China IP

China IP China IP comprehensively reports the latest developments of Chinese IP Industry

Dialogue with   CEO: 2026-2029 Strategic PlanOn July 17, Etienne Sanz de Acedo, CEO of the International Trademark Assoc...
05/08/2025

Dialogue with CEO: 2026-2029 Strategic Plan

On July 17, Etienne Sanz de Acedo, CEO of the International Trademark Association (INTA), held his first collective meeting with nearly 20 leading Chinese media outlets in Beijing. This historic exchange not only demonstrated INTA's strong commitment to the Chinese market but also marked the beginning of a new chapter in its collaboration with Chinese media. Together, they explored the future development and trends of global intellectual property.

During the media exchange, Intellectual Property Observers(China IP) engaged in a discussion with Etienne about the association's 2026-2029 strategic plan. Here's a transcript of the conversation.

Intellectual Property Observers(China IP) : Hello Etienne,I am Jane from Intellectual Property Observers(China IP). My question is the2026~2029 strategic plan expands INTA,terminology from brands to intellectual property with clear coverage of nontraditional trademark fields,such as copyrights and trade secrets Does this positioning or adjustment suggests that INTA will reduce resource allocation priority to trademark protection? Thank you.

Mr. Etienne Sanz de Acedo: Very good observation. In fact,if we go even back by name were international trademark association. And in the past and if you look at the Strategic Plan of,let's say,8 or 12 years ago,it was all about trademarks. Now we did a conscious transition from trademarks to brands to precisely embrace the change within companies to talk about the commercial side of IP and over the years,we've performed a global expansion,but also substantive expansion where we've been covering trademarks,designs,copyrights,data privacy,right of publicity,trade secrets more or less recently.

And as now we're looking into IP in a more holistic way,that means that we will be covering as well and we will be looking into patents.

Now I always say that our landing into patents is gonna be soft and steady,which means we want to take the time to reflect well on what should be our role. In the patent ecosphere,we want to start by educating our own members by raising awareness. But from there,we'll continue developing our activities.

Now the second part of your question will that reduce the allocation to trademark issues? Not at all. I think what INTA has proven over the years is that we have the capacity of continue expanding. That's thanks to our members. We should not forget that we're a global trade association,we're a global not-for-profit organization,but we're members organization and that means that our members as volunteers contribute to the work of the organization. Thanks to them. We can do as much as we do.

Photo: Mr. Etienne Sanz de Acedo
View the full article: https://www.chinaiptoday.com/post.html?id=2236

Licensing and technology transfers in Russia Medvedev, Senior Partner of Gorodissky & Partners and Valery Narezhniy, Cou...
01/08/2025

Licensing and technology transfers in Russia

Medvedev, Senior Partner of Gorodissky & Partners and Valery Narezhniy, Counsel of Gorodissky & Partners share their insights on licensing and technology transfers in Russia.

To view the full article:
https://www.chinaiptoday.com/post.html?id=2235

  Coffee Wins 5 Million Yuan in Trademark Case Against "LUCKY CAT COFFEE" InfringerLuckin Coffee(瑞幸咖啡) has secured a sig...
31/07/2025

Coffee Wins 5 Million Yuan in Trademark Case Against "LUCKY CAT COFFEE" Infringer

Luckin Coffee(瑞幸咖啡) has secured a significant victory in a trademark infringement case, with the Futian District People's Court in Shenzhen awarding the company 5 million yuan in compensation, as per a judgement released on July 21.

The case involved Hangzhou Reliu Brand Operation Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Hangzhou Reliu Company"), which operated under the "LUCKY CAT COFFEE(幸猫咖啡)" brand, and was accused of imitating Luckin Coffee's trademarks.

Founded in 2017, Luckin Coffee has rapidly expanded, reaching 24,032 stores according to its Q1 2025 financial report. With strong brand recognition, the company is a major player in China's coffee shop market.

Hangzhou Reliu Company, established in December 2020, registered the "LUCKY CAT COFFEE" trademark in 2022. The company operated 86 franchise stores nationwide, using branding closely resembling that of Luckin Coffee, including identical logos on coffee cups, paper bags, and staff uniforms. This led Luckin Coffee to file a lawsuit in 2023, demanding that Hangzhou Reliu Company stop the infringement, make a public statement to remove the effects, and pay 5 million yuan in damages.

In a judgement dated on July 29, 2024, the Futian District People's Court in Shenzhen ruled that the two trademarks were highly similar in appearance, color, and visual effect. Given the widespread recognition of Luckin Coffee's brand, the court concluded that the similarity of the trademarks across various platforms—storefront signs, coffee cups, and uniforms—created a significant risk of consumer confusion.

The court determined that Hangzhou Reliu Company had willfully infringed upon Luckin Coffee's exclusive trademark rights. Despite knowing the high market recognition of Luckin Coffee, Hangzhou Reliu Company had used a similar logo to engage in comprehensive imitation with clear malicious intent. The company had profited greatly by charging millions of yuan in franchise fees, making the infringement particularly severe.

