Alyssa Jane, Wisconsin Dells, WI (2026)

12/31/2025

The Death March reduced life to one instruction: keep moving.

Marek Nowak learned to quiet his thoughts. Thinking required energy. Walking did not. Cold wrapped around him like silence. Hunger became distant, almost unreal.

At night, prisoners leaned against one another for warmth. No one lay down. The ground felt final. Standing meant possibility.

When Marek slowed, someone steadied him. No conversation followed. Survival was cooperation without emotion.

After the war, Marek said peace felt unfamiliar. He had learned life in motion, fear as rhythm. Even years later, walking slowly made him uneasy — because once, every step had mattered.

12/31/2025

Winter 1945 — Death March
Marek Nowak walked through endless snow, his steps slow but deliberate. The cold pressed against his body until it became part of him. He no longer felt hunger the way he once had — it had faded into a quiet emptiness that followed him everywhere.

Guards watched in silence as the line moved forward. No one spoke. Everyone understood the rule without words: stopping meant disappearance. At night, prisoners stood close together, sharing warmth simply by existing side by side. Sleep felt dangerous. Stillness felt permanent.

When Marek stumbled, another man supported him without looking back. No names were exchanged. Survival didn’t allow introductions. It allowed motion.

Weeks later, Marek lived to see liberation. His body recovered, but he said walking never felt ordinary again. Each step reminded him of a road where movement was the only permission to remain alive.

12/31/2025

Death March, 1945
Marek Nowak walked barefoot through frozen roads where blood darkened the snow. His shoes had vanished days earlier, torn apart by endless miles and exhaustion. Each step was taken carefully — not to ease pain, but to delay death. The guards made the rules brutally clear: slow down, and you would not rise again.

Pain became constant, so steady it faded into the background. Hunger no longer screamed; it numbed the body into silence. Marek stopped thinking of food, stopped imagining warmth. Survival narrowed life down to a single instruction: keep moving.

Night offered no mercy. Prisoners did not sleep — they collapsed standing, leaning against one another for warmth and balance. Lying down felt final, like giving permission to disappear. When Marek stumbled, another prisoner hooked an arm beneath his shoulder and dragged him forward. No words were spoken. Names no longer mattered. Mercy existed only as motion.

Marek survived and lived to see liberation weeks later. His feet healed, but he said his body never forgot. After the war, he never walked casually again. Every step felt borrowed — a reminder of a road where movement meant life, and stopping meant death.

12/02/2025

Imagine being five years old and watching your mother get beaten so badly she never looked the same again.

That's how Josiah Henson's story began in 1794, on a Maryland plantation where human beings were bought and sold like cattle.

The overseer shattered his mother's face with a single blow. Little Josiah watched her beautiful features twist into something unrecognizable. She never smiled the same way again.

But that wasn't the worst part.

The worst part was knowing this was just Tuesday. This was normal. This was life.

Josiah grew up strong despite the brutality. Maybe because of it. He became the kind of man other slaves looked up to - steady, faithful, unbreakable.

His master trusted him. Sent him on errands. Even let him preach to other slaves on Sundays.

But trust in slavery was a cruel joke.

When Josiah was forty-one, his master decided to sell him south. Away from his wife. Away from his children. Away from everything he'd ever loved.

That's when something inside Josiah finally snapped.

Not into rage. Into clarity.

He gathered his family in the dead of night. Four small children, including a baby. His terrified wife. They had nothing but the clothes on their backs and a desperate hope for something better.

They walked north for weeks.

Through forests that seemed to swallow sound. Across rivers that threatened to drown them all. Past bounty hunters who would drag them back in chains.

The baby cried. Josiah's wife stumbled. The children's feet bled through their worn-out shoes.

But they kept walking.

When they finally crossed into Canada, Josiah fell to his knees and kissed the ground. Free ground. Ground where his children could grow up as human beings, not property.

But Josiah's story was just beginning.

Years later, he met a small, intense woman named Harriet Beecher Stowe. She was writing articles about slavery, but they felt flat to her. Academic. Distant.

Then Josiah started talking.

He told her about watching his mother's face change forever. About preaching hope to people who had every reason to give up. About carrying his baby through the wilderness, not knowing if they'd live to see morning.

Harriet couldn't sleep that night.

Or the next night.

