Ad Fontes Media

  • Home
  • Ad Fontes Media

Ad Fontes Media We Rate The News. Home of the Media Bias Chart®️ We rate the news for reliability and bias to help people navigate the news landscape.

Ad Fontes is Latin for “to the source,” because at the heart of what Ad Fontes Media does is look at the source—analyze the very content itself—to rate it. We have created a system of news content ratings that has beneficial applications for all stakeholders in a healthy news media landscape, including consumers, educators, publishers, researchers, advertisers, and social media platforms. https://adfontesmedia.com/about-ad-fontes-media/

📆📰U.S. forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, from their home in Caracas on Jan...
10/01/2026

📆📰U.S. forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, from their home in Caracas on Jan. 3. They were then brought to New York, where they face charges related to drug trafficking and other offenses. Our analysts rated media coverage about the military operation in our Topic of the Week.

CBS News and Associated Press provided the most fact-based and balanced coverage from our content set. The AP article focuses on the operation itself, including what steps the military took to secure Maduro and his wife, and the military buildup near Venezuela over the past several weeks. It also looks at what will happen next in Venezuela after President Trump stated that the U.S. will “run” the country, at least temporarily. Analysts found the article to be “simple fact reporting” with a “balanced” bias.

The article from the CBS News website examines Trump’s announcement that U.S. officials will oversee the Venezuelan government for now, and “run it properly,” according to the president. The article includes various comments from Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, other administration officials, and newly sworn-in Venezuelan President Delcy Rodríguez, who was Maduro’s vice president. The reporting stresses that few details on the future of Venezuela have been given by the Trump administration thus far. Analysts found the article to be a “mix of fact reporting and analysis” with a “balanced” bias, although they noted that no comments from those opposed to Trump’s actions in Venezuela were included.

In an article titled “The Lie of ‘Self-Financing’ Oil Wars,” Mother Jones compares Trump’s actions in Venezuela with U.S. actions in Iraq. The article begins: “The US attack on Venezuela relies on the same deception that justified the war in Iraq: the idea of self-financing wars with oil.” It warns that these actions in Venezuela will likely have “steep costs” — not only the lives lost during the military operation but also the future costs of accessing the oil there. The article notes that U.S. officials “vastly underestimated the cost of fixing Iraq’s oil infrastructure to fund its invasion and occupation,” which ultimately had a price tag of “around $2 trillion.” Analysts categorized the reporting as “analysis” with a “strong left” bias.

The two videos analyzed by our team had similar reliability scores — in the category of “opinion” — and converse bias scores. In a video on the Legal AF YouTube channel, host Michael Popok questions whether the arrests of Maduro and his wife are truly about drug trafficking and narcoterrorism, which is what the indictment states, or about the U.S. desire to take control of Venezuela’s oil reserves. “Is this really about co***ne?” Popok asks, questioning why, then, Trump recently pardoned former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez, who was convicted in a U.S. court for conspiring with drug traffickers to bring hundreds of tons of co***ne into the U.S. Popok is skeptical that Trump, who recently passed his third “dementia test,” or Secretary of State Marco Rubio are the right people to lead another country. Analysts found that the video contains much speculation, and criticism of Trump and his allies, leading to its “skews left” bias rating.

Ben Shapiro, in a video on his YouTube channel, explains the recent history of the Venezuelan government and its oil industry and speculates about the U.S. role in Venezuela moving forward. Regarding the legal ramifications of the U.S. actions to capture Maduro, Shapiro says he doesn’t care “one iota” about international law, because it’s “stupid,” a “lie” and can’t be enforced. As far as domestic law, Shapiro says that Trump is granted the power to order this operation under Article 2 of the Constitution because “sending drugs to the United States acts as an imminent threat.” He argues that while it would be better, from a constitutional perspective, to get congressional approval first, the truth is that U.S. military actions take place without congressional approval “all the time.” Shapiro applauds Trump’s “audacious” action, saying the Iranians, Mexicans, Cubans and Nicaraguans are all now “on notice.” “The credibility of the United States is very, very high right now under President Trump because President Trump has the stones to do the thing,” Shapiro says. The video received a bias rating of “strong right.”

