Pitchfork Politics

Pitchfork Politics UK + US public affairs, justice and protest stories โ€” including the ones most outlets overlook. Clear. Fair. Independent.

Peter Thiel is buying escape routes to New Zealand and Argentina while his company, Palantir, builds the surveillance in...
04/06/2026

Peter Thiel is buying escape routes to New Zealand and Argentina while his company, Palantir, builds the surveillance infrastructure weโ€™re all forced to live under
https://shorturl.at/srAdK

Before we hand more power to mayors, we should ask who is training them, what agenda they are being aligned to, and why ...
27/05/2026

Before we hand more power to mayors, we should ask who is training them, what agenda they are being aligned to, and why voters were never asked.

Devolution was meant to bring power closer to voters, not align our cities with global agendas the public never approved There is a question Britain has been strangely reluctant to ask. It is not whether our mayors are good at press conferences.

๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—•๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป?That is the question people overseas keep asking.And honestly, it is getting harde...
14/05/2026

๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—•๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป?

That is the question people overseas keep asking.

And honestly, it is getting harder to answer without sounding absurd.

In the country that gave the world Magna Carta, common law and parliamentary liberty, we now have a government pushing ahead with measures that should alarm anyone who still believes in basic democratic restraint.

Trial by jury is being curtailed.

Digital ID is being repackaged and pushed forward despite huge public resistance.

Britain is being edged closer to EU alignment through new legislation, with voters once again left wondering what happened to democratic consent.

And while the state insists it is protecting โ€œthe public goodโ€, it is now barring foreign conservative and anti-mass-migration speakers from entering the country to attend a political protest.

This is the same Britain where people are told everything is normal.

It is not normal.

A free country does not casually weaken jury trial.

A free country does not build digital identity systems while millions of citizens object.

A free country does not drift back into foreign rule-making by stealth.

A free country does not decide which political voices may or may not be heard before a protest has even taken place.

The issue is no longer left versus right.

It is power versus the public.

And the public is beginning to notice.

Britain is not falling in one dramatic moment.

It is being narrowed.

Clause by clause.

Bill by bill.

Ban by ban.

And every time the public objects, the answer from above seems to be the same:

You will accept it.

No.

We should not accept it.

Pitchfork Politics
Sharp political commentary for a country losing patience.

Join me at mattgoodwin.org

Why do governments suddenly look weaker everywhere? The old order is shaking, Britain feels next, and the world may not ...
14/05/2026

Why do governments suddenly look weaker everywhere? The old order is shaking, Britain feels next, and the world may not be ending โ€” it may be shedding its skin.

We are in a period where the old order is being challenged and the new one has not yet settled.

08/04/2026

I HEREBY DECLARE THAT I DO NOT GIVE FACEBOOK OR META MY PERMISSION TO USE ANY OF MY PERSONAL DATA.

For immediate releaseTHE MINISTRY OF MISSHAPEN MANDATES: WHY GOVERNING IS HARD WHEN YOUโ€™RE A BIT BENT OUT OF SHAPEBy Our...
15/03/2026

For immediate release

THE MINISTRY OF MISSHAPEN MANDATES: WHY GOVERNING IS HARD WHEN YOUโ€™RE A BIT BENT OUT OF SHAPE

By Our Political Correspondent

Dateline: Westminster โ€” In the sprawling aisles of British politics, the current Labour government is starting to look less like a finely tuned machine and more like the reduced-to-clear section at your local Morrisons.

You know the one. It's that section near the back of the store where the carrots look like they've lost a fight with a garden hoe, the parsnips resemble a thumbscrew, and the potatoes are shaped vaguely like the British Isles after a heavy night out. It's the โ€œNaturally Wonkyโ€ range.

And frankly, Sir Keir Starmer's administration is embracing the aesthetic with a little too much enthusiasm.

Just as Morrisons relaxed its specifications to ensure โ€œno veg gets left behind,โ€ No. 10 appears to have relaxed its specifications for basic governance. The result? A political harvest so bent, twisted, and oddly proportioned that it would make a farmer weep into their tractor's steering wheel.

Letโ€™s browse the aisle of this particular supermarket sweep, shall we?

THE PARSNIP THATโ€™S ALSO A U-BEND

First up in our wonky basket is the Minimum Wage for Young People. This policy is currently undergoing its sixteenth significant reshape of the Starmer premiership. One minute it's in the manifesto, the next it's being reviewed because business groups warned it was โ€œpricing a generation out of the workplace.โ€

It's like picking up a bag of potatoes only to find that half of them have decided to identify as sweet potatoes halfway home. You can't be cross about it, exactlyโ€”they're all still root vegetablesโ€”but it's not what you signed up for at the checkout.