Josiah's words burned in her mind. She kept seeing that little boy watching his mother get beaten. That father carrying his family toward freedom.

She started writing.

Not an article this time. A story. A real story about real people who suffered and hoped and dreamed just like everyone else.

She called it "Uncle Tom's Cabin."

The book hit America like lightning.

People who had never thought twice about slavery suddenly couldn't think about anything else. They saw Josiah's pain in every page. They felt his mother's suffering. They understood, maybe for the first time, that slaves weren't things.

They were people.

The book sold 300,000 copies in its first year. In a country of 23 million people, that was like everyone talking about the same thing at the same time.

Southern plantation owners banned it. Northern churches preached about it. Families fought over it at dinner tables.

When Abraham Lincoln met Harriet Beecher Stowe years later, he supposedly said, "So you're the little woman who wrote the book that started this great war."

But it wasn't really Harriet's book.

It was Josiah's story.

The story of a five-year-old boy who watched evil win and decided it didn't have to keep winning forever. The story of a man who risked everything to give his children what he never had - the chance to be free.

Josiah lived to be ninety-four years old. He became a minister, a teacher, a leader in his community. He helped other escaped slaves build new lives in Canada.

He never wrote a famous novel. But his life became one.

And that life changed everything.

Sometimes the most powerful thing you can do is simply tell the truth about what happened to you. You never know who's listening. You never know whose heart might break open just enough to let the light in.

