Kajal sah

02/12/2025

12/11/2025

Mercedes‑AMG C 63

The Mercedes-AMG C 63 presents a bold interpretation of performance luxury. The most recent variant, for example, is a plug-in hybrid that pairs a 2.0-litre turbocharged four-cylinder with an electric motor to deliver around 671 hp and 752 lb-ft of torque. The performance is genuinely rapid: 0-100 km/h in around 3.4 seconds (in one test) in the latest model. Historically, the C63 badge has been associated with a V8 engine, rear-wheel or all-wheel drive (4MATIC+), and strong AMG character especially in its exhaust note, chassis behaviour and visual presence.

Inside and out, the AMG C63 emphasises aggressive styling (muscular fenders, quad exhausts, strong AMG badging), and a driving experience that’s as much about “performance first” as about comfort. That said, being a high-performance AMG model, it contains certain trade-offs. The ride may be firmer, ownership costs (fuel, tyres, maintenance) will be elevated, and its performance-centric character can make it less subtle (and possibly less practical) than more everyday luxury sedans.

If you value having a car that shouts performance, feels visceral, and offers strong AMG heritage the C63 stands out. It’s best if you’ll drive it with enthusiasm and appreciate the boldness of the AMG brand.

BMW M4 Coupe

The BMW M4 Coupe is BMW M’s high-performance two-door offering designed for driver engagement. The standard model features a 3.0-litre twin-turbo inline-six engine producing about 473 hp in its base form, and around 503-hp (or up to ~523 hp with xDrive/all-wheel-drive) in higher trims. The driving experience emphasises connection and precision: steering feedback, strong chassis dynamics, and a driver-oriented cockpit with sport seats and M-specific controls.

In terms of usability, the M4 offers a more balanced approach between performance and everyday driveability: it’s a coupe with strong performance but with BMW’s refinement and infrastructure behind it. It doesn’t shout as loudly as some hyper-aggressive machines, but it rewards a driver who wants to feel engaged. On the practical side, being a two-door, high-performance car means the rear seats may be less spacious or comfortable compared to a full four-door performance sedan, and running costs will still be significant if used aggressively.

If you’re looking for a performance car that retains strong usability, driver appeal, and brand pedigree, then the M4 is a compelling choice. It may lack the “explosive statement” of some AMG models, but it offers precision, balance and strong performance in a premium performance coupe.

My Verdict

If I were choosing between the two, it would depend on what I prioritise:

If I want raw character, visual impact, strong badge presence and a car built for performance with fewer compromises, I’d lean toward the AMG C63.

If I want driver-centric dynamics, everyday usability (within the performance-car realm), and something that blends luxury with sport in a more subtle way, I’d pick the BMW M4 Coupe.

Between the two, for my personal use case (mix of spirited driving occasional daily use desire for driver engagement), I’d lean toward the M4. The precision and balance of the BMW appeal more strongly to me. But if I were buying for statement, presence, and maximum performance in a luxury badge domain, I wouldn’t hesitate to choose the C63.

12/11/2025

The Lamborghini Gallardo, the Harley‑Davidson V‑Rod, the Drako GTE and the Maserati E‑Superbike Concept each one very different in scale, purpose and experience.

Lamborghini Gallardo

The Gallardo was Lamborghini’s successful entry into the supercar world in the 2000s, bringing V10 power and exotic looks in a somewhat more accessible package than its V12 siblings. Its mid-engine layout, all-wheel or rear-wheel drive variations, and V10 (5.0-5.2L) engine producing around 500-570 hp depending on version.
Driving it means dealing with raw supercar character: big engine sound, aggressive styling, less refinement than more modern machines, but enormous presence and thrill when you push it. It trades some comfort and usability for performance and drama.

Harley-Davidson V-Rod

The V-Rod from Harley-Davidson represents a “muscle bike” take: a liquid-cooled 1,247 cc Revolution V-Twin engine, producing around 115 bhp in one spec. The look is heavy, the feel is cruiser-muscle, and while performance is solid for a big bike, it’s very different to a supercar in focus. Riding it is less about carving every corner and more about presence, sound, torque, and the feel of the large engine beneath you. Usability is good for a motorcycle, but compared to the cars, the comfort, weather protection and practicality vary widely.

