Planck:

First this: The wave’s particles are not wave of absolute or empty space which we accept wrongly now but wave of thickening and expanding of the space around the particle itself because of the inertial character of the field (see part I USM

www.kanevuniverse.com)
Indeed the dark lines in the spectrum analysis of elements are result of jumping of the electrons on the electronic cloud from lower to the higher orbit and there is supposed that the reverse process it isn’t clear yet, which is correct in the point of view of quantum mechanics, but not according to USM

www.kanevuniverse.com Again quantum mechanics give the answer about quantum action as a preservation of the phase in the diffraction wave in the different energy orbits of the atom’s electron (in concrete case hydrogen atom), which means that there the period of wave must to change whole number times to be possible the particle to be the same. This explanation despite it gives thorough quantity coincidence it isn’t essence of the quantum action. That is why the quantum mechanics can give only probability of electron jumping from higher to lower orbit. According to USM pages 85 to 98 (about atom’s energy stimulation) and pages 153 to 174 (about the nuclei’s energy stimulation)

www.kanevuniverse.com the essence of the quantum action in the atoms and nuclei actually is the belated inertial reaction of the energy stimulation (see also part I and II) and the disputed dark lines in the spectrum of atoms in fact are the times which is necessary that the field reaches to the closest orbital system to communicate about the has come changing in the equilibrium of the stimulated atom. Now about well formulated uncertainty problem: “the probability to find out the electron it isn’t pointed to one particular spot but several such spots, but we can measure experimentally that the electron actually is in some concrete spot and respectively momentum of particle there, not in several spots simultaneously”…well that is the problem…isn’t it? What is the resolution? Let return towards USM

www.kanevuniverse.com part I pages: 8 and 9, where is given the essentially explanation of field creation and there is said that the inter movement between the objects can to be event almost segment (straight line). On the fig 4 and 5 page 11 (USM) is given the essence of electrical charge creation and you can see that the hypothetical electron (can to be the muon and other particles which use the resonance radius of electron, see further in theory), this electron there moves in some harmonic curvet line because of the inertial action and contraction with the nearest orbital systems. So we can make a conclusion: the harmonic oscillation of some particle (through which it creates its own centripetal field) can become almost straight line because there the space continuously expands or contract around this line. Here must to remind that according to USM in the universe doesn’t exist absolutely space, the spaces are only the distances between the objects and if these distances absent, there wouldn’t be orbital systems and therefore no fields no masses, simply nothing, which means there it isn’t something to be described which to shows existence of absolute space itself. Now using the conception that actually the electron’s curvet harmonic line not expand or contract the space on the balanced middle line, follows that we can find out the electron exactly there on some measurement spot and respectively its momentum, where we presumably quietly accepted that this spot is on our mind creation, called absolutely space! So if we refuse to accept the existence of absolutely space the problem disappear! So is it equation of uncertainty real or illusory? Next incorrectness of QM mathematical formalism is impossibility to synchronize the times between the beginning of the two following orbits (phases) to be possible to assert that there (on the two orbits) the phase is the same (hence the same particle!)

We physically define the time as a quantity of movement, for example one year is the movement of Earth around the Sun in full orbital cycle. But what exactly is this movement? To clarify this let return to the relativistic quantum mechanics where we choose such measurement units that the constants of Planck, divided by 2π and velocity of light to be equal to 1, i.e. h/2π=c=1 (see page 345 USM

www.kanevuniverse.com ). So according to the known equation: E=h.γ where γ is the frequency of the wave and E is the energy, we can write that the relativistic “cycle” energy: E=ω, where ω=2π.γ is the angular velocity (frequency). But ω has dimension: [s^(-1) ], which means that the time is converse proportionally to the cycle energy. But what about the next equation: E=N.t where N is the power of some process, it seems like the energy is proportionally to the time, but it isn’t so because if we replace the power: dE/dt=N, we see that the time is again converse proportionally to the “cycle” energy, but the “linear” energy is equal to the work made up in some process: E=A=F.s where (s) is the road which passes the force (F) and in this case it is the length of wave equal to: s=c/ω where c=1, so we can see that actually the time is proportionally to the distances (inside the cycle) as well and that is only about relativistic presentation of the examined functions So let return to the equation of time connection in the special relativity, (see page 47 USM): t^'=t/β;

t=t^'/β As we can see the two times in movable and in immovable coordinates is fully replicable, then the time interval is equal to: ∆t=(t^'-t)=(t-t^' ) And the relativistic energy is equal to: E=1/∆t So what will happen if the time interval is equal to zero? The energy will be infinity! But such event is impossible to exist physically, so obviously the time interval cannot be equal to zero!? It means that the velocities of the two coordinates cannot be equal between and equal to the velocity of light, i.e. if that are two light rays. Conclusion: The explanation of quantum action in QM manner is correct mathematically (because there so far don’t exist formalism of belated functions – “dynamical mathematic”) but wrong physically because it is unfit with physical reality! The truly explanation of quantum action is as it is follows and thickening of the space is the basic for temperature essence explanation and ionization of atoms:

