https://www.facebook.com/104709328849267/

Silver Screen Hub, Macon, GA (2025)

07/29/2025

When *Deep Space Nine* tackled the wedding of Worf and Jadzia in “You Are Cordially Invited,” it gave us one of the richest cultural mash-ups in *Star Trek* history—part rom-com, part Klingon rite-of-passage, part exploration of gender and tradition. And yet, among the Bat’leths and bloodwine, there’s a surprising throwback to our 20th-century cringe culture: the bachelor party. Yes, in a universe where people can literally replicate a steak from thin air and travel faster than light, we’re still clinging to the idea that men must have one last night of "freedom" before submitting to the soul-sucking shackles of marriage. Julian Bashir even describes matrimony with the same enthusiasm one might reserve for a prison sentence, and O’Brien’s discomfort over what Keiko might say about his involvement speaks volumes. It’s as if the *holosuite* had been pre-loaded with frat-boy clichés.

What’s especially jarring is how easily everyone—even non-humans—understands this ritual. Quark, a Ferengi whose culture literally auctioned off women’s clothing rights until recently, is somehow in sync with Earth’s most dated gender tradition? Even the Bajorans, whose spiritual philosophy revolves around prophets and wormholes, seem to nod along as if this whole “one last fling” idea is a universal truth. That tells us a lot—not about future anthropology—but about the limitations of our own cultural imagination in the 1990s, when the episode was written. Bachelor parties in this context don’t feel futuristic; they feel like something left in the back pocket of a sitcom writer from *Cheers.*

Now compare that with the real meat of the episode—the A-plot about Jadzia and Sirella. This storyline is *Star Trek* doing what it does best: interrogating power, tradition, and gender expectations. On the surface, Sirella is the classic “monster-in-law”—imperious, controlling, and dismissive. But dig a little deeper, and she becomes a gatekeeper not just of family tradition, but of cultural survival. Klingon Houses are dynastic, political entities, and Sirella has every reason to test Jadzia, who walks into this world with teal eyeshadow, a cocktail dress, and a symbiont full of past lives. It’s a brilliant subversion of the usual “meet the in-laws” trope: the challenge is not to bake a casserole or laugh at dad’s bad jokes, but to earn a place in a warrior caste society that does *not* mess around.

Klingon women, after all, are a fascinating paradox in Trek lore. They’re marginalized within their own patriarchy—unable to hold House leadership without exception—but they’re also fierce, intelligent, and unapologetically strong. K’Ehleyr, B’Elanna, Grilka—they’re not just tokens, they’re forces of nature. Sirella may be cold, but she’s no stereotype. She demands respect because she knows what it costs to maintain power in a world that doesn't grant it easily. Jadzia doesn’t win her over with submission or flattery—she earns it by standing her ground, by refusing to be anything less than her full Trill-Klingon-honoring self. And that’s the real love story here—not just between Jadzia and Worf, but between a woman and the legacy she chooses to join.

In the end, “You Are Cordially Invited” is an episode about tradition—how it binds us, defines us, and occasionally drags us down. The bachelor party bit may feel like a missed opportunity to imagine a more evolved ritual, but the showdown between Sirella and Dax redeems it tenfold. It reminds us that the best parts of *Star Trek* are the moments when characters collide, challenge each other, and leave changed. Not because they’ve replicated a toga party in the holosuite, but because they’ve survived the gauntlet of identity, culture, and conviction—and still found room to dance.

07/29/2025

*“You Are Cordially Invited”* is what happens when *Deep Space Nine* pulls out the Klingon wedding beads and says, “Let’s get weird.” It’s a delightful cocktail of bachelorette chaos, Klingon pageantry, snarky intergalactic in-laws, and yes—Ferengi interpretive dance that looks like a cross between a religious ritual and someone trying to dry off without a towel. The episode is packed with fun—from Martok’s gravel-voiced exasperation to Dax channeling Mean Girls in warrior couture—but nestled in the spectacle are missed beats that keep it from being the classic it *almost* was.

