09/06/2026
рдЙрддреНрддрд░рдкреНрд░рджреЗрд╢ рдХреЗ рдореБрдЦреНрдпрдордВрддреНрд░реА рдХрд╛ рдмрдпрд╛рди рд╕реЗ рдЖрдк рдХрд╣рд╛рдВ рддрдХ рд╕рд╣рдордд рд╣реИрдВ?
рдХрдореЗрдВрдЯ рдЬрд░реВрд░ рдХрд░реЗ
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath recently made a strong political statement, alleging that previous governments were afraid of powerful criminal elements and failed to take decisive action against them. According to CM Yogi, there was a time when political leaders would hesitate to speak against mafias and criminal networks, while his government has focused on law and order, anti-crime operations, and strict action against organized crime.
Supporters of the BJP argue that the state's crackdown on criminal gangs, illegal properties, and gang-related activities has improved public safety and strengthened governance. They believe that tougher enforcement has helped restore confidence among citizens and sent a clear message that crime will not be tolerated.
However, opposition parties, including the Samajwadi Party, have criticized such remarks, calling them political rhetoric aimed at influencing public opinion. They argue that law and order should remain above political debates and that all governments have contributed to the state's development and security in different ways.
The statement has once again sparked a heated political discussion across Uttar Pradesh, with supporters and critics sharing their views on governance, crime control, and political accountability. As elections and political debates continue, such comments are likely to remain at the center of public discourse.
Do you agree that strict action against organized crime has significantly changed the law-and-order situation in Uttar Pradesh?