Selorm Kwashigah

22/06/2025

21/10/2024

THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD STOP INTERFERING IN PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS TO MAINTAIN THE POWER SEPARATION PRINCIPLE
The recent ruling by Ghana's Speaker of Parliament to declare four seats vacant has sparked intense debate and outrage, especially after the Supreme Court (SC or the Court) intervened, trying to interpret the unambiguous provisions in the 1992 Constitution of Ghana by nullifying the Speaker's decision with an interlocutory injunction. The Speaker's ruling was a significant move, as it shifted the balance of power in Parliament, making the former majority the minority and vice versa.

This dramatic turn of events has raised concerns about the Supreme Court's perceived partisan interference in parliamentary affairs. I am particularly concerned about the SC’s ruling because its decision has made it difficult for me to accept due to its partisan nature, undermining its impartiality and authority.
According to some constitutional law experts, the SC’s ruling establishes a dangerous precedent, encouraging political interference in judicial decisions. The Court has no jurisdiction over this matter and should have recused itself from this matter to maintain the principle of separation of power.

As rightly pointed out, the Supreme Court's actions may have far-reaching implications for the country's democracy. If the Court is seen as being overly partisan, it risks eroding public trust and undermining its own authority. Again, such decisions may encourage successive governments to consider constitutional amendments to limit the Court's powers. For instance, if the Supreme Court's decision demonstrates their bias towards one political group, then the next government may decide to clamp down their claws by making their decisions suggestive, instead of binding. This could happen through constitutional amendments.

Moreover, the Supreme Court must respect precedents as it serves as a point of reference and authority, and adhere to the principles of the 1992 Constitution, which aims to regulate public officers' conduct, ensure conformity, and maintain peace and tranquillity.

The Court must guard against being used as a political tool and ensure its decisions are guided solely by the Constitution. Many experts have indicated that the provisions of Article 97 (1) of the 1992 Constitution upon which the Hon. Speaker based his current ruling are unambiguously stated and that the Speaker did not err in declaring 4 vacant seats in parliament.

Finally, the Supreme Court must prioritize impartiality, and major public opinions to uphold the Constitution to maintain public trust, as many people are in favour of the Honorable Speaker of Parliament’s ruling aligns with the Constitution and the principles of democracy. Ghana's institutions must work together to strengthen democracy, rather than undermine it.

God bless our homeland Ghana... and help us to resist the oppressor's rule.
Let us build Ghana together devoid of unnecessary political cronyism.

Thanks for reading.

Selorm Kwashigah


Good Governance
Highlight
Followers

18/10/2024

The Majority Caucus in parliament should start processes to:

cancel obnoxious taxes e.g., e-levy, covid-levy.

probe the perpetrators of the national cathedral scandal.

sack those party boys at EC.

abogate dubious contracts.

12/10/2024

I've received 2,300 reactions to my posts in the past 30 days. Thanks for your support. 🙏🤗🎉

07/10/2024

Sweet freedom!!

Water Supply Engineering Services (Mechanized Boreholes), Private Tuition & Educational Consultancy

05/10/2024

I've received 1,300 reactions to my posts in the past 30 days. Thanks for your support. 🙏🤗🎉

20/09/2024

The NDC will lead Ghana for the next 8 years!!

Prepare to work!!
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

18/08/2024

Good morning Folks,

President John Dramani Mahama's “No Fees Stress” campaign message is grounded in theory in educational finance and principled leadership. It is a well-thought-through project and must be embraced by all stakeholders in education. It confirms the following Principles of Educational Financing (equality, equity, sustainability and efficiency).

(i) Equality: Ensuring uniform treatment and opportunities for all students, regardless of socioeconomic background. It is a strategy adopted to provide the same amount of resources, support, and opportunities to every student irrespective of their circumstances.

(ii) Equity: Addressing disparities by providing differentiated support and resources based on individual needs. It also refers to the fair and just distribution of resources, support, and opportunities based on individual needs, to address disparities and ensure equal outcomes.

(iii) Sustainability: Ensuring long-term financial viability and stability in educational financing.

