SG Matters

SG Matters The word "Matters" is both a verb and a noun. Singapore Matters because this is home and herein lies our hope and future.

Good morning, Singapore! ❤️🇸🇬❤️
27/11/2025

Good morning, Singapore! ❤️🇸🇬❤️

So many lessons to learn from this. 😢
27/11/2025

So many lessons to learn from this. 😢

This psychiatrist has completely misdiagnosed the problem.If difficulty alone were enough to traumatise children, then e...
27/11/2025

This psychiatrist has completely misdiagnosed the problem.

If difficulty alone were enough to traumatise children, then entire generations of Singaporeans -- including the psychiatrist himself-- would be walking around psychologically damaged from the PSLE. Yet they aren’t.

The truth is, most children walk out of tough exams unfazed until they see how their parents react. It is adult anxiety and expectations, not exam difficulty, that often creates the distress.

And for students who genuinely struggle because of anxiety, ADHD, dyslexia, or processing-speed issues, the solution is not to dilute the entire exam.

The correct approach is to support them through targeted accommodations: extra time, a separate room, a reader to read the questions for the child with dyslexia.

These measures level the playing field without lowering academic standards for everyone else.

Otherwise, what is the purpose of an examination?

If questions must be pitched to the lowest common denominator so that every child can comfortably solve everything, then the exam loses its function. It no longer differentiates ability, provides meaningful feedback, or guides placement. At that point, we might as well scrap exams entirely.

Exams are not the problem. Expecting the whole system to bend because a minority of parents cannot handle discomfort is the real issue.

Read Ben Leong's post here:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EbEKKnRF3/

So sad. 😢
27/11/2025

So sad. 😢

The stress surrounding the PSLE has far less to do with 12-year-old children, and far more to do with the expectations o...
27/11/2025

The stress surrounding the PSLE has far less to do with 12-year-old children, and far more to do with the expectations of adults. It is the adults who panic, catastrophise, and project imagined doomsday scenarios onto a single set of results. Some try to live their unfulfilled dreams through their children. If parents can manage their expectations, if they stop conflating PSLE scores with destiny, the children will be more than okay.

Ben Leong wrote on his Facebook:

"A surprising new study is challenging long-held beliefs about success after researchers found that the sibling who made the worse grades in school is statistically more likely to become a millionaire later in life. "

Speaking from experience in my own family, this is definitely true.

The problem with having grades that are too good in school is that there are many riskless paths that will lead to comfortable lives.

That said, not sure why this article makes it sound like having a stable career that pays the bills is a bad thing. While it is true that the entrepreneurs make a lot more money (if they don't go bust), life should not be measured in dollars and cents.

PSLE results just got released yesterday and there is a lot of angst, as usual.

My take is it mostly stems from the inability of most parents to handle uncertainty well. The other issue is a matter of not being able to handle hard truths.

The reality is that most people are average and the vast majority of students are not going to make it to RI or RGS, or one of the other "top" schools. That's just how it is and people just need to teach their kids to deal with the hand that they are dealt with.

Our eldest daughter went to St Nicks Primary ('cos wife is an old girl). The daughter really wanted to go to St Nicks Secondary. As parents we were actually quite worried because given her trajectory, even if she got in, it was quite likely that she would scrap through by the skin of her teeth and be in the Express stream. I personally didn't think it was a good idea for her to go through 4 years of Secondary school being at the bottom of the cohort.

As it turns out, she barely missed the cutoff to get back St Nicks by a little bit and eventually ended up in a neighbourhood school. Of course, the daughter bawled her eyes out -- but her parents were pretty chill about it, and perhaps somewhat relieved.

Her experience in secondary school really wasn't bad. Her teachers were really caring. She even had the chance to go on stage when the O Level results were released. At St Nicks, there was no hope of this happening. With her results, she would still likely be at the bottom of the cohort.

Today she's in poly doing what she likes and she's happy.

When I talk to my ex-students (who now have their own kids) and younger parents. I told them: the most important thing for their kids when they grow up is 身心健康 (healthy body and soul).