11/23/2025

"The greatest love story Tolkien ever wrote wasn't in The Lord of the Rings—it's carved on two gravestones in Oxford, 55 years in the making.
Long before hobbits journeyed to Mount Doom, before elves sang in Rivendell, before the One Ring corrupted kings and wizards—J.R.R. Tolkien wrote his truest romance.
And it wasn't fiction.
The meeting
Birmingham, 1908. A boarding house on Duchess Road.
A 16-year-old orphan named Ronald Tolkien met a 19-year-old orphan named Edith Bratt. They lived on different floors, but they shared something deeper than proximity: they were both utterly alone in the world.
Ronald's mother had died when he was twelve, leaving him in the care of Father Francis Morgan, a Catholic priest who became his guardian. Edith's parents were also gone—she'd been orphaned young and had no family to speak of.
They were both musical. Both readers. Both searching for something that felt like home.
They found it in each other.
Their courtship was achingly innocent. Long conversations over tea in local cafés. Walks through the Birmingham countryside. And one particular game that became the stuff of legend: they would sit in teashops and try to toss sugar cubes into each other's hats from across the table, laughing when they missed, celebrating wildly when they succeeded.
It was simple. It was joyful.
It was young love in its purest form.
But not everyone approved.
The separation
Father Francis Morgan watched the relationship with growing alarm.
Edith was Protestant—a serious problem for a devout Catholic guardian. She was three years older than Ronald—socially questionable. And worst of all, she was a distraction from his studies at King Edward's School and his hopes of attending Oxford.
In 1909, Father Morgan delivered an ultimatum:
Tolkien was forbidden from seeing, writing to, or even speaking about Edith until he turned 21.
Complete silence. For three years.
Ronald obeyed—barely. It nearly destroyed him. He threw himself into his studies, won a scholarship to Oxford, immersed himself in ancient languages and epic poetry. But Edith was never far from his thoughts.
Meanwhile, Edith—believing herself forgotten, convinced Ronald had moved on—tried to rebuild her life. She moved to Cheltenham. She played piano. She tried to forget.
And eventually, she accepted a marriage proposal from another man.
The letter
January 3, 1913. Tolkien's 21st birthday.
The moment the calendar turned and he was legally free from Father Morgan's authority, Tolkien sat down and wrote a letter.
He poured out three years of silence. He told Edith he had never forgotten her. That he loved her still. That he always would. That she was his first thought in the morning and his last before sleep.
He mailed it immediately.
Her reply shattered him: I am engaged to someone else.
But when they met in person days later—at the train station in Cheltenham—the truth became undeniable.
Their love had survived the silence.
Every suppressed feeling, every banned letter, every forbidden thought came rushing back in a single conversation. What they'd felt at 16 and 19 hadn't faded—it had only grown stronger in absence.
Edith broke off her engagement to George Field. She knew what it would cost her—security, social standing, the approval of the family that had taken her in.
She didn't care.
Then she made an even bigger sacrifice: she converted to Catholicism, knowing it would cost her friendships and support in her Protestant community.
On March 22, 1916, as World War I raged across Europe and millions died in trenches, Ronald Tolkien and Edith Bratt were married in a small Catholic church in Warwick.
She wore a simple dress. He wore his army uniform.
Three months later, he shipped out to France.
The war
June 1916. Lieutenant Tolkien arrived at the Western Front just as the Battle of the Somme began—one of the bloodiest battles in human history.
He served as a signals officer, crawling through mud and shell craters, watching friends die, breathing poison gas, living in constant terror.
He survived the Somme. Barely.
