
08/17/2025
Compact hybrid cameras and Fujifilm are nearly synonymous with young “creatives” these days, and the Fujifilm X-M5 seems to be the perfect model for them. “Almost perfect: is the better phrase. I’ll never poo-poo Fujifilm rangefinder-style cameras. The camera maker earned its reputation for handling, image quality, and style. Its X-M5 model is the smallest in its X line family, uses an APS-C sensor, shoots open-gate video, and is fitted with the XF mount. Good so far. And it offers far more and better capabilities than any smartphone camera. I can see the draw for new, proper camera users. But is it worth the hype?
The short answer is “yes” if you aim to elevate your image proposition beyond that of your smartphone-using competitors, but you can’t afford to spend more than a grand. I won’t say that the images and video from the X-M5 are anything less than what we expect from Fuji. What you don’t get in the model is a viewfinder, In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS), and auto-focus on par with other cameras. You must ask, is your money better spent elsewhere?
For the same cost, you can get a used, nicely spec’d Sony a6600. It has a similar sensor size and nearly the same resolution, IBIS, and superior auto-focusing, plus access to a far greater number of lenses. Also, for a bit less, you can get a used Olympus OM-D EM1 MkIII, with much more stills capability, a high resolution electronic viewfinder, superior IBIS, in a smaller body, albeit with a smaller sensor and slightly less resolution. The Olympus also accepts dozens of Micro Four-Thirds (MFT) lenses. There are several more similarly priced or cheaper alternatives. My point is that while the X-M5 makes a solid case for the new hybrid shooting creative. I know the Fujifilm branding is compelling. But there are many alternatives vying for your dollars. It’s not an easy choice. Educate yourself and study the field. Don’t let hype be the first priority in your decision.
The Fujifilm X-M5 is just one choice in a highly competitive field. Choose wisely.