https://www.facebook.com/1005967335925752/

Light Between Duas, Lagos (2026)

21/05/2026

CHAPTER SEVENTEEN

THE GIRL WHO WORE HIJAB TO UNIEKO

The Moot Court; Professor Bello was in the back row. She only noticed at the end.

The moot court was held in the faculty's main lecture theatre, which had been dressed up for the occasion with a raised bench, a formal lectern, and the addition of a court reporter whose presence served no practical purpose and enormous symbolic one.

Second-year students argued. First-year students observed. Except that Professor Bello, who ran the moot court programme, had extended an invitation in writing, through the departmental secretary — to three first-year students of exceptional academic standing. Aisha's name was one of the three. She would argue the Ramatu case. Not the real one — the moot version, a constructed version of the appeal, with a second-year student arguing the government's position.

She prepared for two weeks.

She prepared the way the Justice had taught her: from the other side first. She built the strongest possible version of the government's argument before she built her own. You cannot defeat an argument you have not respected, the Justice had said. Respect it first. Then dismantle it from the inside.

The day of the moot, she wore the midnight-blue hijab.

Not as a statement. It was the one her mother had ironed. It was the one she had worn on day one. It was — hers. The most herself thing she owned. It seemed right to wear the most herself thing to the most herself moment of the year.

She argued for eleven minutes. The moot ran long because the panel — three second-year students playing judges — asked more questions than scheduled, which was either because they were engaged or because they were testing her or both. She answered each question directly, without filler, without preamble, the way the Justice had drilled into her: answer first, explain second, never third.

Her strongest moment came when the student playing the government's judge pushed back on the duty-to-design argument.

"The government cannot anticipate every religious practice of every employee. The accommodation requirement is unreasonable."

"With respect," Aisha said, and the two words carried the weight of the Justice's forty years, "the government did not need to anticipate every practice. It needed to anticipate this one. Five daily prayers is not an obscure or unexpected feature of a Muslim employee's life. It is a constitutional right whose existence was known to the employer before the employment began. The duty to design for a known obligation is not a burden. It is a baseline."

The theatre was quiet.

She sat down.

She noticed Professor Bello in the back row when the session ended and people began filing out. He was seated in the last seat on the right — not in his usual front-row posture of authority, but at the back, as a member of an audience.

Their eyes met briefly across the emptying theatre. He gave a single nod — not the pedagogical nod of a teacher assessing a student, but something more level. The nod of one person acknowledging another across a space they both occupied.

She nodded back.

They did not speak. They did not need to. Some things are communicated more cleanly in the space between words than in the words themselves.

The Justice's response to her moot report arrived the next morning.

The baseline argument was excellent. I would have asked the same question that flustered them.
You will be a formidable advocate. I say this not as encouragement. I say it as an observation.
A.

Day one hundred and seventy.
I argued in the moot court. I wore the midnight-blue hijab.
Professor Bello was in the back row. I only noticed at the end.
The Justice said I will be formidable. She said it as an observation. I received it as a charge.

Continue reading on this page. More chapters will be uploaded

Please tap LIKE, COMMENT AND SHARE

A story by D-Pen Queen

21/05/2026

CHAPTER SIXTEEN

THE GIRL WHO WORE HIJAB TO UNIEKO

The Justice Falls Ill: Direction without a guide is still direction. But it is lonelier.

The news came at the start of second semester.
The Justice's clerk sent a brief email: Justice Suleiman-Kuti had been admitted to hospital for a procedure. The mentorship sessions would be paused until further notice. She would communicate when she was able.

The email was four sentences. Aisha read it eleven times.

She did not know what to do with the feeling it left. It was not exactly fear — the Justice was sixty-one and the email, though brief, had not sounded alarmed, and clerks who work for careful people write careful emails. But it was not nothing either. It was the feeling of a door you had been walking toward, suddenly, quietly closed — not locked, just closed, and you standing on the other side of it uncertain how long the wait would be.

She went to the library. Opened the Ramatu case file. Worked on the arguments.

After an hour she realised she had been working not to learn but to feel less afraid. She closed the file. That was not how the Justice had taught her to use the law. The law deserved to be approached from strength, not from the need for distraction.

She went to pray instead. After the prayer she sat on the prayer mat for a while, hands open in her lap, and did not ask for anything specific — just for the right response to uncertainty. It seemed the most honest prayer available.