Let’s start with the good stuff. Martok as the cranky-but-sweet father-in-law is pitch-perfect. He’s the guy who grumbles about everything but would defend you to the death if someone disrespected your bat'leth technique. His scenes with Worf walk the emotional line so well—blunt, poignant, and full of that warrior poetry Klingons pretend they hate. Then there’s Dax, who remains the most unbothered bride in Starfleet history. When Sirella, Martok’s wife and full-time Klingon buzzsaw, tries to drag her through a fiery gauntlet of judgment, Dax calmly shivs her with a verbal blade: a withering takedown of Sirella’s not-so-pure family tree. It’s one of those rare “stand and cheer” moments where Star Trek’s diplomacy takes a coffee break and pure sass steps in.

And the Ferengi dancing? Oh, bless it. Nog’s gleeful noises. Rom’s off-tempo enthusiasm. The whole thing looks like an alien Zumba class taught by Jim Henson's fever dream. It’s absurd and earnest and totally in line with DS9’s belief that joy and culture matter just as much as politics and space battles. Seriously, there should be a commemorative plaque: “Here Ferengi danced, and it was good.”

But let’s talk about what *wasn’t* there—and should’ve been. The biggest narrative vacuum is Odo and Kira. Their long-simmering tension from the station’s occupation arc is resolved…in a closet. Offscreen. Are you kidding me? That betrayal—Odo linking with the Female Changeling—was monumental. It nearly got Rom executed, compromised the rebellion, and shattered Kira’s trust. And yet, by the time Dax finds them mid-conversation, Kira’s practically radiant, like she just came back from a yoga retreat. It's not that I don’t want them to be okay—I *need* them to be okay—but give me the emotional road map. I want to see the rawness, the confusion, the reconciliation, not just the glossy postscript.

Even Nana Visitor was reportedly disappointed with that choice, as was Rene Auberjonois, and rightly so. Ronald D. Moore later admitted that the rewrite happened late in the game, and there just wasn’t time to fit in that scene. Fair enough—it’s TV, stuff happens—but that’s a cornerstone emotional beat that got reduced to wallpaper.

Same goes for Worf’s abrupt cold feet and then his equally abrupt about-face. He calls off the wedding, has one heart-to-heart with Martok, and we’re back on. But where’s the scene where he *actually* apologizes to Jadzia? Where he shows her that the stoic, honor-bound part of him has grown enough to say “I was wrong”? That’s the real evolution of Worf—not just as a warrior or officer, but as a partner. Michael Dorn could’ve crushed that scene, and Terry Farrell would've met him beat for beat. Instead, we get a quick retraction and everyone moves on, like it's just another hiccup in Klingon courtship.

That said, I still love the episode. It’s messy and imperfect and full of heart. Like any wedding, it’s a blend of drama, awkward dancing, unsolicited opinions from relatives, and love that somehow pulls it all together. If *DS9* was about found family, then this is the moment the crew fully embraces that concept—not just as colleagues, but as people who will laugh, cry, and occasionally scream at each other over fire rituals. And if you squint past the narrative omissions, what you’re left with is an episode that celebrates not just a union, but a series that always danced—sometimes literally—on the line between comedy and depth, tradition and rebellion. Just maybe next time, let us see the tough conversations too. After all, those are the moments that make love (and great television) real.

\

07/29/2025

There’s a lot to love about Deep Space Nine, especially when it dares to break format and dip its toes into messy labor politics and Ferengi mating rituals (sometimes in the same scene). “Bar Association” is one of those glorious oddballs — a union episode masquerading as a goofy workplace comedy with intergalactic ear-fetishism and one of the weirdest uses of Worf in the entire series. But in its final moments, the episode doesn’t just go out with a strike win and a raised glass — it also leaves us with a few dangling threads and eyebrow-raising lines that are begging for a second look.