The lowest rated coverage from our content set is an opinion article written by David Marcus on the Fox News website. Marcus writes that the “stunning and perfectly executed operation to seize Maduro” proves that the U.S. is the only remaining superpower, as neither Russia nor China “were able to do anything to protect their close ally Maduro.” He compares the U.S. action in Venezuela to Russia’s failed attempt to seize control of Ukraine and China’s unsuccessful plan to take over Taiwan. “Meanwhile, it took the U.S. all of 25 minutes to wipe Maduro off the board forever.” Marcus poses a question to the American people: “Who do we want running the world?” The United Nations? A trilateral group of Russia, China and the U.S.? “Trump has wisely rejected these cowardly and pie-in-the-sky concepts for a return to good old-fashioned, hard American power setting the guardrails and direction of the globe.” Analysts placed the article in the “selective or incomplete/unfair persuasion” category of reliability because of its speculative statements about Russia and China’s inaction and about international law. The article was found to have a “hyper-partisan right” bias because of its praise of Trump and support of isolationist foreign policy.

📆📰 The GOP-led Indiana state legislature recently voted against a new redistricting map that was expected to result in t...
20/12/2025

📆📰 The GOP-led Indiana state legislature recently voted against a new redistricting map that was expected to result in two new red-leaning districts. President Trump had pushed for the change as part of a nationwide redistricting campaign prior to the 2026 midterm elections. Our analysts rated media coverage about the vote and Trump’s reaction to it in our Topic of the Week.

USA Today provided the most balanced and factful reporting from our content set. The article details the vote, Trump’s comments following it, and the pressure Republican lawmakers felt leading up to the vote, including death threats. Analysts found the reporting to be “a mix of fact reporting and analysis” with a “balanced” bias.

An article from Blaze Media received similar scores of “middle” bias and “mix of fact reporting and analysis.” This is notable, because although rated articles from this website range from the top middle to the bottom right portion of the Media Bias Chart®, a weighted average of the content has put Blaze Media in the “opinion” category of the chart, with a “strong right” bias. Not so with this article, which focuses on reaction from the White House after the vote and includes many comments from GOP legislators from Indiana who voted against the redistricting measure.

This article doesn’t have a clearly right-leaning bias that one could attribute to the political positions of the quoted politicians. This is not uncommon with articles that highlight intra-party disagreements. In this particular case, a lot of center and left-leaning folks would agree with the positions taken by the Republican legislators who voted against the measure, but does that make their position center or left-leaning? Not necessarily. Further, in this article, the author himself does not insert any overtly biased interpretations or characterizations; this article is reported just about as straightforwardly as possible. For these reasons, the article received a bias score close to zero.

A video from the Chris Cillizza YouTube channel scored slightly lower for reliability, in the “analysis” category, but still within the “balanced” category of bias. The host expresses surprise that the redistricting effort failed because “Donald Trump over and over again has been able through intimidation and threats to get what he wants out of the … Republican parties around the country.” Because these GOP Indiana lawmakers knew what Trump wanted and voted against his wishes, Cillizza says, this is “an important moment.”

An MS NOW (formerly MSNBC) article written by Steve Benen, producer of “The Rachel Maddow Show,” was the only content rated as “opinion” by our team. The theme of the article is evident in its headline: “Trump pretends his power-grab flop in Indiana wasn’t humiliating (but it was).” The subhead calls the failed vote “one of the most brutal failures of the president’s second term.” The article describes Trump’s “threats” and “rants” toward Republicans who did not support his redistricting efforts, stating that the “severity of the presidential arm-twisting over the course of several months was extraordinary” even though Trump is now downplaying it. Because of the language criticizing Trump, the article was placed in the “strong left” category of bias.

In a video from the Dollemore Daily YouTube channel, the host lobs a lot of insults, calling Trump’s push for redistricting “fascist” and his supporters at the Heritage Foundation “little loyal N**i soldiers.” He says Trump is a “weakling” who “can’t let go of the fact of how he was treated by his parents as a child.” The video details the pressure by Trump to pass the redistricting plan and scoffs at Indiana lawmakers who supported it. And Dollemore mocks others who continue to support Trump, speculating that Speaker of the House Mike Johnson believes Trump “is a great and mighty man with a one-foot p***s that I love.” Analysts noted the frequent insults and vilification of Trump and his supporters, and rated the video as “unfair persuasion” with a “hyper-partisan left” bias.

