
06/04/2025
Behaviour change doesn’t fail because of the client.
It doesn’t fail because of the dog, the environment, the lack of trust, or motivation.
It fails when the structure to support it is missing — before the plan begins.
This work has shaped every part of my professional practice. I’m offering it here because it matters — and because it’s time others had access to it too.
There are three (3) natural-law-rooted, evidence-backed phases that reliably support behaviour change in complex cases.
And they are strategically absent from most formal training.
If you’re seeing compliance plateau, engagement drift, or results that don’t hold — this is likely why.
⸻
1. Align – This is not goal-setting. This is goal-elevation.
It means taking part-focused concerns (barking, reactivity, destruction) and helping the family hold a broader, achievable goal that reflects the full system their dog lives in.
A goal that connects — not fragments.
One that integrates the nervous system, the family, the environment, the rhythms of daily life.
Alignment gives you your touchstone. Without it, engagement collapses under confusion or misdirection.
David Stroh teaches that alignment lifts parts into shared system purpose — essential for coherence and momentum in change work.
⸻
2. Co-Create – This is where systems thinking becomes practical.
Milestones are mapped — not just by symptom or technique, but by identifying core influences shaping the behaviour.
Each milestone has multiple valid paths.
This honours complexity and keeps the family from feeling locked into one “right” method.
It allows for flexibility, adapts to context and capacity, and still holds the outcome.
Peter Senge reminds us that learning requires structures that allow reflection, iteration, and joint authorship — not prescriptive answers.
⸻
3. Sustain – This is the part most plans skip.
You build the structures that let change last — both internal (neurobiological readiness, relational stability) and external (routine, environment, caregiver capacity).
Change that isn’t supported will regress.
Not because the plan was wrong, but because the system never adapted to hold it.
Jay Forrester proved that structure drives behaviour. Donella Meadows warned: if the system doesn’t change, the outcome won’t either.
⸻
This three-phase design sits at the heart of Canine Neurobiological Systems Science (CNSS).
It isn’t a preference.
It’s what change requires.
⸻
Interested in learning how to implement this three-phase design in practice?
Leave a comment below — if I hear from 10 of you, I’ll host a webinar.
It will be barrier-free and pay-what-you-can.
No upsell. No pitch.
⸻
You’re invited to explore how it lives in practice inside the Dog Parentology Podcast —
Real-world cases, transparent failures, and what it takes to make behaviour change stick.
Start with the Dog Parentology Podcast — real case studies, real systems at play, and real change that held because the system changed first.
• RSS: https://rss.com/podcasts/dog-parentology-podcast/2037813
• YouTube: https://youtu.be/ThYzV0VTQwk?si=xYMQKWtOsPNb6FdL
• Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/…/the-dog…/id1767638360
⸻
For professionals:
See Canine Neurobiological System Science applied to medication and complex case planning in my latest paper:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391899664_Systems_Thinking_in_Dog_Medication