Let’s start with Rom. Sweet, awkward Rom — the character who, against all odds, turned from Quark’s comic-relief screw-up of a brother into the beating heart of DS9’s working class. His confession to Leeta that he’s been giving himself too much “oo-mox” (aka Ferengi ear stimulation — essentially the Ferengi version of a solo date with a scented candle and Spotify playlist) is played for laughs. And look, the humor lands. Leeta’s face scrunches with a perfect mix of pity and polite horror, the audience chuckles, and for a split second we’re all in on the joke: Rom’s a sad sack. But then… “Sorry enough to do something about it?” he asks, with the sleazy confidence of someone who just read The Game and thought it applied to Bajoran dabo girls. And that’s where the scene derails.

Let’s be real: Rom’s not a predator — he’s about as threatening as a bowl of lukewarm tube grubs — but that line is a misstep. It’s not charming. It’s not cute. It’s coercive. The writers, likely aiming for that cheeky “he’s harmless” tone, instead stumble into uncomfortable territory. It feels out of sync with the Rom we’ve come to know — the one who blushes when he talks to women, who leads a workers’ revolt not out of ambition but necessity, and who eventually becomes Grand Nagus not because he manipulates people, but because he doesn’t. That line could’ve been edited out, and nothing of value would’ve been lost. And hey, Rom, buddy — give yourself all the oo-mox you want. Just… maybe don’t overshare at work?

Now, let’s shift from ears to ethics — because we have to talk about Worf crossing a picket line. This might be one of the strangest character misfires in DS9’s otherwise sharp ensemble writing. Worf — who just joined the crew in season four and is still settling into life on a station full of people who emote more than he’d prefer — is suddenly hanging out at Quark’s while a strike is underway? This is the same Worf who once challenged a superior officer to a duel over honor. The same Worf who literally quit Starfleet rather than compromise Klingon values. And here he is, breaking a strike… to grab a drink?

It makes no sense. Worf would hate Quark’s. He’d hate the drinks, the noise, the leering clientele, the air of capitalist desperation. He’d consider the dabo tables dishonorable and the food unspeakable. If Worf had wandered into Quark’s mid-strike, it would’ve been to drag Julian out by the collar for being a traitor to Federation values, not to clink glasses with him. And the idea that he’d get into a bar brawl and end up in a holding cell over this? Pure sitcom logic. Funny? Sure. But it completely misses who Worf is. If anything, he’d have written a 14-page personal code of conduct on labor relations and handed it to O’Brien in the replimat over prune juice.

07/29/2025

In *Deep Space Nine*’s “Bar Association,” Quark stomps around his bar like a pint-sized Ferengi Gordon Ramsay, barking orders, dismissing concerns, and generally showcasing a masterclass in bad-boss behavior—only without the charm or kitchen skills to back it up. And while the episode leans into Rom’s awakening as a labor rights icon (go figure!), one of the overlooked but important dynamics here is how Leeta—our sweet, smiling dabo girl—is written firmly on the sidelines, which is both narratively frustrating and thematically tone-deaf for a show that usually does better.

Let’s start with Quark, who opens the episode with one of the oldest s*xist tropes in the book: “I don’t pay you to think.” It’s aimed at Leeta, of course, when she voices concern over Rom’s clearly deteriorating health. Quark’s dismissal isn’t just rude—it’s lazy writing shorthand for a boss who doesn’t listen, doesn’t care, and thinks emotions are an inconvenient nuisance to be shut down. It’s not new for Quark to be morally flexible, but here he veers into outright exploitative. When he belittles Leeta again—this time over her relationship with Bashir, using it as ammunition to question her intelligence—it's not just a cheap shot, it's a thematic regression. Leeta, to her credit, pushes back with, “What I do during my time off is no business of yours,” but even her small fire gets buried in the larger plot scaffolding around Rom.