Drako GTE

The Drako GTE is an electric supercar that pushes technological envelope: its quad-motor setup (one at each wheel), around 1,200 hp, and extremely high torque figures (in one spec 6,500 lb-ft / ~8,800 Nm) and a top speed around 206 mph (≈332 km/h). It’s built for performance and innovation rather than brand legacy. At the same time, it has a luxury supercar mission: high-quality materials, advanced systems, and extreme performance metrics. Driving it would mean dealing with EV dynamics, instant torque, likely much higher cost and much less compromise. Usability may still be less everyday than a conventional car but more usable than some track-only specials.

Maserati E-Superbike Concept

This is the wildest outlier: a two-wheel concept from Maserati, electric powered, with futuristic design (hubless wheels in renders), and more about design statement and concept than widespread production. While full production specs are not widely confirmed like the other machines, it represents what happens when a luxury performance brand crosses into unconventional territory: superbike performance, brand cachet, but likely very niche practicality and use case.

Comparative Reflection

When comparing these four, they span vehicle types (car vs motorcycle), propulsion types (internal combustion vs electric vs concept), and usability levels (everyday to ultra-niche).

The Gallardo is the well-known supercar: visceral, exotic, proven.

The V-Rod is the muscle bike: unique feel, less extreme power but high character.

The Drako GTE is the tech supercar: extreme numbers, electric architecture, limited model.

The Maserati E-Superbike Concept is the pure design/vision statement: less about everyday use, more about statement.
In terms of practicality: the Gallardo wins among cars for everyday supercar use (relatively speaking). The V-Rod wins among bikes for simplicity and riding pleasure (for a bike). The Drako GTE wins for raw performance and innovation. The Maserati E-Superbike wins for concept appeal and design, but would likely compromise usability heavily.
In terms of driving/riding feel: the Gallardo gives exotic combustion engine thrills; the V-Rod gives large engine cruiser feel; the Drako GTE gives electric supercar instant torque and high tech; the Maserati concept gives radical two-wheel adrenaline.

My Verdict

If I were choosing one among them (assuming budget, import, etc all work out) and had to pick to use both enjoyably and reasonably often, I would choose the Lamborghini Gallardo — because it provides supercar thrills with comparatively more track record, brand heritage, and “usable exotic” status. If instead I were chasing “what’s next” and performance above everything then I might pick the Drako GTE. If I love motorcycles and want something different, the V-Rod makes sense. And if design, exclusivity and statement are everything to me (and I accept the compromises), the Maserati E-Superbike concept would be the dream.

12/11/2025

The BMW M4 and the Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE how they differ, what they each do well, and which might suit you better depending on your priorities.

The BMW M4 is a purpose-built performance coupe from BMW’s “M” division, blending everyday usability with strong driver-oriented dynamics. According to BMW, the latest (2026) M4 Coupe offers 473 hp from its 3.0-litre twin-turbo inline-six in the base form. The Competition variant boosts that to 503 hp, and the M4 Competition xDrive (with all-wheel drive) reaches around 523 hp. The drivetrain, chassis and interior all reflect BMW’s emphasis on driver engagement: good steering feel, dynamic suspension options, strong braking, and a cockpit you’ll feel comfortable in whether you’re on a weekend track or a spirited back-road run. On the other hand, the M4 is premium in cost, has less “straight up muscle-car aggression” compared to some rivals, and if you push it hard you’ll still incur higher servicing and running costs typical of high-end performance cars.

The Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE is a more raw, track-oriented interpretation of performance — essentially muscle-car meets circuit machine. The ZL1 1LE version is built atop the standard Camaro ZL1 (which uses a supercharged 6.2-litre V8 producing 650 hp and 650 lb-ft of torque) and then adds serious track-hardware in the 1LE package: upgraded suspension (Multimatic DSSV dampers), stiffer bushings, large aero wing, lighter wheels/track tyres, and other enhancements. What this means is you get a car whose straight-line and cornering credentials are extreme, a big-engine V8 sound and fury, and a strong “performance at value” proposition. The trade-offs are that the Camaro is heavier (especially compared to some lighter European coupes), the ride may be harsher especially in 1LE trim, the interior and refinement may not match the BMW in sophistication, and in some markets practical usability (parking, service network) might be more cumbersome.

When comparing side by side: if your priority is refined performance, balanced driving dynamics, day-to-day comfort plus track capability, the BMW M4 is the compelling choice. If your priority is raw power, V8 character, track-focused hardware and value for dollars, the Camaro ZL1 1LE stands out.

