Fair Media

14/12/2025

Candace Owens Questioned On Spiritual Authority

This clip dives into a very uncomfortable question that many people are afraid to ask out loud.

The speaker challenges Candace Owens not on politics — but on spiritual authority, accountability, and consistency. The discussion raises concerns about money, influence, and whether public messaging aligns with personal convictions.

Key points explored in this moment:

-Who should hold spiritual authority in a believer’s life
-The difference between religious leadership and personal accountability
-Whether faith guidance should come from institutions or family
-The tension between public influence and private conscience

This isn’t a personal attack — it’s a theological and moral challenge rooted in scripture, responsibility, and transparency.
When belief, power, and money intersect, questions are inevitable.

👇 Join the conversation:
Who should guide faith — institutions, leaders, or personal accountability?



Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCM8nJrijTLdv7JRUyFt749w/join

Click Here To Donate To 2 STRONG
✅Cashapp: $2strongpodcast
✅Business Inquiries: [email protected]

We also have a P.O. Box
Fair Media
P.O. Box 1195
Granger, Indiana, 46530

13/12/2025

Did She Make a Good Point!?!

The Abortion Debate That Left Everyone Speechless” - Pro-Choice Meets the Survivor - Both Sides

In this jaw-dropping face-off, a woman conceived in the aftermath of an attempted abortion confronts a pro-choice advocate with a question that stops the conversation cold: “Did I deserve to die for the crime of the man who r***d my mother?” Watch as the debate takes an unexpected turn, exposing the raw, deeply personal stakes behind the abortion argument. This intense exchange reveals the complex intersections of choice, law, and survival that mainstream debates often overlook. Are we ready to face the truth about who gets to live?

13/12/2025

PLEASE HELP ME OUT:

If someone says a deceased loved one is in heaven “orchestrating, strategizing,” and that they can feel it, would you consider that belief:

🅰️ Godly
🅱️ Ungodly

👇 Comments encouraged:
Explain why you chose your answer — biblical perspective, personal belief, or interpretation all welcome. Keep it respectful.

13/12/2025

Candace Owens Past Words Collide With Erika Kirk’s Message In A Shocking Timeline Shift - Both Sides

When Erika Kirk finally stepped forward and addressed the chaos surrounding her husband’s legacy and the nonstop commentary swirling online, the internet immediately turned its attention back to Candace Owens — not just for her latest response, but for the old statements she made long before any of this drama escalated.

13/12/2025

Candace Owens’ Past Words Collide With Erika Kirk’s Message In A Shocking Timeline Shift

13/12/2025

Tonight on Both Sides, we’re breaking down one of the most uncomfortable questions surrounding the ongoing Candace Owens and Turning Point USA fallout:

Why did Brandon Tatum wait so long to speak up?

For weeks, Candace Owens publicly criticized and escalated rhetoric toward Erika Kirk, her family, and TPUSA staff. During that time, Brandon Tatum — someone close to all parties involved — remained publicly silent.

Candace has repeatedly claimed that she would stop if Erika asked her to. Erika eventually did. The attacks continued.

Only later did Brandon release a video expressing sadness over how things unfolded — without addressing why intervention didn’t come sooner, or whether silence allowed the situation to grow worse.

Tonight, we’re asking hard but necessary questions:

Was Brandon trying to “play the middle”?

Was his silence strategic — or fearful?

Does loyalty to personalities outweigh accountability to people?

And what responsibility do influential voices have when private disputes turn public?

This is not about picking sides blindly.
It’s about timing, responsibility, influence, and silence.

Join us live as Both Sides break down both perspectives and let the audience decide what really happened — and why it took so long.

� Drop your thoughts. The link will be posted during the live.

12/12/2025

Candace Owens Said She’d Stop.

So Why Didn’t She?
Candace Owens’ Promise vs. Reality**
By now, most people have seen it.
Erika Kirk speaks.
Candace Owens responds.
And suddenly the internet splits into camps.
But before we get lost in reactions, timelines, and personalities, we need to do something very simple:
Go back.
Back before the responses.
Back before the outrage.
Back before the excuses.
Because the entire controversy hinges on one repeated promise — a promise Candace Owens made multiple times, on camera, in her own words.
And once you hear those words again, slowly and clearly, the narrative changes.