In October 1916, he contracted trench fever—a debilitating illness spread by lice in the trenches. He was sent home to England, weak and haunted, while his closest friends died without him.
Through it all, Edith was his anchor. She wrote him letters. She waited. She prayed. And when he came home broken, she helped him heal.
The dance
There was a moment Tolkien never forgot.
Early in their courtship, before the separation, Edith had danced for him in a woodland glade near Roos in Yorkshire. It was 1917—they'd been married a year, and he was recovering from illness.
She moved through the trees in a clearing filled with flowering hemlocks, graceful and joyful, like something out of legend. The sunlight filtered through the leaves. She laughed.
And in that instant, she became immortal in his imagination.
Years later—decades later—he would write the tale of Beren and Lúthien: a mortal man who falls in love with an immortal elven maiden whose beauty and grace transcend worlds. Lúthien dances for Beren in a forest glade, and he is so captivated he cannot speak.
It was their story.
It had always been their story.
The life
For 55 years, Edith was his partner, his inspiration, his first reader, his greatest supporter.
They had four children: John, Michael, Christopher, and Priscilla. They moved to Oxford, where Tolkien became a professor of Anglo-Saxon. They lived modestly, quietly.
Edith typed his manuscripts. She listened to his invented languages. She was the first person to hear about hobbits, about Gandalf, about the One Ring.
When The Hobbit was published in 1937, she celebrated with him. When The Lord of the Rings became a global phenomenon in the 1960s, she watched him become famous—but their relationship remained what it had always been: two orphans who'd found home in each other.
They weren't perfect. Marriage never is. But they were devoted.
And when Tolkien wrote about love in his mythology—about Beren giving up everything for Lúthien, about Lúthien choosing mortality to be with Beren, about love that transcends death itself—he was writing about a girl who once tossed sugar cubes across a teashop table and danced for him in a forest.
The ending
November 29, 1971. Edith Tolkien died at age 82.
Tolkien was devastated. He'd lost his Lúthien.
He had a single word engraved on her tombstone: "Lúthien"—the elven heroine who gave up immortality for love.
For two years, he lived alone. He continued writing, gave interviews, received honorary degrees. But the light had gone out.
On September 2, 1973, J.R.R. Tolkien died at age 81.
He was buried beside her in Wolvercote Cemetery, Oxford.
And beneath his name, one word was added: "Beren."
Even in death, they are together—the mortal man and his immortal love, reunited at last.
What it means
The greatest fantasy epic ever written—the story that defined modern fantasy, that inspired generations of writers, that created entire worlds out of language and imagination—was born from something achingly real.
A 16-year-old orphan boy and a 19-year-old orphan girl tossing sugar cubes across a table.
Laughing when they missed.
Celebrating when they succeeded.
Falling in love.
Being torn apart by rules and religion and war.
Finding their way back to each other.
And refusing to let go for 55 years.
Tolkien created Middle-earth—a world of magic, dragons, battles between good and evil, quests that span continents.
But the most powerful magic he ever wrote about was the kind that happened in a Birmingham teashop in 1908.
Two lonely people finding home in each other's eyes.
And never, ever forgetting.
Their gravestones stand side by side in Oxford:
Edith Mary Tolkien
Lúthien
1889-1971
John Ronald Reuel Tolkien
Beren
1892-1973
The greatest love story he ever wrote.
Not in Middle-earth.
But in a boarding house. In a teashop. In a forest glade. In 55 years of letters, laughter, children, words, and devotion.
In two names carved in stone—together forever, just as they'd always wanted to be.
That's not fantasy.
That's the truest kind of magic there is."

