12/08/2025
🦌Hunting is conservation. No matter what species hunters are chasing, it is done out of love for the animal, love of the wilderness, and most importantly, putting food on the table. Conservation and management are a bonus. It is truly a win-win situation. The management and habitat conservation points can also be said for fishing.🎣
Anti-hunters love to ask, “What if we stopped hunting deer altogether?”
Here’s the real answer, and it’s not the Disney fantasy they imagine.
1. Vehicle collisions would explode
Take hunters out of the equation and deer numbers surge fast.
Insurance groups estimate crashes would jump 30–50% almost immediately.
More wrecked cars, more injuries, more dead deer on the highway.
That’s not conservation; it’s chaos.
2. Crop damage would skyrocket, and so would food prices
Farmers already lose billions to deer every year.
Remove hunting and damage could double, smashing corn, soybeans, hay, orchards, and vegetable farms.
And when crops suffer, food prices climb, everything from meat and dairy to produce and feed-based products.
Worst part? States will just hire taxpayer-funded sharpshooters to do what hunters were doing for free.
3. Human/deer conflicts would blow up
More deer means more Lyme disease, more garden destruction, more suburban problems, and more aggressive deer during the rut. Communities would be overwhelmed.
4. The population wouldn’t boom forever, it would crash
Without hunting, deer overshoot the habitat and trigger mass starvation and disease outbreaks like EHD and CWD.
It’s not humane: it’s a slow-motion disaster.
BOTTOM LINE:
Stopping hunting wouldn’t “save” deer. It would wreck roads, raise food costs, hurt farmers, and eventually collapse the herd.
Hunting IS conservation.
Hunting IS management.
Hunters keep wildlife healthy.