Let’s Address the Claim Head-On
Candace supporters have repeated the same defense over and over:
“She never went after Erika.”
“She said she’d stop if Erika asked.”
“Candace doesn’t lie.”
“She’s just asking questions.”
So let’s keep all of that in mind.
Hold it close.
Because the receipts matter.

The Promise (Repeated, Clearly, Publicly)
Candace Owens said this — not once, not twice, but repeatedly:
“No one, and I mean absolutely no one, outside of my husband and Erika Kirk has the power to shut me up right now.”
Then again:
“There’s nobody that can get me to stop talking about this except Erika Kirk.”
And again:
“If Erika Kirk asks me to stop, I will stop.”
Those aren’t vague statements.
They aren’t metaphors.
They aren’t jokes.
They’re promises.

Then Erika Spoke
Erika Kirk didn’t shout.
She didn’t rant.
She didn’t attack.
She said — calmly, firmly, publicly — that people needed to stop speculating about her family and her husband.
And at that moment, the test arrived.
This was the exact scenario Candace described.
The exact condition she laid out.
The exact moment she said would end the discussion.
So what happened?

The Reversal
Instead of stopping, Candace escalated.
She dismissed Erika’s response.
She reframed it.
She pivoted to money, media appearances, and motivations.
And suddenly the promise became irrelevant.
Not retracted.
Not clarified.
Just ignored.
Which leaves only two possibilities:
The promise was never sincere
Or Candace changed the rules once they no longer served her
Either way, the result is the same.
The promise was broken.

Words Matter — Especially When You Demand Trust
Candace Owens has built a career on calling out dishonesty.
She demands precision from others.
She demands accountability.
She demands moral consistency.
So it’s fair to ask:
Why doesn’t that standard apply here?
Because when someone says, “I will stop if she asks me to stop,”
and then doesn’t stop,
That isn't a misunderstanding.
That's a contradiction.

Critique vs. Accusation
There’s another important distinction being blurred.
Critique is questioning actions or decisions.
Accusation is asserting wrongdoing without proof.
Erika Kirk asked for speculation about her family to end.
Candace responded by reframing herself as the one under attack — while continuing the same narrative.
That’s not clarification.
That’s deflection.
And deflection only works when people forget the original promise.

Why This Moment Matters
This isn’t about personalities.
It’s not about who you like.
It’s not about sides.
It’s about credibility.
If Candace Owens wants to be trusted when she says “I’ll stop,”
then stopping matters.
If she wants to be seen as principled,
then consistency matters.
And if she wants to hold others to account,
She has to accept accountability herself.

A Note for Erika Kirk
There is one fair criticism here — and it’s said respectfully.
If you’re asking someone to stop,
say their name.
Clarity protects you.
Directness closes loopholes.
Silence invites reinterpretation.
You had every right to speak.
You had every right to draw a boundary.
And you have every right to enforce it clearly.

Final Question for the Audience
This is the moment where excuses stop working.
Candace said she would stop.
Erika asked her to stop.
She didn’t.
So the question isn’t emotional.
It’s logical.

🔥 POLL QUESTION
Did Candace Owens break her own promise?
Yes — the words are clear

Mostly — she changed the standard mid-stream

No — she never meant it literally
This contradiction undermines her credibility
Drop your thoughts below.

Read the quotes again.

Listen carefully.

Because when words stop meaning anything,
Truth doesn’t survive.

And that’s bigger than any one person.

12/12/2025

Candace’s Soldiers Scared of a Conversation? Both Sides ​

There’s a moment in every major online debate where confidence stops being enough — and clarity becomes necessary. That’s the moment we’re in right now.

Over the past several months, Candace Owens has pushed a series of strong claims and narratives that have reshaped public conversation across political and cultural spaces. Alongside those claims, a number of high-profile creators and commentators have voiced agreement, support, or alignment with her perspective. Yet one thing remains noticeably absent: a clear, step-by-step explanation of why these claims hold up under scrutiny.

Hodge Twins, Brandon Tatum, And Ian Carroll Break Down Candace Owens - Both Sides

This video is not an attack.
It is not a debate challenge.
It is an open, public invitation for conversation.

We are asking a simple question:
If the narrative is solid, can it be clearly explained?

