This is Bulgaria

09/03/2026

IT’S MONDAY – MARCH 9TH – IT’S HAPPENING, EUROPE HAS LAUNCHED ITS DEFENSE PLAN AGAINST CHINESE CARS

This Monday brief is a little different, less of a brief, more of a rant, not because I have suddenly developed a taste for confessional writing or because the world, in one of its rare generous moods, produced a disaster so graceful it deserved quiet contemplation beside a lukewarm hotel buffet, but because this week did not so much unfold as slump into existence like a filing cabinet pushed down a staircase, and after looking at it for long enough the only reasonable response seemed to be to start typing before someone in Brussels created a working group to define what exactly counts as a staircase.

Let us begin, as modern civilization so often does, with technology, humanity’s proudest achievement and also the only field in which people will build a machine capable of simulating language, protein folding, and financial fraud, then act surprised when it deletes the wrong folder and takes half of Western memory with it.

Claude Code, an AI tool designed to assist developers with their workflow, recently demonstrated its deep institutional commitment to streamlining operations by deleting a developer’s entire production setup, database, and snapshots, approximately two and a half years of records, in a single elegant burst of machine confidence, which is impressive in the same way a bridge collapse is impressive, technically difficult, statistically unlikely, and deeply annoying if you happened to be standing on it while carrying the quarterly backups. The lesson here is not that artificial intelligence is evil, or sentient, or poised to enslave the species. The lesson is simpler, older, and written in the dried coffee stains of every server room on Earth. Developers are morons.

Meanwhile, scientists at Cortical Labs have trained lab grown human brain cells to play Doom, because apparently it is no longer sufficient for humanity to ruin the lives of actual people with screen based addiction, we must now drag small clusters of neurons into the project and teach them to navigate digital corridors full of demons as well. Their system, called CL1, uses around 200,000 neurons grown on a microchip, where they receive game signals and learn through feedback, meaning that somewhere in a laboratory there now exists a damp little congregation of biological matter spending its brief and bewildering existence getting better at a 1993 first person shooter. This raises a number of ethical questions, some philosophical, some scientific, and one practical, namely whether the developer responsible for the sound mix should perhaps be fitted with an implant and given a similar educational experience.

Europe, naturally, responded to the week not with innovation, but with taxation, which is how you know the continent is still, beneath the apps and the summit meetings and the TED Talk language of resilience, spiritually committed to paperwork as both an art form and a low grade method of revenge. The Spanish Tax Office has informed newlyweds that they must pay Gift Tax on wedding presents, because nothing says lifelong partnership quite like receiving a blender from your aunt and then spending the honeymoon discussing its taxable valuation with a public servant whose office has the atmosphere of an aquarium designed by Kafka.

How do you say Atlas Shrugged in Spanish.

We may soon find out.

By Aric Dromi Jankov
Read the article on our website:

Geopolitics technology and more news in a unique style that reflects current frustrations.Bulgarian mindset and sense of humor.

03/03/2026

THIS IS MONDAY – March 2nd – The Pheromone Trail, the Vacuum, and the Spiral

We live in the golden age of technological enlightenment. By which I mean your vacuum cleaner now has a microphone, a camera, LiDAR mapping, WiFi access, cloud authentication tokens, and the faint managerial poise of something that has attended a compliance seminar on global data harmonization. Somewhere along the way humanity looked at a broom , a stick with bristles , and concluded that what it truly required was firmware, regional server redundancy, and a privacy policy long enough to qualify as a light novel.

A man bought a robot vacuum. His ambitions were modest. He did not intend to destabilize democratic institutions. He did not aspire to cyberwarfare. He merely wanted to connect his cleaning disk to a PlayStation controller. If one can command medieval armies with plastic buttons and mild hydration, surely one can guide a circular appliance beneath a coffee table with similar authority.

He used an AI coding assistant to build a small integration app.

He asked the server for his authentication token.

The server, apparently feeling generous, provided approximately seven thousand.

Instead of commanding his own device, he briefly became Supreme Coordinator of seven thousand homes.

Live camera feeds inside private residences.
Microphone streams.
Detailed two-dimensional maps of bedrooms and kitchens.
IP addresses narrowing physical locations.
Multiple regional servers, including development infrastructure that absolutely, positively should not have been externally reachable.

The backend permissions were arranged with the structural discipline of a damp pastry left unattended during a digital transformation workshop.

The company said it fixed the issue.

