The Forgotten Soldier

The Forgotten Soldier Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from The Forgotten Soldier, Digital creator, Los Angeles, CA.
(14)

In March 2006, Mary Winkler shot and killed her husband Matthew, a minister at the Fourth Street Church of Christ in Sel...
06/11/2026

In March 2006, Mary Winkler shot and killed her husband Matthew, a minister at the Fourth Street Church of Christ in Selmer, Tennessee, then drove away with her three daughters before she was arrested. Within days, the story was the preacher's wife who had killed a man of God.

Matthew Winkler was mourned publicly as a respected church leader. That framing arrived fast and it held. What Mary had described inside that marriage, the physical control, the emotional punishment, the sexual abuse, did not fit the image the community had of him, and so for a time it was treated as secondary.

At her 2007 trial she testified to what the marriage had actually been. The jury heard her account and returned a verdict of voluntary manslaughter, not murder. That distinction mattered. It meant they credited her.

She served only months in confinement. She then fought a separate civil case against her husband's parents to regain custody of her children, and she won that too.

The scrutiny she carried was specific: she had shot a preacher husband, and the public had already decided what that meant. The jury sat with the actual evidence. Two hundred million people did not have to.

They needed someone to blame.

In February 2008, Barbara Sheehan shot her husband Raymond eleven times in their Queens home. The press named what she h...
06/11/2026

In February 2008, Barbara Sheehan shot her husband Raymond eleven times in their Queens home. The press named what she had done. It spent considerably less time on the eighteen years that came before it.

Raymond Sheehan was a retired NYPD sergeant. That fact traveled with every headline. It shaped who the public was asked to grieve and who they were asked to judge.

At her 2011 trial, Barbara testified to nearly two decades of severe physical abuse. She described a marriage in which she had feared for her life. During the confrontation in which she fired, he had also been armed. The jury heard all of it.

The jury acquitted her of murder. It convicted her on a weapons charge tied to using his second gun, a split verdict that required accepting the core of what she had said about those eighteen years. She was sentenced. She served time. The acquittal on the central charge stood.

He was memorialized as a member of the force. She carried the conviction and the weight of having had to prove, in a courtroom, that her own life had been in danger.

They needed someone to blame.

In March 1977, Francine Hughes set fire to the bed where her former husband Mickey lay sleeping in Dansville, Michigan. ...
06/11/2026

In March 1977, Francine Hughes set fire to the bed where her former husband Mickey lay sleeping in Dansville, Michigan. For thirteen years before that night, she had reported his violence to police and to courts. They had not protected her.

That night he had assaulted her again. She drove her children to safety first. Then she went back.

At trial, her defense presented the full history of the abuse. The jury heard it. They acquitted her. The institutions that had received her complaints year after year and done nothing were named in that courtroom, briefly, as the backdrop to everything that followed.

The 1984 television film The Burning Bed brought the case to tens of millions of viewers and pushed the question of why the legal system had left women like her without recourse into a debate that had no good answer. The question was not really about Francine Hughes. It was about what the police had been told, what the courts had been asked, and what they had chosen not to do.

She had gone to the right people. Repeatedly. They are the ones who did not act.

They needed someone to blame.

In September 1970, Katherine Ann Power drove the getaway car in a Boston bank robbery. Within days, an accomplice had ki...
06/11/2026

In September 1970, Katherine Ann Power drove the getaway car in a Boston bank robbery. Within days, an accomplice had killed a police officer and Power was gone, her name added to the FBI most-wanted list while the country processed what had happened.

She was 21. She was a Brandeis student and an antiwar radical who had believed the robbery would fund the protest movement. She did not fire the shot that killed Walter Schroeder. That fact was in the record. It did not change what the record said about her.

For 23 years she lived in Oregon under a false name, working as a cook, raising a child. The FBI kept looking. She kept living. In 1993 she walked into a courthouse and surrendered voluntarily, pleaded guilty to manslaughter and armed robbery, and was sentenced to 8 to 12 years. She served six.

When she resurfaced, the coverage landed almost entirely on the 23 years underground. The politics that had pulled a college student toward a bank robbery in 1970 got less space. The question the press kept asking was about accountability after a rebuilt life, not about what the antiwar movement had looked like to a 21-year-old in the months after Kent State.

She had turned herself in. That was not the part that got remembered.

They needed someone to blame.

In 1989, Carolyn Warmus, a 25-year-old teacher in Westchester County, was accused of murdering Betty Jeanne Solomon, the...
06/11/2026

In 1989, Carolyn Warmus, a 25-year-old teacher in Westchester County, was accused of murdering Betty Jeanne Solomon, the wife of a man with whom Warmus was having an affair. Before her first trial began, the press had already named her: the Fatal Attraction murder, borrowed from a film, borrowed from a fictional obsessive, and applied to a real woman whose guilt had not yet been determined by any court.

