The Personal Lens

The Personal Lens The Personal Lens explores how the most intimate aspects of our lives are deeply political.

and exposes the hidden politics of gender, power, identity, and culture, revealing the intricate web of politics that shapes them.

30/03/2026

Distortion Over Dialogue: Understanding the Straw Man Fallacy

https://youtu.be/QL8PI2i4gdw?si=uS0o1C3yN_j6a12g

In this episode of The Personal Lens, we unpack one of the most powerful—and most dangerous—tools shaping how we argue today: the straw man fallacy. This isn’t just a logical error. It’s a pattern. A strategy. A way of winning arguments without ever engaging with the truth.

From everyday conversations in our homes to political debates on national television, from gender discussions to caste and religion—arguments are constantly being distorted, exaggerated, and rewritten. Instead of responding to what is actually said, we attack a weaker, more convenient version of it. And the consequences are deeper than we think.

This episode explores:

What the straw man fallacy really is—and why it works

How it shows up in everyday life, relationships, and workplaces

Its role in politics, media debates, and social media culture

Why marginalised voices are disproportionately silenced through distortion

How this fallacy turns disagreement into hostility and shuts down honest dialogue

What real, good-faith argument actually looks like—and why we avoid it

Because this is not just about bad arguments. It’s about what happens when a society slowly loses its ability to listen. At The Personal Lens, we believe: The personal is political—but only when we argue with what is real, not what is easy.

Do not forget to like subscribe and share ‘The Personal Lens’. Share your thoughts and comments at [email protected]

22/02/2026

YouTube link:
https://youtu.be/hx0kiN-WARE?si=2-brT6JKOleKm3SC

The Pink Tax: When Being a Woman Costs More

In this episode of The Personal Lens, we unpack the reality of the Pink Tax — the hidden cost of being a woman. The pink tax is not a government tax. It’s a pattern of gender-based price discrimination where products and services marketed to women cost more than similar ones marketed to men — even when there is no difference in quality or production cost.

From razors and shampoos to clothing, dry cleaning, haircuts, car repairs, and menstrual products, this episode examines how gender inequality is quietly built into everyday markets. We explore:

• How marketing turns femininity into a “maintenance project”
• Why grooming becomes compulsory for women
• How menstruation was taxed as a luxury in India until 2018
• Why women are often charged more for services
• How the pink tax compounds the gender pay gap
• What global legal reforms are doing — and where they fall short

Most importantly, we ask a harder question: When being a woman costs more, who benefits? This is not just about pricing. It’s about power. It’s about silence. And it’s about how inequality hides in the most ordinary receipts. Because here, as always, we explore the political through the personal.

If this episode made you think differently about your next purchase, like, share, and subscribe. Visibility is power. Leave your comments at [email protected]



REFERENCES

New York City Department of Consumer Affairs. (2015). From cradle to cane: The cost of being a female consumer.

Triffin, M. (2015, December 17). Pink Tax: Women charged more for everyday products. Time.

Criado Perez, C. (2019). Invisible women: Exposing Data bias in a world designed for men. Abrams Press.

World Bank. (2020). Gender equality and economic growth.

Government of India, Ministry of Finance. (2018). GST exemption on sanitary napkins.

UN Women. (2021). Period poverty and economic inequality.

California Legislature. (1995). Gender Tax Repeal Act of 1995 (Senate Bill No. 899). State of California.

Duesterhaus, M., Grauerholz, L., Weichsel, R., & Guittar, N. A. (2011). The cost of doing femininity: Gendered disparities in pricing of personal care products and services. Gender Issues, 28(4), 175–191.

European Commission. (2018). The gender pay gap situation in the EU. Publications Office of the European Union.

New York City Department of Consumer Affairs. (1994). Price discrimination in consumer products: A study of gender pricing in New York City. City of New York.

OECD. (2020). Gender wage gap (indicator). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Plan International. (2021). Break the barriers: Girls’ experiences of menstruation in Asia. Plan International.

World Bank. (2020). Women, business and the law 2020. World Bank Publications.

13/02/2026

Women in Afghanistan are being erased—legally, socially, systematically. Banned from education, work, movement, and even visibility, they are subjected to absurd and brutal controls like the one-eye rule and moral policing disguised as culture.