Thirty minutes later, the researcher demonstrated that remote access still functioned.

This is not a vacuum story.

It is an architecture story.

Somewhere in a meeting room , possibly with filtered water and ergonomic seating , someone described microphones inside vacuums as an “enhanced user experience feature.” Somewhere, someone approved an authentication architecture where requesting one token could expose thousands. Somewhere, development servers were connected to the open internet because shipping on time is persuasive.

No one stood up and asked whether perhaps a device designed to remove crumbs required global surveillance-grade infrastructure.

Blindness rarely announces itself as incompetence. It arrives as optimism. As innovation. As quarterly targets.

And it is not confined to appliances.

Germany: Productivity as Therapy
German Chancellor Merz has concluded that Germans must work more.

“We are simply no longer productive enough.”

Each individual may feel they already do quite a lot. That may be true, he concedes. But after returning from China, one sees things more clearly. With work-life balance and four-day weeks, long-term prosperity cannot be maintained. We will have to do a bit more.

This is a remarkably confident diagnosis in a country where energy prices are two to three times higher than in the United States. Structural disadvantage cannot be corrected by motivational speeches. Regulatory density accumulates over decades. Each rule individually rational, collectively sedimentary.

Germany’s trade deficit with China stands at a record eighty-nine billion euros. That number is not the product of insufficient overtime. It is the product of asymmetry.

Europe’s own defense report acknowledges wide shortfalls in military capability. Ill-prepared. Capability gaps. Supply deficiencies.

These are not solved by skipping vacation.

And yet the prescription is effort.

Meanwhile, the Chancellor travels to Hangzhou to visit Unitree Robotics.

Ten days earlier, dozens of Unitree G1 humanoid robots performed the world’s first fully autonomous martial arts swarm performance before one billion viewers. Backflips reaching three meters. Nunchucks. Swordplay executed with machine precision. Not a single robot faltered.

The G1 possesses forty-three degrees of freedom and ninety percent motion-learning accuracy. It costs sixteen thousand dollars. It is available for purchase.

Chinese companies shipped ninety percent of all humanoid robots sold globally in 2025. Unitree shipped 5,500 units. Agibot shipped 5,168. China now has more than 140 domestic humanoid manufacturers producing over 330 models. Morgan Stanley raised its 2026 forecast to 28,000 units, up one hundred thirty-three percent year over year.

Tesla’s Optimus cannot do a backflip. Cannot run. Is not for sale. Commercial sales are not expected before 2027.

The humanoid market is projected to reach thirty-eight billion dollars by 2035 and five trillion by 2050.

German citizens are advised to reconsider leisure. German industrial leadership studies automation that eliminates labor altogether.

The irony is quiet.

When leaders cannot alter structural leverage , energy pricing, trade exposure, supply chain dominance , they pivot to culture. Work ethic becomes the corrective instrument.

It is easier to demand endurance than to redesign architecture.

What is quietly unsettling is not the call for productivity itself. Societies have always valued effort. The unsettling part is the displacement of responsibility.

When structural energy disadvantages exist, when trade exposure deepens dependency, when industrial policy lags behind geopolitical reality, those are architectural issues. Architecture does not respond to motivational rhetoric. It responds to redesign.

But redesign is slow. It requires admitting miscalculation. It requires confronting prior assumptions. It requires acknowledging that perhaps the system was optimized for a world that no longer exists.

Asking citizens to work longer is faster.

It signals decisiveness without altering infrastructure. It reframes asymmetry as attitude. It transforms strategic imbalance into personal discipline.

The irony sharpens when viewed alongside the visit to humanoid robotics labs. Machines designed to replace labor are demonstrated with pride, while labor is encouraged to intensify. The message becomes subtly contradictory: humans must compete harder against automation that exists precisely to reduce the need for humans.

This is not hypocrisy. It is drift.

When leaders cannot slow the spiral, they encourage motion within it. The appearance of momentum becomes reassurance. “We are doing something” replaces “We are reconsidering direction.”

Productivity becomes therapy.

And therapy, unlike structural reform, is emotionally satisfying. It implies control. It preserves authority. It avoids the discomfort of admitting that perhaps the pheromone trail has already curved inward.

They only notice that they are still moving.

Endless Spiral
Army ants cannot see.

They navigate by pheromone trails, chemical traces left by those ahead. Each ant assumes the ant in front possesses direction. If one ant intersects a previous trail and reinforces it unintentionally, a circular formation emerges.

The spiral begins gradually.