This is where we bump into the Mako Mori test wall headfirst. The test, for those keeping score, asks: does a female character have her own narrative arc that's not supporting a man’s story? Leeta flunks that test harder than Nog in Federation history class. Her every moment in the episode is built to bolster Rom’s journey—from worried bystander, to supportive flirt, to reward-kiss dispenser. It's not that Rom doesn't earn our affection; Max Grodénchik brings a bumbling sincerity to Rom that’s genuinely touching. But Leeta? She could be fascinating. She *should* be fascinating. Instead, she mostly flutters around the margins, delivering exposition, concern, and affection in carefully portioned doses.

The irony is, there’s such a clear opportunity here to elevate her. She works the floor of the bar. She’s got charisma. She has access to the other dabo girls. Imagine a short scene—thirty seconds, tops—where she leans in and starts quietly organizing, whispering to coworkers, passing around a padd. Suddenly she’s a voice in the union, not just Rom’s cheerleader. Instead, she spends most of the episode echoing Bashir’s hypothetical opinions, saying things like, “Julian wouldn’t approve,” which feels like her sense of agency is leased out to men in her orbit.

Now, that forehead kiss at the end? It’s sweet, sure. It lands with a hint of earned tenderness. And it's honestly kind of subversive that Leeta—glamorous, stylish, confident—picks the shy, nerdy guy who started the episode too afraid to speak up. That’s good subtext. But it’s still framed as a reward for Rom’s development, not a moment of mutual growth or connection. We’re shown that Rom deserves her love, but we’re never really shown why Leeta wants to give it—except that he's a "nice guy." And if we learned anything from ‘90s TV, it’s that “nice” wasn’t always a sufficient character arc.

The writing team on *DS9* often excelled at layering subtext and complexity, especially when it came to breaking Star Trek’s polished ideals with grittier realities. But this episode leans too hard on tropey scaffolding: the long-suffering woman supporting the meek man’s transformation, the overbearing boss as comic villain, the token romantic gesture as a bow on the story. Armin Shimerman and Chase Masterson both do what they can with the material, but you can feel the missed opportunity in the silences—those moments where Leeta could’ve stepped forward with her own voice, but instead steps aside.

And that’s what makes this episode quietly frustrating. It’s not that it fails in a loud, offensive way. It’s that it nearly succeeds. The bones are there for something sharper, more inclusive, more dynamic. Instead, it gives us a love story where one side of the relationship grows and fights and changes… and the other just sort of smiles and waits. For a series that usually sidesteps that kind of lazy symmetry, “Bar Association” leaves Leeta shortchanged.

\

07/29/2025

Janice Rand was never just a pretty blonde with a tray, no matter how many times early *Star Trek* treated her that way. Grace Lee Whitney, the actress who embodied her, understood from day one that Yeoman Rand was written with a slow-burning emotional powder keg tucked neatly beneath her regulation hairstyle. According to Whitney, Gene Roddenberry had a vision: Rand was to be Kirk’s Miss Kitty, his confidante in skirts and boots—not the woman he’d marry, but the woman who *knew* him. The one who understood the toll of command, who could make a joke, deliver dinner, and, without saying a word, steady his moral compass. She was warmth in a steel environment, but Roddenberry built her role around one unbreakable Prime Directive: the longing must remain unspoken.

The chemistry between Kirk and Rand wasn’t the sizzle of a fleeting affair—it was the kind of aching, chaste affection that thrives in the silences. The glances that linger just a second too long. The awkward stiffness when duty brushes against desire. Roddenberry instructed Whitney that Rand was in love with Kirk, plain and simple, and she could *never* say it. The tragedy is baked right into the DNA of her scenes. That’s a hard ask for a 1960s network TV character: be radiant, efficient, heartbroken, and a model of propriety—all without ever quite admitting you feel *anything*.