Additionally, during the trial, the court instructed Hangzhou Reliu Company to provide evidence related to its franchise fees. However, the company failed to comply, obstructing the evidence-gathering process.

Based on the evidence submitted by Luckin Coffee, the court calculated that Hangzhou Reliu Company had earned at least 1.72 million yuan in franchise fees and imposed double punitive damages. The court ultimately set the compensation at 5.16 million yuan, fully supporting Luckin Coffee’s claim for 5 million yuan in economic losses and reasonable expenses.

Photo Source: Luckin Coffee
View the full article:
https://www.chinaiptoday.com/post.html?id=2234

  Loses "无印良品" Trademark Battle in China After 20-Year Legal DisputeAfter a 20-year legal battle, MUJI’s parent company ...
30/07/2025

Loses "无印良品" Trademark Battle in China After 20-Year Legal Dispute

After a 20-year legal battle, MUJI’s parent company Ryohin Keikaku Co., Ltd. ultimately lost its claim to the "无印良品" trademark in China for goods in Class 24. This case exemplifies an international brand losing a core category due to trademark strategy oversights and underscores the strict application of "territoriality" and "first-to-file" principles. It cautions multinational enterprises to proactively secure comprehensive category registrations to avoid rights forfeiture due to strategic missteps.

In 1999, when Japan's Ryohin Keikaku Co., Ltd. registered the "无印良品" trademark in China but failed to cover Class 24. In April 2000, Hainan Nanhua Industrial Co., Ltd. preemptively registered the Chinese trademark in this class (later transferred to Beijing Miantian Textile Co., Ltd.). Although Ryohin Keikaku filed oppositions and pursued other legal avenues to reclaim the trademark starting in 2001, it failed to prove actual use or acquired distinctiveness for Class 24 goods in mainland China prior to 2000. Meanwhile, it was involved in lawsuits from Miantian for using the "无印良品" trademark. Recently, as the Supreme People's Court finally dismissed its retrial application, bringing the dispute to a definitive end.

View the full article:
https://www.chinaiptoday.com/post.html?id=2233

Image from the official WeChat account of 无印良品 MUJI

Ningbo Fengwo Sued for CNY 56 Million in Patent Dispute with GarrettChinese turbocharger maker Ningbo Fengwo Turbocharge...
28/07/2025

Ningbo Fengwo Sued for CNY 56 Million in Patent Dispute with Garrett

Chinese turbocharger maker Ningbo Fengwo Turbocharger System Co., Ltd. (Fengwo) is facing two patent infringement lawsuits totaling RMB 56 million, filed by rival Garrett Motion (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of NASDAQ-listed Garrett Motion Inc., according to Fengwo's recent IPO prospectus.

The lawsuits were initiated since March 2025 at the Shanghai Intellectual Property Court and allege that Fengwo and its subsidiary Jiaxing Fengwo infringed on two of Garrett's Chinese patents: Patent ZL201810548510.0, titled "Turbocharger with Gas Flow Path and Liquid Flow Path", for which Garrett is claiming RMB 25 million in damages, and Patent ZL200910006885.5, titled "Turbocharger Assembly with Heat Shield Centering Configuration", with a compensation demand of RMB 31 million...

To view the full article, please click:
https://www.chinaiptoday.com/post.html?id=2232

Photo Source: Fengwo

Real or Fake “Snow King”?-“Mixue” was awarded Over 5 Million Yuan for Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition Case...
10/07/2025

Real or Fake “Snow King”?-“Mixue” was awarded Over 5 Million Yuan for Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition Case

In recent years, with the vigorous development of the new-style tea beverage market, Mixue has rapidly risen with its unique brand image and affordable pricing strategy, becoming a leading enterprise in the domestic fresh tea beverage industry. With its continuously rising brand awareness and market influence, by the end of 2024, Mixue had over 46,000 stores worldwide. However, along with the continuous enhancement of brand value, Mixue has also become a key target for trademark infringement and unfair competition behaviors. In recent years, counterfeit versions of “Mixue” store or its symbolic Snow King logo have not been uncommon, with attempts that tried to confuse consumer cognition by using imitative trademark signs, store decorations, product packaging, etc. similar to Mixue, seeking to unfairly profit from the brand reputation.

On October 17, 2024, the Baiyun District Court of Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, adjudicated a trademark infringement and unfair competition dispute case between Mixue Bingcheng and Zibo Bingyu Company, ruling that Zibo Bingyu Company as the defendant should compensate Mixue Bingcheng over 5 million yuan...

To view the full article, please click:
https://www.chinaiptoday.com/post.html?id=2231

Photo Source: Mixue Bingcheng Official Website

China Passes Revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law, Effective October 15, 2025 On June 27, 2025, China's National People's...
04/07/2025

China Passes Revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law, Effective October 15, 2025

On June 27, 2025, China's National People's Congress (NPC) passed the newly revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law, which will come into effect on October 15, 2025.

First introduced in 1993, the Anti-Unfair Competition Law serves as China's foundational legal framework aimed at promoting fair competition, regulating market practices, and ensuring the healthy operation of the market economy. The law underwent two revisions in 2017 and 2019. The current revision, passed during the latest NPC Standing Committee session, marks its third update.

