Pink Dino Media

Pink Dino Media True Crime and Celebrity News

๐—”๐˜€๐—ต๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—•๐˜‚๐˜‡๐˜‡๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—š๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐˜๐˜† ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—•๐˜‚๐˜‡๐˜‡๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ, ๐——๐—” ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ๐˜€ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ฒ ๐—ช๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฒUpdate from court today in the Ash...
12/26/2025

๐—”๐˜€๐—ต๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—•๐˜‚๐˜‡๐˜‡๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—š๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐˜๐˜† ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—•๐˜‚๐˜‡๐˜‡๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ, ๐——๐—” ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ๐˜€ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ฒ ๐—ช๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฒ

Update from court today in the Ashlee Buzzard case.

Ashlee Buzzard pleaded not guilty in connection with the October death of her daughter, Melodee Buzzard. At her arraignment in a Santa Maria courtroom, she also denied the special allegations tied to discharge of a firearm causing death and murder by lying in wait.

Santa Barbara County Superior Court Judge John McGregor presided. Many of Melodeeโ€™s family members were present, and people watching on the courtโ€™s Zoom feed shared pink bows in her memory.

Prosecutor Jordan Lockey told the court the District Attorneyโ€™s Office will not seek the death penalty. Instead, the prosecution is pursuing life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Buzzard appeared in regular clothing rather than jail attire. She waived her right to a preliminary hearing within 10 days and confirmed she understood the preliminary hearing must now take place by February 24, 2026.

Judge McGregor also approved a temporary gag order requested by defense attorney Adrian Galvan. The order bars Santa Barbara County Sheriff Bill Brown and sheriffโ€™s employees from speaking publicly about the case or releasing evidence and documents that are not already public. Galvan is the same public defender who represented Buzzard in her false imprisonment case last month. The motion is expected to be heard in Lompoc on January 7.

Buzzard was arrested Tuesday, December 23, and she was charged the following day with first degree murder related to her daughterโ€™s death.

Breaking Newsโ€ผ๏ธMelodee Buzzardโ€™s paternal grandmother told KSBY that detectives have notified her that Melodeeโ€™s body ha...
12/23/2025

Breaking Newsโ€ผ๏ธ

Melodee Buzzardโ€™s paternal grandmother told KSBY that detectives have notified her that Melodeeโ€™s body has been found. Authorities are scheduled to hold a press conference at 2 p.m. Tuesday, where investigators are expected to provide major updates in the case.

12/18/2025

FLORENCE, S.C. โ€” A federal grand jury in Columbia returned a two-count indictment against John Paul Miller, 46, of Myrtle Beach, for cyberstalking and making false statements to federal investigators.

The People of California v. Nick ReinerIn this filing from Los Angeles County Superior Court, the prosecution alleges tw...
12/17/2025

The People of California v. Nick Reiner

In this filing from Los Angeles County Superior Court, the prosecution alleges two counts of murder under California Penal Code section 187 subdivision a. In plain English, that code section is the basic definition of murder in California, an unlawful killing with malice aforethought. The complaint alleges one count for Michele Reiner and a second count for Robert Reiner, both alleged to have occurred on or about December 14, 2025 in Los Angeles County.

The complaint also includes a special circumstance allegation under Penal Code section 190 point 2 subdivision a paragraph 3, commonly referred to as multiple murder. What that means is the state is alleging more than one murder count in the same case, and that special circumstance is what can make the sentencing exposure significantly more severe if a jury ever reaches that stage and if the legal requirements are met.

There is also a weapon enhancement listed under Penal Code section 12022 subdivision b paragraph 1. An enhancement is not a separate crime by itself. It is an added allegation that, if proven, can increase the penalty. This particular enhancement generally relates to personal use of a deadly or dangerous weapon during the commission of a felony, and the complaint specifies a knife.

The paperwork reflects a recommendation of no bail. It also references Penal Code section 872, which is the hold to answer concept. In everyday terms, that is the point in the process where a judge can determine there is enough cause for the case to proceed to the next phase. It is not a finding of guilt.

Shawn Stines Case Update Judge Keeps KCPC Report Sealed but Allows Bond Fight to Move ForwardToday Special Judge Christo...
12/04/2025

Shawn Stines Case Update Judge Keeps KCPC Report Sealed but Allows Bond Fight to Move Forward

Today Special Judge Christopher Cohron entered three major orders in Commonwealth of Kentucky v Shawn M Stines out of Letcher County.

