WomanGoingPlaces

  • Home
  • WomanGoingPlaces

WomanGoingPlaces WomanGoingPlaces.com.au

Advocating for economic security and social inclusion for
Australian women

Welcome to the page of WomanGoingPlaces.com.au

We are a social enterprise telling the stories of Australian women over 50 and advocating for their economic security and social inclusion.

HAMAS GOVERNMENT & NETANYAHU GOVERNMENT- by Augustine Zycher Founder & Editor WomanGoingPlacesThe tragedy for both the I...
29/05/2025

HAMAS GOVERNMENT & NETANYAHU GOVERNMENT
- by Augustine Zycher Founder & Editor WomanGoingPlaces

The tragedy for both the Israeli and Palestinian peoples is that their governments are first and foremost fighting for their own political survival. They are determined to remain in power despite the catastrophe they are imposing on their own and each others people.

Right from the outset, this has been a war targeted at civilians.
When Hamas, the Government of Gaza since 2006, invaded Israel on October 7 2023, it did not seek to engage with Israeli armed forces. Instead it r***d, burned and massacred 1200 Israeli civilians, including babies, children, women, whole families and the elderly, in their homes and at a music festival.

Hamas sought to ensure that the greater the atrocities, the greater the predictable Israeli response.Hamas then hid safely underground in its fortress of tunnels established through lavish funding by Qatar.These were strategically located under schools, hospitals, mosques and homes.

But Palestinians civilians were prohibited by Hamas from seeking shelter in the tunnels during Israeli bombing, and consequently the majority of over 50,000 Palestinians killed, according to Hamas’ figures, are civilians.

And this is the crux of Hamas strategy. They could not inflict a military victory on Israel. But they could defeat it politically. The greater the death toll of Palestinians, the greater international outrage and support for Hamas.The condemnation of Israel quickly merged into an international movement to delegitimise its very existence and to demonise Jews. The killing of Sarah Milgrim and Yaron Lischinsky outside a Jewish museum in Washington was a direct consequence of this vilification.

Hamas could have stopped the loss of Palestinian life by agreeing to return the remaining living and dead Israeli hostages of the 250 seized on Oct 7. But it is not their priority. Nor is the return of the hostages a priority for the Israeli Government under Benjamin Netanyahu. Only by continuing the war can Netanyahu remain PM of his coalition of extreme rightists, stop a state commission of inquiry into his failures of Oct 7, and avoid going to prison for alleged corruption.This is also the the only way he can continue his assault on the judiciary, the intelligence agencies and Israeli democracy.

Netanyahu proclaims that he can achieve total victory, but there is little chance that this war can end in the total annihilation of Hamas. Netanyahu has refused to develop any political framework to end this war. Nor does Hamas want the war to end in any political framework that necessitates its removal as a military and political force from Gaza.

The massive Israeli demonstrations and the polls show clearly that the vast majority of Israelis want the war to end and believe it is only continuing to further Netanyahu’s political survival. Netanyahu's policies that target Hamas but result in the starvation and death of Palestinian civilians are widely denounced.

Since October 7th 2023, the international media has consistently referred to Hamas as “Hamas militants” and "Hamas fighters”. This is both incorrect and misleading. Hamas was elected as the Government by the people of Gaza in 2006. Hamas then seized power and refused to hold any further elections. It is and has been the Government of Gaza for the last 19 years. To call Hamas a ‘militia’ is to distort and diminish its responsibility for their attack on Israel on October 7, the taking and holding of hostages, and the development of the war since then. To call Hamas a ‘militia’ and not the Government of Gaza also distorts and diminishes its responsibility for the protection and welfare of the Palestinian people of Gaza.

Both the Netanyahu and Hamas Governments should be held accountable to end this war.

