03/05/2025
TOP PERFORMING VICE MAYOR OF LEYTE
LEO CARMELO "TOTO" LOCSIN SR.
91.75%
ORMOC CITY
An INDEPENDENT and NON-COMMISSIONED survey conducted by Bayan Serbisyo at Kaunlaran (BSK) Advocates for Participatory Governance and Accountability "TINGOG SA KATAWHAN" provincewide survey, has once again revealed the TOP PERFORMING VICE MAYOR'S OF LEYTE.
BSK Advocates emphasize the “ professional integrity, competence and exemplary legislative performance, underscoring their effectiveness as Presiding Officer of their council leading to a pro-active council, effective and timely legislation, dedication, competence, effective legislation, and CONSTITUENTS TRUST AND APPROVAL rating among others.
The ratings and rankings are greatly dependent on their job performances as well as their public approval and satisfaction ratings.
The Local Government Code of 1991, provides that the Municipal Vice Mayor shall exercise an executive and administrative powers in the legislative department being the regular presiding officer of the Sangguniang Bayan, sign all warrants drawn on the municipal treasury for all expenditures appropriated for the operation of this Office and the Sanggunian as a whole and appoints its officers and emoployees.
Vice Mayors are expected to provide leadership and direction to the Sangguniang Bayan, spearhead and support the passage of ordinances, resolutions and other programs that are intricately crafted to fit the needs of every City and Municipality and geared towards an efficient and effective administration of the LGU and to continuously assist the Sangguniang Bayan in carrying out its duties and functions which will uplift the lives of the constituents locally through active engagements of highly professional and politically-matured Sangguniang Bayan Members and other stakeholders.
THUS, WE BELIEVED, that these public officials who excelled in "constituent service" and service to the municipality and province should be congratulated and commended for their exceptional performance, service and dedication.
The 6,000 Respondents were chosen randomly, and the number of respondents was distributed proportionally based on the number of registered voters per city and town.
Other criteria considered include the passage of priority local legislative measures and pieces of legislation concerning infrastructure, peace and order, healthcare, education, jobs, employment, agriculture, public safety and environmental sustainability.