EverBark

EverBark More than just pets. They’re family. 🐾

08/06/2026

A dog found frozen to a car undercarriage overnight in New York City.
We asked one woman what she thought should happen to the owner.
Her answer surprised us.

The accident happened on a Tuesday. The dog arrived at the hospital entrance on Wednesday morning. The security staff in...
08/04/2026

The accident happened on a Tuesday. The dog arrived at the hospital entrance on Wednesday morning. The security staff initially attempted to move it away from the entrance. It returned each time. By Thursday the staff had stopped attempting to move it and started leaving water. By the following week there was an established feeding routine maintained by three different members of hospital staff across different shifts. The handwritten sign appeared on the fourth day — nobody knows who put it there. The dog has not left the pavement in front of the main entrance in three weeks. It moves aside for ambulances. It allows hospital visitors to approach it. It watches every person who comes through the main doors. It is waiting for one specific person. The owner is recovering. The prognosis is good. The dog does not know this yet.

The evacuation order came on Friday evening. The rescue boats were prioritising people. The family's account is that the...
08/04/2026

The evacuation order came on Friday evening. The rescue boats were prioritising people. The family's account is that they were told there was no space for the dog on the boat and that they had to make a decision immediately. They left with the boat. The dog was on the roof of the porch when the water reached that level. It stayed on the debris as the water continued to rise. The rescue team that found it on Monday morning said it had been on that piece of debris for approximately three days based on the water levels and the timeline. It was alive. It was exhausted and dehydrated but alive. The family has been reunited with it. They have said publicly that they made the only decision they could make in the time they had. They have also said they have not stopped thinking about it since.

The dog had been at the yard since it was approximately eighteen months old. The previous owner had used it as a guard d...
08/04/2026

The dog had been at the yard since it was approximately eighteen months old. The previous owner had used it as a guard dog for the scrapyard business. The business closed due to financial difficulty. The owner had not been contactable since the closure was filed. The new owner who purchased the property at auction found the dog on the day they arrived to take possession. The chain was attached to a fixed post that had been concreted into the ground. There was a feeding station nearby that had been recently filled — someone had been coming to feed the dog even after the business closed. That person has not been identified. The dog is currently in rescue assessment. The behaviourists say it will need significant socialisation work before it can be considered for domestic adoption. It has never lived inside a building.

The hearing was scheduled for nine in the morning. The dog had been chained outside since eight fifteen. The case before...
08/04/2026

The hearing was scheduled for nine in the morning. The dog had been chained outside since eight fifteen. The case before the court involved a bite incident from seven months earlier. The dog had been in rescue care since the incident. It had been assessed four times by two separate behaviourists in the intervening months. Both assessments concluded that the dog did not present an ongoing danger. The owner's legal representation had filed for destruction anyway under local dangerous dog provisions. The rescue organisation had filed a counter application. The rain started at nine forty. The dog remained on its chain throughout the hearing. The court session lasted two hours and twenty minutes. The outcome was a conditional release to a registered rescue facility with a permanent muzzle order in public. The dog did not know any of this while it sat in the rain outside.

The dog was brought in by a woman who found it on her street that morning. She had no information about it. Standard int...
08/04/2026

The dog was brought in by a woman who found it on her street that morning. She had no information about it. Standard intake procedure. The vet ran the scanner across the scruff as part of routine intake. The scanner showed a registration. The registration showed a name, an address four miles from where the dog was found, and a lost report filed eighteen months ago. The registered owner was contacted within the hour. They were at the clinic within forty minutes. The dog recognised them immediately. The reunion took place in the clinic reception area. The vet who had been present for the intake scan was also present for the reunion. She said afterward that the eighteen months of questions that reunion did not answer were the part she could not stop thinking about.

The standard recommendation from veterinary bodies is that collars should allow two fingers of space between the collar ...
08/03/2026

The standard recommendation from veterinary bodies is that collars should allow two fingers of space between the collar and the neck at all times. This collar allowed no fingers. It had no space. The contact points of the electronic device had been pressing against the same two points of skin for long enough that the tissue had adapted around them. The rescue vet who examined the dog after the collar was removed documented the wounds and estimated the collar had been in place for a minimum of several months based on the tissue condition. The dog showed no aggression during the removal process. It lay still for the entire procedure. It allowed the worker's hands to work around its neck for as long as it took. The vet said that level of tolerance during a painful procedure is something that stays with you.

Extendable leashes extend because that is their function. The mechanism that allows them to extend also means the cord i...
08/03/2026

Extendable leashes extend because that is their function. The mechanism that allows them to extend also means the cord is under sustained tension whenever the dog pulls. The cord on an extendable leash is significantly thinner than a standard fixed lead. The snap point is the mechanism housing where the cord meets the retraction spring. Manufacturers list maximum weight ratings on the packaging. The dog in this incident was within the rated weight. The cord snapped at the mechanism anyway. This type of failure is not uncommon. Veterinary emergency records in cities with high dog ownership populations include a consistent percentage of road traffic incidents involving dogs that were on extendable leashes at the point of separation. The dog in this incident survived. The driver of the nearest vehicle had fast enough reflexes to stop. Both of those things were not inevitable.

She had been renting the same flat for eleven years. The building was sold to new owners in January. The new owners issu...
08/03/2026

She had been renting the same flat for eleven years. The building was sold to new owners in January. The new owners issued a no pets policy to all existing tenants with sixty days notice. She contacted every shelter and rescue organisation within travelling distance. Every one that could take the dog told her it was restricted under their insurance. Every one that could take a Staffordshire Bull Terrier had a waiting list of more than three months. Her sixty days ran out on a Thursday. She was on the shelter pavement on a Friday morning. She has a sister forty miles away whose landlord has the same restriction. She has a friend who offered temporarily but is allergic. She has run every option she can find. She is seventy nine years old and she has had that dog for seven years and she is sitting on a pavement outside a building whose sign says they help animals.

The dog had lived in that house for five years. The removal was the result of a cruelty investigation that had been ongo...
08/02/2026

The dog had lived in that house for five years. The removal was the result of a cruelty investigation that had been ongoing for three months. When the officers arrived the dog came to the door. It did not resist being leashed. It walked to the police vehicle with the officer without pulling back toward the house. It was only when it was in the vehicle and the door closed that it turned and looked back through the window. It has been doing that since — watching the house through the glass each time the vehicle has been stationary nearby during the follow up work at the property. The investigating officer says the dog has not shown distress in any other way. It eats. It sleeps. It is cooperative with the shelter staff. It just keeps watching through windows.

Address

10672 Kenai Spur Highway
Kenai, AK
99611

Telephone

+19072838799

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when EverBark posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category