21/09/2025
𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐀𝐠𝐚𝐬 𝐃𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐏𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐔𝐛𝐮𝐥𝐮'𝐬 𝐒𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐏𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐃𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜 𝐏𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦, 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐔𝐤𝐰𝐮𝐚𝐧𝐢 𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐭 𝐂𝐄𝐎 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐇𝐢𝐦 𝐔𝐩
In a video response, Prince Agas denies publishing remixes of King Ubulu's songs by Edu Brazil on paid digital music platforms, accusing Chidi Uwabuofu, CEO of Ukwuani Trumpet, of publishing the song to set him up. However, fans have raised eyebrows over Prince Agas' decision to delete comments on his post from people who asked him critical questions about the controversy (see the attached screenshot)
Here's Chidi Uwabuofu's response to Prince Agas' denial and accusations:
“Prince Agas, it appears you're intentionally misinforming your followers about our publication's stance on this matter, possibly to put us in a bad light. Our publication's reports on this issue are still available on our platform, Ukwuani Trumpet, for you to review and confirm their factual accuracy.
This is what we reported, and it stands as fact: ‘They (Ubulu children) accuse Edu Brazil of re-recording and remixing King Ubulu's songs in Prince Agas Studio streaming them online and depriving the family of their entitlements.’ The term ‘streaming them online’ specifically refers to the publication of the audio from your engagement with Edu Brazil, where he sang Ubulu songs, on paid digital music platforms like Apple, Amazon, Boomplay, etc., and not your Facebook livestream. Edu Brazil stated that he was unaware that the audio of his engagement in your studio was published on these paid digital platforms.
As a media platform, our role is to report the facts as presented to us. We are not accusing you of intellectual theft; rather, the children of King Ubulu discovered the audio of your engagement with Edu Brazil in your studio on paid digital music platforms, with your name listed as the owner of the songs and without their consent. If you're claiming that you didn't publish the music on these platforms, that's between you and the accusers.
You accused us of publishing the music on digital platforms for propaganda purposes and to set you up. What benefit would we gain from setting you up? What are we dragging to warrant your statement? We have no issues with you and don't intend to in the future. Edu Brazil reported being summoned by King Ubulu's children for performing their father's songs, and we published their reasons for the summoning, which included the unauthorized publication of the remixed Ubulu song on paid digital platforms with your name as the owner.
The song was published on July 7, 2025, across all digital music platforms, about two months ago. If the publication timing were more recent or had coincided with the Ubulu children drawing our attention to the publication of the remixes of their father's song on paid digital music platforms with your name as the owner, your accusations might hold more weight. Whether you published the music or not is not our concern; however, we urge you to refrain from making unfounded accusations against our platform.
We suggest that you resolve this matter amicably with the children of King Ubulu by either obtaining their consent for the use of their father's songs or pulling the music down from the digital platforms. This would help to bring closure to this issue and prevent any further disputes!”
— Chidi Uwabuofu
Now, we have some questions:
Why did Prince Agas delete comments from people who asked him critical questions about the controversy?
Does deleting comments suggest that Prince Agas is trying to control the narrative or suppress dissenting voices?
How does Prince Agas' actions impact his credibility in this matter?
If Prince Agas didn't publish the song, why would someone else publish it with his name as the owner?
Does this suggest that Prince Agas may have had some involvement in the publication of the song, even if unintentional?