11/19/2025

In 1923, a 66-year-old woman wrote a novel about a 58-year-old woman reclaiming her s*xuality—and the entire country exploded in outrage.
Her name was Gertrude Atherton. And the book that scandalized America? Black Oxen—a story about a woman who undergoes an experimental rejuvenation treatment and emerges looking thirty again.
But here's what made critics lose their minds: she doesn't do it to find a husband. She doesn't do it to please society. She does it to reclaim her power, her vitality, and yes—her s*xuality.
The novel became an instant bestseller. It was also branded dangerous.
Male critics were horrified. How dare a woman suggest that female desire doesn't die at forty? How dare she write about an older woman competing s*xually with younger women? How dare she give a woman power without punishing her for it?
But Gertrude Atherton had been scandalizing readers for thirty-five years—and at sixty-six, she wasn't about to stop.
Born in 1857 in San Francisco, Gertrude married at nineteen to a man her family approved of but she didn't love. The marriage was miserable. She was restless, ambitious, hungry for more than managing a household.
Then in 1887, her husband died suddenly at sea.
Society expected her to mourn quietly, remarry respectably, and fade into widowhood.
Instead? She felt liberated.
With a small inheritance and burning ambition, she moved to New York, then Europe, and dove into literary circles. She began writing novels that shocked everyone—stories about women who wanted careers, who chafed at marriage, who pursued pleasure and power unapologetically.
Critics called her work "unwomanly." They said she wrote like a man. They accused her of being vulgar and inappropriate.
She kept writing.
Novel after novel, Gertrude created women who wanted s*x and didn't pretend otherwise. Women who pursued ambition without apology. Women who refused to be tamed by marriage or motherhood. Women who aged without becoming invisible.
These weren't nice women. They weren't always likable. They were complicated, flawed, hungry—exactly like real women.
And then came Black Oxen in 1923.
The experimental treatment in the book—the Steinach procedure—was real. Dr. Eugen Steinach had developed a glandular treatment that supposedly restored youth. Wealthy people, including Sigmund Freud, actually underwent it.
Atherton took this real medical phenomenon and asked a revolutionary question: What if a woman used it not to please others, but to reclaim herself?
The result was explosive. Women wrote to thank her for acknowledging that they still felt desire, still wanted power, still existed after forty. But others were scandalized. One reviewer called it "dangerous" because it suggested older women might compete with younger women.
Male critics were particularly disturbed. How dare older women refuse to fade gracefully?
But here's what made Atherton truly revolutionary: she didn't just write about individual women seeking freedom. She dissected the systems designed to control them—how society weaponized "respectability," how marriage could be a trap disguised as security, how aging was used to render women powerless.
And she lived the audacity she wrote about.
After her husband's death, Gertrude never remarried. She traveled constantly—Europe, New York, California. She moved in circles with Mark Twain and Ambrose Bierce. She wrote over fifty novels, supported women's suffrage, and lived independently until the very end.
When she was in her eighties, still writing, a young interviewer asked if she had any regrets.
"Only that I didn't write more," she said.
Gertrude Atherton died in 1948 at age ninety-one, having published her last novel just three years earlier. She worked until nearly the end, never losing her edge, never becoming the respectable old lady society demanded.
But here's the tragedy: Despite being a bestseller in her time, despite writing fifty novels, despite influencing generations—Gertrude Atherton is largely forgotten today.
Literary history remembers the men of her era—Jack London, Frank Norris, Ambrose Bierce. They're taught in schools. Their books stay in print.
Atherton? A footnote. Occasionally mentioned in feminist studies. Rarely read.
And that's exactly the erasure she spent her career fighting.
Because Gertrude Atherton proved something that still makes people uncomfortable: women have always wanted more than they were allowed to want.
Female desire—s*xual, professional, political—has always existed, even when literature pretended it didn't.
She wrote women who were angry, ambitious, s*xual, powerful, flawed. She wrote them when women were supposed to be pure, passive, self-sacrificing angels. She wrote older women who refused to become invisible.
Black Oxen shocked America in 1923 because it suggested a woman's life didn't end at forty. That desire, ambition, and vitality could belong to older women too. That rejuvenation wasn't about pleasing men—it was about reclaiming yourself.
A century later, we're still having that conversation.
Older women are still told to age gracefully (which means invisibly). Female s*xuality is still controversial. Women's ambition is still threatening.
Gertrude Atherton saw all of this in 1890. And 1900. And 1920. And 1940.
She wrote about it for sixty years, never softening, never compromising, never pretending women's desires were anything other than what they were: real, powerful, and worth fighting for.
She married young because that's what women did. She was widowed early and discovered freedom felt better than propriety. She wrote fifty novels that shocked and challenged readers to see women as full human beings.
And then history mostly forgot her—which is exactly the kind of erasure she spent her career exposing.
So here's what we do: We remember her now.
We remember the woman who wrote about female desire when it was scandalous. We remember the writer who gave older women their s*xuality back when society wanted them invisible. We remember the novelist who refused to write "nice" women because real women aren't always nice—they're complicated, ambitious, s*xual, angry, powerful.
In 1923, she wrote about an older woman reclaiming her s*xuality, and America lost its mind.
Maybe it's time we recognized that Gertrude Atherton was right all along.
Women have always wanted more. And there's never been anything wrong with that.