USM (undivided structure of the matter) and the Quantum mechanics. Page 85

Second:

The Planck’s law cannot apply in equilibrium condition (such conditions don’t exist in reality, see below). The Planck constant can to be numerically equal to 1 (energy equilibrium) only in case of full (not approximately) but full reflection. Even I assert below about new material (nuclear chain nature joromachine

www.kanevuniverse.com ) which has full but not approximate reflection, it is valid only about known now existing spectrum of radiations which recover all video, nuclear spectrum, including heat spectrums which is interesting to us because we will try to produce rocket chamber from this material, where we can directly ignite thermonuclear synthesis and this chamber will withstand these huge pressure and temperature. But we cannot assert that this is the all possible spectrum in the universe, because if we success to create such material (nuclear chain), then this material will has very specific resonance spectrum of vibration of nuclei knots of such imagine “crystal lattice”. So what should be this frequency? It will be somewhere between the frequencies of gamma rays and ultra violet rays. So if we make “laser crystal” from such material then we can use this unknown for now rays to tools this material!

The topic here is: “When a black body is heated, electromagnetic radiation is emitted with a spectrum depending on the temperature of the body and not of its composition. Calculating the form of the spectrum, using the then established physical laws, gave an unreasonable result: the radiation in the high frequency part of the spectrum became infinite.”

I said “waves” but not only electromagnetic waves because this process must to be unifying explained by physics law by one meant way to be correct. So I can remind here that mechanically waves can swallow and “radiate” by the materials in resonance’s manner (as to take into account the elasticity of the material). The same must to be in force about any waves including electromagnetic ones, i.e. in resonance’s manner. So see this: Let begin with the physically essence of the light spread in the known to us here on Earth materials. We know that indeed the absent of reflection means full transparency (as we don’t discuss for now how accurately can to be such process). It’s means that the light ray cannot affect the atoms (nuclei) of material where it passes at all. Is it possible? Of course not! But interacting with the surrounding matter, the light ray vibrating points of this material where it can feel some resonance or almost resonance achievement. So the light ray passing is always resonance process. If the resonance process hits only frequencies which aren’t in the visual spectrum, then this material is visually transparent, but that material may to be non heat frequency transparent. So all depends by the material, but it is means that the Planck law is incorrect? Of course not, because it describes one more theoretically event called absolute black body. Absolute black body means matter which absorbs and respectively radiates all spectrums of so called electromagnetic waves. Whether such material existing in the universe in this ideal form? Of course not, because if this was possible then all these material should be identical and therefore non distinguishable. But known here on Earth “black bodies” (or black cavity) possesses very close to maintained above properties. In the universe can exist material which cannot swallow but fully radiates all visually and heat frequencies, which remember effect of absolute black body, but it is not as it is discussed above.

To apply the special theory of relativity between two objects movement, the velocity between them has to be constant: dV/dt=constant which means that there absent acceleration da=0 which is correct in Einstein relativity. But that is the first weak point: if the acceleration between the two objects is equal to zero, then whether these two object exist each other or don’t? And if the answer is don’t, then how we can measure this velocity between two don’t exist each other objects? Obviously this is the problem of special relativity, because to exist each other the two objects have to dynamically interact, for example if we are one of the objects, to see another the light ray has to reach this object which is field (light) interaction. More over according to USM

www.kanevuniverse.com in the spaces there is no empty space, which means that always exist dynamically interaction between all objects to be possible to exist each other.

The second weak point is connected with the velocity equality of special relativity when in equation: u_x=(W_x+V)/(1+(W_x V_x)/C^2 ) the two velocities of two objects are equal between and equal to the velocity of light, then we obtain that u_x is equal to the velocity of light C as well, which means that there no matter whether the coordinate is movable or not (see page 48 USM). But is it possible the two objects to possess velocity of light even they are light rays themselves and by this way to become indistinguishable each other? The answer is no, because the light velocity is different in different mediums (different object have to have different velocities) and that is why we need this:

The problem of photon comes from this: The empty or absolute space doesn’t exist according to USM

http://www.kanevuniverse.com because of the essence of creating the fields (all gravitation, electrostatic-magnetic and nuclear) and their interconnection regarding their quality essence and quantity sizes. So in the general relativity any where the velocity of light in vacuum must to replace with the velocity of light in empty space and because such empty space doesn’t exist, that is the main reason that such velocity can’t be reached. So obviously the photon can has mass in repose equal to zero only in empty space, which doesn’t exist in reality, then all real photons in fact are virtual photons (relativistic photons) which in low velocities, their masses inclined to zero, but they have some masses through interaction with the surrounding matter (the surrounding matter carry partially light ray – experiment of Fizau). This interaction is realizes by the electromagnetic field in accordance with the equations of Maxwell Lorentz and in accordance with the essence of the light ray shown in USM.

