Curatography 策展學

Curatography 策展學 Curatography / 策展學
關注國際當代藝術、策展文化的線上雙語書寫平台 It is produced by Curating Asia International (CAI).

國家文化藝術基金會「ARTWAVE-台灣國際藝術網絡平台」自2018年成立以來,在視覺藝術領域以「廣設台灣館」、「Curators’ Intensive Taipei (CIT) 國際論壇暨青年策展工作坊」、「亞洲策展論壇」等計畫對內垂直整合既有的政策工具,對外橫向鏈結國內外的專業工作者及組識。為持續拓展國際網絡連結,本基金會委託籌組「亞洲策展聯盟」並搭建臺灣第一個研究國際當代藝術策展文化的線上書寫平台《策展學(Curatography)》。

《策展學(Curatography)》 主要關注當代藝術及策展文化的生產, 試圖在二十一世紀的當下, 描繪過去、現在與可預期未來之間的通道, 標誌出在地與全球不斷更迭之多元中心的流動軌跡。 由此開展的視野,是從台灣向國際開放,並尋求溝通的互主體文化論述,及以亞洲與東南亞的視覺藝術和策展文化為坐標,透過線上出版的論述空間,關照彼此地理政治的特殊意涵,並促進區域間的文化對話。

此集體寫作計畫的目的在於,對策展進行反思、促進當代亞洲跨領域知識的發生,並集結對文化生產具有重要影響的策展實踐寫作。二十一世紀的策展實踐,逐漸在社會中扮演著更多不同的角色,其在全球藝術體系之發展位置與軌跡,也不斷替換更迭。無論是在日常生活中還是藝術場域裡, 「策展」作為廣義的展演實踐,已經成為文化中不可或缺的一環。

「策展」一字帶有「治療」與「照料」的意涵, 新創字「策展學」(Curato-graphy)便意味著「照顧與治療的書寫」,不僅因應策展的差異動態,同時,也回溯策展在歷史上,無論是固著抑或是流動變化的意義, 以界定其作為論述的相對位置。最終,我們試圖透過不同的策展方法、技術以及脈絡研究與檢視,針對白盒子展演邏輯中不斷汰舊換新的展覽「失憶」,進行療癒;與此同時,持續探索策展在當代社會中扮演的不同角色,重新界定策展主體/主題的向度。此外,也回應當代藝術與策展基本精神的民主性展現,並且,標榜書寫實踐的原創性及藝術使命。



Curatography is an outgrowth of the achievement of various grants from Taiwan’s National Culture and Arts Foundation (NCAF) in recent decades. In 2018, the NCAF established ARTWAVE – Taiwan International Arts Network platform, which works to integrate Taiwan’s key arts initiatives, including the Taiwan Pavilions Initiative, Curators’ Intensive Taipei (CIT) International Conference, Youth Curatorial Workshop, and the Asian Curatorial Forum to connect with international professionals and organizations. In order to further expand professional networks, the Foundation commissioned to establish “Curating Asia International (CAI)” and build Taiwan’s first online publishing platform with the aim of exploring the global curatorial culture of contemporary art. The result is “Curatography.”

Curatography is an electronic journal, dedicated to the exploration of contemporary art and curatorial culture. The publication examines the geopolitical dimensions of cultural production in East and Southeast Asia, adopting a reflexive stance towards curatorial practice and the way it has generated an interdisciplinary knowledge of Asia today. Curation in the twenty-first century is marked not only by its expanding role in society but also by its changing functions and responsibilities. The neologism “curatography,” is thus born out of the necessity to retroactively define shifting meanings of “curator” and “curation”. The journal will examine curatorial practices across various Asian societies, in order to seek out their different genealogies, resist the “exhibition amnesia” of the white cube, and take a measure of their ontological dimensions. Taiwan’s National Culture and Arts Foundation (NCAF) has supported curatorial practices for more than a decade. NCAF has not only funded numerous international exhibitions and curatorial projects by independent curators, but has also supported conferences, symposiums, and workshops such as the “Curators’ Intensive Taipei 19 (CIT19)” (2019) and conferences in Dhaka and New Delhi (2017, 2019). Curatography was launched in part from the momentum of these grants, and particularly on account of the curators, artists, and scholars, who’ve shown interest in contributing to the field of inter-Asian curatorial culture.

‼️本週日講座 🧬創造共同體:探索策展與政治🧬‼️This Weekend 🧬Creating Communities: Exploring Curating and Politics🧬👉 閱讀十八期文章【繞返及其策展行動】https://...
15/09/2026

‼️本週日講座 🧬創造共同體:探索策展與政治🧬
‼️This Weekend 🧬Creating Communities: Exploring Curating and Politics🧬

👉 閱讀十八期文章【繞返及其策展行動】
https://curatography.org/zh/?p=46681&preview=true

🟢🟣《策展學》第十八期【策展與政治】|專題論壇
▪ 時間|2026 年 9 月 19 日(週六)14:30 ~ 17:00
▪ 與談人|耿一偉、羅秀芝、樂諾斯(Lovenose)
▪ 活動地點|【The Misanthrope Society 厭世會社】
📪臺北市中正區羅斯福路四段40巷1-2號(近捷運公館站)
▪ 主辦單位|Curatography 策展學
▪ 贊助單位|國藝會