She told Abdullahi that evening. He listened in the way he always listened.

"What would she tell you to do?" he asked.

Aisha was quiet. Thought about it genuinely.

"She would tell me to keep working. She would say: the case does not wait for my feelings about the case. She would probably say it with that expression she has — the one that is kind and brisk at the same time."

"Then you already know the answer."
"I know. I needed someone else to ask the question."

He nodded. Then: "Can I ask you something else?"

"Always."

"The first time I saw you — orientation day, in the corridor — you said 'first time anywhere.' I've been thinking about that since. What did you mean?"

She looked at him. It was not the question she had expected.

"I meant that I had never been anywhere that wasn't home, or school, or the road between them. Everything up to that point had been preparation. UniEko was the first place that was — actual. Real consequence. Real stakes. Not practice."

"And now?"

"Now I know that the whole world is the first time anywhere, if you're paying attention. Every room is actual. Every conversation has stakes."

He looked at her for a long moment. "Rumi at dinner," he said softly. "It was inevitable."

She laughed. A real one. The waterlogged kind.

Three weeks later, a short email arrived from the Justice's personal address.

The procedure went well. I am resting. I have been reading, which is what I do when I am forced to be still.
I read your draft arguments for the Ramatu appeal. They are better than your first session. Considerably.
The second argument is now the strongest. I believe you knew that when you rewrote it.
We resume in three weeks. Come prepared to be disagreed with.
A.

Aisha put the phone down. Opened her notepad.

Day one hundred and fifty-one.
The Justice is recovering. She read my work from her hospital bed.
She said: come prepared to be disagreed with.
That is the best invitation I have ever received.

Continue reading on this page. More chapters will be uploaded

Please tap LIKE, COMMENT AND SHARE

A story by D-Pen Queen

19/05/2026

CHAPTER FOURTEEN

THE GIRL WHO WORE HIJAB TO UNIEKO

The Prayer Space Case; She did not want to be a flag. But she would be a lawyer.

The MSSN prayer space petition had been sitting in the university administration for three years, acknowledged twice, acted on never, the kind of petition that exists to reassure the sender that the system has a place for complaints without creating any obligation to address them.

After the exams, Haruna came to find Aisha.

He did not come with a banner. He did not come with a speech. He came alone, on a Wednesday, and asked if she had twenty minutes, and they sat in the student union building with two cups of watery tea, and he laid out the situation plainly. The administration had rejected the formal petition. Their next step was to escalate to the university council, potentially to a human rights body. But to escalate legally, they needed the petition reframed. Not as a request. As a rights claim.

"We need someone who understands how to do that," he said. "Not as our representative. Not as our face. As our drafter."

A pause.

"You said I asked you to be useful before asking if you were willing," he continued. "I am asking first this time. Are you willing?"

She looked at him. He had heard her. He had carried what she said and changed accordingly.

"Yes," she said. "I am willing."

She spent a week on the draft. She consulted the Justice, who reviewed it without comment for forty-eight hours and then returned it with four handwritten notes in the margins — two questions, one correction, one single word: good.

The document she produced was not angry. It was not a complaint. It was a rights claim built on three pillars: Section 38 of the 1999 Constitution — freedom of religion.

The university's own equality policy, which contained accommodation language it had never applied to prayer. And three cases, two Nigerian, one from the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights, that established the positive duty of institutions to provide reasonable religious accommodation.

She wrote it the way the Justice had taught her: beginning with what the institution was obligated to do, not what the students were asking to be given. It was the difference between requesting charity and asserting a right.

Haruna read it and was quiet for a long time.

"This is — this is not what I thought a legal document looked like."
"What did you think it looked like?"
"Long. Intimidating. Written for the person reading it, not the person it's about."

"That's the old way," Aisha said. "The law is supposed to be for people. That's what it's for."

The administration responded within two weeks — faster than they had responded to anything in three years of petitions. A meeting was scheduled. Two dedicated prayer spaces would be created before the following semester. The decision was framed, delicately, not as a concession but as an alignment with existing university policy.

Aisha read the administration's response on her phone in the library. She read it twice. Then she went back to studying.

Haruna sent her a message: "Alhamdulillah. The spaces will be ready before we return. Your name will not appear anywhere in this."

