It's OA

11/08/2025

“Juicier than the hottest Chizmis, this is yummy Chizmax”

Kuya Will be like: “Pagkatapos ninyong punahing wala akong alam…”

It’s not like Kuya Will will “reveal” something “yummy”… “Reveal yummy” like spill the tea or in this case, spill the beans… Beans talk? Hmmm? It’s just that we can’t seem to wonder how this “VP impeachment case archiving” issue would leave a bad taste in Willie’s mouth. It’ll definitely leave a bitter aftertaste in the Philippine's political landscape. Willie felt bitter and sour. Considering the fact that Willie, as a then senatoriable candidate, was a subject of public ridicule citing his supposed lack of knowledge on legislative work at the expense of his better chance at it… Seated supposedly are competent, well-versed and in-the-know legislators. Then all of a sudden gaining full steam, this current debate on “rule of law”, people are chewing on it. Until they realized it wasn’t cooked well for their liking. Or perhaps, it doesn’t satisfy their “sense of taste”. More so, it was consumed way too fast while still hot. At the same time, pride was an odd ingredient which they can’t swallow. As it appears, it’s like it was served as bits and pieces of cold cuts and appetizers when it was supposed to be served as a full course meal. Some parts were raw, some, overcooked. You get the point (unless you’re a diehard/blind supporter sans a discerning taste)…

What’s on the menu or rather what’s being conveyed here is that, we have senators, justices, legislators, lawyers, politicians and what-have-you who were fed with nourishments and provisions, however, quite a lot seated at the big table cannot distinguish smorgasbord from a la carte. Craving from famished. Butter from margarine. Chiz err cheese from tofu. Watermelon from bitter melon. Savory from sweet. Sweetened from bitter. Tasty from bland. Chicken adobo from soy sauce chicken. Well-done from rare. (Speaking of which, not even medium rare, rare indeed, you’d encounter a well-nourished public servant.) Table etiquette from boodle fight. Steak from “pagpag”. RSVP from AICS/AKAP. These and a buffet of “food for the mind”, heart and soul, and so much more. No wonder “maraming nagugutom”… Oh! Just a thought, I guess they don’t see trout fish as the right choice… I mean truth, peace and the righteous… I suppose they’re not hungry enough for those just yet. They could probably be feeding first their egos and their pockets… and for more pockets, bigyan ng jacket mga yan!! Unlike Willie, they still win. They still have that “wow” factor, especially for their “wowed” followers. Now you know WhyWowWin!! Except for Kuya Will… At least now, from this “unconstitutional consumption and regurgitation of inihaw oops I mean know-how”, Kuya Will is trying to prove himself right… They all are, even if their sensibility left them. It marched away. Left, left, left, right, left! “Tingin sa kanaaaaan, kaliwa!!” What could Willie Revillame be thinking right this very moment? He’ll pass a bill. Food bill. A senate bill charging them with “unconsumable ruling” and for storing the “peach” meant for accountability… Yummy?

09/08/2025

Outward Archiving and more OAs

Regarding “this respectable” issue on the “proposed dismissal to archiving instead” of the VP impeachment case, the most used excUSE the Senate President Chiz Escudero-led senators reasoned out as their basis for such “Outward Archiving (OA)” of it is respecting the constitution they swore to abide by. For the sensible ones, that’ll pass as the most “Oddly Absurd” redundancy of the year. Pun intended and Ominously Ambiguous in so many levels. First off, there’s the “respect begets respect” Opportunistic Allusion and as it should rather be, respect is rather earned, not demanded. They certainly didn’t earn it. They’re demanding it though with their Opinionated Assertion for people to side with them given the backlash they’re receiving from the Open-minded Argumentation. The mere fact there is a defensible discourse either way, it means there is respectable logic and contention regardless of which. They just chose to “respect” what’s convenient for their cause. It’s likewise quite disrespectful how SP Chiz Escudero gaslighted the opposing side’s rationalization. It was to further invalidate what seems to be a more sensible case considering his known intelligence now being questioned. It’s also how the Supreme Court’s “unconstitutional ruling” has been likewise disputed by equally competent and accomplished law experts. Apparently caught in a conundrum, SP Escudero was pushed to a corner wherein he had to likewise protect his Senate Presidency. He doesn’t like VP Sara as he once claimed. Then, he further justified his stand to rather uphold the rule of law as if to, more so, uplift his “laudable” resolve worthy of support from every possible entity to secure his position. Much like how Pontius Pilate had the power to exonerate Jesus but was rather pressured by the Pharisees and the crowd, he chose to listen to the clamor albeit “guilty”…
Among the other impeachable cases, the confidential fund issue made SP Chiz a “confidential fan” of the VP perhaps… Or if we throw his “gaslighting logic” (something to the effect of “If it wasn’t VP Sara, would you be as “hateful”?) back to him: “SP Chiz, if you were with the minority, given your “Outstanding Acumen”, how would you have decided on it?” Considering how you know the powers that be, between the co-equal judicial and legislative branches, SC as it appears, confidentially stands for “Senator Chiz”… Whereas, could “SP” be for “Self-servingly Political”? 🤔 🧐 🤨 (excerpt from an article still being written… or could be “Outlawed & Archived - So OA!!) ~ “O”

