Main’POINTS opinion

19/04/2026

Fake NEWS & MEDIA platforms!

The discourse of global official media shapes the narrative through its language, imagery, and analysis. It prefers the term "conflict" to evoke the illusion of a war, presenting it as a balanced confrontation. It describes it as a "war on," emphasizing superiority rather than a "war between," which suggests equality.

Additionally, it indicates that the attacker receives substantial, well-supported, and precise aid, implying that without this support, they could not have caused deaths, destroyed homes, razed farms, or disrupted caravans; they are capable of doing so independently.

Another tactic used by hostile media is referring to "abductees" instead of "prisoners," creating the illusion that negotiations are unlikely to progress beyond prisoner releases.

19/04/2026

The distinction between this place and that one.!

In America, an atheist is simply called an atheist, and in Europe, the term is used with complete clarity and transparency.

However, here, he's referred to as a thinker and researcher in Islamic affairs an enlightened figure, akin to the Enlightenment's own era of enlightenment...

He is a researcher and journalist focusing on interfaith dialogue and the history of proverbs. A philosopher from the school of charlatan theorizing and the enrichment of the cartilaginous eggplant dialectic... An investigative expert on the origins of civilizations and the mechanisms of circumstances, and a lover of lamb!.

03/04/2026

Local and parliamentary elections!

France, with its right and left wings, refuses to hand over Algeria to the Algerians and cannot accept that Algeria gained independence through bloodshed and resistance on July 3, 1962.
The strongest proof of France's ongoing attachment to Algeria. Beyond material interests is what has happened recently.

After the French local elections, when political factions across the spectrum used Algeria as propaganda, featuring it in every rally, election event, and campaign poster, we are now, post-election, faced with two notable events in one day.
First, President Macron suddenly announced his visit to the new pope on April 10-11, just days before the pope's scheduled visit to Algeria, which had been planned a year ago and postponed twice. Why did Macron choose this precise timing for his Vatican visit? Second, the extreme right-wing French newspaper "Valor Actuel" published a 132-page special issue titled "When Algeria was French," nostalgic for colonial times.

The entire issue glorifies French colonialism, ignores the true Algerian history, and dismisses the non-French Algerian experience. Notably, Boualem Sansal appeared in an extensive interview, where he insulted and humiliated Algeria, its people, religion, language, and history, while praising his family's resistance to France's departure. When will we finally end this French influence, hostility, and strategies toward Algeria? Do the Algerians realize that France, in all its political, cultural, and social forms[old and new] is their primary adversary? Will they recognize this?

Local and parliamentary elections should serve as the cornerstone for building a new arsenal of deterrent beliefs against such serious transgressions, supported by some internal and external parties under the guise of reciprocity and correcting what the country has become accustomed to in terms of hidden colonialism under the guise of dependency, obligation, and the false historical link between France and Algeria, as if Algeria before French colonialism was not a sovereign state and did not exist at all!.

23/02/2026

reactions to the same event depend on awareness levels. Greater awareness leads to more balanced responses.

Tucker Carlson is arguably the most influential political podcaster in America today (a fact that's widely recognized).

He has effectively challenged the taboos of the Zionist right and Christian Zionism, leading to significant upheaval against Israeli aggression.
Despite being right-wing, Christian, and conservative completely disconnected from leftist, Islamic movements, or support for Palestine he works from an angle that dismantles Christian Zionist narratives and exposes their roots with remarkable skill and efficiency.

Unlike many liberal content creators, whose support for Palestine is often mixed with ideological barter and virtue signaling such as demanding support on LGBTQ+ issues or feminism in exchange for backing Palestine Carlson's approach is straightforward and impactful.
He's the first to truly grasp the links between Zionism and Christianity within America, exposing them thoroughly without relying on flaky leftist compromises to win favor among Muslims or Arabs.