In response to the rapid growth of the internet industry, the new revision addresses emerging challenges and evolving forms of online unfair competition, significantly improving the rules governing fair competition in the digital economy. This update comes at a crucial time to address new issues in the digital landscape.

The revised law, which now consists of 41 articles—up from the original 33—includes provisions on general principles, types of unfair competition behaviors, investigations of suspected violations, legal liabilities, and supplementary provisions. Below are some highlights of the law:..

To view the full article, please click:
https://www.chinaiptoday.com/post.html?id=2230

Disputes on   of inventions and utility models in RussiaPatenting of inventions and utility models in Russia involves a ...
02/07/2025

Disputes on of inventions and utility models in Russia

Patenting of inventions and utility models in Russia involves a mandatory full examination of patentability. Though examiners of the patent office (Rospatent) are quite experienced, disputes over patentability of an invention or utility model regularly arise between the applicant and the examiners or between the patentee and third parties who disagree with the grant of a patent.

The Russian patent system provides for administrative and judicial review of disputes on patentability of inventions and utility models...

To view the full article, please click:
https://www.chinaiptoday.com/post.html?id=2229

Dialogue with AWGIPC—Promoting the Protection and Commercialization of ASEAN Intellectual PropertyIn recent years, globa...
30/06/2025

Dialogue with AWGIPC—Promoting the Protection and Commercialization of ASEAN Intellectual Property

In recent years, global intellectual property (IP) protection and commercialization have increasingly gained attention, and the ASEAN region has been actively promoting the protection and development of IP. With the rapid growth of the digital economy and innovation sectors, ASEAN countries face various challenges and opportunities in IP protection, enforcement, and commercialization. To promote coordination and cooperation within the region, ASEAN established the Intellectual Property Cooperation Working Group (AWGIPC), which is dedicated to enhancing the IP capabilities of its member states and promoting policy coordination and the sharing of best practices.
AWGIPC advances progress in the field of IP across ASEAN member countries through regular meetings, the establishment of IP sharing platforms, and collaboration with international organizations, etc.

During the 14th Business of IP Asia Forum held in December 2024, the author had the privilege of inviting Mr. Xaysomphet Norasingh(Laos), Former Chairman of the AWGIPC(Note: Laos served as the Chair of AWGIPC from March 2023 to May 2025), to discuss the protection and development of intellectual property in ASEAN countries, as well as ASEAN's efforts in promoting the commercialization of IP...

To view the full interview, please click:
https://www.chinaiptoday.com/post.html?id=2228

  Subsidiaries Win 30 Million Yuan in Landmark   Protection CaseAlibaba subsidiaries Taobao, Tmall, and Taobao Software ...
27/06/2025

Subsidiaries Win 30 Million Yuan in Landmark Protection Case

Alibaba subsidiaries Taobao, Tmall, and Taobao Software (hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiffs") have secured a significant legal victory against the defendants who deployed "parasitic software" to scrape vast amounts of data from their platforms and sell it. This comes after a judgment recently released by the Nanjing Intermediate People's Court.

In a ruling dated June 12, the court determined that the defendants' actions infringed upon the plaintiffs' business secrets and constituted unfair competition. The plaintiffs were awarded 30 million yuan in damages...

To view the full article, please click:
https://www.chinaiptoday.com/post.html?id=2227

Photo: Alizila

Huawei Wins Key 5G Patent Ruling as MediaTek's Challenge Fails in ChinaHuawei has scored a notable win in its escalating...
24/06/2025

Huawei Wins Key 5G Patent Ruling as MediaTek's Challenge Fails in China

Huawei has scored a notable win in its escalating global patent dispute with MediaTek, as China's intellectual property authority has upheld the validity—partially—of one of Huawei's core 5G standard-essential patents (SEPs).

The contested patent, ZL201810211560.X, covers technology related to 5G Polar Code, a channel coding scheme strongly advocated by Huawei during the 5G standardization process. Alongside Qualcomm's LDPC code, Polar Code was adopted by 3GPP as a fundamental 5G coding method, marking a major milestone in China's 5G innovation. ..

To view the full article, please click:
https://www.chinaiptoday.com/post.html?id=2226

Photo:leiphone

  Toymaker Pop Mart Wins   Case, Strengthens Global hashtag   Protection EffortsPop Mart, a leading Chinese toy company ...
20/06/2025

Toymaker Pop Mart Wins Case, Strengthens Global hashtag Protection Efforts

Pop Mart, a leading Chinese toy company known for its popular Labubu brand, has secured a victory in a copyright infringement case against an online seller.

The judgment, issued by the People's Court of Yongkang City in Zhejiang Province and recently made public, concerns the unauthorized use of Pop Mart's Labubu Sports Series by an online store operated by XX Product Factory on the 1688.com platform. The court accepted the case on December 12, 2024...

To view the full article, please click:
https://www.chinaiptoday.com/post.html?id=2225

Photo Source: Pop Mart

Address

Beijing
Beijing

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when China IP posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to China IP:

Share