In this episode, we extend that invitation directly to some of the most recognizable voices who appear to align with Candace Owens’ perspective — including the Hodge Twins, Brandon Tatum, and Ian Carroll — not to argue, but to help clarify what many viewers are still struggling to understand.

This breakdown focuses on process, reasoning, and transparency, not personalities.
In this video, we explore:
✅ Why confidence without explanation creates confusion instead of understanding
✅ The difference between repeating claims and breaking them down
✅ How audience trust is built through dialogue, not dismissal
✅ Why asking questions is not the same as rejecting ideas
✅ How media narratives grow stronger when they can withstand open discussion
✅ What it means to say “we might be wrong” — and actually mean it
✅ Why truth doesn’t need protection from conversation

We also address the growing frustration felt by many viewers who genuinely want to understand why these conclusions are being drawn — and why those explanations so often stop short when questions are asked.

If Candace Owens’ claims are correct, then explanation should only strengthen them.
If her supporters understand something others don’t, then conversation is the bridge.

This channel has always stood on one principle: truth benefits from daylight.

12/12/2025

Brandon Tatum Says Candace Owens Isn’t Lying—Just “Misguided”

When does a lie stop being called a lie?

In this short, we react to Brandon Tatum’s past comments where he argues that Candace Owens isn’t lying, she’s simply “misguided.” That single word opens up a much bigger question about truth, intent, and selective standards in political commentary.

Because when others get labeled liars instantly…
But certain people get protected with softer language…

That’s not consistency — that’s narrative framing.
We break down:
• Why “misguided” is used instead of “lying”
• How intent vs outcome gets blurred
• Whether loyalty changes the rules
• And why accountability should apply evenly

This isn’t about picking sides — it’s about logic and consistency.

💬 Drop your take below:
Is being “misguided” really different from lying, or is it just better PR?



Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCM8nJrijTLdv7JRUyFt749w/join

Click Here To Donate To 2 STRONG
✅Cashapp: $2strongpodcast
✅Business Inquiries: [email protected]

We also have a P.O. Box
Fair Media
P.O. Box 1195
Granger, Indiana, 46530

12/12/2025

Candace’s Defenders Went Silent

This isn’t an attack — it’s a conversation.
The Hodge Twins, Brandon Tatum, Ian Carroll, Coach Colins, Shaun Atwood — you all communicate differently than Candace Owens. Different backgrounds. Different delivery. Same ideas?

If you believe what Candace is saying, help us understand it better.
Because sometimes it’s not the message — it’s the delivery.
All we’re asking for is clarity, not loyalty.

💬 Comment below:
Does delivery change the truth, or does truth stand on its own?



Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCM8nJrijTLdv7JRUyFt749w/join

Click Here To Donate To 2 STRONG
✅Cashapp: $2strongpodcast
✅Business Inquiries: [email protected]

We also have a P.O. Box
Fair Media
P.O. Box 1195
Granger, Indiana, 46530

11/12/2025

Is Brandon Tatum Really “Neutral”?
https://youtu.be/4xIx0GfQJHg?si=medpk...

Or Has He Been Candace Owens’ Personal Guard Dog All Along?**
What you’re about to see is one of the clearest moments yet —
a moment where Brandon Tatum finally showed his hand,
finally revealed his loyalty,
and finally confirmed what so many viewers have been whispering for months:
**He’s not defending the truth.
He’s defending Candace Owens.**
At all costs.
The clip begins innocently.
A friendly interview.
A conversation about faith, Israel, scripture, morality.
Two people speaking respectfully — even warmly.
And then Candace’s name enters the chat.
Instantly, everything changes.

The host — Rochel — gently says what many people feel:
“Candace is evil.”
She waits for Brandon’s response.
Not to attack him.
Not to embarrass him.
Just to hear what he thinks.
And suddenly…
we watch Brandon flip into a different mode.
A different energy.
A different loyalty.
Because instead of addressing the real criticism,
instead of holding his “friend” to the standard he holds everyone else to,
Brandon decides to make one of the strangest declarations of his entire career:
“I know Candace better than anybody.”
Better than anybody?
Better than her husband?
Better than the father of her children?
Better than the people who live with her, work with her, travel with her?
Brandon says he knows her heart.
Knows her intentions.
Knows her spiritual state.
And in doing so…
He accidentally tells us everything.
https://youtu.be/4xIx0GfQJHg?si=medpk...