In more specific terms:

Power vs character: The Camaro has the big V8, loud presence, huge torque. The M4 has less raw brute but more balanced delivery, more modern packaging and more “luxury/performance” blend.

Usability: The M4 will be easier to live with on a daily basis (refinement, comfort, brand service) whereas the ZL1 1LE leans more towards the weekend/track warrior scenario.

Refinement/interior: BMW likely leads in material quality, finish, brand experience; Camaro will lead in “engine drama” and straight-line performance.

Value/enthusiast appeal: The Camaro has strong appeal for those who want maximum performance per dollar; the M4 appeals to those who also care about brand prestige, handling finesse and daily usability.

If I were choosing between the two for my use case (which would include frequent everyday driving plus occasional spirited weekend runs), I’d lean toward the BMW M4. It strikes the better balance between performance and practicality for my needs. However, if I were focusing more on “track days, weekend thrills, raw engine feel” and less on daily refinement, I would be very tempted by the Camaro ZL1 1LE.

12/11/2025

The Mercedes‑AMG GT R and the Audi R8 two serious performance machines from Germany, each excellent but with quite different character.

The Mercedes-AMG GT R is built as a high-performance, track-focused coupe. It uses a 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 that produces about 577 hp and 700 Nm of torque in the Indian spec. Rear-wheel drive, a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission, and a very aggressive chassis setup make it a car that is more about performance than ease. In India its 0-100 km/h is quoted around 3.6 seconds and a top speed of 318 km/h. What you’ll feel behind the wheel is a car that demands your attention: firm ride, a big engine note, sharp responses. It’s less about comfortable cruising and more about cornering hard, enjoying the visceral feeling of speed.

By contrast the Audi R8 is a more balanced supercar still very fast, still dramatic, but with more usability and everyday appeal. The later generation R8 has a naturally aspirated 5.2-litre V10 engine producing up to about 612 hp in the Performance version, with around 580 Nm of torque. It uses a dual-clutch gearbox and (in many versions) Audi’s quattro all-wheel-drive system, which gives it strong grip and stability in a wider range of driving conditions. What you get is a supercar that you can still live with more comfortably good for weekend drives, occasions where you want performance and comfort.

In terms of driver experience: the AMG GT R is more focused, less forgiving, and gives you more raw edge. The Audi R8 is more refined, versatile and offers a bit more everyday usability while still delivering supercar thrills. If you were to pick between them: if you value the absolute edge in performance and driving engagement, choose the AMG GT R. If you want something that still excites massively but is more usable and slightly less extreme, pick the Audi R8.

For me personally, I’d lean toward the Audi R8. It strikes that sweet balance between “this is amazing to drive” and “I can enjoy it more often” rather than every drive being a full-commitment.

12/11/2025

Porsche 718 Cayman GT4

The Porsche 718 Cayman GT4 is a razor-sharp, mid-engine sports car designed for drivers who crave connection, feedback and purity. The version referenced here uses a naturally aspirated 4.0-litre flat-six engine producing around 414 bhp and 420 Nm of torque. It weighs approximately 1,420 kg (per DIN) which gives it a power-to-weight ratio that feels lively and focused. The chassis is engineered for precision: with its mid-engine layout, low centre of gravity, and high-performance suspension and brakes inherited from Porsche’s motorsport DNA, it delivers driving feel that aligns with sports-car purists. What you get is a car that rewards driver skill, invites you to exploit corners, and makes you feel the driving dynamics.

On the flip side, this GT4 sacrifices a bit of practicality and comfort compared to more conventional grand-tourer sports cars. The cabin is functional and focused rather than lavish, the ride is firmer, and everyday use (especially in harsh road conditions) might feel more “engaged” than relaxed. But if your priority is precision, driver involvement and a genuine sports-car experience, the Cayman GT4 hits that mark.

BMW M2 CS

The BMW M2 CS is a compact, high-performance coupe built with “M”-car DNA but in a smaller, more agile package. According to recent specifications, the M2 CS delivers around 523 hp and 479 lb-ft of torque (for the 2024/2025 version) via a twin-turbo 3.0-litre inline-six; weight savings and sharper dynamics help it stand out. It’s rear-wheel drive, features high-performance suspension, brakes and chassis tuning, and is designed to deliver both strong performance and sharp driver engagement.