The lowest-rated content from our set was this article published by The American Tribune. The article includes a summary of the redistricting vote and comments from both Democrats and Republicans in reaction to it. Analysts noted that the text of the article did not match the tone of its headline: “Red State RINOs Betray Trump, Fail To Help Republicans Add Seats To Win In 2026.” In addition, analysts found that the reporting was very likely AI-generated, pulling text from this article published by The Hill and rewording it. The author of the piece appears to be fictional. Because of undisclosed use of AI in the reporting and the bias detected in the headline, analysts placed this article in the “contains misleading info” category of reliability and the “skews right” category of bias.

📺📼 TV/Video Chart, Dec 2025Today we’re releasing our final chart for 2025 — the December edition of the TV/Video Media B...
17/12/2025

📺📼 TV/Video Chart, Dec 2025
Today we’re releasing our final chart for 2025 — the December edition of the TV/Video Media Bias Chart®. It contains 38 of the more than 830 TV/video shows our team has rated.

Our team has worked very hard this year to rate new media sources in order to provide useful data on our ever-changing media landscape. During 2025, we’ve added more than 100 TV/video shows, 100 podcasts and 200 websites to the Media Bias Chart®, for a total of 4,300 sources that are searchable on our free mobile app for Apple and Android or with a subscription on our Interactive Media Bias Chart® on the website.

But we didn’t just rate new websites, shows and podcasts; we also rated new content from sources that have been on the chart for years in order to maintain up-to-date and accurate information. In addition, we gathered preliminary data on thousands more sources for our business customers, resulting in commercial data on 13,680 sources.

Our analysts have spent thousands of hours rating all kinds of news and news-like sources in the past year. It’s time-consuming, complex and sometimes grueling work, but it’s important work, and we’re proud of it.

We look forward to continuing to provide important media data in 2026. Watch for the next edition of our flagship Media Bias Chart® – which contains web, TV/video and podcast sources all in one image – in January! (Want to support our work? You can make an online donation here).

As always, the December TV/video chart that we’re releasing today has a mix of network and cable TV shows, local TV news programs, YouTube and Rumble shows, and documentaries. It’s impossible to put all 800 TV/video sources we’ve rated in one image (the result would be a completely unreadable chart), so we choose a selection of sources to feature each month.

This chart contains 38 TV/video sources, and you can see a list of those 38 here. In order to make the logos as large and readable as possible, we have magnified a portion of the chart and removed portions around the edges that contain no sources.

Ten shows appear in the green box of the December chart. Remember: Sources rated as minimally biased and fact-based are found within the green box. (More TV/video sources fall within the green box, and we’ll feature those on charts in the future.)

ABC 7 Detroit WXYZ: 7 Action News at 6PM
Bloomberg: Bloomberg Real Yield
C-SPAN Live Stream
CNN: The Situation Room
Merit Street Media: The News on Merit TV
Mr Nobody Against Putin
NBC: Today
PBS: Frontline: The Rise of RFK Jr.
Scripps News TV Network
Sinclair: Full Measure
Ten sources appear on the Media Bias Chart® this month for the first time (four of these fall within the green box):

ABC 7 Detroit WXYZ: 7 Action News at 6PM
Al Jazeera: The Silencing of Anas al-Sharif
Bloomberg: Bloomberg Real Yield
CNN: Saturday Morning Table for Five
MS NOW: The Weekend: Primetime (MSNBC)
OAN: The Real Story with Riley Lewis
Scripps News TV Network
Shoe0nHead (YouTube)
Sinclair: Full Measure
This Week On Capitol Hill with Tony Perkins and Mike Johnson

📆📰 During a Cabinet meeting last week, President Trump talked about Somali immigrants in Minnesota after some were indic...
13/12/2025

📆📰 During a Cabinet meeting last week, President Trump talked about Somali immigrants in Minnesota after some were indicted on fraud charges related to social services. He called them “garbage” and said he didn’t want them in the U.S. He also criticized Democratic U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, a Somali American who represents Minnesota. Our analysts rated media coverage about Trump’s comments and the reaction to them in our Topic of the Week.

