Elizabeth Higgins

Elizabeth Higgins If you never try, you will never know

Meta shifts some metaverse investments to AI smart glassesMeta is shifting some of its investments in the metaverse to A...
05/12/2025

Meta shifts some metaverse investments to AI smart glasses

Meta is shifting some of its investments in the metaverse to AI glasses and wearables, hoping to capitalise on the "momentum" in that segment, a company spokesperson has said.

Over recent years, Meta has poured billions of dollars to build the metaverse, which lets people to interact in a virtual reality. However, the tech giant has struggled to convince investors of the viability of the nascent technology.

Bloomberg first reported on Thursday that Meta would cut its metaverse investment by as much as 30%. Its shares climbed more than 3.4% following the news.

The strategic shift to the Metaverse was the reason why Facebook changed its name to Meta in 2021.

"We aren't planning any broader changes than that," said Meta's spokesperson, without commenting on whether the shift in investments will result in layoffs.

Now, the company is seeking to build on an early advantage on AI-enabled glasses, after the positive reception to the latest models launched in September.

The glasses feature a small display within the lens that can describe what it sees and even translate text. That feature is widely seen as a breakthrough that enhances the technology's usefulness while making the design more compact.

Many players in the industry, including firms in China, have also joined the race to build smart glasses and wearable technology.

Meta has struggled in recent years to convince investors about the metaverse. Many have been sceptical over its vision for an immersive digital space and the demand for virtual reality (VR) headsets, which are key to that technology.

The company has invested heavily in such headsets and its metaverse platform, Horizon Worlds, where users can interact as avatars.

Demand for other technologies, especially artificial intelligence (AI), have also surged ahead while Meta prioritised the metaverse.

The firm has recently shifted its focus to building large AI models, like the software integrated into WhatsApp, and developing smart gadgets like its new glasses.

The batteries powering the world's fastest racing EVsFormula E, an all-electric racing competition, is pioneering techno...
03/12/2025

The batteries powering the world's fastest racing EVs

Formula E, an all-electric racing competition, is pioneering technology that could find its way into vehicles at a charging station near you.

On 6 December, 20 cars will race around the São Paulo Street Circuit in Brazil. Stretching over 2.93km (1.8 miles), the course is dominated by long straights along which the cars can scream at full speed. There are just 11 corners.

The cars will reach top speeds of 200mph (322km/h), and accelerate from 0 to 60mph (96km/h) in just 1.82 seconds. This isn't quite as fast as a Formula One car, which can top out at 233 mph (375km/h). But then, these cars are electric.

The São Paulo ePrix will be the first race of the 12th season of Formula E: the world's fastest racing contest for electric vehicles. Launched in 2014, Formula E has rapidly progressed, adding additional teams and races, and building ever-faster cars. The current cars are almost as fast as Formula One cars, which are the fastest racing cars in the world – and the next generation, announced in November, is set to be faster still.

To enable Formula E cars to reach these speeds, their designers have come up with an arsenal of tricks to squeeze every last volt out of their batteries. The ingenuity starts with the batteries themselves, and extends to every other aspect of the cars. What's more, many of the lessons learned in Formula E are being applied to more conventional electric vehicles – helping to drive the electric vehicle revolution and cut global greenhouse gas emissions.

Warner settles lawsuit with AI music firm and launches joint ventureWarner Music Group (WMG) will begin an artificial in...
28/11/2025

Warner settles lawsuit with AI music firm and launches joint venture

Warner Music Group (WMG) will begin an artificial intelligence (AI) music venture with technology start-up Suno - a year after it sued the firm in a landmark case.

As part of the settlement agreement struck between the two firms, Warner will let users create AI-generated music on Suno using the voices, names and likeness of artists who opt-in to the programme.

The record label, which represents artists like Dua Lipa, Coldplay and Ed Sheeran, was among several music giants like Sony Music that sued Suno and a similar platform called Udio.

