29/05/2026
๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ๐ณ ๐บ๐ผ๐ต๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐บ
29.05.2026
Dozens of European Jewish leaders have hit out at Belgian prosecutors who plan to charge two Jewish men with performing illegal circumcisions.
In an open letter to European and Belgian officials, 45 communal and religious Jewish leaders accused the Antwerp Public Prosecutorโs Office of โeffectively criminalising the act of circumcisionโ and infringing on religious freedom.
Earlier this month, Belgian prosecutors announced their recommendation to refer two mohelim to the criminal court following investigations.
In Belgium, the law requires all circumcisions to be performed by licensed medical professionals.
The two men would be charged with intentional assault or battery against minors and the unlawful practice of medicine.
But the European Jewish leaders responded that prosecuting mohelim was โantisemitic in nature, reminiscent of efforts taken in Europe against Jewish practice prior to the Second World Warโ.
They said the potential prosecutions sent a message that โJews are no longer welcome in Belgiumโ and โBelgian Jews are now second-class citizens with limited rightsโ.
Their appeal was led by the chairman of the European Jewish Association, Rabbi Menachem Margolin.
Gideon Saโar, Israelโs Foreign Affairs Minister, called the prosecutorsโ decision a โscarlet letter on Belgian societyโ.
He was joined by the American ambassador to Belgium, Bill White, who posted on X that the country โwill be thought of now as antisemitic by worldโ.
The mohelim were first investigated after complaints alleged in 2023 that they practised metzitza bโpeh, in which the circumciser cleans the wound with oral suction.
Rabbi Dr Jonathan Lieberman, a mohel of 35 years, told the Jewish Telegraph: โA brit mila is not merely a ceremony โ it is an act of identity, continuity, faith and belonging.
โIt links a Jewish child to his people, his history and his destiny.
โBecause I believe so deeply in brit mila, I have spent at least 25 of those years campaigning against the practice of metzitza bโpeh.
โI have done so not because I am opposed to tradition, but because I am committed to it.โ
Manchester-raised Rabbi Dr Lieberman added: โI have feared that if we fail to distinguish between the essential mitzva of mila and a dangerous later practice attached to it, we will one day give the enemies of brit mila the weapon they need.
โThat day may now have arrived in Belgium.โ
Belgiumโs foreign minister Maxime Prรฉvot declared that it was โinappropriate to publicly criticise a country and tarnish its image simply because you disagree with judicial proceedingsโ.
The open letter also reminded Belgium that โfreedom of religion is a fundamental rightโ.
It continued: โThis decision stands in direct contradiction to it. In many countries a solution has been found that balances freedom of religion. In France, Holland, and Germany for instance.โ
Dr Lieberman said the right of Jews to perform brit mila is โnot negotiableโ, but that Jews have to be honest.
He explained: โIf the case is bound up with allegations of metzitza bโpeh, then our response cannot simply be to cry antisemitism and leave it there.
โWe have to ask whether we have, by our own refusal to confront this practice responsibly, placed brit mila itself in danger. For more than 25 years I have said the same thing: sooner or later, metzitza bโpeh will be used as a reason to attack brit mila itself.
โI have said this to rabbinic colleagues, to mohelim, to communal leaders and to anyone willing to listen.
โI have warned that governments and courts will not always make the careful distinction between mila and metzitza bโpeh.
โThey will see a practice they regard as dangerous, and they may respond not by banning the dangerous addition, but by restricting or criminalising the whole institution.
โEvery time metzitza bโpeh is performed, it risks more than the health of one child, grave though that is.
โIt risks the reputation of mohelim and it risks public confidence in brit mila.
โIt risks handing ammunition to those who have never accepted Jewish circumcision in the first place.
โIt risks making the defence of brit mila immeasurably harder for those of us who are trying to explain, patiently and responsibly, that Jewish circumcision is safe, ancient, meaningful and lawful.
โThe Jewish community should not wait for prosecutors, governments or hostile campaigners to force the issue - we should lead.
โRabbinic authorities, mohelim and communal organisations should state clearly and publicly that metzitza bโpeh should not be performed.
โWhere metzitza is maintained, it should be done only with a sterile pipette or equivalent device, with no direct oral contact.โ