05/06/2026
On 20 December 2025, a woman in her 50s was at home in Leicester when 39-year-old Sebastian Kudlak forced his way in carrying a flick knife and an imitation firearm. She had opened the inner door thinking it was her daughter. What followed was two hours of sustained and calculated violence.
Kudlak punched the victim repeatedly in the face, tied her hands behind her back with cable ties, and marched her upstairs. He then forced her to change her clothes and wash her hair, spraying her with Dettol in a deliberate attempt to remove forensic evidence. He used cleaning sprays throughout the house, stole her phone, purse, watch, charger, dressing gown and towels, and threatened to kill her and her family if she went to the police.
What he did not account for was the scratch the victim managed to inflict during the attack. The blood left on a duvet was submitted for fast-track DNA analysis and came back as a direct match. Pet camera footage captured him working through the property with cleaning products. CCTV placed him at the scene. And the victim, still restrained, found a way to call for help using her Alexa smart speaker.
He was arrested on Christmas morning at his home less than a mile away on the same road.
On 27 May 2026 at Leicester Crown Court, Kudlak pleaded guilty to aggravated burglary, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, threatening with a bladed article, possession of an imitation firearm with intent to cause fear of violence, and false imprisonment. Judge Keith Raynor, who described the offence as "utterly chilling," sentenced him to 12 years and 3 months as an extended sentence. He will serve more than eight years before he can even be considered for parole, with three years on licence to follow and a 15-year restraining order.
Detective Constable Kate Dabrowska of Leicestershire Police's Complex Investigation Team said the attack was "completely random" and that the victim had no prior connection to Kudlak whatsoever. She thanked everyone involved in securing the evidence that identified and arrested him, adding that the hard work of the team meant he was in custody before he could cause any further harm.
The victim's bravery throughout, including fighting back and using her smart speaker while still tied up, was central to the case.
Do you think an extended sentence with no automatic early release is the right approach for offences like this one?