Then there's the Farmers' Inheritance Tax, or as it's now known, the โ€œTractor Tax That Wasn't.โ€ Initially, Rachel Reeves rolled in with a plan that looked set to break up family farms like a bad breakup breaks up a folk band. Farmers took to the streets with their tractors, blocking Whitehall in a display of agricultural displeasure.

After a โ€œpersonal interventionโ€ by the Prime Minister, the government performed a U-turn so sharp it left skid marks on the M4. The threshold was bumped up. It's the political equivalent of picking up a wonky cabbage, noticing it has a massive hole in it, and the cashier shrugging, โ€œYeah, but it's naturally holey.โ€

THE SPROUTS THAT KEEP COMING BACK

Perhaps the most versatile item in the wonky range is the Winter Fuel Payment. This particular vegetable has been boiled, mashed, stewed, and turned into a smoothie. Initially, Labour stripped it from most pensioners to save a few quid. It was deeply unpopular. So they did a U-turn and gave it back to most pensioners, just with a slightly different income threshold.

It's the only vegetable in history that has been removed from the plate, scraped into the bin, and then retrieved from the bin because the family complained there was nothing to eat.

We also have the curiously shaped Employment Rights Bill. Remember the iron-clad promise of โ€œday oneโ€ rights for unfair dismissal? It was a cornerstone of Labour's pledge to workers. By the time the bill navigated its way through Parliament and the House of Lords, that โ€œday oneโ€ had quietly matured into a six-month probation period.

It's like buying a bag of โ€œWonky Applesโ€ only to find out that three of them are actually pears. Still fruit, still technically edible, but not quite the crunch you were expecting.

THE MOULDY TOMATO AT THE BOTTOM OF THE BAG

But just when you think you've finished your shop and are heading for the checkout, you notice it. At the very bottom of your basket, lurking beneath the wonky parsnips and the oddly-shaped sprouts, is a tomato that has gone spectacularly, spectacularly mouldy. It's leaking. It smells. And it seems to have been sitting there since 2009.

Welcome to the Lord Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein scandal โ€” the gift that keeps on giving, much like a forgotten bag of potatoes at the back of the cupboard.

Now, every savvy Morrisons shopper knows that a bit of wonk is acceptable, even charming. But a mouldy tomato? One that has been arrested by the Metropolitan Police? That's a different matter entirely.

It all started so simply. Sir Keir, in a moment of what he might now describe as โ€œoptimistic shopping,โ€ decided to appoint the veteran Labour figure Peter Mandelson as the UK's ambassador to the United States. A distinguished role for a distinguished peer. What could possibly go wrong?

Well, quite a lot, as it turns out. Because Lord Mandelson, it seems, came with some rather unusual labelling that No. 10 somehow failed to read.

Firstly, there was the small matter of his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the late financier and convicted s*x offender. This wasn't just a passing acquaintance. Newly released documents from the US Department of Justice revealed that Mandelson, while serving as Business Secretary in 2009, forwarded a sensitive economic briefing โ€” intended for the then Prime Minister Gordon Brown โ€” to Epstein. He also appeared to discuss government policy on bankers' bonuses and gave advance notice of a massive EU bailout. It was, as Gordon Brown himself put it, an โ€œinexcusable and unpatriotic actโ€ during a global financial crisis.

But the wonkiness doesn't stop there. Bank records suggested Epstein made three payments totalling $75,000 to accounts linked to Mandelson between 2003 and 2004. Mandelson claims to have โ€œno memoryโ€ of these transactions. He also appears to have celebrated Epstein's release from prison in 2009 with a gleeful email: โ€œHow is freedom feeling?โ€ to which Epstein replied with a rather unsavoury metaphor, and Mandelson responded, โ€œNaughty boy.โ€

It's the kind of correspondence you'd expect to find scribbled in the margins of a very, very wonky courgette.

Then came the photographs. One particularly striking image shows a smiling Mandelson and the disgraced former prince Andrew, both barefoot and dressed in bathrobes, sitting with Epstein. It's a visual that is, to put it mildly, not great for the brand.

The government's handling of this mouldy tomato has been a masterclass in wonky governance. It emerged that Sir Keir did not even interview Mandelson personally before handing him the keys to the Washington embassy. Instead, the vetting was left to two of Mandelson's long-time friends and protรฉgรฉs.

Itโ€™s like asking a squirrel to approve the security clearance for a nut.

The denouement has been predictably chaotic. Mandelson was eventually forced out of his diplomatic role and quit the Labour Party to avoid causing further embarrassment.

Sir Keir later admitted he regretted the appointment, saying that if he had known then what he knows now, Mandelson would never have been anywhere near government.

It is, without a doubt, the mouldiest tomato in the entire supermarket.