The strength of the M2 CS lies in its balance between usability and performance. It’s more practical than some ultra-pure track-only cars: you can drive it daily, live with it, and still when you press the gas it transforms into something very serious. The trade-offs? While it’s highly capable, it doesn’t quite carry the exoticness or mid-engine layout of something like the Cayman GT4 (which often gives a more “sport super-car” feel). Also, as a performance-specialist model, costs (tires, maintenance, servicing) are higher and the ride may be firmer than mainstream coupes.

Comparative View

Putting the Porsche Cayman GT4 and the BMW M2 CS side by side, you see two different philosophies of “driver’s car”.

The Cayman GT4 is more of a purist’s choice: mid-engine layout, naturally aspirated engine (in many markets), high chassis focus, less compromise. If your goal is maximum connection, cornering agility, and a car that feels like you’re driving a sports machine, the GT4 is compelling. The downside is less practicality, possibly less comfort for daily commuter use, and perhaps higher cost in specialized servicing.

The M2 CS, meanwhile, offers a slightly more rounded package: still very performance-oriented, fun, sharp but with more practicality, more usable daily behaviour, and slightly more comfort. If you drive regularly, want passenger space (somewhat) or more “liveable” performance, the M2 CS might fit better. However you’ll feel the difference: the “feel” of precision might lean in favour of the Cayman GT4.

If I were to pick between them for myself, knowing I value both daily usability and driving thrill but leaning more toward enjoyment than mere transport I’d pick the BMW M2 CS. It gives me plenty of performance, sharpness and driver engagement while being more forgiving for every-day use. But if I had the means, the roads, the purpose (track days, less compromise) I’d seriously consider the Porsche 718 Cayman GT4.

12/11/2025

Koenigsegg Jesko

The Koenigsegg Jesko is a hypercar built with one mission: pushing the boundaries of speed, engineering and exclusivity. At its heart lies a 5.0-litre twin-turbo V8 that produces 1,280 horsepower on pump gas and up to 1,600 horsepower when using E85 fuel. It’s mated to a nine-speed “Light Speed Transmission” multi-clutch gearbox developed in-house by Koenigsegg, allowing near-instantaneous gear shifts and the ability to skip gears rather than go sequentially. The car is extremely lightweight for its power class with dry weights in the 1,290-1,420 kg range depending on version. Aerodynamics are equally extreme: for the “Attack” version the downforce is quoted at around 1,400 kg. What this means is the Jesko is not merely fast in a straight line but engineered for track-radical performance.

Driving the Jesko is less about “commuting” and more about a full-blown mechanical and sensory experience: the acceleration is earth-shuddering, the responsiveness immediate, the systems bespoke. Every input matters gear shifts, throttle modulation, chassis feedback. If you’ve ever wondered what happens when a manufacturer throws away compromise and builds something purely for speed and performance, the Jesko is it. On the flip side, its exclusivity, cost, intense maintenance and brand-new engineering make it a serious commitment, likely suited only for experienced owners with track access, specialist support and high budget.

Lamborghini Huracán Performante

The Lamborghini Huracán Performante is a high-performance variant of the Huracán line, blending supercar speed with Lamborghini’s character and some unique technological touches. It uses a naturally aspirated 5.2-litre V10 engine producing around 640 PS (≈631 hp) and torque in the region of 600 Nm (≈442 lb-ft) depending on market. Its 0-100 km/h time is around 2.9 seconds, and top speed exceeds 325 km/h in many specifications. What sets the Performante apart is not just the engine but the extensive use of forged-composite carbon fibre, a weight-reduced body and an active aerodynamics system (ALA – Aerodinamica Lamborghini Attiva) that modifies aerodynamic load on the fly for better handling or higher speed. In short, it’s less extreme than a hypercar like the Jesko but delivers supercar thrills in a package that still has usability, presence and Lamborghini drama.

Driving the Huracán Performante feels like a pure supercar experience: you’re low, you’re fast, you’re in a dramatic piece of design and engineering but one you can road-drive, show off, enjoy twice a week rather than just on track days (though you’ll want to). It offers a more accessible performance entry than the Jesko, yet still demands respect. It carries the Lamborghini badge, the V10 soundtrack, the supercar pedigree and for many it hits a sweet spot between usability and undiluted excitement.

Comparative Reflections

Putting the Jesko and the Huracán Performante side by side illustrates two very different philosophies of performance.

The Jesko is the ultimate performance machine. Its raw numbers, bespoke engineering, extreme downforce, ultra-lightweight construction and proprietary transmission all speak to a car built to dominate records and push boundaries. If you imagine a car manufacturer saying “we will build the fastest, most extreme car we can” then this is it. Ownership means exclusivity, specialist support, high cost, and a focus on performance above all.