11/15/2025

The nursery rhyme you sang as a child was based on a real 9-year-old girl who saved a dying lamb—and accidentally made history. "Mary had a little lamb, little lamb, little lamb..."You probably sang it in kindergarten. Maybe you sang it to your own children. But did you know Mary was real? And so was her lamb? This is the true story behind one of the most famous nursery rhymes in history. In March 1815, on a cold morning in Sterling, Massachusetts, nine-year-old Mary Sawyer was helping her father with chores in the barn. They discovered that one of their ewes had given birth to twin lambs overnight—but something was wrong. One lamb was healthy and nursing. The other had been rejected by its mother and was lying in the straw, barely breathing, too weak to even stand. Without its mother's care and milk, the tiny creature was dying of cold and hunger. Mary's heart broke at the sight. "Can I take it inside?" she begged her father. Her father shook his head. "No, Mary. It's almost dead anyway. Even if we try, it probably won't survive. "But Mary couldn't bear to watch the lamb die. She pleaded with her father until he finally relented—though he made it clear he thought it was hopeless. When they returned to the house, Mary's mother agreed to let her try. Mary wrapped the freezing lamb in an old garment and held it close to the fireplace, cradling it in her arms through the long night. She didn't know if it would make it to morning. The lamb was so weak it couldn't even swallow at first. But Mary refused to give up. By morning, against all odds, the lamb was standing. Over the next few days, with Mary's constant care—feeding it milk, keeping it warm, nursing it back to strength—the little creature recovered completely. And then something magical happened. The lamb, whom Mary had saved from death, became utterly devoted to her. It recognized her voice. It came running when she called. And everywhere that Mary went, the lamb truly was "sure to go. "One morning before school, Mary called out to her lamb as she was leaving. The lamb came trotting over immediately. Mary's mischievous older brother, Nat, grinned and said, "Let's take the lamb to school with us! "Mary hesitated—she knew it was against the rules—but the idea was too tempting. She agreed. She tried to smuggle the lamb into the one-room Redstone School by hiding it in a basket under her desk, hoping it would stay quiet. For a while, her plan worked. The lamb nestled silently beneath her seat as the lesson began. Then Mary was called to the front of the classroom to recite her lesson. As she stood and began to read aloud, the lamb suddenly bleated loudly and leaped out from under her desk, following Mary to the front of the room. The classroom erupted. The students burst into laughter at the sight of a fluffy white lamb wandering the aisles, bleating and looking for Mary. Even the teacher, Polly Kimball, "laughed outright"—though she gently told Mary that the lamb would have to go home. Mary, embarrassed but smiling, led her lamb outside to wait in a shed until school ended. She thought that would be the end of it—a funny story to tell at dinner. But someone else was watching. Among the visitors at the school that day was a young man named John Roulstone, a college-bound student staying with his uncle, the local minister. He was charmed by the sight of Mary's devoted lamb following her into school. The next day, John rode his horse across the fields to the little schoolhouse and handed Mary a slip of paper. On it, he'd written three simple stanzas:*"Mary had a little lamb,
Its fleece was white as snow,
And everywhere that Mary went,
The lamb was sure to go. It followed her to school one day,
That was against the rule.
It made the children laugh and play,
To see a lamb at school..."*Mary treasured that piece of paper. She kept it for years, along with the memory of the lamb she'd saved. The lamb lived to be four years old, bearing three lambs of her own before she was accidentally killed by a cow in the barn. Mary's mother saved some of the lamb's wool and knitted stockings for Mary, which she treasured for the rest of her life. But the story doesn't end there. In 1830, a well-known writer and editor named Sarah Josepha Hale published a collection called Poems for Our Children. Among them was a poem called "Mary's Lamb"—the same verses John Roulstone had written, plus three additional stanzas with a moral lesson about kindness to animals. The poem spread like wildfire. It was reprinted in schoolbooks across America. Children everywhere began singing it. By the 1850s, it was one of the most famous children's poems in the country. But here's where it gets even more remarkable: In 1877, nearly sixty years after Mary saved that lamb, inventor Thomas Edison was testing his brand-new phonograph—the first machine ever capable of recording and playing back sound. He needed something to recite to test if it worked. He chose "Mary Had a Little Lamb. "Edison's voice reciting those words became the first audio recording in human history. The poem that began with a nine-year-old girl's compassion became the first sound ever captured by technology. As for Mary herself, she lived a long, quiet life. She married, raised a family, and rarely talked about the famous poem until she was an elderly woman. In 1876, at age 70, Mary finally came forward to share her story publicly when she donated the stockings her mother had made from her lamb's wool to help raise money to save Boston's Old South Meeting House. She sold autographed cards tied with yarn from those stockings, telling the world: "I am the Mary. This is my lamb's wool. "People were astonished. The woman behind the nursery rhyme was real—and she was still alive. Mary Sawyer died in 1889 at age 83. Today, a statue of her little lamb stands in Sterling, Massachusetts, commemorating the day a nine-year-old girl's compassion for a dying animal created one of the most enduring stories in children's literature. The lesson of "Mary Had a Little Lamb" isn't just about a pet following its owner. It's about what happened before that—about a little girl who refused to let a helpless creature die, who fought for its life when everyone else had given up, who showed that kindness and determination can create miracles. Mary saved her lamb. And in return, that lamb gave her immortality. The next time you hear someone sing "Mary had a little lamb," remember: it wasn't just a nursery rhyme. It was a true story about a real girl who taught us that compassion matters, that small acts of kindness ripple through time, and that sometimes the gentlest hearts change the world. Mary Sawyer: 1806-1889
The girl who saved a lamb—and created a legend.

