05/11/2025
“When I look at the contemporary Latter-day Saint context in Utah where I live, I see a community that has greatly benefitted from the gifts of form, religion, structure, and answers. I see the well-manicured landscaping of BYU campus and temple square, the stability that comes with a smooth transition of power after a Church president passes away, the vast amounts of wealth the Church has accumulated after careful investing, and so on. All of these things are the result of the work of the Church’s highest leaders, who bring their experience in fields like law, business, auditing, and organizational structure to make the Church run smoothly. This operational excellence gives Latter-day Saints a sense of stability, security, and safety. All of that is, in so many ways, a blessing.
And yet I wonder about the opposite pole—the open and expansive formlessness that comes with raw spiritual questioning. Is there space in the contemporary Latter-day Saint community for “not knowing” (truly not knowing) to balance the “knowing” of testimony meetings? Is there space for artists, storytellers, scholars, and philosophers when what they explore doesn’t fit the mold? Is there space for personal revelation even when it moves someone toward non-traditional beliefs and practices?
I realize that in posing these questions, I’m already hinting at my own position on the matter. And yet in doing so, I don’t mean to imply that everyone should agree with me or share my particular beliefs. I don’t even want everyone to share my beliefs, as that would lead to communal lopsidedness. The Body of Christ, to use the Apostle Paul’s metaphor, has many members.
I only wonder if it’s possible to more fully embrace both form and formlessness in community—and whether, to return to the syntax of wisdom, Latter-day Saints in the twenty-first century need more of the formless, as precarious as that might sound.
What if God is bigger than form, stability, structure, and safety? What if God also includes formlessness, creativity, flexibility, and risk?
What if a living tradition is always “both-and,” like the in-breath and the out-breath?
—Jon Ogden
Keep reading on WayfareMagazine . org