Because this isn’t loyalty — it’s protection.
Brandon suddenly becomes
gentle,
soft,
careful,
almost emotional
when speaking about Candace Owens.
The same Brandon who tears strangers apart online,
the same Brandon who blasts politicians, activists, victims, and random civilians
with zero hesitation…
cannot bring himself to criticize Candace.
Instead, he gives her the most bizarre defense possible:
“She’s not evil… she’s just deceived.”
Not evil.
Just lost.
Just confused.
Just misguided by “the Catholic Church.”
Just suffering from, in his words, a “reprobate mind” —
which, biblically, is literally something God hands you over to.
He didn’t make her sound better.
He made her sound worse.
And then he wraps it all in one neat bow:
**“My job isn’t to talk about her publicly.
My job is to pray for her.”**
Oh really, Brandon?
Because your job seems to be blasting EVERYONE ELSE publicly
with zero hesitation.
Except for one person.
Candace.

And then comes the plot twist that exposes everything.
The interview ends.
The conversation is done.
No hostility.
No disrespect.
Just a woman speaking her mind.
But the next day?
Rochel receives a message from Brandon Tatum’s office —
a message so petty, so controlling, so insecure
that it makes his entire “godly friend” speech collapse in seconds.
It reads:
**Take the interview down.
Delete it.
Do not post it.
Do not promote it.
Brandon wants it gone.**
Why?
Not because he was misquoted.
Not because something was inaccurate.
Not because he misspoke.
But because…
She's the daughter of Rabbi Shmuley Boteach.
A man named Brandon now claims he “opposes.”
A man he never mentioned once during the interview.
A man he never criticized anywhere online.
A man he only suddenly objected to after Candace entered the conversation.
And Rochel said it plainly:
**“This didn't come from Brandon.
This came from Candace.”**
And honestly?
It fits.
Because the timing matches.
The behavior matches.
The fear matches.
The retreat matches.
And Brandon’s sudden desperate cleanup attempt matches EXACTLY the behavior
of someone afraid of upsetting the wrong person.

This is where everything cracks open.
Brandon didn’t delete the interview because of theology.
He didn’t delete it because of Rabbi Shmuley.
He didn’t delete it because of “principles.”
He deleted it because of Candace Owens.
Because she didn’t like what was said.
Because someone criticized her.
Because someone called her “evil”
and Brandon didn’t defend her hard enough.
Suddenly he’s issuing takedown orders like a nervous intern.
Suddenly he’s distancing himself from a woman he called his “sister in faith.”
Suddenly he’s rewriting history to justify the censorship.
This is not conviction.
This is not strength.
This is fear.
This is obedience.
This is protection.
This is a man serving a queen he cannot question.
https://youtu.be/4xIx0GfQJHg?si=medpk...

And here’s what the audience sees clearly:
Brandon Tatum is not standing on principle.
He is not standing on scripture.
He is not standing on conservative values.
He is not standing on truth.
He is standing behind Candace Owens,
shielding her from criticism,
and silencing anyone who threatens her image.
His platform may say “truth,”
but his actions say “loyalty.”
Not loyalty to God.
Not loyalty to honesty.
Not loyalty to his own words.
Loyalty to her.

**Candace didn’t need to defend herself.
She had Brandon do it for her.**
And when the clip leaked?
When Rochel exposed the deletion request?
When viewers saw how quickly he folded?
The illusion broke.
Because the public doesn’t see a leader.
They don’t see a man of conviction.
They don’t see a truth-teller.
They see a guard dog.
Loud when attacking enemies.
Silent when protecting the queen.
Fearful of stepping out of line.
And that, more than anything he said in the interview,
is the real story.
https://youtu.be/4xIx0GfQJHg?si=medpk...

What do YOU think Brandon’s deletion request reveals?

Drop your thoughts below — and don’t forget to subscribe for more breakdowns like this.

Because as always:
**The truth doesn’t fear sunlight.
People do.**

11/12/2025

Do They Really Have the Truth?
https://youtu.be/XCHu5POWmuM

Or Are They Just Hiding Behind Candace Owens?**

The truth is supposed to be simple.
Clear.
Solid.
Something you can stand on without shaking.
But lately?
We’re living in a world where non-truth gets treated like gospel,
where people shout confidence without evidence,
and where entire online armies follow personalities — not facts.
And nowhere is this clearer than in the universe orbiting around Candace Owens.
Because if these people truly had the truth they claim to carry…
Why won’t they defend it?
Why won’t they explain it?
Why won’t they sit down and talk about it?