📝 歡迎免費報名:https://forms.gle/PyLBFp8cw8XN1faE7

🟣🟢講者介紹:
#樂諾斯 (曾瓊慧) 畢業於台灣師範大學美術系藝術行政管理研究所,目前任職財團法人原住民族文化事業基金會。在藝文場域擔任行政管理20多年,研究自日據時代殖民現代性、戰後、原運之百年來原住民藝術演變,近年關注於原住民藝術場域發展,發表《他者中的〈她者〉︰淺談台灣原住民女性藝術》、《理想與美麗︰勞動中的場域生成》等。2012年創辦Pulima藝術獎與Pulima藝術節,以及製作第一個原住民藝術電視節目於2017年播映,2022年擔任第一屆MATA台灣原住民族文化影視節協同策展人。這10年來透過藝術節平台,促成與澳洲明日藝術節、挪威Riddu Riđđu Festival、紐西蘭Auckland Art Gallery等合作,邀請紐西蘭Black Grace與Atamira表演團隊,以及Lisa Reihana等多位藝術家的現地製作。

received her MA in Arts Administration and Management from the Department of Fine Arts at National Taiwan Normal University. She currently works at the Indigenous Peoples Cultural Foundation. With more than two decades of experience in arts administration and cultural management, her research traces the development of Indigenous art in Taiwan from colonial modernity during the Japanese period, through the postwar era, to the Indigenous movement. In recent years, her work has focused on the development of the Indigenous art field in Taiwan. Her published writings include “The Female Other: A Brief Discussion of Indigenous Women Artists in Taiwan” and “Ideals and Beauty: The Formation of a Field through Labor.” In 2012, she founded the Pulima Art Award and Pulima Art Festival, and in 2017 produced the first television program dedicated to Indigenous art in Taiwan. In 2022, she served as co-curator of the inaugural MATA Taiwan Indigenous Film Festival. Over the past decade, through the Pulima platform, she has facilitated collaborations with international arts festivals and institutions, including Yirramboi Festival in Australia, Riddu Riđđu Festival in Norway, and Auckland Art Gallery in New Zealand. She has also invited New Zealand’s Black Grace and Atamira Dance Company, as well as Lisa Reihana and other artists, to participate in co-productions and artist residencies in Taiwan.

🟢🟣講座介紹
在當代策展實踐中, #策展 與 #政治 如何被 #部署、協商與組織,本身就是一項關於方法、權力與倫理的問題。當策展不斷召喚「 #共同體」、「 #地方」、「 #原民性」,或試圖建立跨越國界的「 #全球連結」時,策展人與藝術機構如何避免文化採集、代言,以及體制與地緣政治介入的陷阱?又該如何在不同的地方、文化與政治脈絡之間,建立更具責任感的關係?

本期《 #策展與政治》專題,將從不同尺度與實踐經驗出發,討論策展如何介入政治、回應地方,並進一步思考「共同體」如何在策展行動中被創造。

#耿一偉 將透過「政治干預(PI)」與「政治性表現(PE)」兩條基本公式,分析策展人在機構規模、預算、監督者等多重力量的作用下,如何透過策展機制與溝通主體性,超越對即時政治現象的直接回應,進一步探索議題背後的結構性問題。透過多樣性公眾的參與,使藝術成為說出真理(Parrhesia)以及召喚新共同體的「巴迪歐式事件」。
講者 #樂諾斯 將從「繞返(returns)」與去殖民方法論中的「關係責任(relational accountability)」出發,反思策展如何離開主流美術館的既有框架,深入部落現場、花蓮美感基地與桃園都市原民空間,在曲折的歷史與地方關係中陪伴創作者,將策展轉化為一種建立關係、持續對話的參與式行動。

#羅秀芝 將進一步把視角拉向國際展覽脈絡,從跨國巡展、地緣政治與雙年展機制出發,討論當「共同體」跨越地方與單一族群的邊界後,策展如何面對不同文化體系之間的張力,又如何在跨國流動的過程中,重新想像並形塑一個超越國界的動態共同體。

本場論壇將透過三種不同的策展視角,從去殖民與關係實踐、策展的政治力學,到跨國展覽與全球連結,共同討論:當策展試圖創造一個共同體時,我們究竟正在創造什麼?又是以誰的名義、透過什麼樣的關係與政治條件來創造?

🟣🟢ISSUE 18 "Curating and Politics" Forum

In contemporary curatorial practice, how curating and politics are deployed, negotiated, and organized is itself a question about method, power, and ethics. When curating repeatedly invokes "community," "place," "indigeneity," or attempts to build cross-border "global connections," how can curators and art institutions avoid the traps of cultural extraction, speaking-for-others, and institutional or geopolitical intervention? And how can more responsible relationships be built across different places, cultures, and political contexts? This issue's special feature on "Curating and Politics" will draw on practices and experiences at different scales to discuss how curating intervenes in politics, responds to place, and further consider how "community" is created through curatorial action.

will use two basic formulas—"Political Intervention (PI)" and "Political Expression (PE)"—to analyze how curators, working under multiple forces such as institutional scale, budget, and oversight bodies, use curatorial mechanisms and communicative subjectivity to move beyond direct responses to immediate phenomena and further explore the structural issues behind them. Through the participation of diverse publics, art becomes a "Badiousian event" that speaks truth (parrhesia) and calls forth new communities.

will further extend the perspective to the context of international exhibitions, discussing—through transnational touring exhibitions, geopolitics, and biennial mechanisms—how, once "community" crosses the boundaries of place and single ethnic groups, curating confronts tensions between different cultural systems, and how it might reimagine and reshape a dynamic community that transcends national borders in the process of transnational circulation.

will start from "returns" and the concept of "relational accountabilities" in decolonial methodology, reflecting on how curating can step outside the existing frameworks of mainstream art museums and move into tribal/indigenous community sites, the Hualien Aesthetic Base, and urban spaces in Taoyuan—accompanying creators through winding histories and local relationships, and transforming curating into a participatory action of relationship-building and ongoing dialogue. This forum will bring together three different curatorial perspectives—decolonial and relational practice, the political mechanics of curating, and transnational exhibitions and global connections—to jointly discuss: when curating attempts to create a community, what exactly are we creating? And in whose name, and through what kinds of relationships and political conditions, is it being created?