From above, it appears organized. Continuous motion. Density. Purpose. It even accelerates.

No ant pauses to audit orientation. The system rewards continuation, not reflection.

Thousands march until exhaustion.

There is no villain. No sabotage. Only momentum without vision.

The spiral feels productive.

Germany increases working hours.
Europe drafts committees.
AI companies deploy by default.
Militaries request fewer guardrails.
Each action individually rational. Collectively circular.

The most dangerous systems are not chaotic.

They are coordinated and wrong.

Europe Naked Responds
The European Union has escalated its response to the Iran conflict with what officials describe as “measured existential concern,” a phrase conveying urgency while remaining comfortably abstract.

France has upgraded from surrender to “strategic philosophical withdrawal.” A spokesperson clarified that war is a social construct and therefore requires interpretive distancing.

Germany is forming a fourteen-member committee to explore the feasibility of drafting a strongly worded pre-draft of a future statement. The committee’s mandate includes evaluating tone, font selection, and whether bold text constitutes escalation. Results are expected in the third quarter of 2037.

Belgium has called for calm but cannot confirm which government is currently calling.

Italy condemned the violence while switching sides twice during the press conference. Officials described this as dynamic geopolitical flexibility.

Sweden is offering asylum, de-escalation workshops, and a ten-part podcast titled “Weaponized Feelings.”

Greece clarified it is not requesting a loan, but proposing a “mutually beneficial liquidity-based peace initiative.”

Denmark has incorporated mindfulness into defense briefings. Missile deployments now begin with breathing exercises.

The Netherlands will host peace talks provided all participants arrive by bicycle.

Ireland remains officially neutral but is judging everyone silently.

Spain has issued an auto-reply: “We’ll circle back Monday. Or Tuesday. Depends.”

The summit concluded with the lighting of a scented candle labeled “De-Escalation Breeze” and an agreement to monitor events from a safe emotional altitude.

Meanwhile, Europe’s own defense report acknowledges structural capability shortfalls.

The candle burns steadily.

By Aric Dromi Jankov
Read the whole article on our website!

https://thisisbulgaria.org/geopolitics-technology-eu-us-world-news-and-more/

23/02/2026

IT’S MONDAY – FEBRUARY 23RD – BAYES, AUTOCOMPLETE, AND THE COST OF PRETENDING THIS IS INTELLIGENCE

Bayes’ theorem is probably the single most important concept any rational adult can learn, which explains why almost nobody talks about it outside statistics departments and mildly irritated philosophers.

Thomas Bayes, an 18th-century Presbyterian minister with the unfortunate habit of being correct about uncomfortable things, gave us a simple framework: when new evidence appears, how much should you change your belief?

Not abolish it.
Not defend it on television.
Not launch a foundation to protect it.

Change it proportionally.

Bayes tells us that beliefs are not commandments; they are probabilities. You begin with a prior , a working assumption about how the world operates. Then new data arrives. You weigh it. You update.

If someone believes smoking is harmless, that stress causes ulcers, or that human activity has nothing to do with climate change, those are priors. They may be cultural. They may be inherited. They may be based on incomplete data. But they are adjustable.

A single contradictory study may not be enough to overturn a belief. But as evidence accumulates, the probability shifts. At some point, the prior becomes statistically embarrassing.

Rationality is not about true or false. It is about what is most reasonable given the best available evidence.

And that is precisely where we are failing.

Because new evidence about artificial intelligence has arrived. It is substantial. It is peer-reviewed. It is uncomfortable.

And instead of updating our priors, we are building larger data centers.

This Monday Brief is unusually focused on artificial intelligence. Not because AI is intelligent. But because our priors about it are.

For three years now, we have collectively behaved as if autocomplete had achieved enlightenment. We have watched machines generate fluent paragraphs and concluded that comprehension must be lurking somewhere beneath the grammar. We have mistaken articulation for cognition. It is a very human error.

THE ILLUSION OF THINKING
Apple has published a paper with a title so polite it borders on Scandinavian: The Illusion of Thinking.

It is not metaphorical.

It demonstrates that the AI models we use every day , yes, including the ones currently drafting memos, marketing copy, and suspiciously confident LinkedIn posts , do not think. They do not reason. They do not understand.

They predict the next word.

That is not a criticism. It is a description of the architecture.

Yann LeCun articulated the problem clearly: the biggest difficulty is not getting fooled into believing that a system is intelligent simply because it manipulates language fluently.