AI-generated content has been controversial, with many artists voicing concerns that it could undermine human songwriters.

Starting next year, Suno will roll out new advanced and licensed models to its generative-AI music platform, which allows users to create music based on simple descriptions, said Warner in a statement.

The Massachusetts-based firm has around 100 million users and was launched two years ago.

Suno's 2026 model will replace its existing version and will require users to pay for audio downloads, said Warner. Songs on the service's free tier can still be played and shared.

Warner said the "first-of-its-kind partnership" will open "new frontiers" in music creation while ensuring the creative community is compensated.

Stranger Things: All you need to know about season fiveIt's been over three years since Stranger Things fans' last visit...
27/11/2025

Stranger Things: All you need to know about season five

It's been over three years since Stranger Things fans' last visit to Hawkins, Indiana.

The fictional US town is home to one of Netflix's biggest hits, and the long wait for its blockbuster final series is nearly over.

But, you'd be forgiven for having forgotten what Eleven and her bike-peddling pals were up to when we were last in their troubled neighbourhood.

Here are some of the key questions you might be asking if the show's hiatus has your memory feeling a little Upside Down.

When are new episodes out?
The first four episodes of Stranger Things' fifth season drop on Netflix in the UK early on Thursday 27 November at 01:00 GMT.

That's a late night for any UK fans intent on avoiding spoilers, but it's because the series is being released at the same time globally. For example, it will be 17:00 on Wednesday for viewers in Los Angeles, and 20:00 Wednesday for fans in New York.

But, bingers beware, you'll have to wait until Christmas Day for episodes five, six and seven.

The final series will then conclude with its eighth episode, The Rightside Up, on New Year's Eve.

Stranger Things' entire story will be told before 2025 is over, but how many of its beloved characters will still be with us by New Year's Day?

Australia is banning social media for kids under 16. How will it work?From 10 December, social media companies will have...
24/11/2025

Australia is banning social media for kids under 16. How will it work?
From 10 December, social media companies will have to take "reasonable steps" to ensure that under-16s in Australia cannot set up accounts on their platforms and that existing accounts are deactivated or removed.

The government says the ban - a world-first policy popular with many parents - is aimed at reducing the "pressures and risks" children can be exposed to on social media, which come from "design features that encourage them to spend more time on screens, while also serving up content that can harm their health and wellbeing".

A study commissioned by the government earlier this year said 96% of children aged 10-15 used social media and that seven out of 10 of them had been exposed to harmful content and behaviour. This behaviour ranged from misogynistic material to fight videos and content promoting eating disorders and su***de.

One in seven also reported experiencing grooming-type behaviour from adults or older children, and more than half said they had been the victims of cyberbullying.

What platforms are affected?
The Australian government has so far named ten platforms to be included in the ban: Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X, YouTube, Reddit and streaming platforms Kick and Twitch.

It is also under pressure to expand the ban to online gaming. Fearing they may be targeted, gaming platforms such as Roblox and Discord have recently introduced age checks on some features in an apparent bid to ward off inclusion in the ban.

The government has said it will continue to review the list of affected platforms, and will consider three main criteria when doing so.

These comprise whether the platform's sole or "significant purpose" is to enable online social interaction between two or more users; whether it allows users to interact with some or all other users; and whether it allows users to post material.

YouTube Kids, Google Classroom and WhatsApp are not included as they were not deemed to have met those criteria. Children will also still be available to view most content on platforms like YouTube, which do not require an account.

How will the ban be enforced?
Children and parents will not be punished for infringing the ban - it is social media companies who are charged with enforcing it, and they face fines of up to $49.5m (US$32m, £25m) for serious or repeated breaches.

The government says these companies must take "reasonable steps" to keep kids off their platforms, and use age assurance technologies - without specifying which ones.

Several possibilities have been raised, including the use of government IDs, face or voice recognition and age inference. The latter of these uses online information other than a date of birth - such as online behaviour or interactions - to estimate a person's age.

