19/09/2025
War Doesn’t Whisper Anymore — It Jams, Swarms and Beams
The modern battlefield doesn’t creak forward with tank treads; it whirs. Mosquito-small quadcopters loiter over trenches. Invisible jammers turn GPS into guesswork. And somewhere beyond the horizon, a pencil-thin beam of light promises to swat the cheap with the cheaper. Welcome to 2025, where the loudest weapon might be a spreadsheet.
This week’s moves worth your coffee:
Poland taps Ukraine for counter-drone know-how. After nearly two dozen Russian drones strayed into Polish airspace on 9–10 September, Warsaw did the sensible thing: ring the neighbour who’s been trial-by-fire testing drone defense for years. Ukraine will train Polish forces on a full counter-UAS “stack”—tracking, jamming, and interceptors—in Poland, a quick-turn lesson in coalition learning curves. Call it NATO’s shortcut from theory to practice. 
Lasers leave the lab (for real). Israel says its high-energy laser—“Iron Beam,” now also branded Or Eitan—has completed full-config tests and is slated to be operational later this year, folding into the country’s layered air defense. The appeal isn’t sci-fi; it’s economics: electrons are cheaper than interceptors, especially against small drones and rockets, with performance caveats when the weather turns murky. 
Stealth isn’t on pause. The US Air Force confirmed a second B-21 Raider has joined flight testing at Edwards AFB, nudging the program from “shiny prototype” toward “usable fleet.” Translation: the long-range, low-observable play is still very much alive in an era obsessed with attritable drones. Different tools, different jobs. 
⸻
The new maths of defence
Once upon a time, the attacker’s trick was to overwhelm the defender’s wallet. Fire ten cheap threats; make them spend ten expensive interceptors. Directed energy flips that script. A laser shot costs pennies to a few dollars in power, not tens of thousands in missiles, provided you can keep the beam on target—and the air clear. That doesn’t make missiles obsolete; it makes them selective. Save the gold-plated arrows for the big birds, let the photon broom handle the gnats. 
But no silver bullets here. Lasers hate dust, rain and fog. Drones adapt with reflective skins, erratic flight profiles, and decoys. Every sensor births a jammer; every jammer births a counter-counter. The loop tightens, and the side that iterates faster—on software, training, and logistics—keeps the advantage. (The boring stuff wins wars. Sorry, Hollywood.) 
⸻
Spotlight: Project Octopus and the rise of the interceptor swarm
If lasers are the glamorous headline, cheap interceptors are the workhorse subhead. The UK and Ukraine have kicked off Project Octopus: mass-producing Ukrainian-designed interceptor drones in Britain and shipping thousands per month back to Ukraine. It’s part tech transfer, part industrial policy, and all about bending the cost curve so defenders can actually afford to swat continuous Shahed-style raids. Think “smart shotguns in the sky”—fast to build, cheap to fly, good enough to take down slow-moving threats. 
Why this matters beyond the front line: once you can manufacture counters at scale, critical infrastructure everywhere—refineries, ports, data centres—can contemplate persistent drone defense without going broke. That’s a doctrine shift as much as a hardware shift. 
⸻
So where’s this going?
Short term, expect hybrid air defense: radars and EO sensors cue jammers; jammers herd drones into laser or interceptor envelopes; missiles cover what leaks through. Costs drop for defenders, but not to zero—someone still pays for power, optics, and crews. Medium term, watch for automation creep: AI-assisted cueing and engagement that shortens the OODA loop. That raises the premium on training, rules of engagement, and human-on-the-loop design, because speed without judgment is just a faster mistake. 
And the big picture? The centre of gravity is moving from exquisite platforms to exquisite networks. A bomber is only as useful as the kill-web it plugs into; a laser is just a fancy torch without sensors and command software; a drone swarm is junk without jammers to blind the other guy. The winners aren’t the loudest—they’re the quickest to re-wire.
Bottom line: In 2025, Dark Arts Defence isn’t about cheering hardware. It’s about refusing to be impressed by price tags and asking one rude question: does this bend the cost curve? Because whoever bends it, wins.
