatives seat? There is NO parachuting into seats in the HoR, so unless she picks an easy winnable ON seat or asked one of her newly elected House MPs to step aside so she could recontest in a byelection - NO.

Even Hanson is not confident she could win enough seats in regional electorates - and she certainly won’t win them in city electorates. She says it’s all about preferences - and she is likely right. Preferential voting is the one thing that would save a few LNP and National seats from regional obliteration by any party that offered more than infighting and backstabbing.

Hanson currently has the grand total of ONE seat in the House and 4 seats in the Senate. While this is on the cusp of constituting a minor party, it is a far cry from winning enough seats in the House to become a majority - and you MUST have the majority of seats in the House to form government. The only subtext is if you hold under 76 seats but could win support from other parties or MPs to reach 76 seats - you could form a minority government. Unlikely for Hanson if not impossible.

To win power in the House - which is paramount form government - Hanson would have to run candidates in every single seat in the House - a total of 150 seats to get lucky - and win a substantial share of seats from Liberals, Nationals, Independents and possibly Labor. In 2025 Hanson contested almost all House seats and won a grand total of ZERO. Even if Hanson won a few seats - it would take years and subsequent election wins to build on that total and maintain it to become a viable party in the House. Hanson doesn’t have the time and One Nation without Hanson as a figurehead would fail. One Nation’s resurgence follows a worldwide pattern NOW. As we know, patterns and trajectories change with changing political and economic conditions. As much as the Murdochs and Rineharts push the RW agenda, it won’t last forever.

Hanson, as per the Rinehart memo - seeks to recreate the conditions of tangerine turdville. Like Rinehart, Hanson openly admires the current administrative ideology that is sh*tcanning an entire country. The fact that our world-class electoral system, our compulsory voting and preferential voting counters those rabid aspirations has been lost in the quagmire of decades of One Nation culture-war binfires.
. and let’s not forget the historical ON data. In 1998 Hanson’s party was riding on the crest of popularity. They won a total of 11 seats in QLD - not one of those MPs made it to the next election under the ON banner. One Nation consistently bleeds MPs, has no structure, no MP support and is entirely focused on populist politics for profit and opportunism.

One Nation is not a major party and it never will be. It will never have enough mainstream or structural support to continue to thrive on populist politics. That’s why Hanson loves social media so much. That’s where her misinformation and culture wars thrive.

29/01/2026

There is a whiff of discontent and plotting in the Liberal party right now as the right faction work to shore up their position and count their numbers in light of the Nationals defection and less coalescence than some desperados in the ex-coalition would like.

Littleproud’s tanty came with an ultimatum. Get rid of Ley if they ever wanted to be considered part of a coalition again. Although, given that the Nationals could be in a regional pickle of One Nation proportions, they probably shouldn’t have counted their chickens before they hatched.

According to the SMH, Hastie is gathering his troops and the faithful are making their calls. Angus Taylor is also on his way back from Europe to join in the right-wing fracas in hope of positioning himself favourably.

Either way they go will limit their ability to appear effective in opposition. If they roll Ley it will look like the Liberals have capitulated to Littleproud. Going on the right-wing form of Hastie and Taylor - a resulting opposition leadership from either one of them would likely be worse than anything Dutton could’ve fckd up. If Ley sticks around, she’s already cooked her goose with her p*ss poor partisan performance after the Bondi shootings.

What a pissantry of pillocks.

I often wonder if the shenanigans of the coalition in opposition looks as inept, ineffective and significantly devoid of working synapses to others as it looks to me.

Every time a party fragments they lose power, not only within their party but from those in the electorates who lose faith in that party’s ability to govern effectively. This is historical fact.

This is the only thing the coalition are truly afraid of. Losing power through fragmentation. It’s the only reason they have remained a coalition.

Unfortunately the coalition, as cushioned and protected as they have been by the media, have not learned from their mistakes over the years. They are now completely broken. I don’t expect that will ever be fixed by a kiss and make up and a “fresh start” slogan.

29/01/2026

According to Antony Green, the latest split between the Nationals and the Liberals has more to do with the surging support for One Nation than anything else. The Nationals have reviewed their past political history in QLD and soiled their un**es.

It’s now as serious as a heart attack as far as the Nationals are concerned. The last time One Nation was polling this high resulted in more of a threat to National seats than any other party. This is evidenced by the Queensland election of 1998 where One Nation were polling above 20% and the Nationals lost regional seats to One Nation. QLD Labor also lost some seats to One Nation but picked up those seats from the QLD Liberals, whereas the Nationals did not pick up seats to balance their losses.