Her very first scene in “The Corbomite Maneuver” sets the tone. Rand brings Kirk dinner like it’s a quiet gesture of affection—except what she’s actually delivering is a bowl of lettuce. Kirk looks at it like she’s handed him a dead Tribble. He barks at her for “hovering,” clearly embarrassed, while McCoy chuckles in the background like a meddling uncle. But it’s Rand who has to absorb the brunt of Kirk’s flustered irritation. She offers to change the order with a professional smile, even as the atmosphere screams everything unspoken: she knows him well enough to bring him dinner, but not well enough to expect kindness in return. It’s workplace drama dressed in polyester and phasers.

Interestingly, the original version of that scene, according to *These Are The Voyages*, was even more intimate—Rand waiting in his quarters with clean clothes after his physical, a quiet domestic tableau that was nixed by NBC, likely for being “too suggestive.” Too much subtext, not enough sci-fi. But that’s exactly the tension Rand lived in: she was always too much and not enough. Too alluring to be seen as merely competent, too restrained to be a true romantic lead. In the ‘60s, TV didn’t know what to do with a woman who was both s*xy *and* capable, especially if she wasn’t going to sleep with the hero or die in the third act.

In another world—or perhaps just in a later *Trek* series—Rand could have been the beating heart of the bridge crew. A woman whose emotional intelligence and quiet strength grounded Kirk in a way Spock’s logic never could. Instead, she was written out not long after, a casualty of studio discomfort and a franchise still figuring out what stories it wanted to tell. But for a brief time, Rand stood in for something rare: the idea that love can exist without consummation, and that strength doesn’t always wear command gold. She knew the captain’s favorite foods, she anticipated his moods, and she bore his coldness with grace because that was her post—never quite a partner, never quite invisible.

To rewatch Rand’s scenes now is to see a character caught in the gravitational pull of two opposing stars: 1960s television and Gene Roddenberry’s ambition. She was written to be both a symbol and a person, and Grace Lee Whitney, despite the show’s limitations, gave her soul. The relationship between Kirk and Rand is a study in restraint, of feelings deferred, of dinners served and words unsaid. And in the best *Star Trek* tradition, it dares to ask: What happens when the heart must serve in silence?

\

07/29/2025

Of all the television shows to blast off in the 1960s, *Star Trek: The Original Series* may have had the most dramatic launchpad turbulence — not from Klingons or Romulans, but from casting changes so ruthless they’d make a Borg Queen blush. Before *Star Trek* became a cultural juggernaut, it was just another sci-fi concept trying to impress skeptical NBC executives. And its first attempt, the 1965 pilot “The Cage,” looked almost nothing like the show fans came to adore. In fact, if *Star Trek* had a redshirt among its episodes, “The Cage” wore it proudly.

The original crew? It was a different universe. Jeffrey Hunter played Captain Christopher Pike, a brooding, reluctant leader with a streak of melancholy. John Hoyt was Dr. Phillip Boyce, his martini-swilling, philosophical confidant. Peter Duryea flew the ship as Lt. Tyler. Laurel Goodwin delivered clipboard duty as Yeoman C**t. And Majel Barrett — later the voice of every computer in the galaxy — played “Number One,” the stoic and brainy first officer. Only one actor survived that first contact into the next phase: Leonard Nimoy as Spock, though even he was nearly dropped due to fears his devilish ears would offend midwestern housewives. (NBC really said that.)

The problem wasn’t that these actors were bad. It was that the network didn’t buy them. Jeffrey Hunter, a bona fide movie star with a brooding James Dean energy, wasn’t convinced television was his future — and his wife reportedly encouraged him to walk. Whether he quit or was shown the door depends on who’s telling the tale, but the result was clear: he was replaced by William Shatner, whose Kirk brought swagger, s*x appeal, and just enough camp to offset Spock’s logic. John Hoyt, Peter Duryea, and Laurel Goodwin were quietly jettisoned. They didn't even get a goodbye — just new actors, new roles, and in some cases, no equivalent at all.