This kind of media is rare genuinely committed to freedom, offering journalism that prioritizes truth over popularity. It’s far better than the superficial commentary of figures like Bassem Youssef, who have long exploited this issue, or the Arab American voices eagerly adopting Marxist labels to shield themselves from scrutiny when discussing Palestine.

This was an excellent episode honest, revealing, and representative of Carlson's work in this area, which consistently merits attention and ongoing follow-up.

13/02/2026

The oppressor's justice!

We are individuals who value standards, reasoning, and argumentation, finding comfort in facts and logic.
We reject chaos and improvisation, viewing them as reckless and crooked paths suited only for the lazy and slow, whose nights have become indistinguishable from days, blurring black and white.
Some find it tempting to believe they are tasked with distributing work to laborers and materials to the generous, where those present at the distribution receive the first and main share, while absentees get only crumbs.

This opportunism is a pure form of greed seizing what is available and withholding it when asked. Such individuals rush to secure their gains before it’s too late, sharing with allies as long as they hold power and spoils are accessible, aware of their frivolous nature.
They ignore standards, showing no respect for seniority, knowledge, or fairness, often influenced by frivolous people who resent those standards.

They claim to promote equality and fairness, but arguing with them reveals ruthless, outspoken figures who dominate gatherings with their roars. In today’s age, wolves run rampant, and the oppressed remain silent.

10/02/2026

Far from vanity, hypocrisy, and the habits of the most rich populace!

Years ago, Marcel Labrun, a Canadian, sold his tech firm for over $300 million. Expecting a flashy lifestyle like a mansion by the lake, a yacht, and luxury cars he chose an unexpected path.
Using nearly four million dollars of his own money, he traveled to Fredericton, New Brunswick, and started creating something rare: a village built on dignity, not pity. He founded '12 Neighbours,' a non-profit project with about 96 to 99 small homes designed for people who are formerly homeless or in shelters.
These homes aren't emergency shelters but permanent residences, each equipped with a kitchen, bed, private bathroom, furniture, heating, water, internet, and solar panels. Residents are treated as neighbors, not social problems.
Marcel expanded the project with a community center featuring a café and printing workshop, where formerly homeless individuals earn wages and regain pride.

The project later received over $12 million from the government for expansion, but it all began with Marcel's personal choice. He believes in empowering people to fish for themselves, not just giving or teaching them.
Many wealthy Arabs spend lavishly on cars, parties, or luxury items that could instead support villages like this one. If just one percent of their wealth went to meaningful projects, no Arab child would go hungry or drop out of school, and hospitals wouldn't be overwhelmed.
Marcel didn't wait for official permission; he used his own money to build his version of paradise before hoping for heaven. Each penny spent on human dignity is worth more than gold in Allah's eyes.

The question is:
When will Arabs build similar villages in every city?

This story is about real impact and a challenge to a world that has wealth but lacks courage.

09/02/2026

The nail that the Devil wants!

Originally a tale from Arab folklore called "Juha's Nail," it has been adapted into this visual clip. It shows how the devil can act for his own gain, no matter how long it takes. He schemes with cleverness and accuracy, reflecting what the "State of Satan" and its allies are currently doing. Let's listen carefully to grasp the story’s layers, its frightening similarities to today's events, and what might happen next.

This powerful story teaches a life-changing truth: the enemy doesn’t need your whole life—just one area you refuse to surrender. Don’t give him a nail to han...

08/02/2026

The West is caught between the false veneer of civilization and the recognition of insignificance.

While some aim to diminish the leaders and symbols of the Islamic world, portraying them negatively, European history is rife with stories of kings and princes whose private lives were scandalous. Still, some are regarded as heroes or saints today.

European royal palaces reveal strange details documented by their own historians, including notable rulers like Richard the Lionheart of England (12th century), who was seen as a crusader and saint in religion yet shared a bed with King Philip II of France, demonstrating political alliances.

Edward II of England (14th century) was infamous for his relationships with men, particularly with Pierce Gaveston, leading to conflicts with nobles and with his wife, Queen Isabel, with whom he was more interested in distributing gifts from France than in attending his wedding.