Preferential voting was also a factor as to why some Nationals hung onto a few of their seats… and the reason why the QLD LNP government are not going to budge on their pre-election promise to Queenslanders to abolish preferential voting. While One Nation are polling big nationally the QLD LNP are in very real danger of losing seats in the 2028 state election.

Scarey times for scaredy cats 😏

It is doubtful that - despite the conspiracy numpties decrying preferential voting as a “scam” and a “rort” by Labor - it may well be ironically the only thing that saves some Nationals and Liberals at the next federal election..
. maybe… but maybe we might see a surge in Independents picking off Liberal seats and One Nation picking off National seats. Labor at this point will likely remain largely untouched and could even increase their numbers in the House and the Senate.

Despite One Nation’s high polling, Antony Green notes of that QLD election - “all 11 elected One Nation members had split with the party within two years. The beginning of a pattern that has continued since”.

This is likely to happen to One Nation again, as it has been proven more than once that they can’t govern their own party out of a wet paper bag, let alone represent their constituents and their own members without devolving into a rort fest via Grifters-R-Us Inc.

So, what to do for the Nationals? They certainly won’t survive with any power as a stand-alone party.

Nope. These are desperate times. They’ll bring in the big guns. They could pal up with One Nation in the Senate but would still be limited in the House. I can’t imagine the blokey blokes taking orders from another woman - unless it’s Moneybags Rinehart..
. or they could stir the pot of division within the Liberal party and the LNP to oust Sussan Ley and install a blokey bloke as opposition leader… then kiss and make up with their recycled right-wing foghorning of “a renewed direction” and “realignment of policy and perspective” - that might more resemble a Rinehart-Abbott-Murdoch right-wing brainfart than a modern moderate inner city Liberal voter.

Given that the Liberals and the Nationals have never really “coalesced” historically- the make-up marriage of convenience would be for the sake of power within a more hard-right framework. Past infighting, division, breaking up and getting back together again - twice - will also test the confidence of all but the rusted on voters.

I can’t see it going well given the cookers and the motley “take Australia back” crew have already selected their rightwing hagrid of choice. If the newly formed “Coalition” do win back any punters it won’t be from Labor.

At this point it is game, set and match to Albanese. The ex-coalition are their own worst enemies. Despite the Murdoch scripting, the Sky News echo chamber, the sycophantic supporters offline and online - they still manage to fck it up.

29/01/2026

The coalition are experiencing the inevitable reaping of what they have continued to sow. Or, if you will, a karmic missile right up their nether regions.

You’d think a few synapses would have been working in unison after their election flogging and they might’ve opted for a less disingenuous strategy after past campaigns have reaped them exactly net zero with regard to any benefits for the last two elections. You can only run off the smell of a spiteful and malodorous No campaign for so long. Everyone moves on while you’re stuck holding onto culture wars and punching down on minorities via thinly veiled racism.

“Coalition asks Albanese for the grace he was not afforded in the wake of the Bondi attack”

Claire Armstrong from the abc writes that the coalition are suffering from “buyer’s remorse”. The result of their almost immediate brazen political opportunism post Bondi shooting - along with an avalanche of putrid demands and s***efokery launched at Labor that could now bite them on the ass.

The coalition and a succession of sycophants demanded Parliament be recalled. They demanded a Royal Commission. They demanded that Labor move faster. They whined about “antisemitism” and “extremism” not being addressed fast enough while playing down the need for gun control.

They wanted it all done times two in quick succession. Except, of course, any real restraint on themselves, Zionism, their cronies and likely the ability to punch down on selected minorities in the future.

On cue, some liberals are now claiming they ‘never wanted the government to extend vilification laws to inciting racial hatred’. Perhaps that’s because the liberals and their cronies have been a part of that vilification process for a very long time. It’s a strategy they have reaped certain benefits from.

Now, in a triple pike, the coalition are foghorning that it’s all moving too fast and it all needs careful consideration.

This is more ironic than even the coalition have realised. The government are literally responding to the pressure that the coalition created through their aggressive and opportunistic tactics, the media pile on, the enlisting of sympathetic business figures and sporting identities, the sustained attacks via certain elements in the Jewish community and the interference of a foreign government’s prime minister in Australian political affairs.