08/08/2025

“We don’t need to go back in time like we are to present evidence how Pontius Pilate under duress from the Pharisees and the clamor of the majority was relied on to decide on such an “unconstitutional ruling”. It’s no different from the senate’s 19-5 votes… Who is for the Supreme Court? Who is on The Supreme God’s side? Who is “possessed” by some supreme spirit? Who is truly guided by The Holy Spirit? Amidst all of these constitutional matters in question, God is with us. However, we overlook His presence. And among the honorables we address as their honor to whom we depend on these rule of law concerns, we forget who is The Most Honorable. The true Supreme Justice. Striking His Gavel, we’re not worthy. God, have mercy on us. God save us, Your Honor.”

(Click on the link 👇🏼 and read more)

Sensibility's “held for contempt”. Wisdom's been sentenced. Lies have a gag order, honesty has a restraining order. Madness has been set free. God have mercy.

06/08/2025

God have mercy on the Philippines, Your Honor 🙏🏼
Patigasan, pagalingan, ‘di pagkakasunduan, atbp. Lord, kayo na po bahala sa Pilipinas… 🙏🏼🙏🏼

“While quite a number of these overly opinionated advocates drum up their contention with every possible self-serving noise. It reverberates louder and farther as amplified by others’ deafening silence. For those others who aren’t silent however, they’re apparently muffled by the louder noise. Their mutter doesn’t seem to matter. Their undertones, deemed “under” as literal as it is, are downplayed. And misunderstood as understood, we can’t expect the blind to see clearly. We see however is their haughty conviction that their reasoning and argument are of higher-level which only them are convinced. Unfortunately, there are more who are interested in spreading and believing in/listening to controversial hearsays than taking a look or even glancing at an on-point yet “outnumbered” sense of outrage. Along that premise, morality is lost. Be that as it may, it’s likely justified by a temporal rule of law that’s misconstrued. Most probably, “con’s true”, that’s the truth, their truth. Their ill-advised/mind-conditioned moral truth. Under conflicting principles, who’s right, what’s true, what’s rightfully true? Being on moral high ground however, both sides have a responsibility. The sensible party is to be understanding and forgiving still. Difficult but ethical. Whereas for the case of the “unconstitutional ruling” by the Supreme Court for instance as to its “truth”, it’s ironic how it carries that “domineering supremacy” on court of law rulings but is nonetheless questioned by “associates” within their own “field of expertise”. That “truth” is now being debated on by two sides of which both are presenting valid contentions with legal-basis, constitutional, political or otherwise. It’s law vs law within the same law institution. A free-for-all beyond oral argument and more than their 2-cents among and between varied branches of law, i.e., lawyers, law makers, legislators, arbitrators, justices, et al. And politicians are riding on it… They’re claiming concern over a possible constitutional crisis. Isn’t there one already? Crisis? What about ‘Christ is’? He is not a “lawyer” but Christ is the solution and true absolution.
Truth is, one doesn’t have to be a lawyer or a law expert to see that common sense and sensibility have been “held for contempt”. Wisdom has been “unconstitutionally sentenced beyond reclusion perpetua”. Lies seemingly have a gag order while honesty has a restraining order… Whereas, madness has been released and set free. Truth is, there are in-need-of-fixing rapture-causing loop holes and seeping through is a not-supreme believability. Manifesting “truth” to cover up for a lie is a bigger deception; not supreme at all. Hard truth. And for whose truth are they more concerned about? For whose truth are they looking after? What’s their agenda? Who’s more credible? Who’s more right? Who’s truer, truer than the truth? Confusing as it may, considering there’s the law of man and there’s the law of God, there’s only one truth. God is. The Truth is God. God is The Truth. We don’t need to go back in time like we are to present evidence how Pontius Pilate under duress from the Pharisees and the clamor of the majority was relied on to decide on such an “unconstitutional ruling”. It’s no different from the senate’s 19-5 votes… Who is for the Supreme Court? Who is on The Supreme God’s side? Who is “possessed” by some supreme spirit? Who is truly guided by The Holy Spirit? Amidst all of these constitutional matters in question, God is with us. However, we overlook His presence. And among the honorables we address as their honor to whom we depend on these rule of law concerns, we forget who is The Most Honorable. The true Supreme Justice. Striking His Gavel, we’re not worthy. God, have mercy on us. God save us, Your Honor.”