Reporting from ABC News was found by our team to be “simple fact reporting” with a “balanced” bias. The article on the ABC News website details Trump’s comments during the televised Cabinet meeting and previous remarks about Somali immigrant he has made. It gives statistics about Somali immigrants in the U.S. and gives updates on the investigation into the alleged fraud in Minnesota.

An article from Reuters compares Trump’s recent comments about Somalis to those he made during his first term as president, when he complained about America accepting immigrants from “sh*thole countries” like Haiti and from Africa. The article notes that his previous comments received much criticism and outrage, but his remarks last week resulted in cheers or silence from his fellow Republicans, concluding that “Trump’s racial views are no longer seen as out of bounds among some of his allies and supporters.” The article looks at the history of “racist rhetoric” in politics. Analysts found the reporting to be a “mix of fact reporting and analysis” with a “skews left” bias.

The two videos analyzed by our team both received similar reliability scores, in the category of “opinion,” and converse bias scores. In a video from the NewsNation show “Batya!” the host, Batya Ungar-Sargon, interviews Republican strategist Melik Abdul, who says that Trump should not be calling Somalis “garbage.” The host accuses the media of “conflation intentionally” when they take comments by Trump and turn them “into a conversation about race.” Abdul agrees, and he also blames the Democrats for playing “racial politics.” “… any criticism for any reason is labeled as racism or xenophobia or things like this,” he says. Analysts gave the video a bias rating of “strong right.”

A video from the MS NOW (formerly MSNBC) show “Ana Cabrera Reports” was found by our team to have a “strong left” bias. In it, Cabrera interviews Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), whom Trump also called “garbage.” Omar calls Trump’s “obsession” with her and the Somali community “creepy” and says he’s trying to “deflect from his failures that he’s had as president.” Omar calls Trump “a racist, a bigot, a xenophobic and Islamophobic. … And so it is not surprising that he is going after black immigrants in this country. And it’s certainly not surprising that he’s choosing a black immigrant community that is also Muslim.” Omar says she is not surprised that other Republicans have kept quiet about Trump’s comments about Somalis, saying that they’ve “bent the knee to this president. They’ve welcomed his disgusting and deranged and dangerous rhetoric.”

An article from The New Republic was also rated as “opinion” but with a “hyper-partisan left” bias. The reporting focuses on Trump’s criticism of Omar, and the subhead sets the tone: “Donald Trump went on a particularly racist tirade about the Democratic representative. And his entire Cabinet enjoyed it.” The article criticizes Trump’s “rant”: “As an outspoken Black, progressive, Muslim, African, refugee, and woman in office, Omar is someone whom the president—and the rest of the GOP—can cast their slanderous bigotry toward, much to the delight of the MAGA base.” Analysts noted that the article insults all of Trump’s base: “Trump entered some sort of racist flow state here. He hit all the points that make his base—from the Groypers to the neocons—foam at the mouths…”

An article from Western Journal expresses surprise that Trump, who, it says, usually has “a certain level of control” over his temper, went off “on a fiery rant in a very public forum.” The article, which is labeled as “commentary,” says it’s unusual for Trump to go after an entire group of people: “Trump has seldom had issues viciously attacking a person or idea … but an entire people? The president was clearly fired up.” Still, the author agrees with Trump’s sentiment. “Immigrants have unequivocally taken advantage of America’s generosity. Despite the left wanting to canonize immigrants, they are all human at the end of the day. And that means immigrants are susceptible to greed, avarice, selfishness, and, oh yes, evil.” Analysts noted the article’s support for Trump and the inclusion of a statement (without evidence) that Somalis are “funding terrorist groups back home with American welfare dollars” when rating it as “unfair persuasion” with a “strong right” bias.

🎧🎙Podcast Chart, Dec 2025According to Pew Research Center, more and more Americans rely on podcasts as a source of news,...
12/12/2025

🎧🎙Podcast Chart, Dec 2025
According to Pew Research Center, more and more Americans rely on podcasts as a source of news, a trend that has grown since 2020. About one-third of adults in the U.S. now say they sometimes or often get their news from podcasts, and that number is even higher — 39% — for younger adults (those under age 50).

At Ad Fontes Media, we started rating news podcasts in 2023. We’ve now fully rated 860 of them (more than 3,370 episodes!) and have analyzed content from about 100 more. Our team spends dozens of hours a month listening to podcast episodes and rating them for their bias and reliability.