If the coalition had demonstrated bipartisanship and worked with the government instead of swinging from the chandeliers while clutching at their pearls - the resulting actions - legislation, laws, inquiries, along with a NSW Royal Commission could have introduced a more nuanced response to negotiate the best path forward.

Now, once again - the coalition are wallowing in their fragmentation. The Nationals are squawking about gun laws, some liberals say Labor’s ‘proposals failed to eradicate antisemitism and address radical Islamic extremism’, while many more Liberals are concerned ‘the criminalisation of inciting or promoting racial hatred goes too far’

🙄

As Claire Armstrong points out - There is an alternative to the machinations of coalition bulls***e and bluster. It is still possible for Labor to negotiate and cut a deal with the Greens that will be mutually acceptable. Of course the Greens are going to push for more amendments, but it has already been proven that Labor and the Greens can and will pass legislation if necessary and cut out the coalition entirely from any meaningful input.

Which means the coalition will be again excluded from a chance to ‘shape significant law changes’.

The party of faux pas are dealing themselves into electoral oblivion. Again.

31/12/2025

After the shellacking of the coalition in the 2025 federal election, I wondered - for just a moment - what kind of opposition we would end up with.

I wondered if the opposition would learn from their defeat and discard their RW media echo chamber for some commonsense policies and moderate liberal rhetoric of days gone by to win back a good proportion of the electorate who had abandoned them - particularly as Dutton twisted their RW narrative five ways to Sunday in an attempt to morph his brand into something akin to a sh*t-for-brains tangerine dream in a far-off land. Too late, Dutton realised his mistake in a voter backlash so severe he lost his own seat.

I didn’t have to wonder for long as the coalition looked like a dog’s breakfast, split up momentarily until they realised that it wasn’t worth the financial pain and the power drain - and plotted amongst themselves to unseat their glorious new leader at the first sniff of moderate activity.

What I didn’t expect was for them to not only double down on their Sky News s***efokery - but perform a triple pike as Abbott snapped his fingers and Murdoch pulled the strings of angst, dissent and culture war chaos in synchronised sound bites all over the land.

When they released the Kraken of crappola after the Bondi shootings as sustained political opportunism and a desperate viciousness never before witnessed via the coalition - despite their many shortcomings - I realised that this was the “best” that the coalition would ever be able to offer this country. Ever again.

The coalition’s best days are behind them. The halcyon days of their own peace and gluttonous prosperity, donor pledges and sticky rorts at the expense of everyone else are behind them. Their half-a*sed attempts to govern the nation and not run it into financial ruin are gone. This is what they are left with. A party ruled by the RW rhetoric of “keeping up with the Hansons” lest they lose their remaining rusted ons and boot lickers to a new surge in “likeability” and hoe downs with Barns and Pauline fiddling the books in the back blocks at sunset.

Instead of uniting over a shared grief following the Bondi tragedy - the coalition - with the help of RW media and every sycophant this side of the s***e-stained stump - they opted for a strategy that has been seen before, flooding the zone with the loudest voices, using the media to push their narrative, siding with a Zionist worldview and a powerful Israeli-like strategy to distract and discredit those around them who disagree with them. They attacked the character of those around them rather than to present any real arguments as to why they should exist at all in the context of “opposition”.

We arrive at the crux of the opposition’s dilemma. They really should no longer exist. They have lost the majority of their moderates - and with it their balance - they arrive at the conclusion that they must morph into something more oppressive, more opportunistic, more beholden to vested interests than Hanson herself.

What is worse than a Hanson?

Not much, to be sure - but the opposition are doing a pretty good impression of a tangerine turdine dream right now that is intent on destroying democracy all over the world.

This is the coalition’s desperate go to. Their final stand. Their “go hard or go home”.

They are turning this country into a battleground of hate and division.

Australia wasn’t perfect, but it wasn’t this. Australia has been a safe space for immigrants from all over the world since colonisation. Australia WAS the country of a fair go for everyone.

The coalition wants Australia to be a voice for those with the most power, the most influence and the most money. That doesn’t include Bob down the road who just wants to wave a flag and pretend racism doesn’t exist.

The numpties should think about that as they grind their molars into “Australia first” discontent.

In My Opinion

12/04/2026

12/04/2026

11/04/2026

30/01/2026

29/01/2026

29/01/2026

29/01/2026

29/01/2026

31/12/2025

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category