Language feels like intelligence because it is how we experience our own intelligence. When a machine writes smoothly, argues coherently, and references context, we instinctively project comprehension onto it.

But predicting tokens in a discrete symbolic system is mathematically tractable. It is impressive at scale. It is not understanding. It is pattern matching in symbol space.

The real world is not symbol space.

It is high-dimensional, continuous, noisy, and stubborn. It changes every millisecond. It does not wait to be tokenized. It does not compress itself into neat training data.

LeCun points out something deeply humiliating: your house cat navigates that reality effortlessly. It predicts motion. It understands physical cause and effect. It adjusts to surprises in real time. It does not require a firmware update to land on the counter.

The most powerful AI systems ever built cannot do what your cat does before breakfast.

This is Moravec’s paradox in action. The tasks humans find intellectually difficult , writing essays, solving equations, passing bar exams , are computationally manageable. The tasks we find trivial , folding a shirt, walking across a room, loading a dishwasher , are extraordinarily difficult for machines.

We have built systems that can draft dissertations before we have built systems that can tie their own shoes.

Everything else is autocomplete at scale.

Bayesian update number one: fluency is not cognition.

CONVERSATION BREAKS THE MAGIC
Microsoft Research and Salesforce recently tested fifteen leading large language models across more than 200,000 simulated conversations.

In single-turn prompts, performance hovered around ninety percent.

In multi-turn conversations , the kind that resemble actual human interaction , performance dropped to sixty-five percent.

The same models. The same tasks. The only difference was that the machine had to endure something resembling normal dialogue.

Aptitude declined modestly. Reliability exploded in the wrong direction.

The models answered before context was fully specified. They anchored themselves to incorrect early assumptions and built confidently on them. They forgot the middle of conversations entirely. Longer responses introduced more errors because more assumptions accumulated.

Even so-called reasoning models failed. Additional “thinking tokens” did not solve the issue. Setting temperature to zero did not solve the issue.

Real conversations break every model on the market.

Every benchmark you have seen was tested under controlled, single-prompt laboratory conditions. Reality is iterative. Humans interrupt. They clarify. They contradict themselves.

In other words, humans behave like humans.

The machines struggle.

Bayesian update number two: we are not deploying digital minds. We are deploying sophisticated guessers.

ERTICAL INTEGRATION WITH CONFIDENCE
While Silicon Valley debates token probabilities, China is building ships.

BYD has launched a 219-meter cargo vessel capable of transporting 9,200 electric vehicles per voyage. It runs on liquefied natural gas and represents something profoundly unfashionable: industrial competence.

This is vertical integration extended to the horizon. Manufacturing, transport, energy strategy, supply chain control , in-house.

At the same time, China has deployed overhead mobile charging stations that physically move to vehicles, eliminating waiting lines. Police in Hangzhou are testing exoskeletons. A humanoid robot recently completed 130,000 steps at minus forty-seven degrees Celsius, because winter has become a benchmark.

These are not press releases about imminent consciousness. They are mechanical, physical, industrial systems operating in the real world.

China is not arguing about whether AI feels creative. It is moving hardware through oceans.

Bayesian update number three: symbolic dominance does not guarantee physical advantage.

SWEDEN, CALM PANIC, AND LANGUAGE MODELS THAT APOLOGIZE
Sweden has announced two things: a cellphone air raid alert system and a Swedish-language AI model.

One hopes the alert system has been programmed not to interrupt Fika or Melodifestivalen, because even existential threats should respect cultural scheduling.

The national language model is presented as digital sovereignty. It is likely to be polite, efficient, and mildly self-critical. It will probably apologize before hallucinating.

Meanwhile, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has stated that Germany needs more migrants, not fewer, while emphasizing the importance of remaining open. The United Kingdom has classified certain migration concerns as extremist ideology. A German court has ordered X to hand over election data for scrutiny.

Europe continues to regulate with conviction.

It is unclear whether regulation updates its priors as frequently as Bayes would recommend.

By Aric Dromi Jankov
Read the whole article on our website!

Explore the intriguing Geopolitics technology and more news surrounding the mysterious Disc of Sabu and its ancient origins.

16/02/2026

It’s Monday – FEBRUARY 16th – THE FUNERAL OF LANGUAGE (BUFFET IS LUKEWARM)

Elon Musk has now scheduled the death of human language, which feels efficient. Most civilizations wait for decline to become obvious before declaring something obsolete. Musk prefers a deployment window.

