19/09/2024
The Sikh & Jat relationship of 1760s was quite contrary to what many caste supremacist pages have presented that it was some kind of caste unity of โโJatlandโโ against other kingdoms of Rohillas, Rajputs and Marathas.
It has been recorded that when Suraj Mal, Maharaja of Bharatpur Jat kingdom was killed in 1763 by a Rohilla ambush, his son vowed revenge on Rohilla Chief, Najib-ud-Daula and war commenced, Jats were supported by the Marathas, but due to the lukewarm response turned to the Dal Khalsa Sikhs, who were raiding Ganga-Yamuna Doab by 1764.
Sikhs in turn, what has been presented as a solidarity of โJat Brotherhoodโ (because many of Sikhs had a Punjabi Jatt background), in turn treated Jawahar as a vassal, at Burari Ghat near Delhi, forcing him dismount his elephant, Jawahar Attended the Sikh Sardars, who kicked out his ho**ah bearers and proclaimed โ Jawahar Singh, son of Suraj Mal, has come within the shelter of Khalsa Jio and become a Sikh of Nanak. He demands redress for his fatherโs bloodโ.
More interesting thing is while Dal Khalsa decided to help Jawahir Singh, the Sikhs of Phulkians, 1000 strong under general Bhola Singh were fighting along Rohillas against the Jats only.
18th century politics, as usual were based on mutual benefits and profit, rather than a โcaste unityโ, a fact that that Sikhs, belonging to a totally different cultural zone barely related with Jats of Braj to have any kind of caste factor in the alliance.
๐จ- Suraj Mal & Jawahir Singh, 18th century paintings
๐- History of the Sikhs, Hari Ram Gupta Vol. I