ANZAC DAY REMEMBRANCES- by Augustine Zycher Founder & Editor WomanGoingPlaces.com.auWhen I was in primary school, I reme...
28/04/2025

ANZAC DAY REMEMBRANCES
- by Augustine Zycher
Founder & Editor WomanGoingPlaces.com.au

When I was in primary school, I remember that Anzac Day was very difficult for me. The school held a parade each year and many children proudly wore the medals and insignia of their fathers and grandfathers from WW1 and WW2. My sister and I were aware that WW2 was the critical event of our parents’ lives and part of our lives ever since. So we were perplexed and ashamed, that so momentous an involvement in the war had no token of recognition. There was nothing that we could wear with pride on Anzac Day like our classmates’ inherited medals. And no explanation for their absence. After all, WW2 was the reason we were in Australia.

Both my mother and my father were in Auschwitz. Both survived several concentration camps and the Death Marches. Like most other Polish Jews, almost all their family and relatives were gassed or shot by the N***s. My father was starved and tortured as a slave labourer working for a major German company.

When I was growing up, my parents would hardly talk about their past because they wanted their children to have a normal life, protected from trauma. But we knew that their war was the ‘Lager’ - the camps, primarily Auschwitz-Birkenau. Both had a number tattooed on their arms, an insignia that no parent would choose to hand down to a child.

They met after they were liberated from the concentration camps. They married and immigrated to Australia because it was geographically as far as possible from the horrors they had experienced. My father got a job here on the assembly line at Ford and my mother did piece-work sewing blouses.

Our most enduring memory, was the kindness of Australians to my new immigrant family. Mum, whose English was a bit better than Dad’s, often needed to go to the local council. One elderly man who worked there helped her understand rates, utilities and other matters. One day, he came to our home, with a gift for my sister and myself. It was a well-loved set of encyclopaedias. We were still in primary school and he wanted to express his welcome to our family and to help us with our education. We have never forgotten his kindness.

Australia was a place of refuge and a place of tolerance for my parents as Jews. So I am mortified by the surge of antisemitism here. No, I don’t accept that it is only anti-Zionism and not antisemitism. The demonisation and dehumanisation of ‘Zionists’ is indistinguishable from the demonisation and dehumanisation of Jews. And the consequences are identical.

In Poland in 1939, my mother watched in shock as the first thing the N***s did in her neighbourhood after they invaded was to burn down the synagogue next door.
And in 2024, the Melbourne Jewish community saw a local synagogue deliberately burnt down, and children wearing the uniforms of Jewish schools attacked at train stations.

This is not normal in Australia. And it must not be normalised.

WOMEN'S BUDGET 2025- by Augustine ZycherFounder & Editor WomanGoingPlaces.com.auIf you read the Women’s Budget Statement...
02/04/2025

WOMEN'S BUDGET 2025
- by Augustine Zycher
Founder & Editor WomanGoingPlaces.com.au

If you read the Women’s Budget Statement you would be forgiven for thinking that in Australia, women cease to exist once they pass menopause.This Budget, presented as part of the Federal Budget 2025-26, targets working women below the age of 50. There was little in it for women aged 50 plus, even though this demographic represents a third of the Australian female population. Astonishingly, they remain invisible to the Australian Government.

You may ask, why does this demographic need particular attention? Because after the age of 50, Australian women are more likely than any other demographic, to become impoverished. Statistically they already represent the largest and fastest growing cohort of homeless Australians. We are reaping the consequences of institutionalised economic and social discrimination against women.

This systemic discrimination forces women onto JobSeeker. Then age discrimination keeps them there. Older women are the first to be fired and unlikely to be rehired, which is why they form the majority of those long-term on Jobseeker.

In the Labor Government’s 2023 Budget, there was, for the first time, a nod of recognition that women aged 55+ on JobSeeker had little chance of finding work. Nevertheless, Treasurer Jim Chalmers chose to award them only $6 p.d. extra in their JobSeeker payment.

Presently, JobSeeker is just $56 a day which is only 43.5% of the minimum wage and around 38% below the poverty line. Linkage to the CPI continues to shrink the value of JobSeeker. There are no affordable rentals for someone on Jobseeker.

The Labor Government has failed dismally to provide adequate social housing and support for homeless older women.

And even though the cost of living and rent have never been higher, those on JobSeeker got no increase in the 2025 Budget.