This forum will bring together three different curatorial perspectives—decolonial and relational practice, the political mechanics of curating, and transnational exhibitions and global connections—to jointly discuss: when curating attempts to create a community, what exactly are we creating? And in whose name, and through what kinds of relationships and political conditions, is it being created?

🧬創造共同體:探索策展與政治🧬🧬Creating Communities: Exploring Curating and Politics🧬👉 閱讀十八期文章【危機時代的藝術祭——關於策展與「公共性」的緊張關係】https://curato...
10/09/2026

🧬創造共同體:探索策展與政治🧬
🧬Creating Communities: Exploring Curating and Politics🧬

👉 閱讀十八期文章
【危機時代的藝術祭——關於策展與「公共性」的緊張關係】
https://curatography.org/zh/?p=46680&preview=true

🟢🟣《策展學》第十八期【策展與政治】|專題論壇
▪ 時間|2026 年 9 月 19 日(週六)14:30 ~ 17:00
▪ 與談人|耿一偉、羅秀芝、樂諾斯(Lovenose)
▪ 活動地點|【The Misanthrope Society 厭世會社】
📪臺北市中正區羅斯福路四段40巷1-2號(近捷運公館站)
▪ 主辦單位|Curatography 策展學
▪ 贊助單位|國藝會

📝 歡迎免費報名:https://forms.gle/PyLBFp8cw8XN1faE7

🟣🟢講者介紹:
#羅秀芝 是一位獨立策展人,主要從事城市理論、性別理論和多元本體認識論的研究。她致力於將策展作為一種社會參與、空間探究和批判性反思的方式。主要的策展計畫包含〈台北市第二屆公共藝術節大同新世界〉臨時性公共藝術「街頭劇場」(2005);〈風情萬種〉(2006,國藝會「視覺藝術策劃性展覽獎助計畫」);2007年第四屆保加利亞瓦納爾當代藝術節(Festival of Contemporary Art Varna)台灣策展人,策劃〈影詩疆界〉;2012上海雙年展,特別展「中山公園計畫」聯合策展人;2015-2021 「鏡城地誌學」(國藝會「視覺藝術策劃性展覽獎助計畫」,台北、曼谷、金邊、吉隆坡、雅加達、達卡);2018 關渡雙年展「給亞洲的七個提問」策展人之一;2019 綠島人權藝術季 「拜訪流麻溝15號:記憶 · 地方 · 敘事」以及2020 綠島人權藝術季 「如果,在邊緣,畫一個座標」;「關於島嶼的隱喻」(2021雅加達雙年展)。著有《台灣美術評論全集:王白淵》(1999年)、《台灣當代美術大系‧議題篇:文化‧殖民》(2003年)和《台灣美術地方發展史全集:竹苗地區》(2006年)等書。

Sandy Hsiu-chih Lo is an independent curator whose main research areas include urban studies, philosophical construction of space, gender politics, contemporaneity of indigenous art, and situated knowledge. Her current program focuses on curating as a method of social practice, spatial practice, and critical thinking. Curating topography, a curatorial practice method that she has actively used in recent years, uses relative and relational spatial concepts to bring to light different cultural concepts such as myths, legends, history, memories, morals, ethics, desires and rights embedded in the pluralistic dialectic concept of place in order to strengthen political and ethical transformation through the contrast, confrontation, overlap, and juxtaposition in the becoming of place.

Her major curatorial projects include “Di Hwa Sewage Treatment Plant Art Installation: A New Cosmopolitan World”, ”Street Theatre” (awarded as the best curating work and outstanding project by Ministry of Culture, Taipei, 2004-2005), “Pop Pill” (“Shanghai Cool”, Taiwan Section, Doland Museum, Shanghai, 2005), “Border-crossing, A Tale of Two Cities” (Taipei, Shanghai, 2005-2006), “Exorcising Exoticism”(Taipei, 2006), “Poetic Borderline” (“Borderliner”, Taiwan Section, Festival of Contemporary Art Varna, Bulgaria, 2007). She is the co-curator of the related project of 9th Shanghai Biennale “Zhongshan Park Project”(the related project of 9th Shanghai Biennale, Taiwan, China, 2012-2013), “A Revelation from Ponso no Tao”(Orchid Island, Taiwan, 2014), “Taitung Ruin Academy”(Taitung, Taiwan, 2014), “Topography of Mirror Cities” (Taipei, Dhaka, Bangkok, Jakarta, Phnom Penh and Kuala Lumpur, 2015-2021), “2018 Kuandu Biennale Seven Questions for Asia” (2018-2019), “2019 Green Island Human Rights Art Festival Visiting No.15 Liumagou: Memory, Place and Narrative” and “2020 Green Island Human Rights Art Festival If on the Margin, Draw a Coordinate.”

🟢🟣講座介紹
在當代策展實踐中, #策展 與 #政治 如何被 #部署、協商與組織,本身就是一項關於方法、權力與倫理的問題。當策展不斷召喚「 #共同體」、「 #地方」、「 #原民性」,或試圖建立跨越國界的「 #全球連結」時,策展人與藝術機構如何避免文化採集、代言,以及體制與地緣政治介入的陷阱?又該如何在不同的地方、文化與政治脈絡之間,建立更具責任感的關係?