The government is encouraging platforms to use multiple different methods. It has also said platforms cannot rely on users declaring their own age, or on parents vouching for their children.

Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads, has announced it will begin closing teen accounts from 4 December. Those mistakenly kicked off could use a government ID or provide a video selfie to verify their age, the company said.

Snapchat has said users can use bank accounts or photo IDs to verify their age or take a selfie, which will be used to estimate their age.

The other affected platforms have not yet said how they will comply with the ban.

Will it work?
Without a clear idea of what methods companies will be using, it's hard to say whether the social media ban will be effective - but concerns have been raised that age assurance technologies may wrongly block some users while failing to spot others who are underage.

The government's own report found that facial assessment technology, for example, is least reliable for the exact demographic it's needed to target.

Questions have also been raised as to whether the fines for infringement are big enough. As former Facebook executive Stephen Scheeler told AAP: "It takes Meta about an hour and 52 minutes to make $50 million in revenue".

Critics argue that the ban, even if properly implemented, will not actually reduce online harm for children. Dating websites and gaming platforms are not included, and nor are AI chatbots, which have recently made headlines for allegedly encouraging children to commit su***de and for having "sensual" conversations with minors.

Others point out that teens who rely on social media for community will be left isolated, and argue that educating children about how to navigate social media would be more effective.

Communications Minister Annika Wells has conceded that the ban may not be "perfect".

"It's going to look a bit untidy on the way through," she said in early November. "Big reforms always do."

Are there data protection concerns?
Critics have also raised concerns about the large-scale collection and storage of data that will be required, and its potential mishandling, as platforms try to verify users' ages.

Australia - like much of the world - has in recent years seen a series of high-profile data breaches, including several where sensitive personal information was stolen and sold or published.

But the government says the legislation incorporates "strong protections" for personal information. These protections stipulate that such information may not be used for anything other than age verification and must be destroyed once that has been done, with "serious penalties" for breaches.

It also says platforms must offer an alternative to the use of governments IDs for age assurance.

How have social media companies responded?
Social media companies were aghast at the announcement of the ban in November 2024. They argued it would be difficult to implement, easy to circumvent and time consuming for users, as well as posing risks to their privacy.

They also suggested it would drive children into dark corners of the internet and deprive young people of social contact. Snap - which owns Snapchat - and YouTube also denied being social media companies.

YouTube's parent company, Google, is reportedly still considering whether to launch a legal challenge to the platform's inclusion. It did not respond to a BBC request for comment.
Even as it announced that it would implement it early, Meta argued the ban would leave teens with "inconsistent protections across the many apps they use".

At parliamentary hearings in October, TikTok and Snap said they still opposed the ban but would implement it.

Kick - the only Australian company included in the ban - has said it will introduce a "range of measures" and continue to engage "constructively" with authorities.

Do other countries have similar bans?
The ban on under-16s using social media is a world first, and other countries will be watching closely. Different approaches have been tried elsewhere to limit screen and social media time for children and keep them from accessing harmful material, but nowhere has put a total ban on the platforms involved.

In the UK, new safety rules introduced in July mean online companies face large fines or even the jailing of their executives if they fail to implement measures to protect young people from seeing illegal and harmful content.

Other European countries allow the use of social media under a certain age only with parental consent. In September, a French parliamentary enquiry recommended banning under-15s from social media, as well as a social media "curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.

Denmark has announced plans to ban social media for under-15s, while Norway is considering a similar proposal. Spain's government has sent to parliament a draft law for under-16s to require their legal guardians to authorise access.

Meanwhile, an attempt in the US state of Utah to ban under-18s from social media without parental consent was blocked by a federal judge last year.

Will children try to get around the ban?
Teens interviewed by the BBC said they were opening new accounts with fake ages ahead of the ban - although the government has warned social media companies it expects them to detect such accounts and remove them.

Online, teenagers are also recommending alternative social media apps or giving tips they hope will help them bypass the ban.

