Counterspin Media

14/07/2025

THE STREISAND EFFECT

The Streisand effect refers to the time a stock footage company inadvertently took a picture of Barbara Streisands house on a cliff top and added it to their collection. Nobody would have really known had she not taken the company to court and the media picked up the story and it blew up.

This is what's happening with Epstein. The more Trump and others say "nothing to see here" or "don't talk about it", the more everyone does the opposite and the story blows up even further.

Pepe Lives Matter (which we believe is a trusted channel) has an interesting theory about Epstein file release:

After some careful thought, I truly believe this Epstein cover-up is so blatant that it really feels like a psyop.

Let's look at what happened more closely. Pam Bondi says she has the files and more are coming out, so she invites social media influencers to the White House and hands them these fake binders.

They walk out to an ambush of media and are pictured in a humiliation ritual, smiling about how cool they were that they got this non-existent Epstein list. Why did this happen?

Everyone immediately noticed that pretty much of all of the influencers that actually got the binders have been extremely outspoken zionists.

Some have been married in Israel.

Others were directly called out for their support of Netanyahu, meeting with him.

Everyone who has actually done a modicum of research knows that Epstein was a Mossad agent(and CIA).

In the moment, this felt like an unbelievable slap in the face, and everyone called it out.

How could you expect people who support Israel this vehemently to give us the real Epstein files?

But think about it. What if Trump told Pam Bondi to do this? What if he’s actually begging people to notice the issues with Israel and the Mossad in America?

It's become so glaringly obvious, like an avalanche effect pouring over people's minds, and it's all happened under Trump.

The red pill has been so compounded and magnified that even Charlie Kirk on Turning Point is wondering if Epstein was a Mossad agent.

Turning Point would have never allowed this kind of thing to be said even a few years ago.

Tucker debates Ted Cruz, asks him simple questions like why we have to support Israel, and why are they allowed to buy our politicians.

He has no reasonable answers.

Everyone notices.

Tucker is speaking it so plainly that it's impossible to miss.

So Trump took away Iran's nuclear ability, but did you catch what Iran said?

They said Trump told them about the mission before it happened.

What?

Why would he do that?

What if Trump is dealing with Netanyahu/Israel on multiple different fronts? He's helping his base see what an issue Israel has been and then removing Netanyahu's ability to continue wars and terrorist activities.

He's telling people not to talk about Epstein, so what is everyone going to do, including the re****ed Democrats?

They are going to screech about Epstein.

And it's all inevitably leading back to the truth that the Mossad and our own government were running a blackmail operation and controlling our politicians and celebrities while committing crimes against humanity.

As far as I’m concerned, few would even know anything about Epstein Island without Trump’s rise to power.

It shut down during his tenure.

You can trust the plan or not, but all I'm seeing now is truth being magnified like never before. Trump, the lightning rod, continues to bring worldwide awakening to millions of sleeping normies, and I'm here for it.

13/07/2025

🚨 BREAKING: Has Nuremberg 2 begun??? — the Globalists Are TERRIFIED 🚨

Jim Ferguson has been reporting on an unfolding historic plandemic case.

The case has been filed in Holland where global elites were named in a case involving:
Crimes against humanity
Genocide
Biological warfare
Collusion with the media

Names like:
Bill Gates
Albert Bourla (Pfizer CEO)
Mark Rutte (former Dutch PM, now NATO head)
Klaus Schwab (World Economic Forum)

The lead lawyer, Arno van Kessel, was blindfolded, handcuffed, and thrown in a maximum-security prison without charge — days before the case.
They tried to stop it.
They failed.

This is the first judicial case of its kind since Nuremberg.

If the judge rules in six weeks as promised, the door could open to summoning these individuals to stand trial.

Full video available in comments.

12/07/2025

EPSTEIN - ANOTHER CONSPIRACY THEORY COMING TRUE

Tucker Carlson: asking questions and demanding answers is not hateful or antisemitic.

12/07/2025

BILL GATES SLAMMED BY A-LIST CELEB FOR APEEL

Actress Michelle Pfeiffer has launched an attack on Bill Gates and suggested he's going to contaminate America's food supply.

Michelle Pfeiffer took to Instagram to slam Apeel – an FDA-approved food technology once funded by Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates.

After sharing a post that claimed “organic produce is no longer safe” because “Bill Gates’ Apeel just got approved for USDA-certified organic,” the actress said that she was “very concerned” about the approval.

12/07/2025

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE FROM INFOWARS:
AG Pam Bondi To Take The Blame For The Epstein Case Whitewash Political Firestorm Before Her Ultimate Removal, According To FBI & WH Intel Sources

PLUS, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino Will Resign Soon, But Kash Patel Will Stay On Head Of Agency

"Pam Bondi Will Be Trump's Sacrificial Lamb On This"

11/07/2025

11/07/2025

An Open Letter to the Commissioners of Royal Commission of Inquiry on Covid.

11th July, 2025

Dear Commissioners,

I am writing to express profound disappointment regarding the Royal Commission's current approach to gathering testimony. It has become apparent that the Commission has chosen to primarily engage with organisations, some of which have supported vaccine-injured individuals and bereaved families, rather than directly hearing from those of us who have suffered the direct proven consequences of the COVID-19 vaccine and our families

This decision is particularly concerning given that ACC has acknowledged and compensated over 12.6 million dollars for vaccine injuries (as of Jan 2025)https://acc.co.nz/assets/oia-responses/covid-19-vaccination-claims-refresh-january-2025.pdf alongside additional payouts for five confirmed vaccine-related deaths. If this inquiry is genuinely committed to uncovering the truth and ensuring justice for those affected and the lessons learned, it is imperative that you engage directly with the individuals whose lives have been irrevocably altered.