Instead, the Government in election-mode, chose populist policies of handing out $150 energy relief and tax cuts.The tax cuts alone cost the Government $7.7 billion.

If the Government had really wanted to offer tangible relief to older women who have no home, no work and little food, they could have done so and saved money too. Had the Government increased Jobseeker by $200 per fortnight, it would have only cost them $5 billion - a saving of almost $3 billion. There would also have been a $71.8 million long-run investment-related benefit from an increase in JobSeeker to 90% of the age pension, according to the Economic Inclusion Advisory Committee 2025 Report to Government.https://www.dss.gov.au/system/files/documents/2025-03/eiac-2025-report.pdf

The disproportionate number of older women dependent on JobSeeker constitutes only part of the magnitude of the crisis. There are hundreds of thousands of women facing destitution, homelessness, neglect and isolation due to lack of savings, super funds, or due to divorce or death of a partner. Women who have higher education, professions and skills who have been part of the workforce for decades and also worked in the home, are now sleeping in cars and tents.

On this scale, we are not talking about individual tragedies, but a significant social phenomenon.

Unquestionably, as women age, many enter a social and economic maelstrom. This is indeed a feminist issue. And therefore it is disappointing that despite having a Women’s Budget ostensibly dedicated to women, this Budget fails to address this crisis. Finance Minister and Minister for Women, Katy Gallagher, overwhelmingly focuses on preventative action to improve the economic security of younger generations of women.
This is commendable, but not sufficient.

It in no way absolves the Government from the obligation to tackle the cluster of issues that affect current generations of older women.

WHY IS TRUMP SABOTAGING AMERICA?-by Augustine Zycher Founder & Editor WomanGoingPlaces.com.auThe question we all need to...
18/03/2025

WHY IS TRUMP SABOTAGING AMERICA?
-by Augustine Zycher Founder & Editor WomanGoingPlaces.com.au

The question we all need to ask now is:
Why is President Donald Trump sabotaging America?

Because this, in essence, is what he is doing. He is not only launching tariffs and trade wars. Trump is taking a wrecking ball to the pillars of American democracy and society, eviscerating its institutions and most significantly, destroying their fundamental purpose.

Here are some examples.

When Trump removes thousands of experienced professionals from the Justice Department, it is an assault on the rule of law. It also helps secure the ruling of the Supreme Court that Trump, as President, is above the law by eliminating any possible institutional opposition.

When Trump halves the Education Department, he is effectively destroying education in America.

When Trump freezes federal funding to the National Institute of Health and John Hopkins University he is razing biomedical innovation including research into cancer, heart disease and pandemics.

When Trump withdraws funding and fires the scientists in the top echelons of bodies such as NASA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the National Weather Service, he is crippling American scientific and climate change leadership.

When Trump guts the Internal Revenue Service and at the same time loosens restrictions on money laundering, he is corrupting the integrity of financial regulation in order to serve the wealthy and criminals.

When Social Security, the most popular government program, is described by Elon Musk as a “Ponzi scheme”, and Medicare and Medicaid face cuts, Trump is abdicating any Government responsibility for the common good.

In short, Trump is changing the purpose of government from serving the interests of the people and the country, to serving his personal interests.

In tandem, Trump is already taking steps to remain in power and dispense with any further elections.

The question still remains - in his race toward autocracy, why does he need to destroy everything of value that has made America great?

Why does Trump appoint spectacularly unfit and unqualified people as cabinet Secretaries?

Why did he fire the most senior military personnel in the Pentagon including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, five other admirals and generals, and the first woman to lead the Navy in an unprecedented shake-up of U.S. military leadership?

Where was the imperative for Trump, when he returned to office, to immediately ditch European allies and switch sides from Zelensky to Putin?

Trump is abandoning American led international alliances committed to liberty and the rules based order. These alliances have largely secured international stability and economic prosperity for the last 80 years.

America has had right-wing presidents before, but Trump is doing what no American President has ever done.
Why?
The answer lies in the age-old question: ‘cui bono’ - who benefits?

