14/05/2024
PENAL CODE ACT:
CHAPTER II
CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY
43. A person is presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have knowledge of a material fact if that fact is a matter of common knowledge.
44. A person who does an act in a state of intoxication is presumed to have the same knowledge as he would have had if he had not been intoxicated.
45. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is justified by law, or who by reason of a mistake of fact and not by reason of a mistake of law, in good faith believes himself to be justified by law in doing it.
Illustrations: (a) A an officer of a court of justice being ordered by that court to arrest Y and after due enquiry believing Z to be Y arrests Z. A has committed no offence.
(b) A sees Z commit what appears to A to be culpable homicide. A in the exercise to the best of his judgment exerted in good faith of the power which the law gives to all persons of arresting murderers seizes Z in order to bring him before the proper authorities. A has committed no offence, though it may turn out that Z was acting in self defence.
46. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person when acting judicially as a court of justice or as a member of a court of justice in the exercise of a power which is or which in good faith he believes to be given to him by law.
47. Nothing which is done in pursuance of or which is warranted by the judgment or order of a court of justice, if done whilst such judgment or order remains in force, is an offence, notwithstanding that the court may have had no jurisdiction to pass such judgment or order, provided the person doing the act in good faith believes that the court had the jurisdiction.
48. Nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the course of doing a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.
49. (1) Nothing is an offence by reason of any injury which it may cause or be intended by the doer to cause or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, if it be done without any criminal intention to cause injury and in good faith for the purpose of preventing or avoiding other injury to person or property or of benefiting the person to whom injury is or may be caused:
Provided-
(a) that, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, the doing of the thing was reasonable; and
(b) that, where the circumstances so require, the thing is done with reasonable care and skill.
(2) This section shall not apply to the intentional ,causing of death or to the attempting to cause death in order to prevent or avoid injury to property only except as is provided for in section 66 of this Penal Code,
(3) The death of a person shall under no circumstances be deemed to be for the benefit of that person,
(4) Mere pecuniary benefit is not benefit within the meaning of this section.
Illustrations: (a) A passenger train traveling at a high speed is approaching a stationary passenger train upon the same line of rails. A railway employee, as the only means of preventing a collision which would probably involve the lives of many passengers, switches the moving train into a siding. The employee is not guilty of an offence if in all the circumstances his act was reasonable, although a fatal though less serious accident will probably result and a fatal accident in fact occurs.
(b) A in a great fire pulls down houses in order to prevent the conflagration from spreading. He does this with the intention in good faith of saving human life or property. Here, if it is found that in the circumstances A's act was reasonable A is not guilty of an offence.
(c) (i) A a surgeon knowing that a particular operation is likely to cause the death of Z, who suffers from a painful complaint, but not intending to cause Z's death and intending in good faith Z's benefit performs that operation.
Z dies in consequence of the operation. If the operation is one which in all the circumstances it was reasonable for A to perform and it is performed with reasonable care and skill, A has committed no offence.
(ii) If through drunkenness the operation is performed unskillfully. A is not protected by this section.
(iii) Whether Z (or some competent person on his behalf) has consented to the operation or not, is a material circumstance in judging whether it was reasonable to peiform the operation.
(d) Z is seized by a crocodile. A fires at the crocodile not intending to kill Z and in good faith intending Z's benefit. In fact A kills Z. A has committed no offence.
50. No act is an offence which is done- Act of child.
(a) by a child under seven years of age; or .
(b) by a child above seven years of age but under twelve years of age who has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and consequence of that act.
51. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who. at the time of doing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law.
52. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who, at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication caused by something administered to him without his knowledge or against his will, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law.
53. (1) No act is an offence by reason of the injury it has caused to the person or property of a person who, being above the age of eighteen years, hasvoluntarily and with understanding given his consent express or implied to done by that act.
(2) This section shall not apply to acts which are likely to cause death or grievous hurt, nor to acts which constitute offences independently of any injury which they are capable of causing to the person who has given his consent or to his property.
54.Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to a person for whose benefit it is sent for a per- done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.
55. (1) Nothing is an offence which does not amount to the infliction of child, pupil, grievous hurt upon a person and which is done-
(a) by a parent or guardian for the purpose of correcting his child or ward that child or ward being under eighteen years of age; or
(b) by a schoolmaster for the purpose of correcting a child under eighteen years of age entrusted to his charge; or
(c) by a master for the purpose of correcting his servant or apprentice, the servant or apprentice being under eighteen years of age; or
(d) by a husband for the purpose of correcting his wife such husband and wife being subject to any customary law in which the correction is recognized as lawful.