Over the years we’ve watched as more and more people started recording podcasts, and more and more people started listening to them. Larger audiences have led podcasts and their hosts to be more influential in the news ecosystem; that was evident when presidential candidates regularly did podcast interviews in 2024.

Now, the newly appointed Pentagon Press Corps is primarily made up of podcasters, bloggers and news influencers, giving these “new media” outlets more access and increased ability to cover the government. Notably, many of these news and information sources are rated low for reliability, and many have previously focused only on creating opinion content (which is common for political podcasts) rather than undertaking journalistic activities such as news gathering, fact reporting, fact checking, and editing. We anticipate this will affect the level of reliable news reporting in and around the Pentagon going forward.

The December edition of the Podcast/Audio Media Bias Chart® we’re releasing today includes 48 podcasts (see a list of them here). We choose only a few dozen to include on each month’s static Media Bias Chart because it’s impossible to show all of them in one image. In order to make the logos as large and as readable as possible, we’ve magnified a portion of the chart and removed portions around the edges that contain no sources.

Sources in the green box of the chart have been found by our team to consistently provide minimally biased, fact-based information. Twelve podcasts fall within the green box on the December edition:

Autocracy in America
Banished with Amna Khalid and Jeff Snyder
Conversations with Bill Kristol
Fox News Rundown
Horns of a Dilemma
Just Asking Questions
NPR News Now
NPR: Fresh Air
The New Yorker Radio Hour
This Morning with Gordon Deal
Uncommon Knowledge with Peter Robinson
WSJ: Tech News Briefing
More podcasts fall within the green box, and we’ll feature those on charts in the future.

Seven podcasts are included on the chart this month for the first time (three of these fall within the green box):

America Dissected
Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis
Bo Snerdley’s Rush Hour
Horns of a Dilemma
NPR: Fresh Air
Red Menace
WSJ: Tech News Briefing

💻📰 Web/Print Chart, Dec 2025At Ad Fontes Media, our goal is to rate all the news, and that means rating content from whe...
08/12/2025

💻📰 Web/Print Chart, Dec 2025
At Ad Fontes Media, our goal is to rate all the news, and that means rating content from wherever the general public gets their information. That’s why we rate traditional forms of journalism, such as newspaper websites, wire services and TV news shows, and newer platforms like YouTube channels and podcasts.

We’ve also dedicated our efforts over the past several months to rating content published on Substack, an online publishing platform where writers can share articles, newsletters, and other content. A lot of news and news commentary is now being published there and shared via email and on social media. In fact, my social media feeds contain Substack articles shared by my friends every single day.

Many well-known writers, commentators and journalists now publish on Substack (and on similar platforms such as beehiiv and Medium) — people like Timothy Snyder, Taylor Lorenz, Heather Cox Richardson, Robert Reich, Seth Abramson, Jessica Yellen, Dan Rather, Matt Taibbi and Chris Cillizza. We’ve fully rated articles from 35 Substacks so far, and 11 of them appear on the December edition of the Media Bias Chart® for Web/Print that we’re releasing today:

Big League Politics | Substack
Current Revolt
HEATED
Letters from an American by Heather Cox Richardson
Racket News | Matt Taibbi
So What by Chris Cillizza
The Gold Report
The Hartmann Report
The Redneck Intellectual – C. Bradley Thompson
Thinking About… by Timothy Snyder
To the Contrary by Charlie Sykes
Substack is also the home for some podcasters and video content producers, and our team has rated several of those, as well. Many of these content producers fall within the category of “news influencers.” Vanessa Otero, founder and CEO of Ad Fontes, talked about our analysis of news influencer content in this short video released last month.

We plan to rate more content published on Substack and on similar platforms in the months ahead, so watch for those on future editions of the Media Bias Chart®, or search for them on the Interactive Media Bias Chart® on the website or on our free mobile app for Android or Apple. Do you have a favorite Substack that you’d like us to rate? Let us know at [email protected].

In addition to the 11 Substacks listed above, this edition of the Media Bias Chart® for web/print sources features 101 of the 2,790 web/print sources we’ve rated so far. We know it’s hard to read all of the source logos on the chart, so we’ve provided a list of those 112 here. We curate a list of sources to include on each month’s chart because it’s impossible to put all of them in a single image (the logos would overlap and appear on top of one another, and the result would be an image that is impossible to read).