And then there was Barrett. NBC famously balked at a woman as second-in-command. Despite Gene Roddenberry’s efforts — and the fact she was his romantic partner — Barrett was ousted from the bridge. But Gene, never one to let a good actress (or relationship) go to waste, gave her a second life as Nurse Chapel. It was Hollywood nepotism dressed in a blue Starfleet uniform, and you know what? It worked. Chapel became a recurring figure and eventually, thanks to *Strange New Worlds*, got the spotlight she deserved.

There’s a strange kind of poetry in Spock staying while everyone else was fired, because *Star Trek*’s beating heart was never Kirk’s charm or McCoy’s sass — it was always Spock’s internal battle between logic and emotion. The producers may not have known it then, but in choosing to keep Nimoy, they preserved the philosophical core of the show. Ironically, it was the alien who made *Star Trek* human.

To say that *Star Trek* shed its skin between the pilot and series proper is like saying the Enterprise is a “ship.” The show didn’t just recast — it reinvented. Roles weren’t tweaked, they were reengineered. Characters disappeared without a trace. The network, the studio, Roddenberry — all of them took the show apart and rebuilt it into something more colorful, more adventurous, and more sellable. Sometimes, the transporter doesn’t just beam you to a new planet — it scrambles your atoms and puts them back together as someone entirely different.

So yes, people were fired from *Star Trek* before it ever truly began. Careers were redirected, dreams dashed, and a few careers never quite recovered. But the end result was a cast that gelled, a show that endured, and a legacy that’s still warping across space and time. Sometimes the road to the stars is paved with pink slips.

07/29/2025

In the ever-evolving galaxy of *Star Trek*, it's not just the captains who earn their place in the stars. Sometimes, it's the actors behind latex masks and alien dialects who steal the scene, elevating what could have been forgettable footnotes into unforgettable fixtures. Among these shape-shifting legends, few have done it with as much gusto—and genre-defining glee—as Jeffrey Combs.

Combs is the kind of actor whose name might not be known by every casual fan, but to the faithful, he's the secret spice in the *Star Trek* stew. Originally brought aboard *Deep Space Nine* to play Brunt, a Ferengi liquidator with the charm of an IRS auditor and the social grace of a boot to the face, Combs turned what should have been a bureaucratic foil for Quark into an absolute delight. Brunt wasn’t just a recurring antagonist—he was a satire of capitalism with a monocle made of sharp wit and acid sarcasm, and Combs played him with all the relish of a Shakespearean villain who’s just discovered quarterly profits.

But it was his later role as Weyoun, the Vorta liaison of the Dominion, that solidified Combs as one of Trek’s MVPs. Weyoun could’ve been a generic henchman, the kind of smirking middle-management lackey the heroes dispose of en route to the real bad guy. Instead, Combs played him with eerie sincerity and a devotion to the Founders that bordered on religious mania. It was *how* he believed that made Weyoun chilling—and how Combs could flip from menace to groveling charm with a raised eyebrow. And in true Trek fashion, the writers leaned in hard, cleverly using Vorta cloning as an in-universe excuse to bring Weyoun back again... and again. By the time Weyoun Five showed up, it wasn’t just a recurring character—it was a running commentary on the nature of loyalty, identity, and the creepiness of smiling while threatening planetary genocide.

And Combs isn’t the only one. Vaughn Armstrong might not have had one standout alien role, but across *TNG*, *DS9*, *Voyager*, and *Enterprise*, he played more species than most actors have played roles. It’s a mark of Trek’s ensemble genius that guys like Armstrong became the connective tissue between series, morphing from Cardassians to Klingons to Hirogen without missing a beat. His Admiral Forrest on *Enterprise* finally gave him a recurring human face, but by then, he had already become a one-man alien anthology.

