20/03/2024
Ai is going to replace photography and film production.
Specifically, these categories of film and photo are in danger:
1.) Headshot photography
2.) E-commerce product photography (commercial product photographers, don't worry you're fine)
3.) A lot of landscape photography
5.) Drone video
6.) Stock footage (generic stock footage, story driven stock, still in the clear)
7.) Social/short form/"trend" videos
If you've had a conversation with me at any point about this (this is Sam writing this, by the way), you might be surprised to hear me say this. But hear me out because my stance is the same. If you're creating unique, story-driven work, you're fine. THat's my stance and I'll die by it.
BUT
If you're a photographer or filmmaker that creates these types of images and video products listed above, I would start thinking about how to pivot now.
Why is this? We need to understand a little bit about ai and how it works. Ai requires a quality input and then based on that input generates a predictable output; and what do all of these categories have in common? Predictability; especially given the right inputs.
Photoshop has been doing this forever (in practical use, the back end of the program is different but the principal is the same) and nobody has been all that shook by it. Content-aware fill has existed for a long time and what it does is take its input from the surrounding portions of an image and then it outputs something that the program believes will fit in that spot, visually. Now we've advanced to doing it for entire images and not just portions of images but the principle is the same. Take some guiding input and based on that input, produce a general output that works because of certain predictable attributes.
There's an Ai image generator that exists right now where you can input a handful of low quality selfies with different expressions and generate a truly professional looking studio style headshot with Ai and does so in such a convincing way that you would never be able to tell the difference. Especially in the very small format that most people use headshots which care as professional profile photos and corporate literature where the image is the size of a nickel at best.
Studio headshots are incredibly predictable in terms of the finished product and that predictability has been coded into an Ai generator that will make headshot photography all but niche save for the smallest of applications.
E-commerce photography: same thing. Imagine you have an an e-commerce storefront with 50 different products that need to be shot on a white a background and professionally lit for the listing photos. Set each product on your dining room table and snap a quick photo in the general orientation you like and then upload it to an Ai generator with a prompt to place the product against a plain white background with high-key studio lighting. Boom! You just saved yourself literal tens of thousands of dollars by not hiring a photographer. Again, commercial product photography, not nearly as predictable and far more creative, therefore poses a challenge for Ai.
Drone video or landscape photography, particularly of regularly photographed places, monuments, national parks, landmarks, etc. A simple prompt in an Ai generator and that Ai has literal hundreds of thousands of references to pull from on the internet to create a realistic AND ACCURATE 100% generated image or video of those places and you never have to even set foot there.
Stock photo and video: guess what, same thing. A lot of stock footage and photos are generic and therefore easily coded into an Ai program on how to reproduce incredibly lifelike imagery of a similar fashion.
Trendy Instagram shorts? Well trends by definition are predictable, once they catch one they're the exact thing that Ai is good at replicating.
Hopefully you get the point, predictable, generic, non-creative image creation is going to get replaced by Ai.
But what can you do about it as a filmmaker or photographer? Well, for one, you have to understand your job. Your job is not to create an image; your job is to elicit an emotion, to tell a story, to have an impact. Ai can do all of those things but only haphazardly at best. The only way to exert the control you need to tell the story the way YOU want to tell it in order to have the impact that you want to have is to create it yourself.
Real life example, I was at the Bass Headlamp in Acadia Maine early on in my career. I got this great composition of the lighthouse. Still one of my favorite images I've taken (pictured below). I worked hard to climb down to the ocean to shoot it. I thought I shot something truly unique, I went back to Bar Harbor later that afternoon and every postcard I saw in every gift shop and gas station had essentially the exact same composition of that exact lighthouse on it.
Moral of story is that humans can be predictable and predictability is what Ai does well. Predictability and lazy creation is what Ai will replace. So don't make the first thing that comes to mind. Ponder the work you're doing. Ponder the story you're trying to tell and the impact you're trying to have and then create something custom catered to that intention and therefore, truly unique.
And when you realize that your unique perspective can't be replaced (emotional perspective, physical perspective can absolutely be replaced hence the lighthouse image), that frees you up to realize that Ai is a tool, it might make your life easier if you can learn how to apply it to certain tasks and parts of you're process. It might not serve you at all. It might just be a buzzword you hear and pass by. But one thing is for sure, if you're not offering anything truly unique to you and the way you perceive the world in the work that you're creating, Ai is coming for you and it will replace you. How's that for a dramatic end line 😂
Thanks for reading this far 🤘🏼