18/12/2025
Five media myths were quietly challenged this year...
Media doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It sits inside society, reflecting changes in behaviour, technology and culture as they happen. That’s what makes it powerful, but it also means long-held beliefs need to be revisited as conditions change.
As the year wraps up, we took a step back to look at the gap between what feels true in media conversation and what Australian research and real-world planning experience suggest is actually happening. In doing so, a few familiar assumptions didn’t hold up quite as neatly as they once did.
One example is attention. Despite constant claims that attention spans are collapsing, Australian research from ThinkTV shows people are still spending meaningful time with long-form video, BVOD and premium environments. What’s changed isn’t attention itself, but patience for low-quality creative and poor context.
https://thinktv.com.au/facts-and-stats/
The same applies to reach. Modelling from ThinkTV’s Payback Australia work shows that piling on reach without managing attention, frequency and context quickly leads to diminishing returns and wasted impressions, rather than better outcomes.
https://thinktv.com.au/facts-and-stats/payback-australia-full-report/
There’s also been a quiet rethink around optimisation. While platforms have become more powerful, cross-media work from IAB Australia reinforces that outcomes are largely shaped upstream, by how audiences are defined, prioritised and sequenced across channels, not by last-minute tweaks in dashboards.
https://iabaustralia.com.au/ai-ready-advertising-infrastructure/
Data is another area where more hasn’t necessarily meant better. Deloitte’s research on data overload highlights how growing volumes of metrics can actually make decisions harder, increasing noise rather than clarity. The value of data lies in how its integrated and interpreted.
https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/digital-transformation/valuing-data-assets.html
And finally, cost. Benchmarking work from Ebiquity plc continues to show that CPMs alone are a poor proxy for media value, because they ignore reach accumulation, duplication and business impact. Value sits in outcomes, not impressions, particularly when comparing digital and TV.
https://ebiquity.com/news-insights/blog/in-defence-of-spend-on-the-right-hand-side/
Taken together, these examples reinforce a core truth of media practice: effectiveness has always relied on testing opinions against evidence. The tools and environment may be new, but the discipline required is not.
#2025