(Read more 👇🏼 and hopefully be enlightened 🙏🏼)

https://www.itsoaandall.com/god-is-with-us-your-honor/

05/08/2025

“Bato na Sinapian (BS)”

In light of some villainous entities’ audacity to ironically claim how they’re guided by the Holy Spirit in going about their duties to be as divine as spiritually shepherded. IS IT SOME CALCULATING PERSUASION TO CUNNINGLY CONVINCE PEOPLE TO RATHER BELIEVE THEM? “Hmm, bato bato sa langit, ang tamaan, ‘wag magalit…” The Holy Trinity be like ~ Wide-eyed, apparently taken aback while looking at each other, “Whowhat, did you? Huh, it wasn’t me…” Seriously though, what if God, Jesus or the Holy Spirit decided to join in…

Have you ever thought of what God might say on current issues if He is breathing the same air as we are physically? What if He is actually here but we’re too preoccupied with our own beliefs and opinions? We are as guilty in allowing what God is most likely against considering how we prefer silence. He could be disguised as someone saying all the right things but our pride and passiveness is what’s contradicting it. Did you ever think how God might have allowed the presence as well of disruptors to establish balance for learning and realizations? Did it ever cross your mind to likewise cross-analyze things if only to cross-encounter the truth considering how people now are one-sided as much as close-minded? And they rather look the other way… What could probably be God’s take on issues of corruption, political turmoil, in aid of “selective and divisive” legislation, traffic, floodings, misgendering and neopronouns, discrimination/racism, bashing, what-have-yous and whatnots? What’s His take on these given the probable misalignment of other church leaders’ respective interpretation and standpoint as much as the differing understanding of it by people? How will God differentiate the picking of His chosen one with that of other churches’ endorsement of political candidates? What does God think of the appeasement of people’s worldly desires through man-enacted measures (i.e., laws, bills, ordinances, etc.), while favorable for votes and concealed arrangements and ulterior motives but inconsistent with moral principles? How does He feel about humans favoring their constitutional rights over devotional purpose? What if God Himself were to let us choose between a readily available billions-worth of confidential funds (not a soul will know) for our taking or an impoverished yet meaningful life prone to judgemental eyes, how do you think human nature will play out into our consciousness? Have you thought of God’s possible opinion on the discrepancies of humankind’s constitutional laws versus that of His divine rules?

~ “O”

Kaya sa mga “guided by the Holy Spirit”, you don’t just claim it… here’s something for you to ponder upon, John 16: 13 ~
But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, HE WILL GUIDE you INTO ALL THE TRUTH. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come.