She replied: "That was always the arrangement. Congratulations — it was your work too."

Day one hundred and seventeen.
The prayer spaces are confirmed. A three-year petition became a rights claim and the administration responded in two weeks.
The law is not magic. But used correctly, it is very close.
My name is not in the document. That is fine. The students who pray there will not know who drafted it. That is fine too. The prayer is what matters. Not the credit.

Continue reading on this page. More chapters will be uploaded
Please tap LIKE, COMMENT AND SHARE
A story by D-Pen Queen

16/05/2026

CHAPTER THIRTEEN

THE GIRL WHO WORE HIJAB TO UNIEKO

Chisom's Night; Being a good friend is its own kind of law.

It was the second week of exams when Chisom stopped talking.

Not completely, she still answered direct questions, still ate, still moved through the room with her usual energy. But the quality of her silence was different, and Aisha, who had spent three months learning the precise texture of her roommate's moods the way you learn the sounds of a building you live in, noticed it by day two and said nothing, and noticed it harder by day four and said something.

"What happened?"

Chisom was at her desk, a textbook open in front of her, not reading.

"Nothing."
"Chisom."
"Aisha."

They looked at each other across the small room.

"My parents are separating," Chisom said. Flat. Like reading it from a document. "My mother called. My father has been — there is someone else. Has been for two years apparently. My mother found out last week."

The room was quiet.

"I'm sorry," Aisha said.
"It's fine."
"It's not fine."
"No," Chisom said. "It's not."

She had not cried yet. Aisha could see that — the specific expression of someone who had been holding something at arm's length and had not yet decided whether to put it down.

Aisha crossed the room. Sat on the floor beside Chisom's desk, not in the chair, on the floor, which was lower, which was less formal, which was the position of someone who was not going anywhere.

"You don't have to talk about it," Aisha said. "But I'm here. I'm not going to give you advice and I'm not going to make it make sense and I'm not going to quote anyone at you. I'm just here."

Chisom looked at her.

"What, no Rumi?"
"Not tonight."

A pause. Then Chisom slid off her chair and sat on the floor beside Aisha. They sat there together against the wall of Room 14B, two girls in the middle of exam season with more weight than the curriculum accounted for, not speaking.

After a while Chisom cried — not dramatically, just steadily, the way rain falls when it has been building for a long time.

Aisha did not say anything. She did not reach for solutions. She had learned, watching the Justice work, watching her father listen, watching her mother receive difficult things, that the first response to grief is never an argument. The first response is presence. The argument comes later, when the person needs to be helped back to standing. Right now, Chisom did not need standing. She needed the floor.

Chisom passed her Mass Communication theory exam two days later with the second highest score in her class.

She texted Aisha the result from the exam hall: "I passed. Don't say anything wise."

Aisha texted back: "Alhamdulillah. Eat something."

Chisom replied with three yellow hearts.

Day one hundred and three.
I sat on the floor with Chisom for two hours and said almost nothing.
I think that might be one of the most useful things I have ever done.
Being present is not passive. It is a choice, made repeatedly, to stay.

Continue reading on this page. More chapters will be uploaded

Please tap LIKE, COMMENT AND SHARE

A story by D-Pen Queen

16/05/2026

CHAPTER TWELVE
THE GIRL WHO WORE HIJAB TO UNIEKO
The Crack; Even the strongest walls have a season of testing.

The exams arrived in November like the weather that had been predicted and still managed to surprise.

Aisha had studied. She had always studied. It was not effort that failed her, it was sleep. Three weeks before exams she stopped sleeping properly, not from anxiety exactly but from the accumulation of everything the semester had deposited: the video, the interview, the statement, the court, the Senator's letter, the MSSN, the Justice, Abdullahi, all of it layered one on top of the other until her mind could not find the silence it needed to rest.

The Constitutional Law exam was first.

She sat in the examination hall at eight-fifty a.m. on a Monday in November, and when they placed the paper in front of her and said begin, she opened it and felt — nothing. Not panic. Worse than panic. A white, clean nothing, like a room that had been emptied of furniture.

She had six questions to answer in three hours. She stared at question one for four minutes.

Then she closed her eyes. Placed her hands flat on the table. And she did the thing she had done on the danfo on the first morning, and on every hard morning since.

