Bivan Knows

09/06/2026

Hmm 🤔

09/06/2026

⚠️ The biggest story from the Israel-Iran strikes may not be what was destroyed, but what still cannot be confirmed.

Following the reported exchange of attacks on June 8, both Israel and Iran claimed success against military targets. However, independent verification of exactly which strategic facilities were destroyed remains limited.

What we know so far:

• Israel says it struck military-related targets inside Iran, but there is no fully verified public list of destroyed facilities.

• Iran says it targeted Israeli military sites in retaliation, but there is also no independently confirmed breakdown of major facilities destroyed.

This highlights an important reality of modern conflict: information is part of the battlefield.

Both sides want to show strength to their citizens, allies, and opponents. That means public claims often emerge long before independent investigators can verify the actual damage.

The deeper question is not only "What was hit?" but also "Why are both sides carefully controlling what the world sees?"

For now, the evidence suggests a pattern of calibrated escalation. Both sides are demonstrating capability and deterrence, while appearing to avoid actions that could immediately trigger a much larger regional war.

The situation remains fluid, and many of the most dramatic claims circulating online have not yet been independently confirmed.

08/06/2026

08/06/2026

I hope you can read. 🔥

08/06/2026

🎯 IRAN'S TWO-WINGS STRATEGY: MISSILES AND DIPLOMACY AT THE SAME TIME

Iran fired missiles, then immediately said it was still ready to negotiate.

At first glance, that looks like a contradiction.

But what if that is actually the strategy?

Iran's leadership appears to be sending a message to Washington: military power and diplomacy are not separate tools. They work together.

The idea is simple.

First, demonstrate that Iran can create pressure across the region through missile strikes, shipping disruptions, and its network of allies.

Then, signal that all of that pressure can be reduced if a satisfactory agreement is reached.

In other words, Iran may not be trying to prove it can defeat the United States or Israel.

It may be trying to prove that stability in the Middle East cannot be achieved without Iran at the table.

This is what some analysts call coercive diplomacy.

The message is:

"We can increase the temperature, but we can also lower it. The choice depends on the outcome of negotiations."

That is why Iran's president spoke about diplomacy and defense being the "two wings" of national power.

One wing creates leverage.

The other turns that leverage into political concessions.

The real question is not whether Iran wants to negotiate.

The real question is whether Iran is using military pressure to strengthen its position before the negotiations are decided.

What do you think: Is this a smart strategy or a dangerous gamble?

08/06/2026

Iran's "Two Wings" strategy: fight just enough to increase your value at the negotiating table, but not enough to destroy the negotiating table itself.

08/06/2026

Donald Trump made it clear that Nathanyahu has no choice than to accept any deal between the US and Iran. Trump said he calls the shot.

08/06/2026

I told you in my first video that Iran never intended to resume full escalation. Go and listen to it.

08/06/2026

Iran halts strikes on Israel after two sides exchange fire, but warns of "more severe" consequences if attacks on Lebanon continue.

08/06/2026

🤣🤣🤣 President Trump demands that Israel and Iran "immediately stop 'shooting'" as fresh exchange of strikes imperils ceasefire. Follow live updates.