In this episode of The Personal Lens, we confront gender apartheid, global silence, and the hollow promises of international law. Where is Responsibility to Protect (R2P) when women are stripped of personhood in real time?

This is not distant suffering.
This is a global moral failure.
And silence is not neutrality.

Listen till the end for a closing that refuses comfort. Do not forget to like subscribe and share ‘The Personal Lens’ for more. Do leave your comments at [email protected].

Referencing

Amnesty International. (2023). Death in slow motion: Women’s and girls’ rights abuses in Afghanistan. Amnesty International.
Human Rights Watch. (2026). World Report 2026: Afghanistan. Human Rights Watch.
Human Rights Watch. (2025, January 16). Afghanistan: Taliban repression deepens. Human Rights Watch.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Afghanistan: Human rights country page. United Nations.

United Nations. (2005). 2005 World Summit Outcome Document (A/RES/60/1). United Nations General Assembly.
United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA). (2023). Human rights situation in Afghanistan: Update on women and girls. United Nations.
United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA). (2024). Afghanistan: Systematic discrimination against women and girls. United Nations.
United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Afghanistan. (2022). Report to the Human Rights Council (A/HRC/51/6). United Nations.
United Nations Women. (2023). Gender apartheid in Afghanistan: Women’s rights under Taliban rule. UN Women.
Amnesty International. (2025). Afghanistan: Four years of injustice and impunity under Taliban rule.

Human Rights Watch. (2024). Taliban tighten grip three years into rule.

MEMRI. (2025). Afghan Taliban cleric: Women who set foot outside home must be accompanied by man.

UNESCO. (2025). UNESCO gives voice to Afghan girls and women and calls for their rights to be restored.

UN Women. (2025). Gender alert: Four years of Taliban rule – Afghan women resist as restrictions tighten.

The Guardian. (2026, February 1). The death of medical care for Afghan women.

Indian Express. (2025). Formalised gender apartheid: What Taliban’s new law means for women.

08/02/2026

Watching Women Disappear: Afghanistan, Gender Apartheid, and the World’s Moral Collapse
https://youtu.be/ltPHAaC06M8?si=U8UATLrCm_6bSVZh

Women in Afghanistan are being erased—legally, socially, systematically. Banned from education, work, movement, and even visibility, they are subjected to absurd and brutal controls like the one-eye rule and moral policing disguised as culture.

In this episode of The Personal Lens, we confront gender apartheid, global silence, and the hollow promises of international law. Where is Responsibility to Protect (R2P) when women are stripped of personhood in real time?

This is not distant suffering.
This is a global moral failure.
And silence is not neutrality.

Listen till the end for a closing that refuses comfort. Do not forget to like subscribe and share ‘The Personal Lens’ for more. Do leave your comments at [email protected].

Referencing

Amnesty International. (2023). Death in slow motion: Women’s and girls’ rights abuses in Afghanistan. Amnesty International.
Human Rights Watch. (2026). World Report 2026: Afghanistan. Human Rights Watch.
Human Rights Watch. (2025, January 16). Afghanistan: Taliban repression deepens. Human Rights Watch.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Afghanistan: Human rights country page. United Nations.

United Nations. (2005). 2005 World Summit Outcome Document (A/RES/60/1). United Nations General Assembly.
United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA). (2023). Human rights situation in Afghanistan: Update on women and girls. United Nations.
United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA). (2024). Afghanistan: Systematic discrimination against women and girls. United Nations.
United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Afghanistan. (2022). Report to the Human Rights Council (A/HRC/51/6). United Nations.
United Nations Women. (2023). Gender apartheid in Afghanistan: Women’s rights under Taliban rule. UN Women.
Amnesty International. (2025). Afghanistan: Four years of injustice and impunity under Taliban rule.

Human Rights Watch. (2024). Taliban tighten grip three years into rule.

MEMRI. (2025). Afghan Taliban cleric: Women who set foot outside home must be accompanied by man.

UNESCO. (2025). UNESCO gives voice to Afghan girls and women and calls for their rights to be restored.

UN Women. (2025). Gender alert: Four years of Taliban rule – Afghan women resist as restrictions tighten.