本期《 #策展與政治》專題,將從不同尺度與實踐經驗出發,討論策展如何介入政治、回應地方,並進一步思考「共同體」如何在策展行動中被創造。

#耿一偉 將透過「政治干預(PI)」與「政治性表現(PE)」兩條基本公式,分析策展人在機構規模、預算、監督者等多重力量的作用下,如何透過策展機制與溝通主體性,超越對即時政治現象的直接回應,進一步探索議題背後的結構性問題。透過多樣性公眾的參與,使藝術成為說出真理(Parrhesia)以及召喚新共同體的「巴迪歐式事件」。
講者 #樂諾斯 將從「繞返(returns)」與去殖民方法論中的「關係責任(relational accountability)」出發,反思策展如何離開主流美術館的既有框架,深入部落現場、花蓮美感基地與桃園都市原民空間,在曲折的歷史與地方關係中陪伴創作者,將策展轉化為一種建立關係、持續對話的參與式行動。

#羅秀芝 將進一步把視角拉向國際展覽脈絡,從跨國巡展、地緣政治與雙年展機制出發,討論當「共同體」跨越地方與單一族群的邊界後,策展如何面對不同文化體系之間的張力,又如何在跨國流動的過程中,重新想像並形塑一個超越國界的動態共同體。

本場論壇將透過三種不同的策展視角,從去殖民與關係實踐、策展的政治力學,到跨國展覽與全球連結,共同討論:當策展試圖創造一個共同體時,我們究竟正在創造什麼?又是以誰的名義、透過什麼樣的關係與政治條件來創造?

🟣🟢ISSUE 18 "Curating and Politics" Forum
In contemporary curatorial practice, how curating and politics are deployed, negotiated, and organized is itself a question about method, power, and ethics. When curating repeatedly invokes "community," "place," "indigeneity," or attempts to build cross-border "global connections," how can curators and art institutions avoid the traps of cultural extraction, speaking-for-others, and institutional or geopolitical intervention? And how can more responsible relationships be built across different places, cultures, and political contexts? This issue's special feature on "Curating and Politics" will draw on practices and experiences at different scales to discuss how curating intervenes in politics, responds to place, and further consider how "community" is created through curatorial action.

will use two basic formulas—"Political Intervention (PI)" and "Political Expression (PE)"—to analyze how curators, working under multiple forces such as institutional scale, budget, and oversight bodies, use curatorial mechanisms and communicative subjectivity to move beyond direct responses to immediate phenomena and further explore the structural issues behind them. Through the participation of diverse publics, art becomes a "Badiousian event" that speaks truth (parrhesia) and calls forth new communities.

will further extend the perspective to the context of international exhibitions, discussing—through transnational touring exhibitions, geopolitics, and biennial mechanisms—how, once "community" crosses the boundaries of place and single ethnic groups, curating confronts tensions between different cultural systems, and how it might reimagine and reshape a dynamic community that transcends national borders in the process of transnational circulation.

will start from "returns" and the concept of "relational accountabilities" in decolonial methodology, reflecting on how curating can step outside the existing frameworks of mainstream art museums and move into tribal/indigenous community sites, the Hualien Aesthetic Base, and urban spaces in Taoyuan—accompanying creators through winding histories and local relationships, and transforming curating into a participatory action of relationship-building and ongoing dialogue. This forum will bring together three different curatorial perspectives—decolonial and relational practice, the political mechanics of curating, and transnational exhibitions and global connections—to jointly discuss: when curating attempts to create a community, what exactly are we creating? And in whose name, and through what kinds of relationships and political conditions, is it being created?

This forum will bring together three different curatorial perspectives—decolonial and relational practice, the political mechanics of curating, and transnational exhibitions and global connections—to jointly discuss: when curating attempts to create a community, what exactly are we creating? And in whose name, and through what kinds of relationships and political conditions, is it being created?

🧬創造共同體:探索策展與政治🧬🧬Creating Communities: Exploring Curating and Politics🧬👉 閱讀策展學十八期【策展與政治:兩條基本公式及其解讀】https://curatography.o...
06/09/2026

🧬創造共同體:探索策展與政治🧬
🧬Creating Communities: Exploring Curating and Politics🧬

👉 閱讀策展學十八期【策展與政治:兩條基本公式及其解讀】
https://curatography.org/zh/18-0-zh/

🟢🟣《策展學》第十八期【策展與政治】|專題論壇
▪ 時間|2026 年 9 月 19 日(週六)14:30 ~ 17:00
▪ 與談人|耿一偉、羅秀芝、樂諾斯(Lovenose)
▪ 活動地點|【The Misanthrope Society 厭世會社】
📪臺北市中正區羅斯福路四段40巷1-2號(近捷運公館站)
▪ 主辦單位|Curatography 策展學
▪ 贊助單位|國藝會
📝 歡迎免費報名:https://forms.gle/PyLBFp8cw8XN1faE7

🟣🟢與談人介紹
#耿一偉 目前擔任衛武營國家藝術文化中心戲劇顧問,台北藝術大學兼任助理教授。曾任臺北藝術節藝術總監(2012-17),桃園鐵玫瑰藝術節策展人(2018-2022),台南藝術節策展人(2023-24)。2020年,他與蕭淑文在北美館共同策展《藍天之下:我們時代的精神狀況》。著有《哲學小分隊:暴擊藝術世界的45問》、《閱讀在靈光消逝的年代》、《故事創作Tips:32堂創意課》與《羅伯威爾森:光的無限力量》等,譯有《劍橋劇場研究入門》、《劇場與城市》、《給菲莉絲的情書:卡夫卡的文學告白》、《空的空間》與《布拉格畫像》等。曾獲倪匡科幻獎首獎,並獲頒「德台友誼獎章」(2017)、「法國藝術與文學騎士勳章」(2019)與「歌德獎章」(2023)。

Yi-Wei Keng is the dramaturg of National Kaohsiung Center for the Arts-Weiwuying, and a visiting assistant professor of theatre arts at National Taipei University of Arts. He was previously the artistic director of Taipei Arts Festival (2012-17) and curator of Taoyuan Iron Rose Festival (2018-22) and Tainan Arts Festival (2023-24). In 2020, he co-curated the exhibition Between Earth and the Sky: The Spiritual State of Our Times with Jo Hsiao in Taipei Fine Arts Museum. He has received awards such as the Freundschaftsmedaille (2017), Chevalier dans l’ordre des Arts et des Lettres (2019), and Goethe Medal (2023).