DONโ€™T FORGET THE MANDATORY EXTRAS

And just when you think you've finally finished your shop, you find the Digital ID Cards. Sold as a mandatory measure to deter illegal working, they were quietly put back on the shelf after a public consultation revealed that people aren't wildly keen on mandatory tracking. Now, a passport will probably do just fine.

It's the classic wonky veg paradox: you buy a wonky leek because it's cheaper and reduces waste, but you spend ten minutes cleaning the mud out of it. The government introduces a policy to reduce waste โ€” of money, of time โ€” but spends ten months cleaning up the political mud it trails through the house.

The government even had to U-turn on U-turning the local elections, reinstating votes that were postponed due to a lack of resources, only to uncancel them amid a legal challenge.

That's not just a wonky vegetable; that's a vegetable that has achieved sentience, realised it's in a supermarket, and tried to roll itself back to the farm.

NATURALLY WONKY, NATURALLY WONDERFULโ€ฆ MOSTLY?

Morrisons markets its wonky range with the slogan: โ€œNaturally wonky, naturally wonderful.โ€ It suggests that just because something isn't perfectly straight, it's still perfectly good.

And perhaps that's the takeaway here.

In the grand tradition of Yes, Minister, governing is inherently messy. It involves compromises, double-speak, and the occasional baffling retreat.

Sometimes the weird-looking carrot tastes just as sweet as the straight one.

You just have to peel a bit more of the skin off to get to the good part.

And perhaps, just perhaps, throw the mouldy one in the bin before anyone calls the police.

Her name is Rachel. And the H in her name was added so it would not correlate with the name Megan when her name appeared...
14/02/2026

Her name is Rachel. And the H in her name was added so it would not correlate with the name Megan when her name appeared in the Epstein files. This was all planned a very long time ago.

BREAKING NEWS! Meghan markle's secret friendship with Jeffrey Epstein confirmed in emails released. Royal family braces for more scandal as Prince Harry fall...

EU VOTING ROW FUELS UK CONCERNS OVER ELECTORAL INTEGRITYClaims that European governments are altering migration and voti...
07/02/2026

EU VOTING ROW FUELS UK CONCERNS OVER ELECTORAL INTEGRITY

Claims that European governments are altering migration and voting policies to influence future elections are gaining traction online, following recent political developments in France and Spain.

In France, controversy has followed reports that a parliamentary committee examined proposals related to voting rights for long-term non-EU residents at the local level. While no law has been passed and any such change would require full parliamentary approval, critics argue the discussion reflects an attempt to reshape the electorate as support rises for the opposition National Rally, led by Marine Le Pen.

French authorities note that voting in national elections remains restricted to French citizens, and that existing constitutional safeguards apply.

In Spain, the government has advanced proposals to regularise the status of large numbers of undocumented migrants. Officials say the move is intended to address labour shortages and bring workers into the formal economy. Opponents argue it could encourage further migration and, over time, expand the voting population, a claim the government disputes, noting that citizenship and voting rights are subject to lengthy legal processes.

Similar speculation has emerged in Germany, where the right-wing Alternative for Germany (AfD) is polling strongly, as well as in other EU states.

Election law experts caution that changes to voting rights in EU democracies are tightly regulated and subject to judicial review, but acknowledge growing public mistrust around electoral systems.

UK-FOCUSED ANGLE
EUROPEAN VOTING CONTROVERSIES SPARK QUESTIONS IN UK OVER ELECTORAL INTEGRITY

Political debates unfolding in France and Spain are fuelling renewed scrutiny in the United Kingdom over migration, voting rights, and public confidence in democratic systems.

Online commentators and political activists have pointed to recent developments in France, where proposals concerning local voting rights for non-EU residents were discussed at committee level, and in Spain, where the government has moved to regularise undocumented migrants. While no direct link to voting changes in the UK has been proposed, critics argue these cases illustrate a broader European trend.

In Britain, only UK, Irish, and qualifying Commonwealth citizens may vote in general elections, with local voting rights governed by separate legislation. The government has said there are no plans to alter national voting eligibility, and any such change would require primary legislation and parliamentary approval.

Nevertheless, the European debates have sharpened domestic concerns over electoral trust, particularly as immigration remains a central political issue ahead of future UK elections.

Analysts say the issue is less about specific policies and more about confidence. โ€œWhen voters believe electoral rules might change for political advantage, even without evidence, trust erodes quickly,โ€ said one UK-based constitutional expert.

As election cycles intensify across Europe, UK policymakers face increasing pressure to reassure voters that electoral safeguards remain robust and insulated from political manipulation.

First Spain now Franceโ€ฆrelaxing or doing away with laws to give migrants and illegal migrants full citizenship rights and therefore full VOTING rights is a b...