01/08/2025

If you happen to be one with a faithful commitment to your religious belief and likewise with loyal allegiance to your political disposition, do you even question your likely conflicting affirmation and values? Whether you’re a DDS, a loyalist, dilawan or kakampink, there’s no absolution from being sort of an omnist, “straddled on the fence”, having divided loyalties. You simply cannot idolize two figures at odds with their convictions and reckonings.This rings true in government, playing the field for political expediency. They claim to be for the people to gain their trust and votes but it’s the same people they take advantage of, particularly their gullibility. True enough when making a stand or choosing sides, it’s based on what would be more popular, not necessarily righteous. Exploitation. Manipulation. Betrayal. You cannot honor God while at the same time venerate a sinner. This is where, in most likely cases, there’s conflict in the laws of man as opposed to that of God’s Ten Commandments and beyond. There’s that possibility, when confusion hits us as to its intermediary rationalizations, that in order to mull over what’s morally justified, let’s ask ourselves “what does the law of God tell us?” Then of course, there’s the “we’re but humans” excuse to rather pay heed more on what suits our earthly fundamentals. We’re humanly selfish that way. As much as “God isn’t here with us anyway” for an excuse gets taken for granted. More so, we justify our questionable choices and decisions claiming it to be the better option as dictated by our law-abiding conscience and liberal obligation to mankind, notwithstanding the transgression against morality. ~ “O”

*excerpt from an article currently being written…

30/07/2025

Bukas baka extinct na tayong mga Pilipino…

Paano ba ang maging isang tunay na Pilipino?
Sa kabila ng away ng magkatunggaling mga kampo
Kailangan bang pumili ng kung sinong kakampihan?
Diba dapat ang katapatan ay para sa Inang Bayan

Sa dami ngayon ng mga iba’t ibang katanungan
Anong sagot sa “Ano ba talaga ang makatarungan?”
Eh sinong makakasagot kung bulag sa katotohanan?
Sumusunod lang sa kulay na tila walang paroroonan

P**a, berde, dilaw o kulay rosas, di pantay na apat
Utak o puso ba ang susundan at pagpipilian dapat?
Ni hindi naman parisukat ating nagiging pagkahubog
Talas ng tatsulok ang mapanugod na panghahambog

Nagiging bobong matalino at mga matalinong bobo
Baliktad at ‘di na pantay, tila hindi na bilog ang mundo
May pag-asa pa bang tayo magkasundo at umasenso
Pinagmamalaki ay hindi na ang pagiging Pilipino

Mas pinagyayabang na ngayon ay kung sino ang tama
Kahit bawat argumento ay pilit tinatama ang masama
Ang tunay nating kulay na kayumanggi ay namumutla
Tila takot at walang pananampalataya para sa himala

Pagiging perlas ng silangan ay nawawalan ng saysay
Mga taong iniidolo mismo ang naguudyok ng away
Makamundo ang dahilan, gusto ng kapangyarihan
Mga pananaw, prinsipyo at pagkatao ay nasasagasaan

Wag sanang dumating na sukuan na din tayo ng Diyos
Dahil na din sa paglabag natin sa Kanyang mga utos
‘Di sang ayon sa mga ito na pinakamataas nang antas
Maspinipiling magpakadalubhasa sa saligang batas…

Baka kaya wala nang arkong sasagip sa mga pagbaha
Unti-unti lumulubog pailalim sa mundong nagbabaga
Nasusunog na ating pagkatao at pagiging makamundo
May panganib malipol ang ating puso’t diwang Pilipino

P**a, berde, dilaw o kulay rosas, di pantay na apat. Ano susundan at pagpipilian dapat? Hindi naman parisukat hubog. Talas ng tatsulok panugod na panghahambog

29/07/2025

“Seems soon” episode 4 ~
While PBBM’s yesterday sounded hopeful, it’ll never be enough amongst anti-Marcos... However, until he makes good of all these commitments, every true Filipino is hopeful. Speaking of which, there’s a hopeful characterization here of PBBM as a “Simpson”. You know how ‘The Simpsons’ get to convey likeness to future eventualities, we’re all hopeful this “SONAtionalistic” episode’s promises will soon bear resemblance to our progress as a nation. That’s just how we’re all hoping for the Philippines’ breakthrough… From how PBBM sounded, it “Seems soon”… 🤞🏼

28/07/2025

What are the odds that there’s a fitting definition to a word of the same spelling but of a different pronunciation representing a bully boy living up to that connotation… Now, the general public is “basting” him. “Soundly” I must say…
Under that premise and of the same context, it was also “dated” and “informal” but that loudmouth challenger didn’t show up… So now, he’s being “basted”. 😅



Source: Google

27/07/2025

27/07/2025

of such an affair… ang SARAp ng buhay, eaSCily off the hook, I’MsPEACHless…