🟢🟣講座介紹
在當代策展實踐中, #策展 與 #政治 如何被 #部署、協商與組織,本身就是一項關於方法、權力與倫理的問題。當策展不斷召喚「 #共同體」、「 #地方」、「 #原民性」,或試圖建立跨越國界的「 #全球連結」時,策展人與藝術機構如何避免文化採集、代言,以及體制與地緣政治介入的陷阱?又該如何在不同的地方、文化與政治脈絡之間,建立更具責任感的關係?

本期《 #策展與政治》專題,將從不同尺度與實踐經驗出發,討論策展如何介入政治、回應地方,並進一步思考「共同體」如何在策展行動中被創造。

#耿一偉 將透過「政治干預(PI)」與「政治性表現(PE)」兩條基本公式,分析策展人在機構規模、預算、監督者等多重力量的作用下,如何透過策展機制與溝通主體性,超越對即時政治現象的直接回應,進一步探索議題背後的結構性問題。透過多樣性公眾的參與,使藝術成為說出真理(Parrhesia)以及召喚新共同體的「巴迪歐式事件」。

講者 #樂諾斯 將從「繞返(returns)」與去殖民方法論中的「關係責任(relational accountability)」出發,反思策展如何離開主流美術館的既有框架,深入部落現場、花蓮美感基地與桃園都市原民空間,在曲折的歷史與地方關係中陪伴創作者,將策展轉化為一種建立關係、持續對話的參與式行動。

#羅秀芝 將進一步把視角拉向國際展覽脈絡,從跨國巡展、地緣政治與雙年展機制出發,討論當「共同體」跨越地方與單一族群的邊界後,策展如何面對不同文化體系之間的張力,又如何在跨國流動的過程中,重新想像並形塑一個超越國界的動態共同體。

本場論壇將透過三種不同的策展視角,從去殖民與關係實踐、策展的政治力學,到跨國展覽與全球連結,共同討論:當策展試圖創造一個共同體時,我們究竟正在創造什麼?又是以誰的名義、透過什麼樣的關係與政治條件來創造?

🟣🟢ISSUE 18 "Curating and Politics" Forum
In contemporary curatorial practice, how curating and politics are deployed, negotiated, and organized is itself a question about method, power, and ethics. When curating repeatedly invokes "community," "place," "indigeneity," or attempts to build cross-border "global connections," how can curators and art institutions avoid the traps of cultural extraction, speaking-for-others, and institutional or geopolitical intervention? And how can more responsible relationships be built across different places, cultures, and political contexts? This issue's special feature on "Curating and Politics" will draw on practices and experiences at different scales to discuss how curating intervenes in politics, responds to place, and further consider how "community" is created through curatorial action.

will use two basic formulas—"Political Intervention (PI)" and "Political Expression (PE)"—to analyze how curators, working under multiple forces such as institutional scale, budget, and oversight bodies, use curatorial mechanisms and communicative subjectivity to move beyond direct responses to immediate phenomena and further explore the structural issues behind them. Through the participation of diverse publics, art becomes a "Badiousian event" that speaks truth (parrhesia) and calls forth new communities.

will further extend the perspective to the context of international exhibitions, discussing—through transnational touring exhibitions, geopolitics, and biennial mechanisms—how, once "community" crosses the boundaries of place and single ethnic groups, curating confronts tensions between different cultural systems, and how it might reimagine and reshape a dynamic community that transcends national borders in the process of transnational circulation.

Speaker will start from "returns" and the concept of "relational accountabilities" in decolonial methodology, reflecting on how curating can step outside the existing frameworks of mainstream art museums and move into tribal/indigenous community sites, the Hualien Aesthetic Base, and urban spaces in Taoyuan—accompanying creators through winding histories and local relationships, and transforming curating into a participatory action of relationship-building and ongoing dialogue. This forum will bring together three different curatorial perspectives—decolonial and relational practice, the political mechanics of curating, and transnational exhibitions and global connections—to jointly discuss: when curating attempts to create a community, what exactly are we creating? And in whose name, and through what kinds of relationships and political conditions, is it being created?

This forum will bring together three different curatorial perspectives—decolonial and relational practice, the political mechanics of curating, and transnational exhibitions and global connections—to jointly discuss: when curating attempts to create a community, what exactly are we creating? And in whose name, and through what kinds of relationships and political conditions, is it being created?

🟣🟢​林宏璋老師受邀至「台大EMBA產業聯誼會」演講,講題為 〈隨拍與現代性:為什麼攝影是現代藝術?〉探討攝影如何回應現代性,並成為當代藝術的重要媒介,也藉此思考觀看與影像、殖民主義、與技術帝國之間的關連。​感謝  #商之器科技股份有限公司...
18/08/2026

🟣🟢

林宏璋老師受邀至「台大EMBA產業聯誼會」演講,講題為 〈隨拍與現代性:為什麼攝影是現代藝術?〉探討攝影如何回應現代性,並成為當代藝術的重要媒介,也藉此思考觀看與影像、殖民主義、與技術帝國之間的關連。

感謝 #商之器科技股份有限公司 #華緯數位影像資訊有限公司台北分公司 以及 #度金針資本 的長期支持。

🟣🟢策展學 第17期《雙年展加速主義及其不滿》作者洞見導讀影片​🎥觀看影片https://youtu.be/epuwv0hOggI?si=7t27Plr-P9nCC-BS期待透過本期內容,邀請更多人一同思考:當雙年展成為全球藝術體制的重要機...
20/07/2026

🟣🟢
策展學 第17期
《雙年展加速主義及其不滿》
作者洞見導讀影片

🎥觀看影片
https://youtu.be/epuwv0hOggI?si=7t27Plr-P9nCC-BS
期待透過本期內容,邀請更多人一同思考:當雙年展成為全球藝術體制的重要機制時,策展是否仍能作為批判與公共實踐的場域?又該如何在當代重新開啟不同的可能?