KINOCIDE- by Augustine ZycherFounder & Editor WomanGoingPlaces.com.auThree generations of the Bibas family were victims ...
25/02/2025

KINOCIDE

- by Augustine Zycher
Founder & Editor WomanGoingPlaces.com.au

Three generations of the Bibas family were victims of the Hamas attack on October 7. Their fate demonstrated the very essence and purpose of that attack which was: the deliberate, systematic and targeted assault on Israeli families by Hamas.

As such, Hamas committed a new and unique international crime against humanity - ‘Kinocide’.

Hamas abducted the Bibas family from their home in Kibbutz Nir Oz on October 7. Kfir 10 months, and Ariel 4, were later murdered and mutilated by Hamas. Their mother Shiri was also murdered in Gaza. Their father Yarden was held hostage for almost 16 months. The remains of the grandparents, Margit and Yossi Silberman were found in their burnt home on the kibbutz.

Hamas, the Government of Gaza, did not set out to battle with Israeli soldiers when it breached the Israeli border and invaded homes on kibbutzim.

Instead, its objective was to terrorise and devastate the fabric of Israeli society by destroying the family unit and inflicting maximum suffering.

This was the finding of a groundbreaking report entitled ‘Kinocide: The Weaponization of Families’. See https://www.dvora-institute.org/cco7-1-1

Dr Cochav Elkayam-Levy, the Chair and Founder of the Civil Commission on Oct. 7th Crimes by Hamas against Women and Children, and one of the authors of the report, together with Irwin Cotler, former Canadian Justice Minister, coined the term “Kinocide”.

“These heinous acts were not random. Hamas’s modus operandi on October 7th was as calculated as it was cruel; it was a deliberate strategy to exploit the family unit as a weapon of terror. This form of weaponization is as yet undefined in international law, though the atrocities committed on October 7th clearly constitute crimes against humanity, specifically the weaponization of familial bonds for strategic ends” said Dr Elkayem-Levy.

Hamas murdered children and beheaded babies in front of their parents, parents in front of their children, committed violent sexual atrocities against young girls, women and men, and tortured family members in front of each other before killing them or abducting them to Gaza. Whole families were burnt alive in their homes.

One in 4 of the people in Kibbutz Nir Oz, were either killed or taken hostage. This was just one of the kibbutzim raided by Hamas.

These deaths, mutilations and atrocities were not collateral damage, not the consequence of war. They were the intentional target of cold-blooded murder.

In addition to the deliberate targeting of the family unit, the second factor that made the Hamas attack unprecedented was that they broadcasted their own depravity. Wth GoPro cameras they live streamed themselves exultantly slaughtering, torturing, ra**ng and burning. Hamas did not seek to cover up their crimes at the time. Instead they displayed them as victories and used them to bolster their international political status.

“There have been, tragically enough, too many mass atrocities in our time, but this one harbours an unprecedented evil: the glorification and celebration of these genocidal atrocities in real time on digital media” said Professor Kotler.

FALSE EQUIVALENCE- by Augustine Zycher Founder & Editor WomanGoingplaces.com.auBoth the ABC and SBS have created a false...
21/02/2025

FALSE EQUIVALENCE

- by Augustine Zycher Founder & Editor WomanGoingplaces.com.au

Both the ABC and SBS have created a false equivalence in their reporting of the Israeli hostage and Palestinian prisoner exchanges taking place under the ceasefire agreements between Israel and Hamas.

Why does this matter?

It does, because the fundamental truth is that this exchange is only taking place as a result of crimes under international law. The International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages prohibits taking hostages; the Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits taking civilian hostages in international armed conflicts.

As the leader of Hamas, one of Yahya Sinwar’s key objectives in launching the attack of October 7 was to take Israeli hostages. He, of all people knew the power that would give him. After all, he had benefitted from being released from an Israeli prison in 2011 when serving four life sentences
for the murder of 12 Palestinians. Sinwar’s release was part of a deal that saw 1,027 Palestinian and Israeli Arab prisoners released in exchange for a single Israeli hostage, the IDF soldier Gilad Shalit. Shalit had been held captive for five years after being kidnapped. The prisoners released in that exchange were collectively responsible for the killing of 569 Israelis.