(2) No correction is justifiable which is unreasonable in kind or in degree, regard being had to the age and physical and mental condition of the person on whom it is inflicted; and no correction is justifiable in the case of a person who, by reason of tender years or otherwise, is incapable of understanding the purpose for which it is inflicted.
56. No communication made in good faith is an offence by reason of any harm to the person to whom it is made, if it is made for the benefit of that person.
Illustration: A a surgeon in good faith communicates to a patient his opinion that he cannot live. The patient dies in consequence of the shock. A has committed no offence.. though he knew it to be likely that the communication might cause the patient's death.
57. Except culpable homicide and offences against the State punishable with death, no act is an offence which is done by a person who is compelled to do it by threats which at the time of doing it reasonably cause the apprehension that instant death to that person will otherwise be the consequence:
Provided that the person doing the act did hot, of his own accord or from apprehension of harm to himself short of instant death, place himself in the situation by which he became subject to that compulsion.
58. Nothing is an offence by reason that it causes or that it is intended to cause or that it is likely to cause an injury if that injury is so slight that no person of ordinary sense and temper would complain of the injury.
The Right of Private Defence
59. Nothing is all offence which is done in the lawful exercise of the right of private defence.
60. Every person has a right subject to the restrictions hereinafter contained, to defend
(a) his own body and the body of any other person against an offence affecting the human body;
(b) the property whether movable or immovable of himself or of any other person against any act, which is an offence falling under the definition of theft, robbery, mischief, or criminal trespass or which is an attempt to commit theft, robbery mischief or criminal trespass.
61. When an act, which would otherwise be a certain offence is not that offence by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of the person doing that act or by reason of a misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defence against that act which he would have if the act were that offence.
Illustrations. (a) Z under the influence of madness attempts to kill A; Z is guilty of no offence. But A has the same right of private defence which he would have if Z were sane.
(b) A enters by night a house which he is legally entitled to enter. Z, in good faith taking A for a house-breaker, attacks A. Here Z, by attacking A under this misconception, commits no offence. But A has the same right of private defence against Z, which he would have if Z were not acting under that misconception.
62. The right of private defence in no case extends to the inflicting of more harm than it is necessary to inflict for the purpose of defence.
63. There is no right of private defence in cases in which there is time to have recourse to the protection of the public authorities.
64. There is no right of private defence against an act which does not reasonably cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done or attempted to be done-
(a) by a public officer doing an act justifiable in law and in good faith; or
(b) by the direction of a public officer acting lawfully and in good faith.
EXPLANATION. A person is not deprived of the right of private defence against an act done or attempted to be done
(a) by a public officer as such unless he knows or has reason to believe that the person doing that act is a public officer, or
(b) by the direction of a public officer, unless he knows or has reason to believe that the person doing the act is acting by that direction or unless the person states the authority under which he acts or, if he has authority in writing, unless he produces that authority if demanded.
65. The right of private defence of the body extends, under the restrictions mentioned in sections 62 and 63 of this Penal Code, to the voluntary causing death only when the act to be repelled is of any of the following descriptions, namely-
(a) an attack which causes reasonable apprehension of death or grievous hurt; or
(b) r**e or an assault with the intention of gratifying unnatural lust; or .
(c) abduction or kidnapping.
66. The right of private defence of property extends, under the restrictions mentioned in sections 62 and 63 of this Penal Code, to the voluntary causing If death only when the act to be repelled is of any of the following descripions, namely-
(a) robbery; or .
(b) house-breaking by night, or
(c) mischief by fire committed on any building, tent or vessel, which building tent or vessel is used as a human dwelling or as a place for the causing custody of property; or
(d) theft, mischief, or house trespass in such circumstances as may reasonably cause apprehension that, if such right of private defence is not exercised, death or grievous hurt will be the consequence.
67. If, in the exercise of the right of private defence against an assault which reasonably causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectually exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person, his right of private defence extends to the running of that risk.
Illustration: A is attacked by a mob which attempts to kill him. He cannot effectually exercise his right of private defence without firing on the mob and he cannot fire without risk of harming young children who are mingled with the mob. A commits no offence if by so firing he harms any of the children.