📚本期介紹
近年來,雙年展已成為全球當代藝術最重要的展演機制之一,但當雙年展不斷增殖,它究竟仍是藝術與公共性的實踐場域,還是逐漸被全球資本、文化治理與藝術市場所收編?

《策展學》第 17 期 《雙年展加速主義及其不滿》,正是從這個問題出發,重新思考雙年展制度的歷史、限制與未來可能。

本期由 林宏璋 擔任主編,邀集 Henk Slager(漢克.斯勞格)、朱峯誼、李芊 等策展人與研究者共同撰文,從不同角度探討雙年展主義(Biennialism)、展覽綜合體、全球化、文化霸權,以及策展如何重新回應社會與政治想像。

📖 閱讀《策展學》第 17 期:�https://curatography.org/zh/17-0-zh/

📝本期文章包括:

・林宏璋回溯雙年展從帝國競爭到全球藝術生意(Art Business)的發展,提出「加速主義雙年展主義」的批判,思考如何透過放大制度內部矛盾,開啟新的策展可能。
・Henk Slager 主張從節慶化的大型展演轉向研究導向的策展實踐,將雙年展視為一個能夠「減速」、協商生態與社會議題的工作坊。
・朱峯誼以台北雙年展為例,分析國際化與在地主體性的張力,並思考是否能從雙年展機制內部展開對文化霸權的抵抗。
・李芊則從第 14 屆台北雙年展出發,探討展覽如何突破美術館體制,真正與城市、社會及集體意識建立連結。

此外,本期也推出,由主編與各篇作者共同分享本期的研究脈絡與核心觀點,帶領大家一起重新思考雙年展的未來。



🟣🟢
Curatography ISSUE 17
“Accelerationist Biennialism and Its Discontents”
Author Insights Video

🎥 Watch the video
https://youtu.be/epuwv0hOggI?si=7t27Plr-P9nCC-BS

Through this issue, we invite readers to reflect on a pressing question: As biennials become an increasingly significant mechanism within the global art system, can curatorial practice still serve as a site for critique and public engagement? And how might it open up alternative possibilities in the contemporary moment?

📚 About this issue
In recent years, biennials have become one of the most prominent exhibitionary mechanisms in global contemporary art. Yet, as they continue to proliferate, do they still provide spaces for artistic and public engagement, or are they increasingly being absorbed into the forces of global capital, cultural governance, and the art market?

“Accelerationist Biennialism and Its Discontents” is edited by curator Hongjohn Lin, with contributions from curator and researcher Henk Slager, curator and researcher Feng-Yi Chu, and researcher Chien Lee.

By tracing the genealogy of the biennial from imperial competition to the modern "art business," diagnoses the rise of "accelerationist biennialism." He asks if we can push the system toward a "transvaluation"—strategic amplification of internal contradictions—to push beyond the point of reintegration into the global capital industry.

In contrast, argues for the power of the "periphery." By moving away from spectacular festivalism and toward "research exhibitions," Slager suggests the biennial can become a workshop for "deceleration." Here, the exhibition operates as a transitory space for negotiating ecological urgencies and "liveable time."

analyzes the Taipei Biennial as a "cultural game" with Western-centric rules. He explores the tension between internationalization and local subjectivity, questioning whether it is possible to resist the game from within by using the biennial form as a medium to articulate the very problems of cultural hegemony.

Finally, offers a sensory and sociological reading of the 14th Taipei Biennial. While praising the "architectural softening" of the museum’s Brutalist edges, Lee warns against "interiorization." He urges the biennial to breach its institutional walls and integrate itself into the living fabric of the city and its collective consciousness.

#策展學 #當代藝術 #台北雙年展 #雙年展制度

🟣🟢策展學 第17期《雙年展加速主義及其不滿》作者洞見導讀影片​​​期待透過本期內容,邀請更多人一同思考:當雙年展成為全...

📣📣策展學十七期實體講座在  #鳳甲美術館 舉辦✦很久我們沒有為台北雙年展吵架了!——國際雙年展氣候觀測✦座談側記上線!📝📝徐文瑞策展人📝📝講座重點▎祭典與數據:作為流動能量的雙年展系譜身為台灣策劃過最多雙年展的策展人,徐文瑞坦言自己也是「...
15/06/2026

📣📣策展學十七期實體講座
在 #鳳甲美術館 舉辦✦很久我們沒有為台北雙年展吵架了!
——國際雙年展氣候觀測✦座談側記上線!

📝📝徐文瑞策展人📝📝講座重點
▎祭典與數據:作為流動能量的雙年展系譜
身為台灣策劃過最多雙年展的策展人,徐文瑞坦言自己也是「被加速的策展人」。他梳理了精確的系譜:1895 年威尼斯雙年展,與其隔年的奧運規模相似,象徵著國力競爭從武力轉向藝術力與身體技術。雙年展的本質應是不同於美術館機構的「祭典」,是定期對「文化生產力」的檢查。但在數據上,現實卻很骨感:TCAC 曾以 40-50 萬台幣舉辦雙年展,而北雙的預算則從 2000 萬(2500 萬)一路飆升至 2025 年預計的 7000 萬。相比威尼斯雙年展的 500 萬美金(高度仰賴藝廊投注),台灣的國家體制是否能跟上全球成長率與文化政策的轉型?1993 年的「遊牧主義(nomadnism)」所強調的去疆域化自由,在如今高度親睞市場的「國際主義」下,還剩下多少空間?