That is why, on October 7, in addition to r**e, committing atrocities and the massacre of 1200 Israeli babies, children, men and women, mostly civilians, Sinwar made sure to kidnap 250 Israelis and foreign nationals as hostages back to Gaza.

And indeed over the last 16 months, the hostages have served as human shields to protect Hamas. Now they serve as a powerful bargaining tool during the ceasefire negotiations. In order to obtain the release of the hostages, Israeli is prepared to release disproportionate numbers of Palestinians prisoners, even many murderers with ‘blood on their hands’. Hostage taking is a very profitable and effective way to release convicted murderers en masse.

For example, in exchange for Agam Berger, Israel released 50 security prisoners, for Arbel Yehoud, 30 prisoners, and for Gadi Mozes, 30 prisoners. Israel has agreed to release 1,904 Palestinian security prisoners and detainees. More than 200 of them were serving life sentences.

It is therefore very disturbing that both the ABC and SBS in their reporting on the exchange are downplaying the seriousness of the crimes committed by many of the Palestinian prisoners. In doing so, they are creating a false equivalence between Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners.
This has become a pattern in the reporting of both the ABC and SBS on these hostage-prisoner exchanges.

Let’s take a closer look.

The 250 hostages who included babies, children, women and elderly people, were seized by Hamas from their cots, beds, homes, offices and from a music festival. Most were civilians. Even the Israel female spotters were non-combatants. Nor had any been convicted of crimes by any court of law.

The ABC and SBS however did not mention the fact that a considerable number of the Palestinian prisoners had been convicted by Israeli courts of murder. Throughout their various news reports, reporters for both networks preferred to focus of those held in administrative detention, or held either without charge or for offences like stone throwing. Both networks glossed over the crimes of prisoners convicted of murder and terror or they vaguely mentioned their crimes as serious charges.

At the same time, in a number of these reports, released Palestinian prisoners freely made lengthy allegations of torture, beatings, and neglect while in Israeli prisons.

But there was much that both the ABC and SBS were not telling the viewers in these same reports.

On January 30, 2025 Israel released 110 Palestinian security prisoners as part of the third phase of the Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal in exchange for three Israeli hostages: Gadi Mozes 80, and two young women, Arbel Yehoud, and Agam Berger.
The SBS coverage of this exchange reported that Zakaria Zubeidi “one of the leaders of al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, the armed wing of Fatah, was the most prominent Palestinian prisoner to be freed.” “Zubeidi has been known as the strongman of the West Bank city of Jenin, a hotbed of Palestinian resistance to Israeli occupation and the site of frequent Israeli army raids, including a major operation just a week ago.” There was however, not a single word about him being convicted for killing at least 6 people by placing bombs in civilian offices.

John Lyons, global affairs editor ABC in his report just mentioned that Zakaria Zubeidi led a group of deadly attacks. Most of his report focused on the joyful reunion of Palestinian prisoners with their families and their statements about bad treatment and torture in Israeli prisons.

Neither Lyons nor SBS mentioned that also released in that exchange was Mohammad Abu Warda, a Hamas operative involved in placing bombs on buses that resulted in the deaths of 45 Israelis. Abu Warda was sentenced to 48 life terms and is the prisoner with the most Israeli murder convictions among those being released.
On February 1, Matthew Doran, Middle East correspondent for the ABC, reported at length on a young Palestinian man suffering from a bad condition of scabies. He had been arrested for stone throwing and reported on the lack of hygiene in detention and a beating.

On February 2, Eric Tlozek ABC Middle East correspondent reported on the release of 183 Palestinian prisoners, 72 of whom were serving jail sentences. He did a short feature on Palestinian prisoner Atta Mohammed Abdel Ghani who was released after spending 23 years in jail. Tlozek mentioned that Abdel Ghani was imprisoned for “fighting with one of the Palestinian militant groups against Israel during the second intifada.” He made no mention of the fact that Ghani had been serving 3 life sentences for murder. Just that he fathered his two youngest children with s***m smuggled out from an Israeli prison.

