10/09/2025
PACC Exposes Delays in Digos River Flood Control Project (Sections 2)
Digos City, Davao del Sur — September 9, 2025. The Philippine Anti-Corruption Czar (PACC), led by Chairman Doc. Louie F. Ceniza, PhD, has uncovered alarming irregularities in the implementation of the Digos River Flood Control Project, Barangay Ruparan (Sections 2–6), following formal complaints from residents and concerned citizens of Digos City.
The inspection team included PACC President VADM Andres Visaya (PCRGA), Board of Trustees members Pastor Allan Japor and Pastor Richie Cubos, PACC Spiritual Adviser Bishop Rod Cubos of the Christ the Healer International Missions Movement, and members of the local media.
Project Background
1. Contract ID 22L00080 (Section 2)
- Contractor: Rely Construction & Supply / Dreirich Builders (JV)
- Project Cost: ₱173,168,697.86
- Scope: 705 linear meters (both banks)
- Start Date: March 25, 2022
- Original Completion Date: February 7, 2023 (320 days)
- Revised Completion Date: October 6, 2025 (1,292 days)
2. Contract ID 22L00081 (Section 3)
- Contractor: MAC Builders Corp. (formerly MAC Builder’s Development Corporation)
- Project Cost: ₱173,625,230.25
3. Contract ID 22L00082 (Section 4)
- Contractor: MAC Builders Corp.
- Project Cost: ₱173,700,000.00
4. Contract ID 22L00083 (Section 5)
- Contractor: MAC Builders Corp.
- Project Cost: ₱173,700,000.00
5. Contract ID 22L00084 (Section 6)
- Contractor: P.L. Sebastian Corporation Inc. (formerly P.L. Sebastian Corporation)
- Project Cost: ₱173,600,437.58
Key On-Site Findings
1. Section 2 “paper vs. ground” mismatch.
- DPWH reports 80.03% accomplishment as of August 31, 2025, yet field validation showed only ~20 linear meters hurriedly completed near the access road—leaving most of the section unfinished.
2. Sections 3–6 need independent technical validation.
- Although reported as completed, these sections require third-party checks to confirm quality, durability, and compliance with specifications.
1. “Missing” Section 1.
- Project documentation begins at Section 2. When questioned, DPWH officials admitted the records start with Section 2—fueling public concern: “Why did the project start with Section 2? Where is Section 1? Was it deliberately excluded from the program of works?”
According to Engr. Marcos T. Pacifico of DPWH Region XI, Section 2 was suspended on January 3, 2023 due to ROW (right-of-way) issues and pending revisions.
Chairman Ceniza rejected this justification, stressing:
This project lies within the river channel, which under the Civil Code of the Philippines and the Water Code (PD 1067) is public domain and subject to easements. Right-of-way is not a valid reason to halt a project in a river easement. These issues should have been resolved before awarding the contract—not after construction began.”
Residents compared the situation to the Plaridel, Bulacan ghost flood-control scandal, where work resumed only after public exposure.
PACC President VADM Visaya warned:
“We are seeing a disturbing pattern—projects stalled or abandoned for years, only to suddenly resume when investigations begin.”
Bishop Rod Cubos, PACC Spiritual Adviser and head of the Christ the Healer International Missions Movement, declared:
“I fully support PACC’s mission to eradicate corruption in our country. We will stand with communities to demand transparency and integrity in every public project.”
Bishop Cubos also serves as Chairman of the First World Philippines Movement, whose objective is to mobilize citizens and institutions to bring the Philippines to First-World status through honest governance, accountability, and nation-building.
Bishop Rod Cubos, Calls for immediate audit, possible charges vs. erring officials and contractors; PACC Spiritual Adviser vows full support to eradicate corruption
Accountability Measures Sought by PACC
1. Immediate audit of Contract IDs 22L00080–22L00084 by the DPWH Central Office and the Commission on Audit (COA).
2. Filing of administrative and criminal charges against responsible DPWH officials and contractors for possible violations of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (RA 3019).
3. Price reasonableness review in response to community complaints raising possible overpricing.
4. Institutionalized citizen-reporting mechanisms to expose ghost, abandoned, substandard, and overpriced projects nationwide.
The missing Section 1, the unexplained delays, the specter of overpricing, and weak oversight make this project a textbook case of corruption risks. The Filipino people deserve transparency, accountability, and infrastructure that truly protects communities. Contractors and officials who waste public funds must know—PACC will not stop until corruption in infrastructure projects is eradicated.” via| PACC