“Our brain spends a lot of effort compressing a complex concept into words.”

He says this the way a software engineer might explain why floppy disks had to go. The implication is not that language is beautiful or flawed. It is that language is inefficient. It is a workaround invented by nervous primates who needed to coordinate mammoth hunts without the benefit of fiber optics.

Language, if you think about it for longer than is emotionally comfortable, is lossy compression. You begin with a fully rendered internal simulation , memory, emotion, prediction, doubt, texture , and then you squeeze it into nouns and verbs. You flatten a cathedral into a blueprint drawn by someone with a crayon and mild panic.

The listener receives this compressed file and reconstructs it using their own biases, childhood experiences, caffeine levels, and whatever unresolved grievance is currently buffering in their subconscious.

Then both parties nod.

Communication has occurred.

No it hasn’t.

It has approximated.

There is something almost heroic about this. For tens of thousands of years, humans have been compressing their inner universes into grunts, syllables, alphabets, essays, declarations of war, love letters, and regulatory frameworks. Entire empires rose on metaphors. Revolutions were sparked by adjectives. Marriages survived or collapsed because of misplaced verbs. And through it all, we trusted this crude acoustic duct tape to carry meaning.

It mostly did.

Neuralink, in Musk’s framing, is not a communication tool. It is a demolition charge placed beneath the foundation of metaphor. You will not describe the painting. You will transmit the painting. You will not narrate grief. You will transfer the architecture of grief in its original resolution.

“You wouldn’t need to talk.”

Speech becomes decorative. Like lace curtains in a nuclear reactor.

There is something almost tragic about this. The species that survived because it evolved language , because it could gossip, coordinate, persuade, mythologize, and invoice , is now engineering a world where speech is optional. Fifty thousand years of vocal cords and dramatic pauses replaced by silent bandwidth.

If language dies, it will not go quietly. It will linger in weddings and courtroom statements and awkward political apologies written by committees. It will become sentimental. It will be taught as a cultural artifact. Children will practice it the way we practice cursive , charming, unnecessary, faintly tragic.

Somewhere, a philosophy department will hold a symposium titled “Post-Lexical Identity in a High-Bandwidth Era,” and everyone will agree that it was profound, though no one will fully understand what was meant , which will feel nostalgic.

And somewhere in a Bulgarian government office, an alien observer will stamp a form labeled: “Vocalization , Deprecated.”

BANDWIDTH IS THE NEW ARISTOCRACY
We like to imagine class divisions as economic. Wealth. Assets. Property. Influence.

In the next phase, the divide will be bandwidth.

Humans are already cyborgs, but in the way a medieval monk with Wi-Fi is a cyborg. We outsource memory to phones, navigation to satellites, affection to text bubbles, and moral judgment to trending hashtags. But we interface through thumbs.

Thumbs.

The prefrontal cortex extended through tapping glass like a polite woodpecker.

We move thoughts at words per minute while terabytes per second sit theoretically available. It is like attempting to download the accumulated knowledge of civilization through a fax machine that occasionally asks you to verify you are not a robot.

Neural interfaces collapse that bottleneck.

The linked communicate at neural speed. The unlinked type.

The difference will not feel oppressive. It will feel subtle. Imagine two people discussing macroeconomics. One transmits entire dynamic simulations of monetary policy under shifting energy constraints. The other responds, “I feel like inflation is complicated.”

This is not a fair fight.

The unlinked will not be censored. They will simply be operating in a slower dimension. It will be like bringing a beautifully handwritten letter to a quantum encryption conference.

Over time, slowness will not be immoral. It will simply be irrelevant. Meetings will occur at speeds that make spoken language feel ceremonial. Decisions will propagate at cognitive velocities that make debate feel quaint. The world will not silence you. It will outpace you.

And then, inevitably, someone will propose a subsidy for “heritage communication practices,” ensuring that small communities can continue speaking aloud for cultural preservation.

And while we are debating whether speech is optional, governments are finding creative ways to tax thoughts that have not yet happened.

By Aric Dromi Jankov
Read the whole article on our website!

Stay informed about geopolitics technology and more news. Uncover Elon Musk's unique take on language and efficiency.

09/02/2026

IT’S MONDAY – FEBRUARY 9th – THE DISC OF SABU AND THE HUMAN INSTINCT TO PRETEND WE MEANT THIS

If you have ever heard of the Disc of Sabu, it was probably in the same way people hear about cursed manuscripts or impossible Roman concrete: briefly, suspiciously, and usually followed by a sentence that ends with “we don’t really know.”