First, he refused to unseal the KCPC mental health evaluation. The defense argued that this report is central to their motion to dismiss and their request for bond, but the judge said no and pointed back to his written rulings on those issues. The evaluation stays sealed.

Second, he granted an adversarial bond hearing. Before there is any talk of dollar amounts, the court will take evidence on a narrow question under the Kentucky Constitution whether Stines is even bailable at all on a capital murder charge for the killing of Judge Kevin Mullins in chambers in September two thousand twenty four, an event caught on video and already played at the preliminary hearing and grand jury. If the court decides he is bailable, then it can consider a bond. But the judge was very clear that the defense cannot use any part of the sealed KCPC report at that hearing. Bond will be about basic facts and whether the proof is strong, not about turning a sealed forensic report into a mini trial on insanity or extreme emotional disturbance.

Third, the judge denied the motion to dismiss the indictment. The defense claimed the prosecutors misled the grand jury about Stines mental state and about any connection between Judge Mullins and the federal Fields case. After walking through grand jury law, the court held that even if you accept the defense complaints on their face, the video of Stines repeatedly shooting Judge Mullins more than supports probable cause for murder. The judge found no prejudicial misconduct and no problem with how medical and jail records were subpoenaed and used, so the indictment stands.

Big picture this judge gave Stines the bond hearing he wanted but drew a very firm line. The KCPC evaluation stays sealed. Mental health defenses will have to be presented to a trial jury in the open, not used to erase the indictment and not slipped in through a sealed report at a bond hearing.

Bottom line tonight
Indictment still in place.
KCPC report still sealed.
Bond hearing coming, with the focus on the video and core facts, not spin.

Today Special Judge Christopher Cohron entered three major orders in Commonwealth of Kentucky v Shawn M Stines out of Letcher County.

First, he refused to unseal the KCPC mental health evaluation. The defense argued that this report is central to their motion to dismiss and their request for bond, but the judge said no and pointed back to his written rulings on those issues. The evaluation stays sealed.

Second, he granted an adversarial bond hearing. Before there is any talk of dollar amounts, the court will take evidence on a narrow question under the Kentucky Constitution whether Stines is even bailable at all on a capital murder charge for the killing of Judge Kevin Mullins in chambers in September two thousand twenty four, an event caught on video and already played at the preliminary hearing and grand jury. If the court decides he is bailable, then it can consider a bond. But the judge was very clear that the defense cannot use any part of the sealed KCPC report at that hearing. Bond will be about basic facts and whether the proof is strong, not about turning a sealed forensic report into a mini trial on insanity or extreme emotional disturbance.

Third, the judge denied the motion to dismiss the indictment. The defense claimed the prosecutors misled the grand jury about Stines mental state and about any connection between Judge Mullins and the federal Fields case. After walking through grand jury law, the court held that even if you accept the defense complaints on their face, the video of Stines repeatedly shooting Judge Mullins more than supports probable cause for murder. The judge found no prejudicial misconduct and no problem with how medical and jail records were subpoenaed and used, so the indictment stands.

Big picture this judge gave Stines the bond hearing he wanted but drew a very firm line. The KCPC evaluation stays sealed. Mental health defenses will have to be presented to a trial jury in the open, not used to erase the indictment and not slipped in through a sealed report at a bond hearing.

Bottom line tonight
Indictment still in place.
KCPC report still sealed.
Bond hearing coming, with the focus on the video and core facts, not spin.





STATE WITHDRAWS DEATH PENALTY: Major Shift in Shanna Gardner & Mario Fernandez Saldana Prosecution
11/22/2025

STATE WITHDRAWS DEATH PENALTY: Major Shift in Shanna Gardner & Mario Fernandez Saldana Prosecution

๐Ÿ“ฃ IDAHO UPDATE: Stacey Wondra Hearing Dates ReleasedThe Payette County Court has officially filed a Notice of Hearing in...
11/18/2025

๐Ÿ“ฃ IDAHO UPDATE: Stacey Wondra Hearing Dates Released

The Payette County Court has officially filed a Notice of Hearing in State v. Stacey James Wondra (CR38-25-1295). Here are the key dates just set:

๐Ÿ”น Status Conference
๐Ÿ“… December 15, 2025
โฐ 9:00 AM
๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš–๏ธ Judge Brian D. Lee

๐Ÿ”น Preliminary Hearing
๐Ÿ“… December 16, 2025
โฐ 9:00 AM
๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš–๏ธ Judge Brian D. Lee

Both hearings will be held at the Payette County Courthouse in Idaho.