The incoming government can achieve equity in fee waivers by adopting the following practical approaches:

1. Needs-based criteria for fee waivers, consider factors like financial need, academic merit, and social background.

2. Means-testing system, to assess students' financial needs and provide fee waivers or subsidies accordingly.

3. Quota for disadvantaged students, especially students from low-income families, rural areas, or those with disabilities.

4. Transparency and communication during the fee waiver process.

5. Regular monitoring and evaluation to ensure the effectiveness of the fee waiver program.

Some Measures to Ensure Sustainability of the "No Fees Stress Policy Include:

1. Diversify funding sources (public-private partnerships, endowment funds, GETFund, etc).

2. Phased implementation plan.

3. Capacity building and training.

4. Regular review and adjustment of the program.

5. Accountability and transparency in resource disbursement.

The Government can also adopt the following Measures for Efficiency.

1. Centralized database for student information and needs.

2. Online application and selection process for fee waivers.

3. Clear, measurable goals and targets for equity in fee waivers.

4. Effective resource allocation.

5. Collaboration between universities, students, and community organizations.

In these hard economic times, it is prudent for the GoG to focus its financial support on the last two (equity and sustainability) to achieve equality and efficiency in students’ educational outcomes. The GoG should also prioritise STEM-related programs to enhance access. For instance, more funds should be given to medical students to enable them to acquire additional resources they may need for their studies.

Kwasi Kwashigah

19/07/2024

"WHEN THE POWER OF LOVE OVERCOMES THE LOVE OF POWER, THE WORLD WILL KNOW PEACE" JIMI HENDRIX
The quote "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace" by Jimi Hendrix is a profound and visionary statement that explains the difference between two fundamental human drives: the desire for power and the capacity for love.

The love of power:
1. The love of power refers to the human desire to control, dominate, and manipulate others, situations, and outcomes.
2. This drive is often fueled by ego, self-interest, and a need for external validation.
3. The pursuit of power can lead to conflict, competition, and aggression.

Again, “the power of love,” refers to the capacity for selfless, unconditional, and unwavering affection, compassion, and empathy.

This also means that love unites or can unite people, foster connection, and bridge divides.

Love can heal wounds, transform lives, and elevate humanity.

Hendrix's quote suggests that when the power of love becomes stronger than the love of power, the world will experience peace. This means that:
1. Love will triumph over ego and self-interest.
2. Unity and connection will prevail over conflict and division.
3. Humanity will prioritize compassion, empathy, and understanding over competition and aggression.

In short, the quote envisions a world where love becomes the guiding force, leading to a state of peace, harmony, and global unity. Hendrix's words inspire us to cultivate love, compassion, and selflessness, recognizing that true power lies not in domination but in the ability to uplift and transform ourselves and the world around us.

16/07/2024

"THE WORLD WILL NOT BE DESTROYED BY THOSE WHO DO EVIL, BUT BY THOSE WHO WATCH THEM WITHOUT DOING ANYTHING," ALBERT EINSTEIN.
The renowned quote attributed to Albert Einstein, "The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything," underscores the paramount importance of individual agency and accountability in the face of injustice and evil. A closer examination of this quote reveals the following insights:

The initial clause, "The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil," acknowledges the existence and potential harm caused by malevolent forces or individuals. However, the subsequent clause, "but by those who watch them without doing anything," poignantly highlights the greater peril posed by bystander apathy and inaction.

This wise quote from Einstein implicitly suggests four key principles:

1. Inaction is tantamount to complicity, as individuals who choose not to act effectively condone or enable evil actions.

2. Silence and neutrality in the face of injustice are equivalent to consent and acceptance.

3. Individual responsibility is paramount, as each person has a moral obligation to confront evil, regardless of how insignificant their actions may seem.

4. Collective inaction can lead to catastrophic consequences, as the cumulative effect of individual apathy can ultimately destroy the world.

This quote encourages individuals to:

1. Develop situational awareness and recognize evil or injustice.

2. Take ownership of their actions and inactions.

3. Courageously stand up against evil, even in the face of adversity or unpopularity.

4. Inspire others to do the same, fostering a collective force for good.
Ultimately, Einstein's quote concludes that individual agency is the catalyst for change. By choosing to act, we can collectively shape a better future and create a world that is more just, equitable, and peaceful.