Sources in the green box (top middle) of the chart have been rated by our team to be minimally biased and to provide fact-based information. You might notice that none of the 11 Substacks listed above fall within the green box. That’s because much of the content there is analysis and opinion.

Here’s a list of the sources from the December chart that fall within the green box (many more web/print sources fall within the green box, and they will be included in future releases of the Media Bias Chart®):
1440 Newsletter
Ballotpedia
Barrett Media
Bellingcat
Boston Herald
Center for American Progress
Christianity Today
CNN (website)
CTech
Defense News
El Especialito
Flagler Live
Fortune
Fox Business (website)
Hong Kong Free Press HKFP
News 8 WROC Rochester
Newsweek
NPR (website)
Pew Research Center
Prison Legal News
Puck News
Quillette
RealClearDefense
Reuters
Roll Call
San Francisco Chronicle
South Florida Sun Sentinel
Straight Arrow News
The Advocate – Baton Rouge
The Gazette
The New York Times
The Reload
The Week
TheGrio
Upworthy
USAFacts
Wall Street Journal
Washington Post
World News Group

Eleven sources make their debut on this month’s chart:
Conservative Brief
Conservative Firing Line
Daily Express
LADbible
News 8 WROC Rochester
San Francisco Chronicle
So What by Chris Cillizza
South Florida Sun Sentinel
The Gazette
Thinking About… by Timothy Snyder
To the Contrary by Charlie Sykes

📆📰 Two members of the West Virginia National Guard were shot while on duty in Washington, D.C., last week. One of them d...
04/12/2025

📆📰 Two members of the West Virginia National Guard were shot while on duty in Washington, D.C., last week. One of them died. Our analysts rated media coverage about the shooting in our Topic of the Week.

The most fact-based and balanced coverage from our content set came from an article on the Army Times website. The reporting focuses on the two National Guard members who were shot and the response from their communities in West Virginia. The story includes several comments from their families and friends. Analysts found the article, which was reported by the Associated Press, to be “simple fact reporting” with a “middle/balanced” bias.

The Washington Post published an article that focused on the shooter, an Afghan national who came to the United States in 2021 after working with the CIA in Afghanistan. The story looks at the background of Rahmanullah Lakanwal, who was shot during the incident, and reports on the possible charges he will face. Analysts noted a slight bias in language when the article discusses the National Guard deployment in D.C. and the Trump administration’s investigation. The analysts found the article to be a “mix of fact reporting and analysis” with a “skews left” bias.

An opinion article written by Jonathan Turley on the Fox News website focuses on comments made by U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Democrat from Florida. Turley writes that Wasserman Schultz “set a new low in American politics” when she partially blamed the shootings on President Trump. In a media interview, she stated that Trump should not be sending the military into U.S. cities to handle “law enforcement responsibilities.” Turley criticizes her for assuming the shooter’s motive before the investigation is complete and for using the “tragedy” for political purposes. Analysts rated the article as “opinion” with a “strong right” bias.

In a video from the Harry Sisson YouTube channel, the host criticizes President Trump and his “regime” for their response to the shootings. He calls the West Virginia governor “irresponsible” and “gross” for initially stating that both National Guard members had died before later correcting that statement. Sisson criticizes Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth for sending even more troops into D.C., predicting that “they are using this as a launching pad for what they’ve always wanted, which is having National Guard troops in every single city.” He quotes a couple of right-wing influencers and accuses them of trying to “politicize the tragedy” by pointing fingers at Democrats and spreading conspiracy theories. Analysts found the video to be “opinion” with a “strong left” bias.

A video from the Ben Shaprio YouTube channel scored a bit lower; analysts found it to be “selective or incomplete/unfair persuasion” with a “hyper-partisan right” bias. Shapiro calls the shooting a “terrorist attack” and “the wages of Joe Biden’s awful foreign policy combined with his awful immigration policy.” He blames Biden for his “cowardice” and “failure” of withdrawing American troops from Afghanistan and then bringing “unvetted” Afghan “terrorists” to the United States. He concludes: “When you bring in huge numbers of people from countries that do not like the United States and whose cultures are in fact not assimilative to American values, then you can’t be surprised when stuff like this happens, you cannot. And this one is on Joe Biden, pure and simple. I don’t know who else to blame.”