This filing was entered today, 11/17/2025, and service went out to the prosecutor and defense by email.

11/18/2025

โญ BREAKING: Karen Reads Civil Lawsuit Lays Out a Chilling Step by Step Conspiracy That the Public Was Never Shown โญ

If you thought you knew the Karen Read case, buckle up because her newly filed forty six page civil lawsuit is a bombshell that reads like the script of a corruption thriller. And for once, the receipts are all in one place.

This is not speculation.
This is not rumor.
This is what her legal team just submitted to the Court.

And it is devastating.

๐Ÿ”ฅ What the Lawsuit Actually Alleges

After reading page after page of sworn allegations, one thing becomes clear. Karen Read was not just prosecuted. She was targeted.

According to the complaint:

โ€ข Multiple police officers and members of the Albert and McCabe families are accused of forming a coordinated plan to frame her.

โ€ข Evidence was not just mishandled. It was allegedly manufactured manipulated planted and later used against her in court.

โ€ข John O Keefes body was allegedly moved staged and presented in a false narrative to make it appear he was hit by Reads SUV.

โ€ข Exculpatory evidence was ignored hidden deleted lost or destroyed entirely.

โ€ข Phones were wiped SIM cards cut and surveillance footage auto deleted or withheld for years.

โ€ข Interviews with the Alberts the McCabes and Higgins were done at their homes lawyers offices or over the phone not recorded not documented and outside protocol.

โ€ข Proctor and Bukhenik allegedly manipulated sallyport video inverted footage and deleted key portions to hide the true condition of the taillight.

โ€ข And yes taillight pieces and glass fragments were allegedly planted on John O Keefes clothing and on the Albert property.

All of this is spelled out in the civil complaint.
The fact pattern is not just bad. It is career ending.

๐Ÿ”ฅ The Counts What Karen Read Is Suing For

The lawsuit lays out several major legal claims:

โ€ข Massachusetts Civil Rights Act violations
โ€ข Common law malicious prosecution
โ€ข Intentional infliction of emotional distress
โ€ข Civil conspiracy
โ€ข Violations of her constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment

And every claim is backed by specific documented allegations.

๐Ÿ”ฅ The Human Cost

The lawsuit also outlines what Karen lived through for nearly four years:
โ€ข Major autoimmune disease flare ups
โ€ข Dozens of medical procedures
โ€ข Two arrests
โ€ข Two trials
โ€ข Over one million in legal and expert costs
โ€ข Loss of her job health insurance car license home income and reputation
โ€ข Fear she would spend her life in prison for something she did not do

All while the real story was never investigated.

๐Ÿ”ฅ Why This Filing Matters

For the first time this lawsuit puts the entire alleged conspiracy the timeline the players the acts and the cover up in one public searchable undeniable document.

And it raises the question many have whispered for years:

If this is even halfway true how was this ever allowed to happen

This filing will set the tone for everything that happens next civil federal and beyond.


The Defense Strategy in the Andrew McGann CaseI went through the latest filings in the case of the State of Arkansas ver...
11/12/2025

The Defense Strategy in the Andrew McGann Case

I went through the latest filings in the case of the State of Arkansas versus Andrew McGann, and the defense is building a clear story long before this case reaches a jury. Instead of reacting to what the State does, they are shaping the entire battlefield in advance.

The first part of their strategy is a direct attack on the death penalty. One filing argues that Arkansas uses a three step process in death cases, and the final step is so vague that jurors could rely on anything they want, even things the law forbids. ๏ฟผ Other filings argue that the death penalty statute is flawed, that the charging document does not actually list the required aggravating factors, and that the line between capital murder and first degree murder is unclear.

The next chapter of their plan demands a higher standard for the entire case. They remind the court that death is different and requires more careful review at every stage, not just during trial.

