Padre Damaso PH

26/07/2025

26/07/2025

File file kayo ng case sa Supreme Court tapos sasabihin nyo ready kayo??? Anong kahangalan yan!

‘WE REMAIN PREPARED TO ADDRESS THE ALLEGATIONS’

The defense team of Vice President Sara Duterte issued a statement on Friday following the Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling that declared the fourth impeachment complaint against the Vice President unconstitutional, citing a violation of the one-year ban on filing multiple impeachment cases against the same official.

“The decision of the Honorable Court affirms what we had maintained from the outset — that the 4th impeachment complaint is constitutionally infirm… We remain prepared to address the allegations at the proper time and before the appropriate forum,” they stated.

With the impeachment declared unconstitutional, the Senate cannot acquire jurisdiction over the case, according to Supreme Court spokesperson Camille Ting.

RELATED: https://tinyurl.com/2aezmjyj

26/07/2025

Huy ano yan! Hair folice test lol

26/07/2025

Finally!

Starting today, July 25, 2025, commuters in Metro Manila can now use their Mastercard credit, debit, and prepaid cards to pay for fares on the Metro Rail Transit Line 3 (MRT-3)—simply by tapping at designated contactless turnstiles. | via Ted Cordero/GMA Integrated News

Article link in the comments section.

26/07/2025

LAWMAKERS SLAM SC RULING JUNKING VP SARA IMPEACHMENT COMPLAINT

Lawmakers on Friday, July 25, denounced the Supreme Court's decision declaring the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte unconstitutional.

Akbayan Partylist Rep. Perci Cendana warned the ruling set "a dangerous precedent," saying the High Court had "reduced itself to being the Supreme Coddler of Vice President Sara Duterte."

"Lahat ng tiwaling politiko, pwedeng magtago sa likod ng Supreme Court at takasan ang pananagutan sa sambayanan," he said.

Akbayan Partylist Rep. Chel Diokno stressed that the complaint followed constitutional procedures, including endorsement by more than one-third of the House of Representatives.

"Sa desisyong ito, talo ang taumbayan. Talo ang pananagutan," Diokno said. "Kasama ang taumbayan, hindi tayo titigil manawagang panagutin ang dapat managot."

Meanwhile, ML Partylist Rep. Leila de Lima called the ruling "procedurally questionable," noting that the House, a principal respondent in the case, was not asked to file a formal comment — a clear requirement under Rule 65, Section 6 of the Rules of Court.

"Even traffic violators are given more due process than what was accorded here," De Lima said. "Walang naburang kasalanan. Walang nalinis na pangalan."

She added: "We must not let this ruling numb our sense of justice. Hindi tayo dapat masanay sa mga lider na hindi napapanagot."

26/07/2025

25/07/2025

25/07/2025

🇵🇭 👊