Here’s what we’ve watched for months:
People hopping on bandwagons like it’s a parade.
Followers repeating claims they never verified.
Creators standing ten toes down on theories they can’t explain.
Voices yelling “trust me!” while offering nothing to trust.
Some folks don’t even need proof anymore —
They just need someone they like to say there’s proof.
That’s the new pudding test:
Nobody needs to taste it.
They just need to hear, “Trust me, there’s pudding,” and boom —
They're believers for life.
And unfortunately…
Candace Owens has mastered this style of influence.
Her following is massive.
Her reach is unmatched.
Her fanbase is loyal beyond logic.
But for all the noise surrounding her, we still can’t answer one simple question:
What exactly is she saying that is so undeniably true?
Because nobody — not her allies, not her friends, not her loyal echo chambers —
can actually explain it.

Let’s name names — because they matter.
There is a growing circle of influencers who parrot Candace’s talking points,
but go completely silent the moment someone asks them to explain it:
The Hodge Twins
Ian Carroll
Brandon Tatum
Coach Colin
Stew Peters
Shaun Attwood
Dave Smith
Every one of them repeats the message.
None of them will discuss it.
And it’s not a debate we’re asking for.
Not a fight.
Not anger.
Not an ambush.
Just a conversation.
Just a chance to say:
“Here’s what we believe, here’s why, and here’s the proof.”
But all we get is silence.

And here’s the part that makes people suspicious:
If you really believe something…
If you really stand on it…
If you really call it “the truth”…
Shouldn’t defending it be natural?
Easy?
Automatic?
That’s how truth works.
Truth doesn’t run.
Truth doesn’t hide.
Truth doesn’t dodge questions from people who honestly want to understand.
But the people standing behind Candace behave like they’re carrying something fragile —
like a bubble that pops the moment anyone touches it.

Meanwhile, on our side?
We’re willing to defend what we believe.
We’re willing to lay our logic on the table.
We’re willing to invite criticism.
We’re willing to say, “Show us where we’re wrong.”
Because we want the truth, not the applause.
And if someone proves we’re wrong?
We’ll change.
We’ve done it before.
That’s what real truth-seeking looks like.

So why won’t they talk?
Is it fear?
Is it uncertainty?
Is it lack of evidence?
Or is it simply that they don’t actually understand the claims they repeat?
Because if you look closely, all these influencers share a pattern:
They push Candace’s narrative.
They defend her worldview.
They echo her suspicions.
They amplify her accusations.
But ask them to explain it?
Ask them to walk through the logic?
Ask them to clarify the contradictions?
Suddenly the mic goes silent.
No messages answered.
No livestream invite accepted.
No willingness to talk to people who genuinely want clarity.
And that silence speaks louder than any clip Candace could ever post.

This is bigger than disagreement — it’s about responsibility.
If these creators believe we’re wrong,
if they believe Candace is right,
if they believe their side has the truth,
Why leave us in the dark?
Who benefits from confusion?
Who benefits from half-answers?
Who benefits from followers repeating things they cannot defend?
Not the public.
Not the audience.
And definitely not the truth.
If these creators truly cared about clarity,
they’d be lining up to explain what we’re “missing.”
But they’re not.

So here is the invitation — again.
To the Hodge Twins,
Ian Carroll,
Brandon Tatum,
Coach Colin,
Stew Peters,
Shaun Attwood,
Dave Smith,
and anyone else riding the Candace train:
We are willing to talk.
We are willing to listen.
We are willing to be corrected.
All we’re asking for is a conversation.
If we’re wrong, show us.
If Candace is right, prove it.
If the truth is on your side, bring it.
Because nobody who actually has the truth should be afraid to share it.
https://youtu.be/XCHu5POWmuM

🔥 POLL QUESTION
Why do Candace’s supporters refuse to have open conversations about her claims?

Drop your thoughts below — and make sure to subscribe for more breakdowns like this.

The truth matters.

But it only works when the people who claim to have it are willing to show it.

There’s a moment in every major online debate where confidence stops being enough — and clarity becomes necessary. That’s the moment we’re in right now.Over ...