Bismillah.

She opened her eyes. Read the question again. And the room came back, not everything at once, but piece by piece, the way a familiar place comes back after you've been away. The cases. The principles. The arguments she had built and rebuilt. They were there. They had always been there. She had just needed a moment to remember where she had put them.

She picked up her pen. She began.

She came out of the exam at eleven-fifty-three and sat on the stairs outside the exam hall and did not move for ten minutes. Abdullahi found her there. He sat beside her on the stairs without asking, without saying anything, in the way that was becoming their language — the full silences, the attentive quiet.

"How was it?"
"I went blank for four minutes at the start."

He looked at her. "And then?"

"And then I remembered who I am and I answered every question."

A pause. Then:

"Four minutes is nothing."
"It felt very long."
"Four minutes is the amount of time it takes a Fajr adhan to finish. It is nothing."

She looked at him. He was staring forward, as if he had not said anything particularly significant. She thought about how much she had underestimated, in the beginning, the specific way he was good.

"Thank you," she said.
"For what?"
"For sitting here. For saying that. For being the person you are."

He looked at her then.

"Aisha."
"I know," she said. "Not yet. But I know."

She called her mother that night. Not her father, her mother, which she did less often, and which her mother always received with a particular quality of attention, as if she knew the call meant something more than the ones where Aisha called them both.

"I nearly cracked today," Aisha said.

Her mother was quiet for a moment. Not the quiet of not knowing what to say. The quiet of choosing carefully.

"Nearly is not the same as cracked."
"I know."
"Even the Prophets had moments of nearly. What matters is what comes after the moment."

"I picked up the pen," Aisha said.

She could hear her mother smile.

"Then you are fine, my daughter. Go eat something. Call your father in the morning. And who is the boy?"

Aisha stopped. "What boy?"

"The one in your voice when you talk about not yet."

A long silence.

"His name is Abdullahi," Aisha said. "I'll tell you when there is something to tell."

"Insha'Allah," her mother said. Simply. Without pushing.

That was why she had called her mother.

Day ninety-seven.
I nearly cracked. I did not crack.
There is more strength in the nearly than I expected to find.
My mother asked about the boy in my voice. I did not deny there was one.
That is as close to honesty as I can manage right now.

Continue reading on this page. More chapters will be uploaded

Please tap LIKE, COMMENT AND SHARE

A story by D-Pen Queen

01/05/2026

CHAPTER ELEVEN

THE GIRL WHO WORE HIJAB TO UNIEKO

The Proposal

Some offers are traps wearing the face of opportunity. Senator Mahmoud's second visit was not in person.
It arrived as a formal letter, on thick cream paper with a Senate letterhead, delivered to Abdullahi in his faculty pigeonhole on a Tuesday morning. Abdullahi read it once, came to find Aisha in the library, placed it on the table in front of her without a word, and sat down.

She read it.

The Senator was establishing a foundation, the Mahmoud Foundation for Legal Excellence. It would fund four annual scholarships for outstanding law students across Nigeria. It would also fund a legal aid clinic in Kaduna State. He was writing to inform Abdullahi that he intended to nominate Aisha Bello-Lawal as the foundation's inaugural public ambassador. The role would come with a modest stipend, speaking engagements, and association with the foundation's brand.

Aisha set the letter down.

"He consulted you?" she asked.
"He informed me," Abdullahi said. "There is a difference."
"I know."

She looked at the letter again. The scholarship fund was real and good, she recognised that immediately, cleanly, without letting it complicate her thinking. Four students per year. A legal aid clinic. Real things that would help real people. She believed the Senator meant them.

She also knew what it meant to be a foundation's inaugural public ambassador. She knew what it meant to have her face and her name and her midnight-blue hijab attached to the brand of a politician, however well-intentioned. She knew what it meant for every argument she made for the rest of her career to carry the footnote: funded by the Mahmoud Foundation.

She thought about what she had said to Haruna in the MSSN meeting. She thought about Folake and the conditions she had negotiated. She thought about the statement.

"The scholarship fund is genuinely good," she said carefully. "I believe he means it."
"I believe that too."
"But the ambassadorship—"
"I know," Abdullahi said. "I know."

He was looking at the table. She could see the thing this cost him — the position it put him in, between his father and his integrity, again, this time with no simple answer because his father was doing something genuinely good.