Both the ABC and SBS in their coverage did background stories on released Palestinian prisoners. This is entirely legitimate. But it is not legitimate for them to only do background features on Palestinian prisoners and not on the Israelis hostages who were released. Their coverage of the Israelis was principally about the reunion with their families in Israel. Nothing about who they were and under what conditions they had been held hostage by Hamas for almost 500 days.

This is entirely consistent with the coverage of both the ABC and SBS of the hostages during their entire incarceration since October 7. Other than a passing reference to the numbers being held, Australian audiences received hardly any coverage.

It is true that the ABC and SBS did not have access to the hostages. But they did have access to verified information and sources, they could speak to the hostages’ families and most importantly follow up U.N. and ICC reports.

So again, let us fill in some of the missing parts of their coverage because they did not inform the public of what Israeli hostages experienced.

Seven young Israeli female spotters and one female civilian were released after almost 500 days in captivity by Hamas in these exchanges. Spotters are unarmed soldiers who monitor computers on borders to report on any unusual activity. They had been taken hostage after Hamas massacred 15 of their colleagues on October 7.

During captivity they were moved around to different locations including the underground tunnels. “There was a point when we barely had any food at all,” one of the released spotters told relatives. “We all sat around a plate of rice and tried to divide it equally between us, to the last grain. You find yourself counting. Such hunger can’t be explained.” Daniella Gilboa was shot in the Hamas attack and still has a bullet in her leg. Emily Damari said she was held in UNRWA facilities during her captivity in Gaza but denied medical care after being shot twice, losing two fingers on her left hand, and carrying the unhealed wound in her leg. One was held alone in the underground tunnels for over 50 days. The Red Cross did not visit any of the Israeli hostages at any time during their captivity.

The ABC and SBS chose not to make any reference to evidence that Israeli female hostages have been subjected to ongoing sexual violence.

Both networks had access to the U.N. Report on the sexual violence committed by Hamas on October 7 since it was published on March 4, 2024 and adopted in April by the U.N. Secretary General. In this Report on the widespread r**e, sexual atrocities and massacre of Israeli girls and women across multiple locations committed by Hamas it found that “with respect to hostages, the mission team found clear and convincing information that some have been subjected to various forms of conflict-related sexual violence including r**e and sexualized torture and sexualized cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.” “The team was also convinced that this violence persists against the remaining hostages.” https://news.un.org/en/sites/news.un.org.en/files/atoms/files/Mission_report_of_SRSG_SVC_to_Israel-oWB_29Jan_14_feb_2024.pdfOffice of

In addition, International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim Khan referred to the hostages when he pursued an arrest warrant for Hamas leader, Yahya Sinwar for “extermination, murder, taking of hostages, r**e and sexual assault in detention.” https://edition.cnn.com/2024/05/20/middleeast/icc-israel-hamas-arrest-warrant-war-crimes-intl/index.html

But neither the ABC nor SBS during the last 15 months did any feature reports on this, if they even mentioned the existence of this Report. They certainly did not refer in any of their coverage to sexual violence that any of the hostages may have experienced.

And yet both networks in their coverage had no hesitation in reporting allegations by Palestinian prisoners of torture, beatings and bad conditions.

They also failed to report on the conditions endured by other Israeli hostages. Gadi Mozes aged 80 for much of his time in captivity was held in a two-square-meter room, in which he regularly paced some 7 kilometers (over 4 miles) every day, counting the tiles on the room floor and solving math problems to pass the time and keep his mind sharp. For some 70 days of his captivity, Mozes was in complete isolation, locked alone in a dark room. Mozes lost some 15 kilograms in captivity.

Hostages Ohad Ben-Ami, Or Levy, and Eli Sharabi were paraded by Hamas in shockingly emaciated condition after 16 months in captivity. In its commentary, SBS on February 9 sufficed to note that “They appeared pale and weak as armed Hamas fighters escorted them from a van onto a stage in Deir al-Balah.”
All three hostages actually endured severe torture under Hamas captivity, their families reported to Israeli media. They were choked, bound, gagged with cloth to the point of suffocation, hung upside down, and burned with a heated object. They were deliberately starved, receiving only a rotten pita every few days, which they had to share with other hostages. At times, they went days without water.