By contrast, the Huracán Performante is more refined into the “supercar” world rather than “hypercar” territory. It still delivers breathtaking acceleration, sensational sound and aggressive looks but with slightly more usability, slightly less extreme demands on the owner, and a bit more day-to-day practicality. It remains dramatic, but you might feel comfortable driving it to an event, parking it, enjoying presence and then taking it for spirited drives.

In terms of driving feel: I’d expect the Jesko to ‘flatten’ everything acceleration beyond ordinary, chassis tuned for no-compromise, you feel every last bit of performance. The Huracán Performante, while fiercely fast, will feel somewhat softer around the edges, more approachable, yet still stunningly exciting.

In practical terms for ownership: the Huracán has a broader supporting structure (Lamborghini network, parts availability, track days), while the Jesko is ultra-exclusive (limited production, bespoke setup, major service cost). For many enthusiasts the Huracán might hit the “peak” of what they can realistically manage; the Jesko may be beyond that into “trophy hypercar” territory.

My Verdict

If I were choosing between the two and budgeting, usage, and practicality were considerations, I’d lean toward the Lamborghini Huracán Performante. It offers nearly all the visceral thrill of a top-tier supercar, has the Lamborghini brand drama, is more usable and still extremely special. The Jesko is awe-inspiring and clearly future-defining but unless you’re planning to exploit its every capability (track use, top speed runs, ultra-exclusive ownership) it might be “too much”

In short: choose the Jesko if you want the ultimate hypercar, regardless of cost and practicality. Choose the Huracán Performante if you want one of the best supercars you can reasonably live with and experience more often.

12/11/2025

Comparison between the Toyota Supra, the BMW M4 and the Dodge Viper three very different performance cars that reflect distinct philosophies of driving, usability, engineering and character.

The Toyota Supra tends to stand out as the “fun sports car” choice modern, relatively compact, light (compared to many supercars) and with good performance. For instance, recent versions of the Supra (GR Supra) include a 3.0-litre turbo inline-six producing around 382 hp and capable of a 0-60 mph time in the region of about 3.9 seconds. The driving feel here is about agility, sharpness and the pleasure of a well-sorted coupe rather than maximum raw brute force. It makes a lot of sense if you want performance but also some degree of everyday usability. The trade-offs: it won’t have the same extreme power or presence of a big supercar or exotic, and some purists feel it lacks the character of older naturally-aspirated performance icons.

The BMW M4 sits above this as a more “serious performance machine” that still retains a lot of usability. For example the current M4 base version offers around 473 hp from its twin-turbo 3.0-litre inline-six, and the Competition trim pushes that to about 503 hp. With rear-wheel drive (or in some trims all-wheel) and BMW’s focus on driving dynamics, the M4 delivers sharper chassis, better performance thresholds and more driver-focused engineering. It is heavier and more complex than the Supra, and may cost more to buy and maintain, but those who drive it hard will appreciate the extra precision and capability. If you prioritise driving feel, track usability and performance with some everyday comfort, the M4 is compelling.

The Dodge Viper is in a category of its own: raw, visceral, unabashed performance, with a big naturally-aspirated V10 engine, minimal compromises, and a huge presence. For example the 2017 Viper SRT features an 8.4-litre V10 producing around 645 hp and 600 lb-ft of torque. Driving the Viper is pure emotion: you get large size, loud engine, raw throttle response and a sense of being in a real performance beast. The trade-offs are significant: heavier weight, more challenging daily usability, higher fuel and maintenance costs, and fewer modern conveniences. For someone who simply wants the ultimate expression of muscle with minimal dilution, the Viper is fantastic but for everyday driving or practicality it may feel too much.

If I were choosing one for myself knowing I want a combination of usability, driving enjoyment and performance without going into ultra-extreme territory, I’d pick the BMW M4. It gives me the strong performance and driving character without sacrificing too much in daily life. If I were looking more for “weekend fun, lighter weight, more agile sports car” I’d go with the Toyota Supra. And if I were chasing a true performance icon with raw power and drama and I was okay with the compromises, I’d choose the Dodge Viper.

12/11/2025

The Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S E Performance 4‑door Coupe, the Nissan GT‑R (R35 generation), the BMW M4 and the Lamborghini Huracán STO side by side, you can see they each serve very different performance philosophies even though they all wear high-performance badges.

The Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E Performance is in many ways the apex of brute, modern engineering in a somewhat practical body. Its plug-in hybrid system combines a handcrafted 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 with a powerful rear electric motor, producing a combined output around 805-831 hp and over 1,000 lb-ft of torque in its latest form. That means sprinting 0-62 mph in under 3 seconds is easily possible. The four-door body means you get high performance without completely giving up usability, making it a super-sedan on steroids.

By contrast the Nissan GT-R (R35) is more about pure performance in a relatively compact, more focused package. Its 3.8-litre twin‐turbo V6 produces around 565 hp and a strong torque figure (for its era) depending on the spec. Its all-wheel drive system and six-speed dual-clutch transmission make it exceptionally capable, especially for its price class. Though it may not match the newest hyper-sedan in outright output, it has phenomenal real-world presence, tuning potential and a driver-friendly dynamic.

Then you have the BMW M4, which offers a more driver-oriented, slightly more affordable performance coupe. With its 3.0-litre twin-turbo inline-six producing around 473 hp (base) and more in higher trims (503 hp or more) in recent versions. It isn’t quite on the same level of sheer power as the Mercedes or the Huracán STO, but what it does offer is an excellent blend of sharp handling, everyday usability, luxury finish and serious performance.

Finally the Lamborghini Huracán STO swings everything back toward raw supercar emotion. With its naturally aspirated 5.2-litre V10 delivering around 630-640 hp in many markets, and with significant weight savings, track-inspired aerodynamics and a rear-wheel-drive layout, it’s more about the visceral experience than practicality. This is a car you drive to feel alive, not to commute quietly.

If I were choosing between them: if I wanted the most dramatic performance and could accept less everyday practicality, I’d pick the Huracán STO for its pure super-car feel. If I wanted something more usable but still extreme, the Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E Performance would be top of the list. If I were after a balance of cost, camp-style performance and daily usability, the BMW M4 would be my pick. And the GT-R would appeal strongly if I valued Japanese performance heritage, tuning potential and driving engagement more than raw headline numbers.

Each has its place depending on what you value: power and scale, driver engagement, usability, or dramatic emotion.

12/11/2025

The BMW M4 Coupe, the Nissan Skyline GT‑R R34, the Audi S5 Sportback and the Mercedes‑AMG GT R each nail a unique kind of performance-sedan or coupe ambition, and comparing them together highlights how different driving philosophies and priorities can lead to very different machines even when they all wear “sport” badges.

The M4 Coupe is the textbook driver’s car for the performance-sedan set: a twin-turbo 3.0 litre inline-six, superb chassis balance, sharp steering, and the flexibility to go from daily commuter to track weapon without completely losing either identity. It’s agile, quick, luxurious enough for everyday use, yet serious when you push it. You get the sense BMW engineered it to cover the whole spectrum from family trips to pulse-racing backroads.

The Skyline GT-R R34, by contrast, is more of a niche legend. With its RB26DETT twin-turbo inline-six, ATTESA all-wheel drive, and honours in JDM performance history, it offers something rare: heritage, tuning potential, and a performance culture all its own. It may require more maintenance, may not have the modern polish of newer cars, and may feel less refined in everyday driving but what it gives back is raw emotion, connection to an era, and a tuning playground often unmatched.

The Audi S5 Sportback introduces a different compromise: it’s less extreme than the M4 or GT-R, but still sporty and capable. With its turbocharged V6 (depending on market) and quattro all-wheel drive, it provides a comfortable, usable car that still lets you indulge in driving fun. It trades some sharpness for refinement and practicality four doors, hatchback practicality, premium interior and so it appeals if you want performance but with fewer sacrifices.

Finally the AMG GT R is the pure performance star of this quartet: with its 4.0 litre twin-turbo V8, rear-wheel drive, serious power, aerodynamics, chassis tuned for high speed and track work it’s a super-coupe in every sense. It’s less about “daily practicality” and more about delivering an elevated driving experience every time you turn the key. It demands more, but it also gives more.

If I had to pick one, I’d lean toward the BMW M4 Coupe: it hits the sweet spot of performance, usability and daily-driveability. But if I were chasing something more exotic and track-focused, the AMG GT R would steal my heart. If I wanted something rooted in JDM heritage and tuning potential, the R34 GT-R would be incredibly tempting. And if I wanted a sporty yet practical premium car, the Audi S5 Sportback would be smart.