The lowest-rated reporting from our content set this week came from an article published by Alternet. It focuses on a comment made by Trump during a press conference when he announced the death of one of the National Guard members, Sarah Beckstrom. When asked if he would attend the funeral, Trump “boasted that he won Beckstrom’s home state by a significant margin in the 2024 election.” The article includes comments from many journalists and left-leaning commentators who call Trump’s remark “disgusting” and “vile,” and say Trump is “the most demented malignant narcissist alive” who “couldn’t, even for one moment, just be a decent person and not make it about himself.” Due to the number of insults and because the article focuses on only one very small part of a larger news story, analysts rated it as “selective or incomplete/unfair persuasion” with a “hyper-partisan left” bias.

📆📰 Six Democratic lawmakers with a background in the military or U.S. intelligence released a video last week reminding ...
27/11/2025

📆📰 Six Democratic lawmakers with a background in the military or U.S. intelligence released a video last week reminding U.S. service members that they must refuse unlawful orders. President Trump then called for the arrest of the six, writing that the video is “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH.” Our analysts rated media coverage about the video and Trump’s reaction to it in our Topic of the Week.

Stars and Stripes, an American military newspaper, provided the most balanced and factful coverage from our content set. The article includes the full video published by the Democratic lawmakers and quotes from it in the story. It also quotes President Trump’s social media messages and a statement from White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. Analysts found the article to be “simple fact reporting” with a “balanced” bias.

An article from Reuters received similar scores, in the “balanced” category of bias and “mix of fact reporting and analysis” for reliability. The article calls Trump’s reaction to the video “the latest example of him calling for punishment of those he sees as political enemies,” and it includes comments from both Democratic and Republican lawmakers.

A video from NewsNation’s “On Balance With Leland Vittert” was rated as “analysis” with a “skews right” bias. Vittert plays portions of the Democrats’ video before introducing a retired general and former CIA official to provide analysis. The host says that according to the Constitution, service members “don’t get to not follow orders you don’t like or you may disagree with” even though the Democrats in the video tell the military that “we have your back.” He concludes that the Democrats’ message encourages the military to disobey orders and “puts people’s lives at risk in so many different ways.”

An article from Reason also was found to be “analysis,” but with a “skews left” bias. It calls Trump’s response to the video “characteristically over-the-top” and “authoritarian,” and it confirms that “soldiers … have a duty higher than obedience to the president’s whims.” The article details several controversial military actions taken by Trump and quotes a law professor who questions the legality of the U.S. military’s boat strikes in the Caribbean. The writer doubts the president’s comprehension of the law: “Trump deploys accusations of treason as recklessly as he threatens to yank broadcast licenses, and both habits reflect his intolerance for speech that offends him, which he thinks should be (or already is) illegal. He either does not know or does not care what the crimes of treason and seditious conspiracy actually entail.”

Hosts from ABC’s “The View” focus their analysis on President Trump accusing the Democratic lawmakers of sedition “punishable by death.” Hosts call Trump’s statement “ridiculous” and warn he should not be “ratcheting up the rhetoric,” which can lead to political violence. The hosts agree that the video for the military was necessary because there are things “being done by the administration that are unconstitutional.” This segment from “The View” was rated as “opinion” with a “strong left” bias.

The lowest-rated reporting from our content set came from an article published by Patriot Journal. It applauds the “sacred principle” that “armed forces answer to the elected Commander-in-Chief, not to the shifting winds of partisan politics” and accuses the Democrats who released the video of taking “a sledgehammer to that foundation for a cheap political thrill.” It says the video has an “absolutely bone-chilling message” that “can only be described as a call for mass insubordination.” The writer criticizes the Democrats for seeking security protection following the video release: “This isn’t principled leadership; it’s the petulant whining of children who broke the nation’s most expensive vase and are now crying because they got sent to their room.” Analysts found the writing to be “selective or incomplete/unfair persuasion” with a “hyper-partisan right” bias.

Address


Website

https://adfontesmedia.com/individuals/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Ad Fontes Media posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Ad Fontes Media:

  • Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?

Share