The first error in discussed topic is that radiation even in black body always is in resonance manner i.e. depending by the chemical composition but not contrary and assertion that the part of the spectrum (ultraviolet light) become infinity is not physical category because nothing in real word can become infinity that is mathematical symbol which doesn’t mean anything in physics! Obviously the Planck quantifying is mathematically approach which is unfit with the physically reality! Then what is the resolution of experimental data?

The answer is in phase modulation between different spectral lines which must to be different each other because they represent different frequencies! So because the time interval cannot to be equal to zero follows that higher frequency possesses bigger phase difference (because in high frequency the electron jump from basic orbit to higher orbit than the same electron which jump from basic orbit to more close orbit in case of low frequency!), than the low frequency wave’s length spectrum which shows unfit with physical reality to apply different wave frequencies in one beginning point of coordinate!

After all:

Whether the constant of Planck is universal all over the universe? Of course not, no constant is absolutely in the universe, all is changes depending by the time, but some processes are changing so slowly that practically it is impossible to detect not only experimentally but mathematically as well because represented it by some mathematical sequence it inclines to zero. So in concrete case this theory it isn’t correct simply because there it isn’t fulfills energy preservation, the equation of Planck is about some concrete frequency E=h.γ no matter whether this frequency radiation is illuminated particularly, or fully as it is in case of absolute black body. So about our position of observation, the radius position of our Sun in the Galaxy, this constant as well other known constant (for example the constant of velocity of light) are “absolutely”. But what about the time dependence? Well because we know from USM

www.kanevuniverse.com that the Sun was born on the center of our galaxy and shifting towards the periphery the protons and electrons there become heavier and the neutrino become lighter, follows that the conditions about radiation process is changes as well. What kind of changes? let see firstly this: Very interesting question: “whether the speed of light is absolutely…” Of course not, but this is related only to the constant of light spread like a real number, not as a limited which we can’t reach! What I mean? Firstly see pages: 94 to 98 and pages: 198 to 202 USM

www.kanevuniverse.com here was delivered these formulae: r=h/(C.m) where: r – is the resonance radius of the particle; h – is the constant of Planck; C – is the velocity of light; m – is the mass of particle; and this formula: C_i=m_p/m_i .C where: C_i - is the constant of velocity of light (like a real number) about the different possible worlds (see shown pages); m_p - is the mass of proton; m_i - is the mass of current stable particle about current possible world; C – is velocity of light in our world where the velocity of light has this value (C). As it is seen on the shown above pages the resonance radius is connected with the mass of the particle which is stable particle in examined world and the real number of the velocity of spread of the field in this possible world. The important conclusion is not only possibility to be created “Oracul” (see the pages), but more importantly is the consequence that on the center of our galaxy (in fact any galaxy) where are situated and was born the proto particles the limited constant of spread of field (“light”) is different like a real number compare to this value in our space which is (C). That is one of the reason that we can’t see the central zone of any galaxy! And this: So what is the Planck length in the center of any (including our) galaxy? It is inclines to zero and it is so close to zero as the energy of this spot is close to zero. Because there the thickening of the space is also inclines to zero and of course the velocity of light spreading inclines to infinity. There springs up the following question “if the light spreading inclines to infinity whether this spot contains infinity energy because of the equation:E=m.c^2 “. Because we are asserting that there the energy inclines to zero. Let return towards page 49 formula 14 and page 50 formulae 15, 16, 17 and explanation to page 51 USM

www.kanevuniverse.com and as to take into account that these equations are actually belated ones (see part I USM) we can write: E=0,98024.〖lim〗_(m→0) (m).〖lim〗_(V→C) (V).〖lim〗_(C→∞) (C) If we replace the limits there we can obtain that the energy inclines to infinity, because there the light velocity appears risen in second power. But that is wrong, because we have to imagine that this mass (m) in fact is part of orbital system (see part I USM) to be possible to exist and when mass (m) disappear (inclines to zero), passes time t=R/C which is needed the light ray to communicates to the center of orbit about has coming changes. So the mass (m) inclines to zero before the velocity (v) to inclining to (C) and obviously the energy in this spot inclines to zero. So you can see that if we follow mathematic strictly the energy in the center of any galaxy (“big bang” or “black hole”) has to be infinity, which hasn’t physical meant, but if we observe that in the universe there absent purely interaction (without accelerations – special theory of relativity and that we cannot synchronize the clocks, because to exist some object we must to have dynamically interaction with it and there is needed time to reach the field, the light there), follows that the shown above limit of energy must to judge contra mathematically.

So whether in the center of our galaxy the constant of Planck is the same as it is in our present position - the Sun? The correct answer is no, because in the center of our galaxy and in fact about any galaxy we have the very first orbital system contained from two almost equal masses (protoparticles) orbiting each other, so the condition of quantum action is far more different in such orbital system than the hydrogen atom in our position of observation and as it is now. That is why we cannot see the center of our galaxy, because the constant of Planck there is different and it is inclines to zero there as well the length of Planck also inclines to zero. G.Kanev