"This is harder than the screenshot," she said.
"Yes. The screenshot was simple. He was wrong and I said so. This—" he stopped. "This is him trying. In his way. Which is not your way. Or mine. But it is his."

A long silence.

"Abdullahi."
"Yes."
"I am going to decline the ambassadorship."

He nodded. He had known.

"And I am going to write to him and explain why. Not harshly. Accurately. The same way I wrote the statement."

"He will not understand."
"He might not. But I would rather be declined honestly than accepted incorrectly."

Abdullahi looked at her. That expression again — the one she had catalogued carefully and kept.

"When it's quieter," he said softly. A reminder. A promise.
"When it's quieter," she agreed.

She wrote the letter to the Senator that evening. Two hundred and sixty words. She thanked him for the scholarship fund — genuinely, in specific terms, because it deserved specific thanks. She explained that she was unable to accept the ambassadorship because she was committed to building a legal career that was seen to be independent, and that associating her name with any patron at this stage — however admirable — would compromise that independence in ways she could not recover from. She wished the foundation every success. She meant it.

She sent it before she could reconsider. Then she called her father and read it to him.

He was quiet for a moment.

"Did you say everything you needed to say?"
"Yes."
"Did you say anything you didn't mean?"
"No."
"Then it's a good letter."

Day eighty-three.
The Senator offered me something good, for the wrong reasons, in the wrong form.
I said no to the form. Not to the intention.
That distinction matters. I hope he hears it.

Continue reading on this page. More chapters will be uploaded

Please tap LIKE, COMMENT AND SHARE

A story by D-Pen Queen

30/04/2026

CHAPTER TEN

THE GIRL WHO WORE HIJAB TO UNIEKO

Real Law

Nothing in a textbook smells like a courthouse.
Her first full morning of court observation was a Thursday.

Justice Suleiman-Kuti did not sit on the Ramatu case,she had recused herself publicly, as Aisha now knew, because her own statements on religious accommodation made her appearance of neutrality impossible. She sat instead on an appeals panel reviewing a contract dispute between two Lagos companies over the ownership of a warehouse. The facts were not romantic. The law was not famous. No one would make a Twitter video about it.

Aisha loved every second.

She sat in the public gallery and watched the way the law moved when people who had spent thirty years inside it put it in motion. She watched senior counsel who argued as if they had been born already knowing which words to weight and which to carry lightly. She watched the court registrar, who was the invisible hinge on which everything turned. She watched the Justice who listened to both sides with the same expression she always wore, that precise, assessing stillness and saw how her questions were never neutral.

Each one was a probe: not hostile, not friendly, but surgical. Finding the place where the argument was built on assumption instead of logic.

During a brief adjournment, the Justice's clerk found Aisha in the gallery and handed her a folded note.

"Senior counsel for the respondent used a phrase: 'reasonable commercial expectation.' Write me three reasons why that phrase is doing more work in this case than the actual cited precedent."

Aisha opened her legal notepad.
She had three reasons written before the clerk had returned to chambers.
Afterward, in the chambers corridor, the Justice reviewed her notes.

"The second reason is the sharpest."
"I thought so too."
"Why did you put it second rather than first?"

Aisha had thought about this during the writing.
"Because the first reason establishes the problem and the second deepens it. If you lead with the sharpest point, the first point reads as preamble. If you sequence them, the reader arrives at the sharp point with momentum."

The Justice handed back the notepad.
"Keep coming," was all she said.

She told Abdullahi over jollof rice that evening in the cafeteria. He had begun sitting with her and Chisom on the days they all coincided, which was now most days, a fact that had settled into routine so naturally that none of them had formally noticed it.

"She passed you notes during a hearing?"
"During the adjournment."
"That is — Aisha, that is exceptional."

She felt it — the warmth she still did not have language for when he said her name that way. She filed it under: later.

"How are things with your father?" she asked.
"Slow. But not stopped. He called twice this week. The second time we talked for forty minutes. He told me about his first court case. He was a lawyer, before he became a politician. I didn't know that."

"You didn't know?"
"He never spoke about it. I think he became a different person somewhere along the way and stopped referring to the one before."

"Maybe the conversation you started is helping him remember him."

Abdullahi looked at her. "You have a way of saying things that are very simple and very hard at the same time."

