11/20/2025
There's a million-dollar difference between social media marketing and brand marketing.
One chases trends. The other builds equity.
When working with heritage brands vs. startups, success looks different:
Startup Marketing: → Move fast, test everything → Engagement = success
→ Be everywhere, try all trends → Performance metrics are king → "Break things" is encouraged
Heritage Brand Marketing: → Move deliberately, protect brand equity → Brand perception = long-term success → Be selective, be intentional → Brand alignment + performance both matter → "Preserve value" is the priority
The Framework I Now Use:
Before creating any content, I ask:
1. Does this express our brand vision?
2. Which strategic pillar does it serve?
3. Would our target audience engage with this?
4. Does it feel premium but accessible?
5. Would our competitive set do this?
If the answer to any of these is "no," it doesn't matter how well it might perform.
This isn't limiting creativity, it's focusing it.
The best work happens within constraints when you understand the brand you're building, not just the metrics you're chasing.
For those of you who work with established or luxury brands:
- How do you balance brand stewardship with staying culturally relevant?
- What's your process for evaluating trend participation?
- Have you experienced a similar shift in approach?
- Would love to hear different perspectives. What am I missing in this framework?