Some teens, including influencers, have switched to joint accounts with their parents. Commentators are also predicting a surge in the use of VPNs - which hide the country a person is accessing the internet from - as happened in the UK after the implementation of age control rules.

As floods, storms and wildfires intensify around the world, these are a few key questions to ask when considering travel...
11/11/2025

As floods, storms and wildfires intensify around the world, these are a few key questions to ask when considering travelling to a destination recovering from a natural disaster.

Less than a week after Hurricane Melissa pummelled Jamaica, leaving 72% of residents without electricity and causing an estimated $6bn to $7bn worth of damage, the country's tourism minister stated that he expects the island to welcome travellers in time for its peak tourist season starting 15 December.

Given that the Category 5 storm was one of the strongest to ever hit the Caribbean, and thousands of people remain in shelters across Jamaica, many would-be visitors may wonder when it's appropriate to return to the battered island and how they should act once they land.

It's a dilemma that travellers may increasingly face. Experts say that as the climate crisis intensifies, the strength and frequency of these extreme storms, as well as floods, fires and tornadoes, will only continue to increase. As these events become more common, travellers will need to navigate not only when it's safe to visit after a disaster, but also when it's sensible.

Here are some important questions to ask before booking a trip to a recovering destination.Is your visit contributing to the local community?
After Hurricane Maria, which devastated Puerto Rico in 2017, officials started welcoming visitors back to the island just three months after the storm. Though travellers were happy to return, many residents, who were still without power and running water, quickly found themselves resentful of tourists at a time when locals still lacked basic services.

"I think it [left] a bad taste in locals' mouths," explained Mikey Cordero, an activist and co-founder of the Defend Puerto Rico Media Collective. "You're enjoying my island, you're enjoying my community, you're enjoying what the local people built… but at the end of the day, it doesn't trickle back down to us."
While Cordero acknowledges that the situation wasn't so much the fault of the visitors themselves, he feels strongly that both government and guests should do a better job to ensure that their money actually goes towards helping the local community, especially after a disaster. This is a particularly sticky issue in the Caribbean where all-inclusive resorts and cruise ships make up much of the tourism landscape. Making a point to stay at locally run hotels, shop with local vendors and eat at locally owned restaurants can help in hard times by ensuring that your tourist dollars are going directly to the affected community rather than to large companies based elsewhere.

Are you helping or just watching?
After Hurricane Katrina tore through New Orleans in 2005, leaving almost 1,400 residents dead and countless homes demolished, a cottage industry of Katrina tours popped up around the city in the following weeks to show that devastation to visitors – a move that many locals found problematic. "There were still boats up in trees and houses sitting on top of barges," recalls Jason Bradberry, who lived in the city both pre- and post-Katrina. "It was insane."

In response to public outcry, city eventually banned tours of the Lower Ninth Ward, one of the areas most devastated by the storm. "No one wants to be cleaning out the remnants of the home that they've owned for decades or that's been in their family for generations, and have a tour bus drive by," said Kelly Schultz, senior vice president of communications for the city's tourism bureau, New Orleans & Company, whose family also lost everything in the storm.

However, the intense focus on the city after the storm did bring another type of tourist whose positive impact was deeply felt.

"Many of our visitors initially were what we call 'voluntourists', who came here because they wanted to help rebuild a church or school," Schultz explained. "We had college kids come help clean out my family's house for their spring break. Like you could be on a beach… but you chose to come gut somebody's home, which is a physically and emotionally gruelling process."
For Schultz, tourism was also an important way to help keep the city's culture alive. She points to one of the campaigns the city ran when welcoming tourists back after the storm: "Soul is Waterproof", a nod to the importance of preserving the unique music, food and practices that make the city so special, as something that also helped to bolster residents' pride after the devastation.

It's important to keep in mind the devasting impact these events have on locals and to be respectful of the people still struggling to recover. Organisations like the Red Cross, Habitat for Humanity and local churches and other community organisations often offer volunteer opportunities for both locals and visitors alike in the wake of disasters, as they did during the flooding in Kentucky in 2022, Hurricane Ida in 2021 and during the rash of tornados that tore through the Midwestern US in 2023.