One of the freed hostages said he had been chained for 15 months. "I was shackled inside a dark tunnel, with no air or light. I couldn't walk or stand, and only before my release did my captors remove the chains, forcing me to learn to walk again," he told his family, who shared his account with Israel’s Channel 12.

Neither the ABC or SBS reported any of this in their coverage of the exchange despite the terrible appearance of all 3 hostages. Mathew Doran on February 9 reported on the emaciated appearance of all three. But made no effort to explain how they came to be in this condition. Instead Doran then went on in the same report to say that “Israeli authorities have been repeatedly accused of severe neglect of Palestinians in Israeli prisons with diseases ripping through facilities and alleged beatings.”

In its February 9 broadcast, SBS reported that it was only when Eli Sharabi returned home that he learnt that his wife and two teenage daughters “had been murdered”. But failed to mention that it was Hamas that had murdered them or that they had done so by burning them alive in their “safe room” during its assault on October 7, the same day they took him hostage. Sharabi’s brother was also taken hostage and murdered in captivity.

When the ABC and SBS downplay the seriousness of the crimes of Hamas, it is not balanced reporting. It actually obliterates their war crimes in both the taking of Israeli hostages and their treatment of them in captivity.

When the ABC and SBS downplay the seriousness of the crimes of many of the released Palestinian prisoners and present some sort of false equivalence between Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners, it just masks the deadly game of extortion that is taking place in this exchange.

GAZAN RIVIERA- by Augustine ZycherFounder & Editor WomanGoingPlaces Gaza could indeed have been the Riviera of the Middl...
09/02/2025

GAZAN RIVIERA

- by Augustine Zycher
Founder & Editor WomanGoingPlaces

Gaza could indeed have been the Riviera of the Middle East, owned and operated by and for Palestinians, and not Americans.

Qatar and others had been transferring tens of millions of dollars to Hamas on a regular basis over the past 19 years of Hamas rule. Hamas had received enough money to develop Gaza into such a Riviera. But Hamas chose not to build housing for Palestinians living in refugee camps, nor to reconstruct Gaza as a pathway to Palestinian statehood, and not to turn Gaza into a magnet for investment and international tourism.

Instead it chose to spend the billions on stockpiling weapons and building an extraordinary 500km long network of underground tunnels, military headquarters and weapons manufacturing sites. The reason it made that choice is because, for jihadist Hamas, the destruction of Israel took precedence over the development of Gaza.

This ideology is also the reason Hamas was prepared to sacrifice the lives of Gaza’s population. When Hamas launched its massacre of 1200 Israelis and the kidnapping of 250 hostages, it knew Israel would retaliate massively. That was part of the strategic plan to involve Iran, Hezbollah, Houthis, Iraq and other members of the Iranian axis. Nevertheless, it built no bomb shelters for Gazan civilians and banned them from taking shelter in its network of tunnels. These were reserved for Hamas operatives only. After 15 months of war, there were 47,000 Gazans dead, hundreds of thousands injured, and a devastated terrain.

The world-wide media uproar about Trump’s Riviera plan for Gaza deflects from a fundamental truth. It is Hamas that unleashed this catastrophe on both Palestinians and Israelis.

Trump’s Riviera plan represents a denial of any Palestinian right to self-determination, either in Gaza or as part of a two state solution alongside Israel. Trump spoke breezily about taking over Gaza and expelling 2 million Palestinians.

It is Hamas that has dealt this blow to the aspiration of Palestinian statehood.

Address


Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when WomanGoingPlaces posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to WomanGoingPlaces:

Shortcuts

  • Address
  • Alerts
  • Contact The Business
  • Claim ownership or report listing
  • Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?

Share

Our Story

Welcome to the page of www.womangoingplaces.com.au - an online community of women over 50.

We share the stories of Women of Oz - our experiences, opinions, achievements, grievances, information and our knowledge.