James I of England (17th century) was known for his intimate relationships with men, even expressing love for Duke George Feliers in his letters, likening it to Christ's love for John.

Henry III of France (16th century) surrounded himself with young men called 'female gentles,' admired women's fashion, and indulged in perfumes, fueling rumors about him.

Philip I of France (17th century), Louis XIV's brother, was known for his femininity and jewelry, with relationships in court being publicly accepted.

Friedrich the Great of Prussia (18th century) was described as abnormal, with his inclinations causing conflicts with his father, who ordered the ex*****on of his friend Hans Hermann.

Christina, Queen of Sweden (17th century), refused marriage, dressed like a man, and behaved accordingly.

Ludwig II of Bavaria (19th century), known as the 'Swan King,' never married and struggled with his attractions and religious beliefs, eventually being labeled mad.

These facts are often ignored or portrayed as symbols of civility, while figures like Caliph Harun al-Rashid are deliberately mischaracterized.
They allege he was lustful, but in reality, he was a pious, devout man who performed Hajj, engaged in scholarship, and was humble—caring deeply about religion and justice.

This comparison clearly shows the difference between figures who truly led lives dedicated to worship and service, and those mythologized as legends today.

Jeffrey Epstein’s footsteps on their history are neither surprising nor unusual, it’s their natural reality.

08/02/2026

What goes around comes around!

In the United States, President Trump created a Faith Office in the White House.
In Europe, many parties were established with a Christian foundation. Israel was founded on a religious basis and has over ten religious parties.

Regarding Muslims, their leaders often demonize Islam by dubbing it "political Islam." When speaking to such ignorant individuals, they claim, "Political Islam has destroyed our homes."

I believe we might accept dropping "political Islam," but ask the West to give up political Christianity and the Jews to forsake Judaism. Yes, secular Arabs, what is your response to this?! Of course, if you dare reply, it’s impossible.
I don't understand you.
Your satanic loyalty has betrayed you. You are merely their foot soldiers, destined to perish beneath their feet. How wretched they are! Even their ignorance is deplorable.

04/02/2026

The West and the pigpen!

Many people make the mistake of mixing up progress with civilization and culture. Philosopher Ali Izetbegović explained this distinction clearly, saying that civilization is unbelieving, while culture involves belief.

He viewed civilization as the material side of human progress—industry, construction, science, and technology.

In contrast, culture represents ethical and spiritual values, rooted in religion and morality.

Therefore, Western civilization may be advanced in material terms, but it remains a civilization of the material, not of ethics.

Genuine culture shapes a person from within, refines the soul, and guides behavior toward truth, goodness, and beauty.

Without religion, civilization loses its conscience, and without faith, culture loses its purpose.

It’s crucial to distinguish between them carefully. Not all technologically advanced societies are truly civilized in a human sense, and simply possessing technology does not equate to valuing principles.

Religion is the spirit that prevents civilization from falling apart and gives progress enduring human meaning.

The Epstein scandal was not isolated; it exposed the ugly face of a world where desires are treated as laws, and corruption is tolerated as part of the system.

Here, Satan appears, not as a ruler on a throne, but as a seduction architect, making the tempting path look appealing so people walk into it willingly.

Satan does not use a sword; he uses an idea.
He does not command armies; he opens gateways to hearts when the light of values is extinguished.

He manipulates followers with illusions, gradually pushing them toward corruption until they believe their deviation is progress and their downfall is freedom.

In these crucial moments, the truth becomes clear:

Some sell their souls for influence, lust, or power,

and their "sacrifices" are principles trampled, rights violated, and consciences numbed.

The real battle is not between individuals or names, but between a light that awakens innate goodness and a darkness disguised as self-interest and slogans. Those unaware of this inner conflict see chaos; enlightened hearts understand that the devil does not lead with chains but with deception.