11/15/2025

She asked one question that shattered centuries of silence: "Why is woman always defined as the Other?"
Then she answered it—and the world called her dangerous.
Simone de Beauvoir published The Second S*x in 1949, and it detonated like a bomb in the polite drawing rooms of postwar Paris. The book did something revolutionary: it treated women's existence as a philosophical problem worth serious intellectual investigation.
That shouldn't have been revolutionary. But it was.
Because for centuries, male philosophers had theorized about humanity, consciousness, freedom, and existence—always with "man" as the default human and "woman" as a mysterious deviation requiring explanation.
Simone flipped the entire framework.
She asked: What if women aren't mysterious? What if everything society teaches about femininity—the passivity, the modesty, the dependence, the decorative existence—isn't natural destiny but deliberate construction?
What if "woman" as the world understood her was a cage built so carefully that most people mistook it for biology?
The answer filled 700 pages and changed history.
The Second S*x argued that women were made, not born. That femininity was performance, learned through thousands of small lessons starting in childhood. That every "natural" female trait—nurturing, submissiveness, vanity, weakness—was actually trained into girls through relentless social conditioning.
"One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman."
That single sentence contained dynamite.
Because if women were made, they could be unmade. If femininity was construction, it could be demolished. If gender roles were artificial, they could be rejected.
Simone wrote it all down in precise, philosophical language—building arguments the way male philosophers had for millennia, except she was analyzing the very system that had silenced women's voices for all those millennia.
The reaction was immediate and vicious.
Catholic Church? Condemned it. Put it on the Index of Forbidden Books. Declared it dangerous to morality and faith.
Critics? Called her "unsatisfied," "frigid," "masculine." Said she was bitter, lonely, incapable of understanding real womanhood because clearly something was wrong with her.
Fellow intellectuals? Many dismissed her as Jean-Paul Sartre's student. His lover. His intellectual shadow. Surely this book was really his ideas, filtered through her typewriter?
The fact that Simone was already an accomplished philosopher, an established novelist, a brilliant thinker in her own right—none of that mattered. She was a woman, so her thoughts must be derivative, must be borrowed, must be somehow less original than a man's.
This was exactly the dynamic she'd described in her book.
Women could think, but their thinking was never quite legitimate. Never quite their own. Always suspect, always secondary, always understood in relation to a man—his wife, his student, his lover, never simply herself.
Simone and Jean-Paul Sartre were partners—intellectual equals who influenced each other's work, maintained a lifelong open relationship built on honesty and philosophical companionship. But history kept trying to shrink her into his footnote.
She refused.
She kept writing. Essays. Novels. Memoirs. Philosophy. For decades, she produced work that challenged how people thought about freedom, ethics, aging, death, gender, power.
But The Second S*x remained her earthquake.
Women read it and recognized themselves. Recognized the thousand invisible ways they'd been shaped into smaller versions of what they could have been. Recognized how "choice" often meant choosing between limited, pre-approved options. Recognized how even their desires had been carefully curated to serve a system that benefited from their compliance.
The book spread slowly at first, then explosively. Translated into dozens of languages. Passed hand-to-hand among women who'd never articulated why their lives felt constrained but knew something was wrong.
It became the philosophical foundation for second-wave feminism. Betty Friedan's The Feminine Mystique owes a debt to Simone. Gloria Steinem cited her. Generations of feminist thinkers built on her framework.
But here's what often gets forgotten:
Writing The Second S*x wasn't just an intellectual exercise for Simone. It was personal survival.
She lived in a world that told women to be decorative, to be silent, to exist in service of men. She chose instead to think, to write, to claim authority over ideas. Every page was rebellion against everything her society told her she should be.
To be a female philosopher in 1949 Paris wasn't simply unusual. It was transgressive. It meant claiming space in cafés and universities and intellectual debates where women were supposed to be muses, not thinkers. It meant enduring constant dismissal, constant questioning of her credentials, constant suggestions that she should be doing something more feminine.
She did it anyway.
For decades.
And she paid the price. Critics never stopped calling her unfeminine, unnatural, angry. They psychoanalyzed her, suggested she had "issues" with men or with her own womanhood. They tried every possible explanation except the obvious one: that she was simply right.
Simone de Beauvoir died in 1986, at age 78. Thousands attended her funeral—women who'd never met her but whose lives she'd changed by giving them permission to think freely.
Today, The Second S*x is considered one of the most important philosophical texts of the 20th century. It's taught in universities worldwide. Scholars write dissertations analyzing her arguments.
But the world she described—where women are always "the Other," always defined in relation to men, always secondary—hasn't disappeared.
It's just gotten subtler.
Every woman who speaks with authority and gets called "bossy." Every female expert interrupted by a less-qualified man. Every time a woman's ideas are credited to her male colleague. Every professional woman told to smile more, be warmer, take up less space.
The Second S*x is happening, still, every day.
Which means the rebellion Simone described is still necessary.
The rebellion isn't always loud.
Sometimes it looks like a woman speaking without apologizing for her knowledge. Sometimes it looks like claiming credit for her own ideas. Sometimes it looks like refusing to shrink, to soften, to perform femininity as reassurance.
Sometimes it looks like a pen held steady, writing truths that make people uncomfortable.
Simone de Beauvoir didn't tell women to be polite revolutionaries. She told them to think—rigorously, critically, fearlessly. To question everything they'd been taught about their nature, their limits, their proper place.
Because thinking freely, for a woman, is the most dangerous act of all.
It means refusing to be the Other. Refusing to exist only in reflection of men. Refusing to accept that biology is destiny or that femininity is fate.
She asked: "Why is woman always the Other?"
She answered it in 700 pages that the Church banned and critics called dangerous.
She was right.
And 75 years later, we're still living the revolution she described.
To be a woman and to think freely isn't disobedience.
It's evolution.
And it started with one philosopher who refused to let the world tell her what women were allowed to think.

Alyssa Jane

12/31/2025

12/31/2025

12/31/2025

12/02/2025

11/23/2025

11/19/2025

11/15/2025

11/15/2025

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share

Category