Are you listening to the locals?
In 2023, wildfires burned through the island of Maui in Hawaii, leaving the historic community of Lāhainā particularly devastated. In response, the state's governor called for an evacuation of tourists as well as a temporary halt on incoming visitors, "so that resources and attention could be focused on the residents who needed it the most at that time", explained Ilihia Gionson, public affairs officer at the Hawaii Tourism Authority.

The moratorium on travel to the island lasted about a week before tourism was slowly phased back in. The key to success, however, was that the locals played a major role in the reopening. "Our Department of Health did a rapid needs assessment," Gionson said. "Just asking disaster survivors 'what is your most critical need right now?' More than a third of respondents listed either financial stability or housing stability or some combination of that. Understanding that… there were about 60,000 jobs powered by visitor spending, it was clear that we needed to recover travel demand to the island of Maui."
Officials also made sure that when visitors were allowed back on the island, they were respectful of those still struggling to restart their lives, by making devastated neighbourhoods off limits to tourists. Instead, visitors were encouraged to support the community in other ways, and though visitor numbers are still in recovery, many people rose to the challenge.

The clear communication and locals-first approach put forth by the island's leadership was reflected back by visitors. "In Maui's hour of need, the outpouring of aloha from around the world… whether it was monetary donations or offers of expertise or just prayers and good wishes. It was really heartwarming to see," said Gionson.

So how soon is too soon?
While Gionson acknowledges that there's no easy answer of when places should start welcoming visitors after a disaster, he feels there are some clear guidelines that both travellers and destinations should follow. Top of mind is honest and transparent communication about the impact of the disaster from officials and respectful behaviour to affected residents from visitors. But perhaps more important than that, is that everyone does their part to make sure that the reopening of tourism supports the community at large.

How to be a respectful visitor after a disaster

Read up: Be sure to read up on the most recent information put out by the destination itself.

Buy local: Local businesses need your dollars more than ever after a disaster.

Be respectful: Locals inevitably struggle to rebuild their lives after a disaster, so it's important to be mindful and sensitive as a visitor.

"Tourism is an important piece of any community's recovery post-disaster, but you cannot let the economic activity lead everything," he said. "You have real people who experienced the real trauma, who have different needs for their recovery. Restoring the economic activity for an area is one factor to consider, but it cannot be the only factor. You cannot let the economic recovery outpace the people recovery."

This story was originally published in 2024 and has since been updated.

'She would have been stripped of practically everything': The untold story of Princess Margaret's forbidden first loveEl...
06/11/2025

'She would have been stripped of practically everything': The untold story of Princess Margaret's forbidden first love
Elizabeth II's sister had to choose between cancelling her engagement and renouncing her title in 1955. Or did she? In 1978, the BBC talked to the war hero who almost married a princess.

When Princess Margaret announced on 31 October 1955 that she was ending her engagement to Group Captain Peter Townsend, it brought an end to a will-they-won't-they saga that had enthralled the nation. The enduring myth is of a trapped monarch, an uncompromising government and a 25-year-old woman forced to give up her dream wedding to a war hero. The princess, it seemed, was presented with a stark choice: she could either keep her royal privileges or live in quiet exile as plain old Mrs Townsend.