Academics is something that is "can means can" one. When I was young, school was a walk in the park (and I never ever worried about exams or grades) -- but as it turns out, our kids don't have the same gifts. What is the point of imposing unreasonable expectations on them?

Even if they get damn good grades and end up in medical school, will they necessarily be happy?

It is not likely that our kids will ever make it to Harvard or MIT, but minimally, I am confident that they will grow up to be well-adjusted adults. If they grow up to make a lot of money, power to them; if they don't end up making so much money, then jolly well learn to make do with less. What's the big deal?

My wife and I hope that they will eventually find something they like to do when they grow up and lead meaningful lives. Every day, we also pray that they will grow up to marry good people.

It's a crisis. 😲
26/11/2025

It's a crisis. 😲

Min Ong in Guangzhou.
26/11/2025

Min Ong in Guangzhou.

Every so often, we hear calls to remove the PSLE because it is “too stressful,” or to eliminate challenging exam questio...
26/11/2025

Every so often, we hear calls to remove the PSLE because it is “too stressful,” or to eliminate challenging exam questions because some children struggle.

But shielding our children from difficulty does not prepare them for life. If we bubble-wrap them all the way until they leave school, what happens when they eventually step into society and realise that no one is there to shield them?

Without the experience of facing and overcoming challenges, they will be left unprepared for the realities adulthood demands.

And when that happens, the very same voices calling for children to be protected from every discomfort will be the first to ask: What’s wrong with our education system? Why are our young people so ill-equipped for life?

When we see children celebrating their results, we're reminded that success only feels meaningful when it is earned.

The smiles, the cheers, the sense of pride exist because the children had to work hard and overcome something difficult.

Removing the PSLE simply because it causes stress also removes the opportunity for students to experience the joy of accomplishment that comes from rising to a challenge.

Of course, not every child will get the result they hoped for. But disappointment is a natural part of growing up.

Setbacks teach children how to regulate their emotions, pick themselves up, try again, and grow stronger. These are life skills no exam can measure but every adult needs.

Shielding children from all discomfort doesn’t protect them. It just deprives them of the resilience they need to thrive beyond the classroom.

Instead of scrapping the PSLE or watering down exams, the more constructive approach is to help our children navigate stress with the right support and perspective.

Let them celebrate their victories. Let them learn from their disappointments. Both experiences shape character in ways no textbook ever could.

Success deserves celebration. Disappointment builds resilience. Both are essential. Removing the PSLE to avoid stress means losing both and leaving our children weaker, not stronger.

Agree with Bilahari.He was asked a direct question at the Bloomberg New Economy Forum : given the spat between Japan and...
26/11/2025

Agree with Bilahari.

He was asked a direct question at the Bloomberg New Economy Forum : given the spat between Japan and China, how precarious does Asia feel?

This is an international platform watched closely by investors, policymakers and partners.

A Prime Minister cannot simply shrug off a question or hide behind vague platitudes.

That would make Singapore look timid, evasive, or unsure of itself. Do we want our Prime Minister to represent us in this way? Certainly no!

PM Wong gave exactly the kind of answer we would expect of a Singapore leader.

1. He was measured. He didn't take sides.

2. He was principled. He reiterated Singapore's long-standing position of wanting stability in Asia.

3. He was realistic. He acknowledged the historical baggage, strategic competition and geopolitical complexities.

4. He was confident. He affirmed South East Asia's support for Japan's constructive role in the region.

There was nothing provocative or “interfering” in what he said.

So yes, the influence operation using Hong Kong media to attack our Prime Minister is an attempt to test a new leader.

Singaporeans shouldn’t fall for narratives that try to manufacture outrage where none exists.

This is as much a test for Singaporeans as it is a test for a new leader.

PM Wong handled the question like a seasoned statesman.

What about us, Singaporeans?

Glad that Mr Baey's injury is not serious.
25/11/2025

Glad that Mr Baey's injury is not serious.

Address

Singapore

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when SG Matters posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to SG Matters:

Share