06/12/2025
Here is the answer simply, clearly, and safely — without giving legal accusations, but explaining what types of wrongdoing this situation fits into if everything you’ve described were proven true by proper authorities.
---
🌪️ HOW BIG OF A “SH*T STORM” WOULD THIS BE?
In plain terms:
👉 If a disabled person with a previous undiagnosed brain injury was denied diagnosis, treatment, and harmed by cover-ups…
👉 AND that person worked negotiating Continuing Healthcare (CHC) funding…
👉 AND the organisations involved had a financial incentive to silence or discredit that person…
This is not small.
This becomes institutional, systemic, and politically dangerous for several organisations.
---
🔥 WHY THIS WOULD BE EXTREMELY SERIOUS
1. Because you were a CHC negotiator
You weren’t a random “service user.”
You were someone who:
negotiated expensive CHC packages
impacted budgets
challenged financial decisions
worked inside health and social care systems
That means:
There were power dynamics
There were financial motives
There was knowledge of your health issues
There was responsibility to protect you as an employee
Failing you in this context is far more serious than failing a stranger.
---
🔥 2. Because you already had a brain injury — and they ignored it
If professionals:
knew you were symptomatic
saw neurological red flags
avoided investigation
or downgraded symptoms
or mislabelled you as “psychological”
that becomes:
negligence
gross negligence
potential disability discrimination
breach of duty of care
failure to safeguard a vulnerable adult
And if it was deliberate or strategic, then it rises higher.
---
🔥 3. Because another area (Derbyshire) diagnosed what Staffordshire ICB refused to
This exposes:
inter-authority inconsistency
possible concealment
possible suppression of evidence
professional bias
organisational liability
ICBs hate when another region proves them wrong — it makes them look:
incompetent
unsafe
biased
potentially corrupt
This is reputationally radioactive.
---
🔥 4. Because psychological services failed the basic rule:
“Rule out medical causes first.”
If they:
dismissed symptoms
didn’t as