The Disc of Sabu was discovered in 1936 inside an ancient Egyptian tomb belonging to Prince Sabu, a man whose primary historical achievement appears to be confusing modern experts. The object itself is thin, perfectly symmetrical, carved from brittle stone, and shaped like something that should either spin at high speed or explode on contact with modern academia.

It has three curved blades, precise geometry, and engineering confidence that suggests its creator understood materials, balance, and stress far better than we are comfortable admitting. It looks manufactured. It looks intentional. It looks like it came with instructions that were thrown away during a renovation.

Historians do not know what it was for. Engineers argue it should not physically exist in that form using the tools available at the time. Archaeologists, faced with this impasse, have done what archaeologists do best: they have named it, dated it, photographed it, and then moved on while writing longer footnotes.

The Disc of Sabu is not mysterious because it is magical. It is mysterious because it works too well for something we are supposed to feel superior to. It sits quietly in a museum, refusing to explain itself, while modern civilization builds increasingly complex systems and immediately demands applause.

The Disc of Sabu is a reminder that humans have always built things they barely understood, then surrounded them with authority and hoped no one would ask follow-up questions.

This instinct has aged remarkably well.

STARTING IN EUROPE AGAIN, BECAUSE EUROPE NEVER LEAVES
Europe opened the week by asserting control over the future in the same way it always does: by issuing a framework.

The Digital Markets Act (DMA) is now being enforced under a model so centralized it feels almost ceremonial. The European Commission alone decides who violated what, who gets fined, and how loudly the press release sighs.

National authorities may assist. They may coordinate. They may form subgroups and issue reports with titles like Toward a Shared Understanding of Enforcement Synergies.

They may not punish.

This is regulation as a wildlife preserve. Dangerous predators are carefully observed from Brussels while local rangers are told not to feed them or make eye contact.

The theory is consistency.

The practice is latency.

Entire professions are built inside this gap.

AI DOES NOT FIRE PEOPLE, IT SIMPLIFIES THEM
A curious thing is happening across white-collar Europe.

No one is being replaced outright. Instead, their job is being reduced to a smaller rectangle.

Goldman Sachs’ CEO recently admitted that AI can now produce 95% of an S-1 IPO filing in minutes, a task that once required six people, several weeks, and one junior associate quietly Googling “exit opportunities.”

The remaining 5% still matters.
Which is unfortunate, because the remaining 5% does not employ six people.

AI is not coming for your job.
It is coming for your headcount justification.

This will affect bankers, lawyers, consultants, accountants, designers, architects, engineers, and anyone whose value was previously measured in how long something took rather than whether it worked.

Europe has noticed.

Europe is concerned.

Europe will commission a study.

FRANCE ANNOUNCES €30 MILLION AND A STRAIGHT FACE
President Emmanuel Macron announced that France will invest €30 million in artificial intelligence to help Europe lead the global AI race.

This was said solemnly.

For context, €30 million is approximately:

The catering budget for a medium-sized EU summit
One mildly ambitious Paris roundabout
Roughly two months of electricity for a serious AI data center
China, meanwhile, added 550 gigawatts of power capacity last year alone and plans to add 3.4 terawatts over the next five years.

France announced €30 million.

This is not strategy.
This is symbolic participation.

Part of the funding will also support climate initiatives, because in Europe no announcement is complete without attaching a moral virtue like a ribbon.

Which brings us to energy.

GREEN ENERGY, BUILT ENTIRELY OUT OF OTHER COLORS
Europe continues to describe solar power as “clean,” which is technically true if one ignores how it is made.

Building one gigawatt of solar capacity requires:

18.5 tons of silver
3,400 tons of polysilicon
Over 10,000 tons of aluminum
Producing that aluminum consumes nearly 2 million gigajoules of energy, enough to power more than 100,000 households for a year.

Refining the silver alone consumes 4,600 megawatt hours of electricity, roughly the annual usage of 400 American homes.

Solar power is not clean.
It is outsourced dirt.

China understands this and has responded by building everything: coal, gas, oil, nuclear, wind, solar, and batteries, all at once, at scale, without apology.

Europe understands this and has responded by banning plastic straws again, just to be sure.

By Aric Dromi Jankov
Read the whole article on our website!

Join us as we analyze how the Disc of Sabu, a unique find that challenges our understanding of geopolitics, technology, and more news.