02/06/2026
Former Wuli West MP Sidia Jatta argues that the loss of language contributes to a sense of inferiority among Africans and undermines their independence
By Ousman A. Marong
Former Wuli West MP Sidia Jatta has spoken out against the prevalence of foreign languages in Africa, claiming that these imposed language policies were crafted by the West to instil a sense of inferiority and keep Africans feeling "lazy and backwards."
Jatta shared his thoughts during a Current Affairs radio program on Vibes FM, hosted by Ousman A. Marong.
He emphasized the importance of language in shaping identity, stating that language is what truly makes us human. Forcing Africans to abandon their native tongues in favour of colonial languages, he argued, is akin to stripping away their humanity. “If someone comes to you and demands that you give up what is rightfully yours—your language—by compelling you to speak theirs, then they have effectively devalued and destroyed your own,” he remarked.
Jatta raised an important question about why African nations don’t embrace their indigenous languages in official settings, especially when so many other countries around the globe communicate in their native tongues. “In the world, aside from Africa, other nations speak their own languages. So why aren’t African countries doing the same?”
He connected the suppression of local languages to colonial education methods that shamed students for using their native dialects. “There are over two thousand languages, and the West aimed to undermine us by instilling an inferiority complex, making us feel less than one another. Remember back in the day when a student spoke their vernacular in class? They were made to wear a symbol of shame. That was the first step in making us feel inferior to each other.”
The former lawmaker pointed out that these tactics were intentional efforts to push Africans towards adopting foreign languages. He argued that such strategies have played a significant role in Africa’s underdevelopment. “These methods from the West have made us appear lazy and backward as Africans.”
Jatta also linked the idea of linguistic independence to genuine political freedom. “Independence means freedom,” he stated, “but how can you truly be free if you’re speaking someone else’s language?”
To illustrate his argument, he provided some figures, suggesting that language barriers create skewed power dynamics. “If we break it down, in a group of 100 people, about 80 are speaking English. So, among those 100, the 80 percent who don’t speak English are the ones who own the country, while the minority who do speak English are working for them. How can you work for me if I don’t understand your language, and I’m the one providing for you?”
“Just look at your National Assembly Members. What language do they use in parliament? Obviously, it’s English. Who put them in those positions? It’s clear that what they’re discussing in the house is not accessible to the majority.”