✏️《策展學/Curatography》是一個以亞洲為關注焦點,研究策展文化、策展意識的雙語平台,未來將會陸續舉辦線上和線下的活動,敬請期待。
-----------
《很久我們沒有為台北雙年展吵架了!——國際雙年展氣候觀測》
Missing the Drama! Climate Watch on International Biennials
▪ 時間|2026 年 5 月 31日(週日)14:00–17:00
▪ 與談人|徐文瑞(策展人)、林宏璋(策展人)、黃舒屏(策展人)
▪ 活動地點|【鳳甲美術館】11268 臺北市北投區大業路 166 號 11F
▪ 主持人| #陳世育
▪ 紀錄| #蘇爽
▪ 攝影| #陳宇弘
▪ 主辦單位|Curatography 策展學、鳳甲美術館
▪ 贊助單位|國藝會

📣📣策展學十七期實體講座在  #鳳甲美術館 舉辦✦很久我們沒有為台北雙年展吵架了!——國際雙年展氣候觀測✦座談側記上線!▎台灣雙年展的偵候:外交與機構幽魂黃舒屏以台灣的雙年展整體歷史開講,以機構策展人的身份出發,身處「加速器」之中的工作者,...
11/06/2026

📣📣策展學十七期實體講座
在 #鳳甲美術館 舉辦✦很久我們沒有為台北雙年展吵架了!
——國際雙年展氣候觀測✦座談側記上線!

▎台灣雙年展的偵候:外交與機構幽魂
黃舒屏以台灣的雙年展整體歷史開講,以機構策展人的身份出發,身處「加速器」之中的工作者,如何看待雙年展。90年代台北市立美術館開始舉辦雙年展之前,50年代至70年代,其實台灣就以「國家」的身份參與聖保羅雙年展,屆時眾美術館尚未成立,是由外交部與國家歷史博物館(史博館)辦理;而98年則是台灣首次加入威尼斯雙年展。90年代之後,雙年展「加速」,2000年以降,國美館本身辦了「國際版畫雙年展」、「國際紀錄片雙年展」、「亞洲藝術雙年展」、「台灣美術雙年展」等,除此,許多學校、博物館,包含鶯歌陶瓷博物館等。講者將此一加速現象歸咎於台灣對於「國際化」的期許,雙年展在此意義下就是「文化國際化」的捷徑。

雙年展在台灣大多是與機構綁定,不為獨立存在,不是藝術家、藝術群體等小單位自發舉辦,以巴西聖保羅雙年展的台灣參與為例,在機構眼裡是「文化外交」的需求所推動;90年代以來的「加速」則是全球化下,亞洲整體在資本投入下「全球城市」的興起,意同進入「全球競爭」的網絡,當時光州、上海、福岡、布里斯本、台北等雙年展都陸續成立。回望台灣「外交部」主導參與的聖保羅雙年展,當時台灣與巴西猶是邦交國,駐巴西的台灣李大使致電「我們不能在消極的地方讓匪團文化滲透」,擲出屆時中華人民共和國意圖透過加入聖保羅雙年展與巴西結交。由此背景,再次可見台灣對於「國際化」的焦慮,雙年展興起於其作為「文化外交」之工具,回扣台灣雙年展多為由「機構主導」。

*關於參與聖保羅雙年展之歷史,史博館於今年辦了一場回顧展。

▎又愛又恨:雙年展的衝突
黃舒屏策展人拋出一個問題:「藝術家需要雙年展嗎?」,明言藝術家與雙年展相互依賴的關係— —既需要它,又需要批判它。講者對「很久沒為雙年展吵架了」的講座標題發想,討論雙年展的「吵架/衝突」,到底該吵些什麼?回歸且綜觀威尼斯雙年展的議題們,在其「國家館」的運行體制下,大宗還是回歸了幾個問題:藝術是否能脫離國家政治、藝術的自由、政治的制裁、藝術是否被資本與權力收編、誰有資格代表國家跟歷史、藝術機構是否真的中立等。

這次的威尼斯雙年展(威雙),是首屆非裔女性擔任策展人,背負了許多期待,包含解構威雙多年來「歐美中心主義」的定調,帶入「全球南方」、非洲的視角;然而這屆的爭議卻落回強者國家的討論,例如俄羅斯的回歸、抗議以色列參展、巴勒斯坦抗議導致評審團全體辭退等,這些爭議似乎針對「雙念展機制」。相比之下,台灣雙年展的「吵架的點」,則是歷史脈絡下的「台灣主體性與國際化的矛盾」、「全球化策展權力的失衡」、「西方理論是否壟斷當代藝術語言」、「藝術政治化」外國策展人短期吸收「台灣元素」成為「文化符號」等相關問題。

▎加速機器下的「疲態」
雙年展如雨春筍,夾雜了許多不同的聲音和現象,專業觀眾對於雙年展問題的修正的期許、雙年展的制度化/模板化、其城市行銷的意圖讓文化觀光化等,講者想以機構策展人的身份重新出發,檢視巨型的雙年展機器後的「勞動力結構」。台灣的機構主導型雙年展,讓其逃脫「政策」的影響,不管是大政治環境、國家政策,或是美術館本身的著眼願景,更實際上則是資源、經費分配,這些並非藝術上的問題,更偏向「文化治理」,讓台灣雙年展被機構的邏輯限制,對於實驗性的創新發想等力量被收耗。

▎在地「微型化」的雙年展
機構在國際/在地策展人的擇取,不僅有上述考量,講者也強調了其與社交網絡、研究範圍和議題視野等考量,台灣的在地策展人的確有視野較在地的傾向,相比國際「巨型」雙年展,在台灣的雙年展有「微型化」的趨勢,無論其資本、經濟投入,或是否具備城市行銷,都彷彿「失格」了雙年展的定義。