I urge the Commission to have ACC immediately contact individuals who have been formally diagnosed and approved as vaccine-injured by ACC, as well as families of the recognised deaths, such as the Nairns, where a conclusive link between the COVID-19 vaccine and death has been established. These individuals and families must be afforded and offered the opportunity to provide public testimony before this inquiry.

The focus on "temporal" and "causal" links during the questioning of support groups like VFF, NZDSOS, and The Health Forum yesterday felt deeply dismissive and, frankly, like a continuation of the gaslighting already endured both our injured and the families of those who have suffered fatalities from the Covid vaccine. It raises the question of whether those chosen to speak and this line of questioning is employed precisely because it cannot be applied to cases where vaccine injury or death has already been conclusively proven.

Many of us have faced egregious misdiagnoses by medical professionals, who, under apparent pressure from the Medical Council, often dismissed clear physiological symptoms and as "anxiety." ignoring test results. This systemic failure led to delayed treatment and exacerbated suffering. Our experiences, including the arduous and often gruelling ACC review process that necessitates legal and expert intervention, highlight a profound lack of support and recognition within the existing systems. My own son's case, involving multiple misdiagnoses, misread ECGs at multiple hospitals and lost test results, and a delayed discovery of a critical ECG indicating pericarditis, is but one example of the devastating impact of this medical negligence or fear on the part of Doctors to be associated with diagnosing Covid 19 Vaccine injury. Which is also why you should also invite those who have been turned down by ACC as well . Many have formal diagnosis and are still turned down.

Many vaccine-injured individuals, including my son, are now permanently impaired, requiring ongoing medical care and medication. His health, in his twenties, has been irrevocably compromised by the COVID-19 vaccine.

By failing to hear publicly from the vaccine-injured and the families of those who have died, this Commission risks undermining its own integrity and perpetuating the very invisibility and marginalisation that has plagued our community. We have been hidden from public view for too long, and excluding our direct testimony from this inquiry would be an insult to our suffering and a disservice to the public's right to know the full truth..

We implore you to reconsider your approach and ensure that the voices of the vaccine-injured and bereaved are central to this Royal Commission's proceedings.

Sincerely,

Aly Cook

Mother of a formally diagnosed mRNA Covid 19 injured son

10/07/2025

NZDSOS AT THE PLANDEMIC INQUIRY

10/07/2025

Covid inquiry - the afternoon:

Tremendous piling on of fact after fact by Doctors Matt Shelton and Allison Goodwin today. Very professional, cool and unrattled.

However the commissioner’s questions, especially when compared to the next individual to testify, showed their extreme bias and perhaps (although we don’t know for certan what they are going to decide yet) gave away the fact that they are applying very different rules for pro- and anti-vax speakers. Is their job simply to do another whitewash? After today that seems rather likely.

After NZDSOS was an individual representing FUCT - sorry, I mean FACT (Fighting Against Conspiracy Theories, Aotearoa) who couldn’t have been more different - weak and uninforrmed - and it was the difference in treatement from the questioners that convinced me that this is not a level playing-field.

The commissioners kept asking questions about misinformation and conspiracy theory, accepting all FACT’s premises on these, without ever asking the spokesperson to explain what she meant by these terms. Whereas Matt and Allison were pressed constantly over everything.

After the NZDSOS doctors had just demonstrated the truth of what was being held up as false information, to see such clear double-standards was breath-taking. For those with a brain, the contrast was clear and brought out all the stronger what might be going on with this Commission.

And the NZ mainstream media seems to be ignoring it all. Is anyone surprized?

It’s the journey not the destination that’s important. Huge thanks to morning and afternoon speakers who did a wonderful job. If what you said is indeed ignored and downplayed - as I now began to feel it will be - you have still fought the good fight and what you have done will be significant in the end.

One day soon historians will play clips of both sides and wonder how anyone could have fallen for the propaganda of “safe and effective” and go on believing it for another four years. (mb)

10/07/2025

LUNCHTIME PLANDEMIC INQUIRY UPDATE

Covid inquiry (lunchtime report). The morning of questioning has been completed. First Linda Wharton and Health Forum and then VFF. VFF testimony was marked by some very tough questioning by the Commission Chair, Ray Illingworth, but I felt the three ladies were always up to the mark in their answers.

Things like, “Do you admit that the NZ Govt had a responsibility to keep people safe?” They answered yes, but the response has to be proportionate and gave factual examples of where this had not been followed and where govt did not follow the advice it was given as showed in OIA responses. They kept their cool and always gave balanced answers that referred back to facts.

At the end Illingworth admitted the questions had been tough but that did not mean the Commission had made its mind up one way or the other. That suggested to me that he had actually been impressed with their answers. However, what he and his cobbers will eventually say is totally unknown. We will find out.

Next event is at 1.10pm - recorded video testimony from members of the public. They are running quite late (a sign they did give HF and VFF a full chance to be heard) and NZDSOS is meant to be at 1.15 but looks like it may be nearer 2.15. (impressions from mb)

10/07/2025

Legally, if the Covid-19 inquiry issues you with a summons, you are committing a criminal offense if you refuse to comply

09/07/2025

COVID INQUIRY LIVE LINK

Learn more about the first public hearing