29/11/2024
“After all, it’s not the end of the world.
Well, that’s just it. It is the end of the world. Every day another collapse, another catastrophe, another emergency, another tipping point, and another feeble attempt to avert the end.
No, it’s not. It’s not the end of the world. It’s the end of capitalism, the end of humanism, the end of global finance, the end of planet-gouging resource extraction, the end of neoliberalism, the end of white supremacy, the end of increasingly intensified surveillance technologies, the end of cis-hetero-normativity, the end of settler colonialism, the end of mononaturalism, and the end of patriarchy.
What’s left?
What’s left is the world. We need to save the world.
But there’s so much that needs to be destroyed to give the world a chance: global finance, liberal humanism, patriarchy, cis-hetero-normativity, settler colonialism . . . How can we ever clear away all that’s needed to save the world?
Really, it’s simple. What you think of as the world, and what you think of as desperately worthy of being saved, has already required so much destruction and annihilation. . . . So much attempted world-ending in order to “save the world.” What you think of as the end of the world is the end of “too big to fail” logic. You need to save the world, not capitalism.
What’s left?
What’s left is everything we are willing to live and die for.” -Colebrook, Claire. Who Would You Kill to Save the World? (Provocations) (pp. ix-x). Nebraska. Kindle Edition.
First of all, I apologize to Colebrook for posting the whole of her provocation. If it is a problem, I will respectfully cease and desist. It’s just that on this 3rd reading, of this book, I realize that this pretty much captures what it is that keeps drawing me back to this book. (Having just finished my second reading of it, I tried to break away. But here I am.) As I have said before, I can hardly watch The Walking Dead w/out noting the extent to which it spits in the face of producer/consumer Ca