26/08/2026
There is something unsettling about seeing an active military officer like Col. Raymund Lachica being drawn into a highly political interrogation over confidential funds.
By all means, investigate public money. Accountability is non-negotiable. But when the person being questioned is a military officer and the subject may involve security operations, there should also be a national-security lens.
It is one thing for civilians to demand accountability. It is another to expose military personnel to politically charged questioning, particularly when some of those doing the questioning openly come from the ideological left.
I honestly wonder how the rank and file and the military institution itself, view this. Does this strengthen civilian oversight, or does it risk politicizing the military?
That distinction matters. In a democracy, civilian control of the military is essential. But so is protecting the professionalism, institutional integrity, and legitimate security interests of the armed forces.