05/10/2024
Did you know the ancestors of the ancient Egyptians, modern Egyptians, [of , , , , , , , , , ] including the , , the Dogon, the , the , the , the , the , the , the , the , Nilo-Saharan speakers the , , , , , the (Jews), , and used to live together in the Wet Sahara (11,000 - 5,000 years ago)?
Genetic markers like A3-M13, E-M2, E-M78, R-V88, L3, M and N indicate shared ancestry during the Green Sahara period, when the Earth’s slow orbital “wobble” transformed the Sahara desert to a land covered with vegetation, lakes and migrating animals. This lush environment facilitated significant human movement and cultural homogeneity, shaping the genetic landscape of both northern and sub-Saharan Africa. A lot of intermarriages, migrations and events have happened since then but this debunks at least 5 myths:
1. Myth: Ancient Egyptians were distinct from sub-Saharan Africans.
Genetic markers like A3-M13, E-M2, and E-M78 debunk this by revealing shared ancestry between ancient Egyptians and groups across sub-Saharan Africa during the Green Sahara period. This shows that the early Egyptian population had deep African roots (D’Atanasio et al., 2018).
2. Myth: Egyptians and sub-Saharan Africans had minimal interaction.
The genetic evidence, including shared mtDNA lineages like L3, M, and N, indicates significant movement and intermarriage between populations in Egypt and sub-Saharan Africa, debunking ideas of isolation (Vai et al., 2019).
3. Myth: The Sahara was always a barrier to human movement.
During the Green Sahara period, the region was a fertile, connected landscape, facilitating migrations between northern Africa and sub-Saharan regions, disproving the notion that the Sahara always served as an impassable barrier (Vai et al., 2019).
4. Myth: Agriculture in Egypt was primarily influenced by the Levant.
African crops such as sorghum, millet, and watermelon played a crucial role in Egypt’s agricultural foundation, demonstrating the significant African influence in the Nile Valley’s early agricultural practices (Vai et al., 2019).
5. Myth: Technological advancements in Egypt came solely from outside Africa.
Early African societies developed advanced technologies, including mummification and the bow and arrow, which were adopted and enhanced by ancient Egyptians, showing Africa’s technological contributions to Egyptian civilization (Wendorf & Schild, 1998).
Studies which support this include:
D'Atanasio E, Trombetta B, Bonito M, et al. (2018). The peopling of the last Green Sahara revealed by high-coverage resequencing of trans-Saharan patrilineages. *Genome Biol*, 19(1):20.
Vai S, Sarno S, Lari M, Luiselli D, Manzi G, Gallinaro M, Mataich S, Hübner A, Modi A, Pilli E, Tafuri MA, Caramelli D, di Lernia S (March 2019). "Ancestral mitochondrial N lineage from the Neolithic 'green' Sahara". Sci Rep. 9 (1): 3530.
Kivisild T, Rootsi S, Metspalu M, et al. (2003). "The genetic heritage of the earliest settlers persists both in Indian tribal and caste populations". American Journal of Human Genetics. 72 (2): 313–32. "Also, the lack of L3 lineages other than M and N in India and among non-African mitochondria in general suggests that the earliest migration(s) of modern humans already carried these two mtDNA ancestors, via a departure route over the horn of Africa."
Wendorf, F., & Schild, R. (1998). Nabta Playa and its Role in Northeastern African Prehistory. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 17, 97-123.
Wendorf and Schild’s archaeological work on Nabta Playa presents evidence of early ceremonial and astronomical practices by African populations, which significantly influenced later Egyptian culture and technology.