13/05/2026
**VIET TAN DELEGATION ATTENDS DEMOCRACY CONFERENCE IN COPENHAGEN, DENMARK**
On May 12, 2026, a Viet Tan delegation attended the 9th Copenhagen Democracy Summit to discuss how free nations can build a new alliance to lead in an increasingly chaotic world, witnessing the rise of authoritarian regimes and the fragmentation of international institutions.
Hosted by former NATO Secretary General and former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen and the Alliance of Democracies Foundation, the summit brought together leading figures from politics, economics, technology, and civil society, including representatives from democratic countries such as Ukraine, Taiwan, Iran, Venezuela, and Cuba.
The conference opened with a speech by Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen, followed by an informal meeting with Denmark's interim Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen. Ukrainian presidential advisor Oleksandr Kamyshin presented the current situation and Ukraine’s efforts to establish a just peace.
A session organized by the World Freedom Congress focused on how the international democratic community can better address the priorities identified by activists and opposition leaders working in the field under authoritarian regimes. A recent survey of members confirmed that the most urgent needs within the network are emergency aid, legal support, resettlement assistance, election preparation, and specific solidarity for activists facing repression.
During this session, the Human Rights Foundation presented the Tyranny Tracker ranking, classifying countries worldwide into three categories: fully authoritarian, semi-authoritarian, and democratic. The ranking is based on three pillars:
**Pillar 1: Electoral Competition**
Electoral competition refers to the extent to which the ruling government prevents opposition parties or candidates from competing on a level playing field. This pillar focuses on national elections, particularly those for the executive and legislative branches, and whether electoral conditions provide equal opportunities for opposition parties or candidates. Elections are seen as a crucial factor of democratic governance, as they provide institutional mechanisms for competition that allow for peaceful power transfers and reflect voters' ability to hold the ruling government accountable.
**Pillar 2: Freedom of Protest**
Freedom of protest refers to the extent to which the ruling government suppresses the ability of independent media, political leaders, civil society representatives, organizations, and citizens to express dissent. This pillar addresses political repression regarding freedoms of speech, press, assembly, and association. The term "dissent" is broadly understood to encompass any form of expression considered a challenge to the current government. It can be a deliberate act or provoked by repressive circumstances. Dissenters can include journalists, activists, and protesters, but also artists, scholars, lawyers, religious leaders, or anyone deviating from authoritarian norms or values. Freedom of protest is deemed essential to ensure diverse political participation.
**Pillar 3: Institutional Accountability**
Institutional accountability refers to the extent to which the ruling government extends its institutional powers repressively. This pillar focuses on mechanisms through which judicial independence, legislative oversight, and administrative autonomy are undermined. As the foundation for addressing governance issues between election cycles, these institutions allow for horizontal accountability through the ability to sanction abuses of power by the ruling government. The removal of accountability and law enforcement—central elements of internal and inter-institutional accountability—is the focus of this pillar, drawing attention to their legal capacity, independence, and autonomy.
Given this ranking, it is no surprise that Vietnam is classified as a fully authoritarian country.