Then the defense turns to evidence. They filed a major discovery motion asking for every witness statement, digital file, crime lab report, police note, and any record that could help them prepare. ๏ฟผ They also ask the court to require officers to keep their rough notes, because early notes often hold details that do not reach the final reports. ๏ฟผ In a separate filing, they ask for all jail records, including calls, texts, and medical and mental health information, because these may be important if the case reaches sentencing. ๏ฟผ

The defense also wants control over the courtroom process. They ask that every conversation be recorded, no matter how small, that the State respond to motions in writing, and that McGann be present at every hearing. ๏ฟผ ๏ฟผ ๏ฟผ They also ask the court to block the State from trying to get information from McGann through informants or quiet conversations in the jail. ๏ฟผ

Finally, the defense asks the court to protect its expert witnesses. They argue that their experts are part of the defense team and should not be contacted by the State unless the defense chooses to use them. ๏ฟผ

When you put it all together, the defense is building a full strategy. They want to remove the death penalty if they can. If not, they want the State to open every file and follow every constitutional rule. And they want to control how the case moves forward so nothing happens without notice, without record, and without the defendant present.

This is not just preparation. It is the groundwork for the entire case.

โš–๏ธ Aaron Spencer Case Update โ€” Lonoke CountyThe defense and prosecution just filed a joint motion on Nov 3, 2025 asking ...
11/04/2025

โš–๏ธ Aaron Spencer Case Update โ€” Lonoke County

The defense and prosecution just filed a joint motion on Nov 3, 2025 asking the court for a little more time to finish discovery and prep their filings.

Theyโ€™re asking to move the motion deadline to Nov 24 and give until Dec 8 for responses. The defense also flagged a possible Dec 17 scheduling conflict that might require a reset or second pretrial date.

The filing was officially logged by Circuit Clerk Deborah Oglesby at 3:46 PM the same day. The court will decide soon whether to approve the new timeline.

Breaking: Stacey Wondra Charged with Murder in Disappearance of Fruitlandโ€™s โ€œMonkeyโ€ VaughanAuthorities in Idaho have an...
10/31/2025

Breaking: Stacey Wondra Charged with Murder in Disappearance of Fruitlandโ€™s โ€œMonkeyโ€ Vaughan

Authorities in Idaho have announced new charges in the disappearance of five-year-old Michael โ€œMonkeyโ€ Vaughan, who vanished from his Fruitland home in July 2021.

According to the Payette County Sheriffโ€™s Office, Stacey Wondra has been charged with first-degree murder, second-degree kidnapping, and destruction of evidence. Wondra, who lived just blocks away from Michaelโ€™s home, is currently in federal custody in Arizona but is expected to be extradited to Idaho.

Michaelโ€™s mother, Brandi Vaughan, released a statement expressing both relief and heartbreak:

โ€œOur family has mixed emotions. Yes, we are glad charges are coming. We want them to tell us where Michael is. Period. We will let the justice system take care of the rest.โ€

Despite the charges, Michaelโ€™s remains have not been found, according to the Payette County Prosecutorโ€™s Office.

In 2022, Sarah Wondra, Staceyโ€™s wife, was arrested for failing to report a death after a credible tip led investigators to excavate the coupleโ€™s yard. Although cadaver dogs alerted to possible remains, none were recovered, and her charge was dropped in 2023. Sarah is currently serving time for aggravated assault, destruction of evidence, and drug possession in an unrelated case.

Bodycam footage released in 2025 shows Stacey on a video call with detectives during the 2022 excavation, directing them to a location where he claimed Sarah had buried the child. He told investigators he believed his wife later moved the remains.

The Vaughan family continues to plead for answers and remains steadfast in their pursuit of justice for Michael.

BREAKING: Kowalski v Johns Hopkins All Childrenโ€™s Hospital โ€” Verdict Thrown OutThe Florida Second District Court of Appe...
10/29/2025

BREAKING: Kowalski v Johns Hopkins All Childrenโ€™s Hospital โ€” Verdict Thrown Out

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal has reversed the entire verdict in the Kowalski case.

That means the $200 million award in favor of Maya, Jack, and the Estate of Beata Kowalski is no longer valid.

The appeals court ruled that the trial judge made major legal errors mainly by not applying Floridaโ€™s child abuse immunity law correctly. This law protects hospitals and medical staff when they report suspected child abuse in good faith or follow state and court orders related to those reports.

Because Johns Hopkins All Childrenโ€™s Hospital was following those laws and court orders after Maya was taken into state custody, the court said it should have been immune from many of the claims.

What happens now:
The case is sent back for a new trial, unless the Kowalski family appeals to the Florida Supreme Court.
So for now, the original jury verdict is gone.

This is a massive development in one of Floridaโ€™s most emotional and closely watched cases.

Address

Destin, FL

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Pink Dino Media posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share