"My father quotes Rumi at dinner."
"I know. It was inevitable. You've told me."

She smiled. She let him see it this time.
Day seventy-one.
I sat in a real court today and watched real law move. I want this. I want this with my whole self.
The Justice passed me notes. I answered three questions correctly. She said: keep coming.
Two words. But I heard: you belong here.

Continue reading on this page. More chapters will be uploaded

Please tap LIKE, COMMENT AND SHARE

A story by D-Pen Queen

29/04/2026

CHAPTER NINE

THE GIRL WHO WORE HIJAB TO UNIEKO

The Statement

The statement was four hundred and twelve words.

Aisha had written six versions before this one. The first was angry, she had burned it at midnight in her mind and started again. The second was too careful, law school language, every edge sanded down. The third tried to be balanced. She deleted it. Balance, she had decided, was not the same as truth. Balance was what you did when you were afraid to pick a side. Truth was what you did when you were more afraid of silence.

The final version said this: " That Professor Bello had made a comment in class that was directed — she believed — broadly and not specifically at her. That she had received it as personal because of the context and her position in the room. That it had made her angry. That anger had driven her to prepare harder than she might otherwise have done. That the result was an argument she was proud of.

That Professor Bello had come to her afterward and acknowledged that his comment had been poorly framed. That he had apologized in his way and she had accepted it in hers. That he had given her an A, which she had earned. That she did not believe the comment rose to the level of discriminatory conduct as defined by university policy.

That she had not been consulted before her name was cited. That she did not consent to being used as evidence for a position she had not been asked whether she held."

She emailed it to the Faculty Dean, copied to the panel, and then — because she had thought carefully about this — copied it to the student rights organisation.

Then she put her phone face-down and went to sleep.

By morning it had spread.

Not the way the video had spread — not virally, not with fire emojis. Steadily. Shared by law students, then by lawyers, then by one journalist who called it the most precise deployment of due process logic by an undergraduate she had ever read. The student rights organisation issued a response that was careful and slightly wounded. Professor Bello issued no response at all, which Aisha thought was the most dignified thing he had done since she met him.

The campus was divided cleanly.

Half called her a hero. The second half called her a traitor — to Muslim women, to students everywhere, to the cause. Several MSSN members stopped greeting her in the corridor. One girl she had never spoken to told her, in the queue for the library printer, that she had set everyone back by protecting a man who had hurt them.

Aisha listened to that one carefully. She always listened carefully to the hardest version of the argument against her.

"If protecting one man means what you say it means," she said, "then the statement would need to be different. But I did not protect him. I told the truth. He said something that was poorly framed. He acknowledged it. I received it. That sequence — harm, acknowledgement, repair — is not the same as harm with no acknowledgement and no repair. Treating them the same would be a lie."

The girl looked at her for a long moment. Then walked away without responding.

Aisha did not know if she had reached her. She thought probably not, today. But possibly later. That was how most true things worked, they arrived late and quietly, once the noise had died.

Chisom brought her chin-chin and sat on the end of her bed that evening.

"Half the campus thinks you're brilliant."
"I know."
"The other half thinks you've betrayed the sisterhood."
"I know."
"Which bothers you more?"

Aisha was quiet for a moment.

"Neither, exactly. What bothers me is that people want me to have been more harmed than I was. They need the story to be simpler. The villain stays a villain. The victim stays broken. But I'm not broken. And he's not only a villain. And the world has always been more complicated than anyone finds comfortable."

Chisom handed her a piece of chin-chin. "You know what? You're going to be a terrifying lawyer."

"That's the plan," Aisha said.

Justice Suleiman-Kuti's response arrived by email.

Now you know what it costs to tell the truth in public.
That is the most important lesson I can teach you.
No one can take that knowledge from you now.
A.

Day sixty.
I wrote a statement. Half the campus is angry. I am not.
The Justice said: now you know what it costs. She is right. I do.
Paying the cost is different from regretting it.
I do not regret it.

Continue reading on this page. More chapters will be uploaded

Please tap LIKE, COMMENT AND SHARE

A story by D-Pen Queen

Light Between Duas

21/05/2026

21/05/2026

19/05/2026

16/05/2026

16/05/2026

01/05/2026

30/04/2026

29/04/2026

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category