05/24/2022
You may have heard some sleep “experts” use the term “junk sleep” when it comes to where, when, and how our babies fall asleep. The theory goes that naps in the light, or a car seat, or stroller do not provide the ideal environment for babies to fall into a deep restful sleep. However, studies have actually shown that motion can promote deeper, longer stretches of sleep in both adults and babies, as well as boosting oxygen to the brain. That doesn’t sound like junk to me.
The term is also used to describe the kind of sleep adults get when they do not get enough, or have very disrupted sleep caused by screens or a chaotic environment. This is a more realistic use of the term.
Many sleep trainers will tell you the only way your baby will get quality sleep is alone, in a dark room, in a crib. But that simply doesn’t make evolutionary sense. If all other places and environments are “junk sleep” then the human race wouldn’t have survived this long.
We know from anthropology, neuroscience, and biology, that babies are meant to sleep in close proximity (ideally in direct contact) with a caregiver. We know that early humans didn’t have black out blinds or cribs, and wouldn’t leave a baby out of sight to get “good quality sleep” for fear of environmental dangers.
If motion, breastsleeping, contact, and daylight naps are junk sleep then our hunter-gatherer ancestors must have had some serious health problems. These practices are still considered normal by the majority of human society, and many primate species. The western view of solo infant sleep is the odd one out.
So, if someone tells you your baby is “junk sleeping” ask them for the evidence base behind this and see what they come up with! 😉
Does your baby “junk sleep”? Mine certainly does!