"I believe her decision was absolutely right in the circumstances," said Townsend on the BBC's Nationwide while promoting his autobiography in 1978, coincidentally on Valentine's Day. But confidential government papers released after Princess Margaret's death revealed that her options may not have been quite as drastic as they are sometimes portrayed.
Townsend was a war hero who was highly decorated for his role in the Battle of Britain. Born in 1914, he had joined the Royal Air Force at the age of 19. Among his exploits as an ace fighter pilot, he helped to shoot down the first German bomber on English soil. Townsend told the BBC in 1995 how he had visited the plane's wounded rear gunner in hospital the following day: "I thought, this may happen to any of us, so I went to see him just to say, 'Well, we're not really enemies after all; we're human beings.'" Indeed, Townsend was himself later shot down but was largely unscathed, physically at least. As the air campaign ground on relentlessly, he recalled: "We became hardened killers who had no thought but for destroying the enemy."
By the end of the war, with his nerves shot, Townsend landed on his feet with a job in the Royal Household as King George VI's equerry: a trusted military officer charged with the smooth functioning of royal engagements and ceremonial duties. He was close to the family, living in the grounds of Windsor Castle and often accompanying the princesses on public engagements. The teenage Margaret really took notice of the dashing Townsend in 1947 on a tour to South Africa. Margaret was 17; Townsend was almost twice her age and married with two children.

The princess had grown up to become a dazzling socialite, thrilling the world's press
If their friendship was deepening over time, it was all strictly hush-hush. In 2005, Margaret's friend Lady Jane Rayne recalled to the BBC's Timewatch that she witnessed the pair's chemistry at a shooting party in Balmoral in 1951, as the princess approached her 21st birthday. "Like the proverbial gooseberry, I felt I shouldn't have been there. They never kissed or held hands or anything, but you could just feel it," she said.

The princess had grown up to become a dazzling socialite, with stories of her party-going thrilling the world's press. But in February 1952, tragedy struck when her beloved father, King George VI, died aged just 56. Margaret's sensible older sister Elizabeth was next in the line of succession. At the late Queen's coronation in June 1953, a tabloid newspaper reporter spotted the princess flicking a piece of fluff off Townsend's jacket. While hardly something out of Bridgerton, this intimate gesture was enough to set tongues wagging.
In fact, Townsend had already proposed to her, a few weeks after his divorce. Elizabeth asked Margaret to wait for a year to let things settle down after the coronation. Under the Royal Marriages Act of 1772, designed under King George III to prevent undesirable spouses joining the family, Margaret would require the Queen's permission to marry before the age of 25. After that, she would need the approval of Parliament.

Banished to Brussels
As in so many Royal stories, divorce was a dirty word. Behind the scenes, the couple encountered the wrath of Sir Alan "Tommy" Lascelles, the Queen's powerful private secretary, who had experience in this area: his service went all the way back to the abdication crisis of 1936, when Edward VIII, unable to reconcile his desire for US divorcée Wallis Simpson with his role as king, made the shocking decision to give up the throne. Sir Alan advised the Queen and Prime Minister Winston Churchill to get rid of Townsend straight away. He told the group captain he "must be mad or bad" if he thought he could marry the sister of the Church of England's head.

Townsend found himself banished to a new role as air attaché to the British Embassy in Brussels, where he remained for two years. The understanding was that he would not set foot on British soil. Townsend told the BBC in 1978 that he felt it had been a "slightly disciplinary measure".

In History

In History is a series which uses the BBC's unique audio and video archive to explore historical events that still resonate today. Sign up to the accompanying weekly newsletter.

With Townsend exiled overseas, Princess Margaret relaunched herself on London's glamorous social scene. But their passion was not cooled by distance, as the British establishment may have hoped, and they wrote to each other almost every day. On 21 August 1955, Princess Margaret turned 25. She was now free to marry whomever she pleased, but potentially at a high personal cost.

When Townsend returned from Belgium in October, Margaret said that if she were to marry him, she would have to renounce her right to succession, her annual £6,000 Civil List income, her HRH title, and status as a member of the Royal Family. Public opinion was split over what she should do, while some royals also felt conflicted. Craig Brown's biography of Princess Margaret, Ma'am Darling, notes how when the Queen Mother fretted about where a future Mrs Townsend might live, Prince Philip, "with heavy sarcasm", replied that it was "still possible, even nowadays, to buy a house".

Address

бульвар Тараса Шевченка, 30
Kyiv
1030

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Elizabeth Higgins posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share