05/02/2026

Se alla dina favoriter bland videor och musik, ladda upp originalinnehรฅll och dela allt med vรคnner, familj och hela vรคrlden pรฅ YouTube.

๐—›๐—ข๐—ช ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฅ ๐— ๐—œ๐—ก๐—— ๐—•๐—จ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐——๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ช๐—ฆ โ€” ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—›๐—ข๐—ช ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ช๐—ฆ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ง๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—™๐—”๐—ฉ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฅ๐˜๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ง๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜บ, ๐˜ข ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ด-๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ...
05/01/2026

๐—›๐—ข๐—ช ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฅ ๐— ๐—œ๐—ก๐—— ๐—•๐—จ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐——๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ช๐—ฆ โ€” ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—›๐—ข๐—ช ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ช๐—ฆ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ง๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—™๐—”๐—ฉ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฅ

๐˜๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ง๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜บ, ๐˜ข ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ด-๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข โ€” ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ซ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ โ€” ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ค๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ข ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฒ๐˜ถ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ด. ๐˜ž๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ธ๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜ข ๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ข ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ?

If the 18th-century philosopher George Berkeley walked into a modern newsroom, he might nod grimly in recognition. His famous idealist notion โ€” โ€œto be is to be perceivedโ€ โ€” has escaped the seminary and lecture hall. It now plays out daily in the relentless churn of headlines, algorithms, and social media feeds that form our collective consciousness. We are not passive receivers of news, but active participants in its creation. The stories we consume, share, and react to form the very fabric of the reality we then inhabit.

This is more than a metaphor. Cognitive science confirms that our brains are prediction engines, constructing our experience from fragments of sensory data filtered through beliefs and biases. What mainstream media provides is a powerful, shared set of fragments. It directs our collective attentionโ€”a finite and fiercely contested resource. What it highlights becomes, for all social and political purposes, real. What it ignores languishes in the shadows of public awareness.

The Feedback Loop of Fear and Outrage

Consider the mechanism. Our innate negativity bias โ€” a survival instinct that primes us to notice threat โ€” is catered to by platforms built for engagement. A headline about crisis or conflict captures our mental โ€œprojector.โ€ We click, we watch, we fear. Algorithms register that engagement and serve more of the same. Editors, chasing traffic, greenlight similar stories. The result is a projected world, reflected back through our screens, that feels disproportionately dangerous and divisive. This projected reality then alters behaviour: we vote from anxiety, polarise from tribalism, and demand policies addressing amplified threats.

As media theorist Neil Postman warned, we are โ€œamusing ourselves to death,โ€ but the deeper danger may be frightening ourselves to death โ€” into a reality of our own co-created making.

The Fractured Cathedral of Consensus

The digital revolution has shattered the monolithic โ€œprojectorโ€ of the mid-20th-century media. Where once three network anchors could narrate a shared national reality, we now have countless niche channels, each catering to a specific worldview. Your social media feed, your chosen news network, your preferred pundits โ€” they all reinforce a particular projection. One personโ€™s projected reality features a climate emergency as the defining narrative; anotherโ€™s features cultural decay; a thirdโ€™s, economic conspiracy.

The peril here is not merely disagreement, but the erosion of a common factual substrate. When there is no consensus on what is real, democratic discourse and collective action become all but impossible. We are not arguing over solutions within the same world; we are inhabiting different worlds, projected from different sets of curated facts.

Breaking the Cycle: From Passive Reception to Conscious Projection

The way forward begins with a radical act of media literacy: recognising the projector in our own minds. This is not a call to disconnect, but to engage with intention.

Acknowledge the Filter. Understand that every news report is a constructed narrativeโ€”an edited, framed, and prioritised version of events. Ask: What is being projected here, and why?

Diversify Your Inputs. Deliberately expose your โ€œprojectorโ€ to sources outside your comfort zone. Challenge the algorithmโ€™s grip on your perceived reality.

Mind the Emotional Engine. Notice when fear, anger, or tribal pride is your primary motivator for consuming or sharing a story. That emotion is the fuel for your realityโ€™s projection.

Demand Projection Integrity. Support journalism that strives to illuminate complexity rather than stoke division, that corrects errors, and separates news from commentary.

The great journalist Edward R. Murrow once said television should โ€œilluminateโ€ and โ€œinspire.โ€ In our age, the mandate is broader. The media ecosystem we cultivate โ€” and our conscious engagement with it โ€” will determine whether we project a world of perpetual fragmentation and reaction, or one where a clearer, shared understanding can still be focused, however dimly, on the screen of our common future.

The world you see on the news is, in a very real sense, yours. The critical question is: Are you building it with intention, or is it being built for you?

Address

Bideford

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Pitchfork Politics posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share