講者在最後提及了自己對雙年展的想像,奠基在現實條件下,小型然而「多節點」的展覽串聯似乎符合了亞洲地區的語言,也不必與歐洲「大資本」、「明星策展人」去比拼。在小資本額的語境內,保持溝通、討論,尋找「搭建對話」的方式是最為重要。

✏️《策展學/Curatography》是一個以亞洲為關注焦點,研究策展文化、策展意識的雙語平台,未來將會陸續舉辦線上和線下的活動,敬請期待。
-----------
《很久我們沒有為台北雙年展吵架了!——國際雙年展氣候觀測》
Missing the Drama! Climate Watch on International Biennials
▪ 時間|2026 年 5 月 31日(週日)14:00–17:00
▪ 與談人| #徐文瑞(策展人)、 #林宏璋(策展人)、 #黃舒屏(策展人)
▪ 活動地點|【鳳甲美術館】 臺北市北投區大業路 166 號 11F
▪ 主持人| #陳世育
▪ 紀錄| #蘇爽
▪ 攝影| #陳宇弘
▪ 主辦單位|Curatography 策展學、鳳甲美術館
▪ 贊助單位|國藝會

📣📣策展學十七期實體講座在  #鳳甲美術館 舉辦✦很久我們沒有為台北雙年展吵架了!——國際雙年展氣候觀測✦座談側記上線!📝📝林宏璋策展人講座重點▎當文明遇上加速主義:雙年展是慾望還是權力?林宏璋從佛洛伊德的《文明及其不滿》切入,——該文中提...
08/06/2026

📣📣策展學十七期實體講座
在 #鳳甲美術館 舉辦✦很久我們沒有為台北雙年展吵架了!
——國際雙年展氣候觀測✦座談側記上線!

📝📝林宏璋策展人講座重點
▎當文明遇上加速主義:雙年展是慾望還是權力?
林宏璋從佛洛伊德的《文明及其不滿》切入,——該文中提及了當人類慾望被文明所「閹割」,以及兩個神: eros(慾望)與 ananke(權力/力),藉此討論傅柯以來對「權力」的分析。以此延伸,講者欲以20世紀以來資本主義之下極端運作模式的「加速主義」概念及其發展為軸,藉此討論19世紀末以來的「文化工業」,以及上述兩概念與政治傾向的關係。若引述海德格《藝術作品的起源》,當普及性與專業性產生連結,「藝術生意」便隨之開始。在資本主義的框架下,雙年展正陷入一種「加速主義」——不只是新自由主義或現代性的狂飆,更是數量上的爆炸(兩年內出現了 200 個)。這種現象如何與科技發展、國家主義及地緣政治(如亞洲、東南亞的跨地連結),甚至是藝術學院產生關聯。在此大環境的脈絡之下,藝術機制(art system)如何發展也是文章討論的重點。總結之下,「雙年展做爲一種藝術生意」是講者想爬梳的脈絡。

▎雙年展發展系譜:從帝國博覽會到收耗不了的內爆
威尼斯面對逐漸淤積港口及沒落的商城,其在1895年採用近似萬國博覽會之形式,即殖民者之國家館,以及藝術被徹底商品化的現象。討論雙年展最初與「資本主義」、「文化帝國主義」和「威權」之掛鉤。另外講者提點文件展,其誕生與50年代後德國二戰後經濟復甦的企圖息息相關,將希特勒年代的頹廢藝術之脈絡修改,並以此躍上文化舞台,為德國當時的國際主義。由此來看,「展覽」這詞從來皆與威權相黏,Exposition(商展)在拉丁文字源則是當時的刑罰、處置。延伸於此,展覽與權力的關係再也明顯不過,此張力關係可見於1972年文件展的art and language等藝術家抗爭事件、上屆文件展反猶之爭,2004年台北雙年展藝術家連署「罷展」。

然而,歷史中亦有反動,「機制批判」在加速主義之中,成為了其不斷加速齒輪之下,無法被收耗(subsumption)的可能,ruangrupa在documenta 15的策略——邀請藝術家去策劃排定展覽的最終呈現,這樣的策略無法被藝術系統所收編,永遠皆是多餘過剩的,放大了內部的矛盾與衝突,藉此有內爆的可能。

回歸台北雙年展,1998年第一次舉辦,試圖將台灣放進亞洲當代藝術版圖,此後轉換為雙策展人的機制,十幾年來一直是「論述型展演」的定位,而這兩屆雙年展策展人,重新利用北美館館藏,且以幾個簡單的台灣微小物件,就試圖呈現台灣藝術文化史的姿態,不僅讓人聯想到早期人類學家以外來者的姿態,隨便採樣幾個文物,以物件式的文化獵奇。這樣的策展正好點出了台北雙年展長期與美術館綁死的現象。隨此,講者想問:雙年展舉辦的必要性,以及其能(不能)做什麼?

✏️《策展學/Curatography》是一個以亞洲為關注焦點,研究策展文化、策展意識的雙語平台,未來將會陸續舉辦線上和線下的活動,敬請期待。
-----------
《很久我們沒有為台北雙年展吵架了!——國際雙年展氣候觀測》
Missing the Drama! Climate Watch on International Biennials
▪ 時間|2026 年 5 月 31日(週日)14:00–17:00
▪ 與談人|徐文瑞(策展人)、林宏璋(策展人)、黃舒屏(策展人)
▪ 活動地點|【鳳甲美術館】11268 臺北市北投區大業路 166 號 11F
▪ 主持人| #陳世育
▪ 紀錄| #蘇爽
▪ 攝影| #陳宇弘
▪ 主辦單位|Curatography 策展學、鳳甲美術館
▪ 贊助單位|國藝會

Address

台北市中正區同安街90-1號1樓
Taipei
100

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Curatography 策展學 posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Curatography 策展學:

Shortcuts

Share