Let’s not forget Suzie Plakson, who turned the archetype of the Klingon warrior woman on its ear as K’Ehleyr in *TNG*. She brought bite, brains, and a soul to a species often written as blunt instruments. Her tragic arc with Worf could’ve been cheesy romance; instead, it cut deep. Later, she resurfaced as a Q on *Voyager*, and while the episode was uneven, she once again proved she could command the screen even in omnipotent drag.

It’s a testament to Trek’s creative elasticity that when producers see a guest actor knocking it out of the park, they don’t just applaud—they write them back in, species be damned. Actors like Combs became so essential, they transcended the makeup chair. They didn’t just play aliens. They inhabited them, defined them, *elevated* them.

In a franchise known for boldly going, it’s the return trips—those recurring faces in unfamiliar forms—that remind us how versatile great actors can be. They don’t just portray different species; they give them soul, and in doing so, they transform sci-fi archetypes into something human, poignant, and real.

07/28/2025

In the grand tapestry of *Star Trek*, where admirals scheme, captains philosophize, and Klingons shout honor into the void, it’s often the one-off characters who catch you off guard — a flicker of humanity (or alienity) that sneaks up and guts you. For me, that character is Kilana from *Deep Space Nine’s* “The Ship.” She only appeared once, played with eerie grace and emotional intelligence by Kaitlin Hopkins, and yet her impact lands like a photon torpedo to the heart. You don’t expect to care this much about a Vorta — genetically engineered, silk-tongued negotiators of the Dominion — but Kilana is different. She’s all softness and sorrow under that diplomatic sheen, and her performance pulls you in like gravity.

The episode itself is a bottle of tension corked by paranoia, loss, and Federation grit. The crew finds a downed Dominion ship and, predictably, decides to salvage it. Kilana shows up, all charisma and subtext, requesting the ship back with the sort of persistent calm that suggests she’s got a phaser behind her back. But this isn’t some mustache-twirling plot; this is *DS9* doing what it does best — moral ambiguity wrapped in character drama. The real gut punch doesn’t come from blasters or betrayals, but from Kilana’s quiet unraveling.

What makes Kilana unforgettable is how Hopkins plays her as someone walking a razor’s edge. She isn’t some bureaucratic mouthpiece; she’s a woman with orders, a desperate need to keep secrets, and — here’s the kicker — real feelings. Watch her eyes in the final scenes. You can see the moment her mask cracks. The fear. The shame. The genuine grief. The camera doesn’t linger, but your heart does. Kilana isn’t evil — she’s trapped by the cruelty of the system she serves, the same way Odo once was, the way so many Trek characters are when caught between duty and decency.

That last scene, when she realizes what’s been lost — not just the ship, not just the Founder — but the chance to avoid all this death… that’s Shakespearean. It’s a performance that deserved a Hugo nomination on its own. You *feel* for her. Not in a “villain was right” Tumblr post kind of way, but in a “damn, this galaxy breaks people” kind of way.

And then she vanishes.

No return episode. No arc. No redemption. Kilana is filed away in the great *Star Trek* cabinet of unforgettable one-offs, alongside Marla Gilmore, the Exocomp, and that poor guy who got eaten by tar in TNG. But her absence only deepens her power. She’s a ghost of war’s collateral damage — a reminder that even in sci-fi, the cost of conflict is too often borne by those just trying to follow orders without losing their soul.

I wish she’d returned. Maybe not in some redemption arc, but just a cameo to remind us that sorrow has a face, and sometimes, it smiles through tears and says, “Please, just give me the ship.” Hopkins didn’t play Kilana like a plot device. She played her like a woman drowning with style. And in a franchise where even redshirts get novels, Kilana stands out because she *didn’t* get more screen time — and yet stole the whole damn episode.

\

Silver Screen Hub

07/29/2025

07/29/2025

07/29/2025

07/29/2025

07/29/2025

07/29/2025

07/29/2025

07/28/2025

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category