Her first trial ended in a hung jury in 1991. A second trial in 1992 produced a conviction on second-degree murder, built largely on circumstantial evidence and a forensic link that remained disputed. She was sentenced to 25 years to life. She maintained her innocence from the first day of her incarceration to the last.

She served 27 years. In the years after her conviction, questions about the strength of the evidence and the conduct of the investigation did not go away. They accumulated. Her account of a wrongful conviction found support among people who went back and read the record carefully.

The man at the center of the affair was not charged. He was not given a tabloid name borrowed from a film. The asymmetry was not an accident of the evidence. It was a choice about who the story needed.

They needed someone to blame.

In June 2001, Andrea Yates drowned her five children in her Houston home while suffering from severe postpartum psychosi...
06/11/2026

In June 2001, Andrea Yates drowned her five children in her Houston home while suffering from severe postpartum psychosis. Within months, a Texas jury convicted her of capital murder, and the country decided it had the story it needed.

She had been hospitalized before. Her doctors had documented that she should not be left alone with her children and should not have more of them. Those warnings existed in writing. They did not change what happened at trial.

Clinicians who evaluated her described her as among the most severely psychotic patients they had ever seen. The courts processed her as a capital defendant first. The illness came second, if at all.

In 2006, a Texas appeals court overturned the conviction. At retrial, she was found not guilty by reason of insanity and committed to a state mental hospital, where she has remained. The legal system got there. It took five years.

The psychiatric care system that failed her, the medical advice her family received, the documented history that was ignored: all of it came out after the conviction. The country had already made up its mind in 2001. The reassessment was quieter than the verdict.

They needed someone to blame.

In June 2008, Jodi Arias killed Travis Alexander in his Arizona home. By 2013, the trial was a daily cable-news broadcas...
06/11/2026

In June 2008, Jodi Arias killed Travis Alexander in his Arizona home. By 2013, the trial was a daily cable-news broadcast watched by millions who had already decided what they were watching.

The courtroom feed ran live for months. Audiences tuned in not for the legal question but for her. The camera stayed on her face. Anchors narrated her expressions. She became the product.

Her defense raised claims of abuse. Those claims were largely dismissed, in part because she had given shifting accounts before settling on self-defense, and the credibility damage from those earlier lies was irreparable. The jury convicted her of first-degree murder. In 2015, after the jury deadlocked on the death penalty, she was sentenced to life without parole.

The trial is studied now not for what it resolved about her guilt but for what it demonstrated about the medium. A live courtroom feed, a defendant the public found compelling to hate, months of uninterrupted broadcast. The entertainment infrastructure was already in place. She fit it perfectly.

They needed someone to blame.

In July 2002, Clara Harris ran over her husband David in a Houston hotel parking lot after finding him there with the wo...
06/11/2026

In July 2002, Clara Harris ran over her husband David in a Houston hotel parking lot after finding him there with the woman he had been seeing. Within days, the story had a name and a frame: the wife who used her car as a weapon.

Harris was a dentist. No prior record. She had, by the account of her own defense, just watched her marriage end in a parking lot in front of her stepdaughter. The question of whether what followed was deliberate murder or a collapse of control was the argument her trial was built around. The jury heard it and convicted her anyway.

The trial was televised. The conviction carried a 20-year sentence. The jury also found she had acted under sudden passion, a legal finding that capped the sentence at what she received. She was paroled in 2018, after about 15 years. That finding, and what it acknowledged about the circumstances, did not make the headlines the conviction did.

David Harris's affair was the event that set everything in motion. The coverage filed it under backdrop. He died at the scene. His conduct did not follow him into the national story the way hers did. She carried the conviction, the televised trial, the lasting public image of the woman with the car.

They needed someone to blame.

In 1991, Aileen Wuornos was arrested and charged with the murders of seven men she said had assaulted or attempted to r*...
06/11/2026

In 1991, Aileen Wuornos was arrested and charged with the murders of seven men she said had assaulted or attempted to r**e her while she worked as a pr******te on Florida's highways. The press had a verdict before the jury did.

She was one of the few women on death row in the United States. The coverage did not treat that as a fact requiring examination. It treated her as a category: the female monster, the predator, the aberration. Her account of what those men had done to her was processed as a legal defense to be defeated, not a claim to be investigated.

Her childhood was documented. The abuse began early. The homelessness followed. None of it was hidden, but in the courtroom and in the coverage it was filed under background, not context. The prosecution argued robbery. The press argued monster. Her own words about what had happened to her were largely beside the point.

She was executed by the state of Florida in October 2002. The reassessment came after. Documentaries. Longer accounts. The question of self-defense given more room than any trial had allowed it. The record of what had been done to her, across her entire life, finally occupying more than a paragraph.

The legal system had finished with her. The press had already moved on. What the whole episode revealed was how little space existed, in 1991 or 2002, for a woman like her to be believed.

They needed someone to blame.

Address

Los Angeles, CA
90004

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Forgotten Soldier posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category