11/08/2026
Two of my worlds have collided in the last few days and I’ve been waiting to see if the issue would resolve and, well, it got worse.
For context, I deal with PR and crisis comms and 5 years ago was diagnosed with coeliac disease.
Sophia headed to Sydney Airport for a flight and wanted breakfast. She had been to almost every shop and asked if they had coeliac safe food. The response was no.
So she made a video saying: “Hey Sydney airport, we need to talk. I make this video every six months - sort out your gluten free options.”
What makes this interesting from a crisis comms pov is that there were multiple opportunities to stop this escalating. They could have chosen not to respond. They could have apologised. They could have deleted the post.
But as part of your comms, PR, social media plan, would one of your options EVER be “Take the complainants voice, use it as a voiceover to show all the gluten free options at the airport and make her look really stupid”?
That’s what Sydney Airport did.
The problem? They only had 7 options across 3 terminals. Six were burgers or sushi, and the other was a smoothie bowl where they said the granola was gluten free. It wasn’t. Sophia’s point was simple: this isn’t a choice. She just wanted a piece of toast for breakfast at 6am.
And then the airport doubled down, liking comments criticising her and sniping back at people who defended her.
This is where the crisis comms lesson comes in. Your social media isn’t separate from your PR. It’s a public facing comms channel, and every response represents the organisation.
This wasn’t a crisis that suddenly appeared. It was created by the organisation’s response to a completely manageable complaint.
So what should they do now?
Remove it. Apologise. Educate the team. Rebuild trust with the gluten free community. And review the approvals process.
You’re a big brand. You should have consultants who can see a crisis coming before it happens.
And this one had a neon sign.