The Guardian. (2026, February 1). The death of medical care for Afghan women.

Indian Express. (2025). Formalised gender apartheid: What Taliban’s new law means for women.

01/02/2026

Have you ever walked away from a conversation thinking, “Maybe I imagined it”? That feeling is not confusion or overthinking — it may be gaslighting.

In this episode of The Personal Lens, we explain gaslighting as a form of psychological manipulation used to make people doubt their memories, emotions, and sense of reality. Gaslighting is not just lying or disagreement — it is a pattern of control rooted in power imbalance.

This episode breaks down:

What gaslighting really is (and what it is not)

How gaslighting works in relationships, families, and workplaces

Why gaslighting is a process, not a single incident

Gaslighting and patriarchy: why women are often targeted

Gaslighting in Indian homes, offices, and social systems

The psychological effects of gaslighting

How to recognise gaslighting and begin reclaiming self-trust

From personal relationships to political systems, gaslighting shapes who is believed and who is silenced. This episode shows how doubting yourself is often learned, not natural — and why trusting yourself again is a powerful act of resistance.

If you’ve ever felt confused, unheard, or made to question your reality — this episode is for you. Do not forget to leave your comments at [email protected]. Do like subscribe and share for more of such content.



REFERENCES

This episode draws on feminist theory, trauma psychology, sociology, and Indian legal scholarship to understand gaslighting as both a personal and political practice.

American Psychological Association. (2023). Gaslighting.
Bancroft, L., & Silverman, J. G. (2002). The batterer as parent: Addressing the impact of domestic violence on family dynamics. Sage Publications.

Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review

Dworkin, A. (1987). In*******se. Free Press.

Follingstad, D. R., & DeHart, D. D. (2000). Defining psychological abuse of husbands toward wives: Contexts, behaviors, and typologies. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(9), 891–920.
Kishwar, M. (2005). Off the beaten track: Rethinking gender justice for Indian women. Oxford University Press.

Mahapatra, N. (2012). South Asian women in the U.S. and their experience of domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 27(5), 381–390.
Sweet, P. L. (2019). The sociology of gaslighting. American Sociological Review, 84(5), 851–West, R. (1997). Caring for justice. NYU Press.

Drescher, A. (2024, January 20). Origin of the term gaslighting. SimplyPsychology.org. https://www.simplypsychology.org/origin-of-the-term-gaslighting.html

Kelley, A. (2023, August 21). 3 ways women are impacted by gaslighting. Psychology Today. Retrieved, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-your-corner/202308/3-ways-women-are-impacted-by-gaslighting?msockid=12b49303f346661d26ee861df2146730

Risse, M. (2026). Leadership on the line: Gaslighting, adaptive leadership, and the battle for the soul of democracy. Ethics & International Affairs, 1(1), 1–17. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679425100282

MapsofIndia.com. (n.d.). What is gaslighting and how to respond. Maps of India. Retrieved, from https://www.mapsofindia.com/my-india/india/what-is-gaslighting-and-how-to-respond

01/02/2026

27/01/2026

What does it mean to be a woman who desires — not to be desired, not to be pleasing, not to be “ladylike,” but to want, to choose, to long, unapologetically?

Why does female desire still make society uncomfortable? Why is a woman who expresses longing, lust, agency, or attraction labelled “shameless,” “dangerous,” or “characterless”?

In this episode of The Personal Lens, we explore desire, shame, and the female gaze through feminist, q***r, historical, psychological, and cultural lenses. From patriarchy’s obsession with controlling women’s bodies to the politics of shame, from cinema and media to everyday lived experiences, this episode unpacks why female sexuality has always been treated as a threat — and what happens when women stop apologizing for wanting.

We examine how desire becomes political, how shame is constructed and enforced, how the female gaze disrupts power hierarchies, and how q***r perspectives challenge compulsory heterosexuality. More importantly, we ask a radical question: what if female desire is not dangerous — but liberating? This is not just a conversation about sexuality. It’s about power, agency, dignity, and freedom. It’s about reclaiming something that was always ours — but never freely given.

Do not forget to like subscribe and share this episode. Leave your thoughts and reflections at [email protected]

Address

Sundar Boro Path
Guwahati
781022

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Personal Lens posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category